APRIL 2025
WILLIAM'S PHOTO DIARY
NEW SEARCH OPTION
USE TEXT BOX ABOVE
IS THIS ACTIVITY ILLEGAL
THE WORKING FROM HOME IDEA DID NOT GO WELL [HOW DISAPPOINTING BUT YOU CAN HAVE WHAT IS LEFT]
The Issue of Abandoned Furniture on Footpaths: Prevalence, Legality, and its Classification as Fly-tipping
The sight of discarded furniture left on a footpath, often accompanied by a handwritten note offering it for free, appears to be a common enough occurrence in Ireland. This practice, seemingly a way for people to get rid of unwanted items whilst potentially avoiding disposal charges, gives rise to several questions. This discussion will examine this trend, looking at how widespread it is not only in Ireland but also in other countries.
Furthermore, we'll delve into the legal implications of this practice, both here in Ireland and internationally, and critically assess whether it constitutes fly-tipping, identifying similar terms used in other regions. By analysing the available information, this report aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon and its impact on waste management and public spaces.
How Common is Leaving Free Furniture on Footpaths in Ireland?
My own experience suggests that leaving furniture on footpaths with a "free to take" note is a noticeable trend across Ireland. While hard statistical data on how often this happens might be scarce, anecdotal evidence and comments within online communities give us an idea of its commonality.
For instance, a comment on a news article from 2014 mentions that in Ballymun, Dublin, some people simply leave unwanted furniture outside their homes, seemingly hoping the council will collect it. While their intention might not be to explicitly offer the items for free to passers-by, the act of placing bulky furniture on a public thoroughfare indicates a recognised way of trying to remove it from one's property. This suggests that using public spaces for getting rid of or exchanging unwanted furniture isn't a completely new idea.
Moreover, a discussion on an Irish subreddit about street furniture and pedestrian access implicitly acknowledges the presence of objects, potentially including discarded household furniture, on footpaths. The very nature of the query, focusing on how these items affect pedestrian flow and safety, suggests that furniture and other bits and pieces appearing on footpaths are common enough to cause concern and discussion amongst residents. This indicates that the phenomenon isn't just isolated incidents but is seen as a recurring feature of the urban landscape in Ireland.
Adding another layer to this is a comment in an online forum where a user describes Irish footpaths as a "free for all." While this comment relates to general footpath etiquette, it could be interpreted as reflecting a potentially less regulated or more informal environment where practices like leaving furniture out for collection or free taking might be more common or at least less strictly challenged compared to places with tighter rules and enforcement regarding public space. Therefore, while precise figures might be hard to come by, the available anecdotal evidence points towards the practice of leaving unwanted furniture on footpaths being a recognised and relatively common occurrence in Ireland, particularly in urban centres like Dublin, where, where I live, this has become an issue compounded by the fact that the abandoned furniture is vandalised or set on fire by local youths.
An International Look: Occurrence in Other Countries
The practice of leaving unwanted items, including furniture, on public pathways with the hope that someone will take them for free isn't unique to Ireland and crops up in various forms around the world.
In the United Kingdom, online discussions reveal a strikingly similar trend. Users on platforms like Reddit frequently mention the act of placing furniture, mattresses, and sofas on pavements with notes saying they are "free to take," particularly in areas of London like West London and New Cross. This is often seen as a handy way to get rid of unwanted items and a form of informal recycling, although some commentators view it as lazy or even a form of fly-tipping. Similar to Ireland, the social acceptance of this practice in the UK seems to vary, with some embracing it as community sharing while others criticise it as irresponsible disposal.
In contrast, Canada has adopted a more structured approach to facilitating the reuse of unwanted household goods. Numerous cities, including Vaughan, Niagara Falls, York Region, Newmarket, Bethlehem, and Halifax, organise "Curbside Giveaway Days." These are scheduled events where residents can place used items in good condition at the kerb for others to take for free on specific weekends. These events often come with detailed guidelines regarding what items are acceptable, when to put them out and when they should be gone by, and general etiquette to ensure safety and minimise disruption. This formalised system indicates a societal recognition of the value of reuse and a proactive effort by local authorities to manage and encourage it.
Australia presents yet another context with its "verge collection" services. These are council-organised bulk waste collection services that happen periodically in different areas. In this context, residents might place unwanted furniture and other large items on the verge (the strip of land between a property and the road) hoping that others will take them before the scheduled council collection. This suggests that the informal practice of leaving furniture out can sometimes be intertwined with formal waste management systems, with an element of community scavenging and reuse occurring alongside the planned council removal.
The United States offers a slightly different perspective, with the legality and social acceptance often depending on whether the items are left on private or public property. Leaving items on one's own lawn with a "free" sign is generally considered legal and acceptable in many areas. However, the practice of leaving furniture on public footpaths is viewed with more caution and is often subject to local regulations. Online discussions reveal similar debates about the etiquette and potential risks (like bed bugs) associated with taking free furniture from the kerb.
Overall, the trend of leaving unwanted furniture out for free is a global phenomenon, but how common it is, how socially acceptable it is, and how the law treats it varies significantly across countries. While the UK mirrors Ireland's more informal approach with similar debates, Canada has embraced a structured, community-oriented model, and Australia sees it linked to formal waste collection schedules. The US context emphasises property rights, with private property being a more accepted space for such exchanges.
The Legal Standpoint: Leaving Furniture on Footpaths
The legality of leaving furniture on footpaths, even with a friendly "free to take" note, is a key consideration and one that varies depending on where you are in the world. Here in Ireland, the legal framework strongly suggests this isn't on. Our Citizens Information website clearly states that "unwanted furniture" falls under the broad definition of litter. And as we all know, leaving litter in a public place is an offence, potentially leading to fines issued by the local council and the Gardaí. These on-the-spot fines can be up to €150, and if it goes to court, you could be looking at a bill of up to €4,000. So, placing that old sofa on the pavement, no matter how good your intentions, is likely to be seen as breaking our litter pollution laws.
Furthermore, Dublin City Council, like many other local authorities, offers a bulky household waste collection service, though often for a fee. The very existence of this service implies that they expect us to use these official channels for getting rid of larger items like furniture, rather than simply leaving them on public footpaths. Private waste collection services operating in Dublin also emphasise the regulated nature of waste management here, pointing out that it's illegal to give your waste, furniture included, to unauthorised collectors. While this specifically refers to formal waste disposal, it highlights the general legal expectation that waste should be managed through proper channels, suggesting that informal disposal on our footpaths isn't within the rules.
Beyond just littering, leaving furniture on footpaths can also cause problems by blocking public pathways. As we've seen in online discussions, these items can impact how easily and safely people can walk. Dublin City Council has even run campaigns in the past against obstructing footpaths, showing a clear policy against anything that blocks pedestrian access – and that would certainly include abandoned furniture. So, in Ireland, leaving that armchair on the pavement is likely to be considered illegal, both as littering and potentially as an obstruction.
The legal situation in other countries echoes this sentiment. Across the Irish Sea in the UK, leaving furniture on the street is considered fly-tipping and is against the law. Similarly, in the USA, many local areas have specific rules against leaving furniture on sidewalks unless it's part of a scheduled collection. Even in Australia, where those verge collections are common, there are strict rules about not blocking footpaths and not putting items out too early.
To give you a clearer picture without a table, here's a quick rundown of the likely legal situation in these places:
Ireland: Likely illegal under the Litter Pollution Act, with potential fines reaching €4,000.
UK: Likely illegal as fly-tipping under the Environmental Protection Act, with potential fines and even imprisonment.
Canada: Likely illegal (except during organised Curbside Giveaway Days) under Street and Traffic Bylaws, with fines potentially up to $10,000.
USA: Likely illegal, varying by state and city, often under ordinances against sidewalk obstruction, with potential fines and even jail time.
Australia: Likely illegal under Environmental Protection Acts or Litter Acts, with significant fines possible, even up to $62,500 for individuals in some cases.
So, while the idea of giving away your old furniture might seem harmless, the law in many places, including Ireland, tends to see it differently.
Is it Fly-tipping? Defining and Classifying the Practice
To determine if leaving furniture on a footpath with a "free to take" note constitutes fly-tipping, it's important to understand what this term means and what similar terms are used elsewhere. Fly-tipping, according to the House of Commons Library, is the "illegal dumping of household, industrial, commercial or other 'controlled' waste." This definition covers a wide range of materials, including household items like furniture.
Wikipedia further clarifies that illegal dumping, also known as fly-tipping, involves getting rid of waste illegally instead of using authorised methods. In the United States, the term "illegal dumping" is more commonly used, with North Carolina DEQ defining it as "depositing solid waste at a location other than a legally accepted facility." In Ireland, Longford County Council uses "illegal dumping" and "fly-tipping" interchangeably to describe the unauthorised disposal of waste.
Applying these definitions to the practice in question, leaving furniture on a footpath with a "free" note likely fits the bill for fly-tipping or illegal dumping. The act involves leaving an unwanted item, which, in the context of waste management, is considered waste, in a public place without explicit permission from the local authority. While the intention behind leaving the furniture might be for someone else to reuse it, the way it's being disposed of doesn't typically follow authorised waste management channels, such as council collections, recycling centres, or donation programs.
The main difference between this practice and typical fly-tipping might be the intention. People leaving furniture for free often hope it will be taken and reused, driven by a desire to avoid landfill or disposal fees, or simply to get rid of the item conveniently. This is different from the intent of those who more obviously fly-tip, which is often to irresponsibly discard waste in an effort to avoid proper disposal procedures and costs, sometimes including hazardous materials.
However, from a legal and waste management point of view, the focus is often on the act of unauthorised disposal and the potential consequences for public space and the environment, rather than solely on the disposer's intent. Regardless of whether the furniture is left with a "free" note, it remains an unmanaged item in a public area until it's taken, potentially causing obstruction, looking unsightly, and if left for too long or in poor condition, environmental concerns. Therefore, while social perceptions might differ, legally, this practice is likely to be classified as a form of fly-tipping or illegal dumping.
Why People Do It and What the Alternatives Are for Furniture Disposal
Several factors might motivate people to leave unwanted furniture on footpaths with a "free to take" note. A significant one is likely the desire to avoid the costs associated with formal waste disposal. Many local authorities and private waste management companies charge for collecting and disposing of bulky items like furniture. By leaving it out for free, people may hope to avoid these charges. Convenience also plays a part; simply putting the furniture on the footpath requires less effort than arranging a special collection or taking it to a recycling centre. Additionally, there's often a genuine hope that the furniture will be reused by someone who needs or wants it, extending its life and keeping it out of landfill.
Despite these motivations, Ireland offers numerous legally compliant and environmentally responsible alternatives for getting rid of unwanted furniture:
Donation to Charities: Many charities across Ireland, such as Oxfam Ireland, St. Vincent de Paul, Enable Ireland, Habitat for Humanity ReStore, and Vision Ireland, accept donations of furniture in good nick. Many even offer free collection services for bulky items.
Selling or Giving Away Online: Platforms like eBay, Gumtree, Facebook Marketplace, Freecycle, and Trash Nothing provide effective ways to find new homes for unwanted furniture, either for a price or for free.
Utilising Council Bulky Waste Collection Services: Dublin City Council and other local authorities offer bulky waste collection services. While these services often involve a fee, they ensure responsible disposal through authorised channels.
Bringing to Recycling Centres or Civic Amenity Sites: These facilities accept a wide range of household waste, including furniture, although there might be charges for certain items.
Engaging with Reuse Networks: Organisations like Community Reuse Network Ireland (CRNI) can connect individuals with local initiatives focused on furniture reuse, repair, and upcycling.
Upcycling or Repurposing: People can explore creative ways to upcycle or repurpose old furniture, giving it a new lease of life and avoiding disposal altogether.
Similar alternatives exist in other countries. The UK has a strong charity shop culture and numerous online platforms. Canada has formalised reuse through Curbside Giveaway Days and also has donation options. Australia offers charity shops, online marketplaces, and council verge collections. The US has a well-established network of donation centres and online selling platforms.
The Role of Reuse Networks and Community Initiatives in Dublin and Ireland
Ireland benefits from a dedicated network of organisations and initiatives that focus on furniture reuse, repair, and recycling. Community Reuse Network Ireland (CRNI) serves as the national representative body for these community-based efforts. Their 2021 impact report highlights the significant contribution of their members, generating over €52 million in turnover, saving substantial amounts of carbon emissions, and providing employment and training opportunities for over a thousand people. CRNI's work underscores the environmental, social, and economic benefits of supporting a circular economy through reuse.
Within Dublin and across Ireland, numerous local initiatives are actively involved in furniture reuse. BusyBee's Furniture Recycle in Dublin operates by taking in unwanted furniture, refurbishing it, and selling it on, giving these items a second life.
Age Action runs a large second-hand furniture warehouse in Cherry Orchard, Dublin, offering affordable furniture options to the community and diverting items from landfill. Habitat for Humanity Ireland, through their ReStore locations in various regions including Lisburn and Drogheda, accepts donations of furniture and building materials, selling them to fund their housing projects. The Rediscovery Centre in Dublin runs the Rediscover Furniture program, which focuses on repairing, restoring, and upcycling furniture, also providing valuable training and skill-building opportunities for individuals interested in reuse and repair.
Similar networks and initiatives exist in other countries, demonstrating a global trend towards recognising and supporting reuse. In the UK, Freegle facilitates the free exchange of unwanted items, and the Reuse Network acts as an umbrella organisation for charitable reuse efforts. Canada has platforms like Trash Nothing for giving and receiving free items. Australia sees community-based reuse facilitated through Buy Nothing groups and online marketplaces like Gumtree. These international examples highlight a shared commitment to promoting reuse as a vital component of sustainable waste management.
Conclusion
To sum up, the practice of leaving unwanted furniture on footpaths with a "free to take" note, while seemingly common in Ireland and other countries like the UK, is likely to be considered illegal. In Ireland, this act probably constitutes littering under the Litter Pollution Act, potentially leading to fines. Similar regulations exist in the UK (fly-tipping), the USA (illegal dumping, sidewalk obstruction), and Australia (illegal dumping, obstruction).
While the intention behind leaving furniture for free often involves a hope for reuse and the avoidance of disposal costs, legally, it aligns with the definition of fly-tipping as it represents an unauthorised method of waste disposal in a public space. The term "illegal dumping" serves as a common equivalent to fly-tipping in many other regions.
For individuals in Ireland seeking to dispose of unwanted furniture responsibly, numerous alternatives exist. Prioritising donation to charity shops or reuse organisations, utilising online platforms for selling or giving away, considering council bulky waste collection services, bringing items to recycling centres, and exploring upcycling or repair options are all viable and legally compliant choices. Raising public awareness about the legal implications of leaving furniture on footpaths and promoting these responsible alternatives is crucial. Furthermore, exploring the potential for implementing formalised "Curbside Giveaway Day" initiatives in Ireland, inspired by the Canadian model, could provide a structured and community-oriented approach to facilitate furniture reuse while adhering to regulations and promoting environmental sustainability.
WHO IS DUNCAN
THE WRIGHT CYCLE CENTRE IS GONE AND DUNCAN AGE 51 AND THREE QUARTERS WAS HERE [USHER'S ISLAND]
Recently, a photograph of mine prompted some comments regarding the recurring appearance of seemingly childlike graffiti around Dublin City that reads "Duncan Age 51 3/4". The commenters, along with myself, had noticed this peculiar inscription with great frequency.
Before delving into potential interpretations of this "Duncan" graffiti, it's worth providing some context about Usher's Island, as it is the location that is featured in this series of photographs.
Usher's Island: A Historical Overview
Usher's Island is a section of the Dublin Quays situated between Mellows Bridge and the James Joyce Bridge. For many years, a bicycle shop, the Wright Cycle Centre, operated here. However, as you noted, this premises is now occupied by Mr Gearbox Mr Clutch.
The name "Usher" has deep roots in Dublin, associated with a prominent family involved in the city's commerce and civic life for centuries. In the late 16th century, John Ussher built a significant residence called Bridgefoot House in this area. The gardens of this former house now lie beneath Usher's Island and Usher's Quay.
Interestingly, this location is linked to the early history of printing in the Irish language. While some accounts suggest the very first book printed in Irish was produced on this property in 1571 – an alphabet and Christian catechism financed by John Ussher – other sources indicate the first such book was printed later, in Louvain, Belgium in 1611. Furthermore, it was John Ussher's son, Sir William Usher, who funded the first printing of the New Testament in Irish. The precise details of this early printing remain somewhat unclear and would require further historical investigation to confirm definitively.
Over time, the Usher family's focus shifted away from direct trade as they became more gentrified.
Usher's Island Today
Today, Usher's Island forms part of the bustling Dublin Quays, characterised by a mix of commercial and residential properties.
Notable Buildings: Number 15 Usher's Island
The most significant building on Usher's Island is undoubtedly Number 15. This late 18th-century Georgian townhouse, built around 1775 for a grain merchant named Joshua Pim, holds considerable cultural importance. It served as the home of James Joyce's grand-aunts in the 1890s and is famously the setting for his short story "The Dead", featured in his 1914 collection Dubliners.
Recognised for its architectural, artistic, and cultural significance, Number 15 is a protected structure. It has previously functioned as a museum or gallery. Recent proposals to convert the building into apartments have faced objections from heritage organisations like An Taisce, underscoring its national cultural value as a well-preserved example of a Dublin Georgian townhouse that significantly contributes to the historic character of the South Quays.
The Former Wright Cycle Centre
As you correctly mentioned, the Wright Cycle Centre was indeed located on Usher's Island, specifically at Units B & C, Pier 19. Online information confirms that it offered bicycle and e-scooter sales and repairs. However, it appears to have ceased trading at this location, as observed.
Recent Closures of Bicycle Shops in Dublin
It is worth noting a recent trend of bicycle shop closures in Dublin, including the Wright Cycle Centre. Several factors may contribute to this:
Difficult Trading Conditions: Reports cite "difficult trading conditions" as a key factor, exemplified by the recent closure of ThinkBike after 26 years of business.
Changing Work Patterns Post-COVID: The increase in remote working may have reduced demand for commuter bikes and related services from physical shops.
Increased Competition: Online retailers and larger stores often offer more competitive pricing, impacting independent bicycle shops.
Rising Costs: Increased costs for rent, utilities, and stock can pose significant challenges to the profitability of smaller businesses.
E-bike Specialisation: The growing popularity of e-bikes requires specialised servicing knowledge and equipment, which some traditional bike shops may lack.
While cycling's overall popularity and infrastructure have improved, these broader economic and retail trends can still significantly affect individual businesses.
The Enigma of "Duncan Age 51 3/4" Graffiti
The recurring graffiti "Duncan Age 51 3/4" presents an intriguing puzzle within Dublin's urban landscape. Its seemingly amateurish style, described as if done by a child, and its unusual message set it apart from typical street art.
Unlike much graffiti, which often involves stylised tags or pseudonyms, this inscription includes a full name and a precise age. To understand this phenomenon, it's helpful to consider the broader context of street art in Dublin.
The Spectrum of Street Art in Dublin: From Murals to Tags
Dublin's streets showcase a diverse range of artistic expressions. Officially sanctioned murals by celebrated artists like James Earley (known for his work on the Blooms Hotel), the distinctive and often politically charged pieces by Maser (including the well-known "U Are Alive*"), and the holographic style of Aches (exemplified by "Horseboy") enrich the city's visual appeal.
Community-driven initiatives like Dublin Canvas further enhance the urban environment by transforming everyday objects like traffic light boxes into miniature artworks, showcasing the creativity of various artists.
Beyond these formal projects lies informal graffiti, ranging from simple tags to stickers with personal or social messages. Even historical inscriptions, such as those in Kilmainham Gaol or remnants of medieval graffiti, contribute to the city's layered narrative. The motivations behind these diverse forms of urban art are varied, including artistic expression, community engagement, personal statements, acts of rebellion, and the fundamental desire for visibility.
Against this backdrop, the recurring "Duncan Age 51 3/4" graffiti poses a unique question: what is the nature and motivation behind this specific inscription? Is it a form of personal expression, an unconventional art project, or something else entirely?
The specificity of the message is immediately striking. While most tags use pseudonyms or cryptic phrases, the inclusion of a full name and a precise age suggests a highly personal and potentially unconventional motivation. The user's description of the graffiti's "poor quality" might indicate that the creator is not part of the established graffiti scene, where skill is generally valued. This suggests the driving force behind this graffiti is likely more personal than artistic or territorial.
Analysing the "Duncan Age 51 3/4" Tag: Form, Content, and Context
The message "Duncan Age 51 3/4" comprises three elements, each potentially significant. "Duncan" is a relatively common name with historical links to Scotland and Ireland, derived from the Gaelic "Donnchadh," meaning "dark warrior" or "brown-haired warrior." While the literal meaning may not be relevant, the use of a recognisable name deviates from typical graffiti anonymity.
The word "Age" explicitly clarifies the following number. However, it is the precise age "51 3/4" that is most unusual. The fraction of a year suggests this is not a general identifier but might relate to a specific point in time or a personal milestone deemed important by the creator.
Considering other non-traditional public inscriptions in Dublin offers context. Examples like "Jesus Merrion Joseph" on Merrion Road signs and the altered Canal Road sign reading "anal Toad" illustrate that unconventional public markings are not unprecedented. Similarly, the repetitive "stealth" graffiti in Wexford demonstrates the phenomenon of enigmatic graffiti with unclear motivations.
The constant sightings of the graffiti suggests a deliberate effort to disseminate this message across various locations, a characteristic of tagging aimed at visibility. However, the personal content distinguishes it from typical tags. The unusual precision of the age moves beyond a simple declaration, strongly hinting at a specific personal context or a recurring event tied to this precise age for the individual named Duncan. It is unlikely such detail would be in a traditional tag aimed at recognition within the graffiti subculture or a piece of street art with a broader message. This specificity points to a personal significance connected to this exact age.
Who is Duncan? Exploring the Name and Age in Relation to Graffiti Culture
A key aspect of much graffiti culture is the preference for anonymity or pseudonyms, often to avoid legal consequences for unauthorised public markings and to cultivate a distinct public persona.
The "Duncan" graffiti stands out by explicitly revealing a name and age, prompting questions about the creator's intentions. Given the precise age, it is more probable that "Duncan" is the individual's real name and the age is accurate, making the lack of anonymity even more notable.
Graffiti writing is often associated with younger individuals. While older people can participate in street art, someone in their early fifties consistently creating what is described as "poor quality" graffiti is less common within established graffiti circles, where skill and artistic development are typically valued.
The age "51 3/4" may be crucial to understanding the motivation. If the graffiti's appearance coincided with this age, it could signify a life transition or the start of a personal project. Alternatively, it could be an ongoing way for "Duncan" to mark the passage of time and their presence in the urban environment during this specific life phase. The repeated sightings suggest the graffiti has been present for some time. If "Duncan" began this around their 51st birthday, the "3/4" could represent their progression through the subsequent three-quarters of a year, a personal way of documenting their age or marking a milestone publicly.
Motivations Behind Graffiti: Personal Expression and Beyond
Motivations for graffiti and street art are varied, often including establishing identity ("getting up"), artistic expression, social or political commentary, belonging to a subculture, and rebellion against norms.
Given the unusual nature of the "Duncan" graffiti, less conventional motivations should be considered. The precise age could signify a personal event, a significant life stage, or a period of introspection expressed publicly. The repetition and potential evolution of the age suggest a unique form of public diary or a way for "Duncan" to document their existence in the city over time. It's also possible this is a subtle social experiment or performance art, introducing an unexpected element into the urban fabric. While the "poor quality" might seem to contradict this, repeatedly writing one's name and age could be a way to feel seen in a large city. The simple message with the precise age might also aim to inject whimsy into the routines of city dwellers.
The "poor quality" of the graffiti might be a significant clue. If artistic recognition or a complex message were the primary goal, more attention would likely be paid to execution. The "poor quality" suggests the focus is on the message itself – the name and age – rather than artistic skill. This combination strongly indicates that the motivation behind the "Duncan Age 51 3/4" graffiti is likely rooted in personal expression, a unique form of public interaction, or perhaps an idiosyncratic way of marking time, rather than a desire for recognition within the traditional graffiti art scene.
Conclusion: Tentative Interpretations and the Ongoing Narrative of Urban Art
Based on the available information, several interpretations of the "Duncan Age 51 3/4" graffiti in Dublin City can be offered. It may be a personal marker for an individual named Duncan, possibly related to turning 51 and documenting their age as the year progresses. It could be an unconventional public diary, a way for Duncan to assert their presence in the urban environment.
Alternatively, it might represent a subtle social experiment, a quiet attempt to gain attention in an anonymous city, or even a touch of urban whimsy. Without direct insight from the creator, the precise motivation remains speculative.
The broader context of urban art reveals diverse expressions, and not all public inscriptions fit neatly into categories of art or vandalism. The "Duncan" graffiti, with its peculiar characteristics, reminds us of this inherent diversity.
Even seemingly "poor quality" or unconventional graffiti contributes to a city's evolving visual narrative, reflecting individual stories and the human desire to communicate publicly. The ongoing discussion about the role and perception of graffiti highlights the complex relationship between individuals, their urban surroundings, and their chosen methods of interaction. Ultimately, the "Duncan Age 51 3/4" graffiti remains an intriguing enigma within Dublin's urban landscape. Continued observation might reveal further patterns or changes in the message, potentially offering more clues to its underlying meaning and purpose. The existence of such unique personal expressions underscores the unpredictable and often mysterious nature of urban art, reminding us that even simple markings can offer glimpses into individual narratives and the human impulse to leave a mark on the world.
It's entirely plausible that the "Duncan Age 51 3/4" graffiti is, in its creator's mind, something quite simple or even meaningless in a conventional sense. Just like the lyrics of "I Am The Walrus," which John Lennon himself described as deliberately nonsensical and a bit of a joke, the graffiti could be:
A purely personal act: Perhaps "Duncan" is simply marking their presence, processing a personal milestone in a non-communicative way, or even just experimenting without any intention of conveying a deeper message to others.
A fleeting impulse: It could have started as one instance and then, for reasons only Duncan knows, became a recurring habit without any grand design.
A form of private humour or in-joke: It might have significance only to Duncan or a very small circle of people, and the public observation is an unintended consequence.
An act of rebellion against the norm: Perhaps the very lack of obvious meaning is the point – a small act of disruption in the urban landscape.
Our human tendency is often to seek patterns and meaning, to try and decode the world around us. When confronted with something unusual like this graffiti, our minds naturally try to find a narrative, a reason for its existence and repetition. This is where the risk of over-analysis comes in. We might be projecting our own desire for coherence onto something that is fundamentally random or driven by motivations we can't possibly fathom.
The comparison to "I Am The Walrus" is particularly apt because that song actively plays with language and imagery in a way that resists easy interpretation. It became a source of endless speculation for listeners trying to find hidden meanings, even though the creator's intent was partly to create something deliberately confusing.
So, yes, it's definitely possible – and perhaps even likely – that we, as observers, are indeed over-analysing the "Duncan Age 51 3/4" graffiti. It could be a simple, personal, or even nonsensical act that has inadvertently caught our attention, prompting a search for meaning where none was intended for a wider audience.
This doesn't necessarily diminish our curiosity, but it's a good reminder to consider the possibility that sometimes, things simply are, without a hidden code waiting to be cracked. The mystery might be more about the act itself and our reaction to it than any profound message from "Duncan."
TEMPLE BAR
DIFFERENT VIEWS OF TEMPLE BAR [I USED A SONY FX30 WITH A ZEISS BATIS 25MM LENS]
Temple Bar is Dublin's vibrant cultural quarter, a lively hub of colourful buildings and cobbled streets. During the day, it offers a charming and exciting atmosphere for children. They can enjoy street performers, explore novelty shops, and experience traditional Irish music spilling out from the pubs. The area is also home to The Ark, a dedicated cultural centre offering workshops and performances specifically for children.
However, as night falls, Temple Bar transforms. The daytime family-friendly vibe shifts dramatically as the area becomes a magnet for adult nightlife. Pubs become crowded and rowdy, with a strong focus on drinking and late-night entertainment. This atmosphere is generally not suitable or enjoyable for children, making it a very different experience compared to the daytime.
LUCY'S VINTAGE LOUNGE
LUCY'S VINTAGE LOUNGE [DOES IT NOW ONLY OPEN AT WEEKENDS?]
Unlocking Lucy's Lounge: Temple Bar's Enduring Vintage Treasure
Dublin's Temple Bar pulses with a unique energy, a vibrant, sometimes chaotic, blend of cobbled lanes, lively pubs , and streams of visitors seeking the heart of the city's social scene. Amidst this bustling backdrop, on Fownes Street Upper, stands an establishment that halts passers-by in their tracks: Lucy's Lounge. Its exterior, often described as an unmissable shock of "bubblegum pink" or perhaps purple , adorned with layers of stickers and graffiti , serves as a bold declaration. This is not just another shop; it's a portal to a different world. In a district where visual competition is fierce, the flamboyant facade acts as more than mere decoration; it's a deliberate assertion of identity, a vibrant beacon signalling the unconventional spirit within, drawing in those attuned to its unique frequency before they even cross the threshold.
Lucy's Lounge is far more than a retail space; it's a long-standing Dublin "institution" , an "infamous" and cherished "treasure trove" that has captivated locals and travellers for decades. Widely regarded as one of the city's "quirkiest and most intriguing" vintage stores , its reputation precedes it. Its enduring presence as a beloved landmark, despite its location in a high-traffic tourist area sometimes criticised for lacking authenticity , speaks volumes. It suggests a deeply rooted identity and a loyal following drawn to something genuine, something that transcends the potential transience of its surroundings.
But for the keen observer, a question arises: the shop currently welcomes visitors only at weekends. Was this always the rhythm of this Temple Bar icon, or has time brought changes to its schedule?
The Woman Behind the Whimsy: Deirdre Macken and the Shop's Soul
To understand Lucy's Lounge is to understand its founder, Deirdre Macken. Often affectionately called "Lucy" herself , she is the visionary who first opened the doors in 1987 , initially under the name SeSi. Deirdre is the heart and soul of the operation, described by one former employee as "the most beautiful woman in the world" and by others as a "friendly lady" and a "real sweetheart". She is Dublin's undisputed "veteran of vintage" , a true "pioneer" in the city's fashion landscape.
Her connection to clothes is profound, described as a lifelong "obsession". From a young age, she possessed an innate fashion sense, recalling how her mother would search Dublin for specific items she desired, only for those styles to become trends the following season. Her teenage years unfolded during the New Romantic era of the 1980s , a time she spent dressing up and frequenting Dublin's discos – spaces where self-expression through clothing was paramount. Facing limited opportunities in Ireland at the time, she knew her path lay with fashion, driven by the desire to provide unique clothing for others like herself.
Deirdre's entrepreneurial journey began not in Dublin, but in London. She ran market stalls on East Street, and in the iconic Camden and Portobello markets. She notes that the era under Margaret Thatcher, whose family were shopkeepers, offered support for small businesses through free courses – a contrast to the situation in Ireland then. This experience trading in London's vibrant markets likely forged her resilience and sharpened her eye for sourcing the unique and eclectic items that would become the hallmark of Lucy's Lounge, contributing significantly to its long-lasting reputation as a genuine "treasure trove" rather than a strictly curated, high-end boutique. By 1987, she had returned to Dublin and established SeSi in Temple Bar, at one point managing multiple shops.
However, establishing an alternative fashion haven in the Dublin of the 80s and 90s presented challenges. Deirdre recalls the era's conservatism, recounting "vivid memories of being spat on or shouted out just because of what she was wearing". This personal experience of navigating a society less accepting of outward individuality profoundly shaped the ethos of her shop. It became more than just a place to buy clothes; it evolved into what she calls a "sacred place for people who love clothes and expressing who they are" , a haven born from her own need for escape and self-expression through fashion, a place to find one's "tribe". Her philosophy permeates the space: she sees the shop as "the inside of a pleasantly disturbed mind" , believes clothes hold memories and offer escape , and champions sustainability. Her own captivating style – described once featuring white petticoats, a turquoise bowler hat, and oversized glasses – embodies the spirit of creative freedom the shop encourages.
Down the Rabbit Hole: Inside the Treasure Trove
Stepping into Lucy's Lounge is often described as embarking on an adventure. The ground floor typically offers an enticing glimpse, showcasing jewellery, prints, and various unique objects. Some visitors note an initial impression that can feel almost "witchy" or "goth-like" , hinting at the eclectic wonders that lie deeper within.
The true heart of the Lucy's Lounge experience, however, lies downstairs. Descending into the basement is frequently likened to falling down the rabbit hole, an intentional nod to the Alice in Wonderland theme that explicitly inspires the shop's design and atmosphere. This physical journey downwards, away from the street-level bustle, transforms the act of shopping into one of discovery, entering a hidden world brimming with possibilities. It's a "cavern of whimsy and weirdness" , a space designed to encourage exploration, "rooting and rummaging". The decor itself contributes to the fantastical feel, with antique dolls, clocks, and branches adorning the ceiling , and vintage finds displayed against bare brick walls.
The basement bursts with an astonishing variety of stock. Rails overflow with vintage clothing: dresses, jackets, tops, skirts, jumpers, band tees, and blouses. Specific eras and styles surface in descriptions – 90s windbreakers, 80s band tees, bold florals, leopard prints, leather trousers, velvet party dresses, and even vintage nightgowns arranged by colour. Beyond clothing, shoppers can uncover accessories, shoes, household textiles, and intriguing bric-a-brac. A key part of the appeal is the potential for finding incredible bargains, with items priced affordably ("as cheap as a fiver" ) and offering "unbeatable" or "decent" value.
While the experience feels like a treasure hunt, there's a sense of "curated chaos." The stock, though vast and eclectic, is also described as carefully "hand-picked" , suggesting Deirdre Macken's experienced eye ensures quality and interest amidst the delightful jumble.
Adding another layer to the shop's identity is its creative dimension. Lucy's Lounge houses 'Lucy's Lab,' a space where clothing is crafted and remixed, featuring the shop's own upcycled range. They even offer sewing workshops, inviting customers to learn new skills. This active engagement in making and teaching elevates Lucy's Lounge beyond simple retail. It positions the shop as a participant in the fashion cycle, deepening its commitment to the sustainability mentioned by several sources and fostering a community around shared creative and ethical values.
Opening Hours: A Shift in Time?
The observation that Lucy's Lounge now operates exclusively on weekends is indeed accurate. Numerous recent sources confirm this schedule, placing it firmly as a Saturday and Sunday destination for vintage hunters.
However, this weekend-centric timetable represents a significant change from the past. Evidence confirms that Lucy's Lounge was not always restricted to weekend opening. A blog post from April 2013 explicitly stated the shop's hours were "Monday-Sunday 12-6pm". This historical data point definitively answers the core question: the weekend-only schedule is a relatively recent development.
The current hours, based on the most consistent recent information, are generally Saturday from 12:00 to 18:00 and Sunday from 14:00 to 18:00. Some minor variations appear in reports (Sunday start times of 13:00 or 14:00, closing times of 17:00 or 18:00) , but the weekend-only pattern is clear and consistently reported.
One source from January 2024 mentioned the shop being closed only on Tuesdays and Wednesdays , implying potential opening on other weekdays at that specific moment. This could represent a transitional phase, a slight lag in reporting, or simply an anomaly, as the overwhelming consensus from other recent accounts points squarely to the current weekend-only model.
While the specific reasons for this shift aren't explicitly stated in the available information, several factors common to long-standing independent retailers might be considered.
After over four decades in the business , a desire for a more manageable schedule is understandable. Focusing efforts on the peak weekend footfall in Temple Bar could be a strategic move to maximise impact. Furthermore, the development of an online presence, including an Etsy shop , provides an alternative channel for sales and engagement, potentially reducing reliance on constant physical opening hours. Dedicating more time to the creative aspects, such as 'Lucy's Lab' and workshops , might also be a factor. This evolution reflects how even established Dublin institutions must adapt to changing retail landscapes and personal priorities over time. Paradoxically, the reduced hours might even enhance the shop's allure, concentrating the buzz into the weekends and making a visit feel like a more distinct, sought-after event.
Why Lucy's Lounge Still Captivates
Despite the shift to weekend-only hours, the magnetic pull of Lucy's Lounge remains undiminished. Its enduring appeal stems from a potent combination of factors consistently highlighted by those who experience it.
Chief among these is the promise of uniqueness. Lucy's is celebrated as a place to find items you simply won't encounter elsewhere. It caters to the thrill of the hunt, the joy of unearthing a personal treasure that speaks to individual style. In a world often dominated by mass production, it offers a powerful avenue for self-expression.
The atmosphere itself is a major draw. It's consistently described as more than just a shop; it's an immersive experience. The "magical," whimsical environment invites exploration and lingers in the memory. This is amplified by the warmth and knowledge of the staff, often including Deirdre herself, who are seen as friendly guides rather than mere salespeople. This focus on providing an authentic, engaging experience is a highly valued quality in today's consumer culture, offering an escape into nostalgia and discovery through tangible interaction.
Lucy's Lounge also boasts broad appeal. It's recognised as an ideal spot for students seeking affordable, unique fashion , a must-visit destination for dedicated vintage lovers , and a point of genuine local colour for visitors seeking authentic Dublin experiences. Its status as a "favourite shop" for many locals underscores its deep roots in the city's fabric. The shop's consistent inclusion in guides and "best vintage" lists further cements its reputation and ongoing relevance.
While the truest magic requires a physical visit, the shop maintains a digital presence through platforms like Instagram (@lucyslounge) , TikTok , and its Etsy store , offering glimpses and purchase opportunities from afar. This digital footprint allows the spirit of Lucy's to reach beyond its Temple Bar basement, yet ultimately reinforces the desire to experience the real thing. By nurturing a community around shared values of vintage aesthetics, sustainability, and individuality , Lucy's Lounge functions as more than just a retailer; it's a cultural anchor point, contributing significantly to its resilience and enduring charm.
Conclusion: A Weekend Well Spent at a Dublin Original
In the heart of Dublin's often-frenetic Temple Bar, Lucy's Lounge stands as a testament to individuality, creativity, and the enduring magic of vintage. It is a rare and precious entity: a truly independent, character-filled Dublin original that has not only survived but thrived for decades, largely thanks to the unique vision and passion of its founder, Deirdre Macken.
The rhythm of the shop has indeed changed over time. The days of browsing its eclectic rails seven days a week are part of its history. Now, the enchantment is concentrated into the weekends , a shift that perhaps makes a visit feel even more like a special occasion, a deliberate seeking-out of its unique charm.
The essence of Lucy's Lounge, however, remains potent. It continues to be a place of discovery, self-expression, and sustainable style, a "treasure trove" where the past comes alive in vibrant colour and texture. For anyone visiting Dublin with a love for the unique, the whimsical, and the genuinely authentic, stepping through that unmissable pink door on Fownes Street during a weekend exploration is an experience not to be missed. It’s an invitation to descend the stairs, embrace the delightful chaos, and perhaps emerge with a piece of Dublin magic all your own.
CEANNT FORT
CEANNT FORT ORIGINALLY McCAFFREY'S ESTATE [A CENTURY OF HISTORY AND COMMUNITY]
I used a Sony FX30 camera and an old, but much liked, Sony 24-70mm F2.8 GM lens. I like the FX30 but it is not a full frame camera and does not have an EVF. The lens is approaching its end of life and I am planning to replace it with a Sony 28-70mm F2 GM lens.
Ceannt Fort, Dublin: A Century of History, Architecture, and Community
I. Introduction
Ceannt Fort stands as a distinctive residential estate nestled within the historic Kilmainham area of Dublin 8. It is a place notable not only for its unique architectural character and strong sense of community but also for its deep roots in the tumultuous history of early 20th-century Ireland. Born from a period of profound social need and national transformation, Ceannt Fort represents more than just a housing development; it is a tangible link to Dublin's efforts to address severe urban deprivation, a memorial to a key figure of the 1916 Easter Rising, and a testament to evolving ideals in urban planning and design.
The estate’s origins lie in the pressing need to alleviate the dire housing conditions that plagued Dublin at the turn of the century, a crisis brought into sharp focus by events like the Church Street tenement collapse in 1913. Its development, undertaken by Dublin Corporation between 1917 and 1922, coincided with the latter stages of the First World War, the Irish War of Independence, and the establishment of the Irish Free State, embedding it within a narrative of national emergence. The deliberate renaming of the estate from McCaffrey’s Estate to Ceannt Fort, honouring the executed 1916 leader Éamonn Ceannt, further cemented this connection. Architecturally, it marks a significant step in the design of social housing in Dublin, reflecting a shift towards more humane, community-focused planning principles under the guidance of architect T.J. Byrne. This unique blend of historical significance and architectural merit has led to its designation as an Architectural Conservation Area (ACA), signifying a commitment to preserving its special character.
This discussion will delve into the multifaceted story of Ceannt Fort. It will explore its historical foundations, examining the context of Dublin's housing crisis and the Corporation's response. It will detail the life and legacy of Éamonn Ceannt, the revolutionary leader whose name the estate bears, and analyse his crucial role in the 1916 Rising, particularly at the nearby South Dublin Union. The report will then investigate the architectural evolution of the estate, contrasting the initial proposals with T.J. Byrne's influential design, and discuss the implications of its ACA status. Furthermore, it will outline Ceannt Fort's location, amenities, and excellent connectivity, examine the evidence of its enduring community spirit and social fabric, and consider its contemporary context, including the local real estate market and recent challenges faced by residents. Through this comprehensive exploration, the report aims to illuminate the enduring significance of Ceannt Fort as a unique and valued part of Dublin's urban heritage.
II. Historical Foundations: From McCaffrey's Estate to Ceannt Fort
Dublin's Early 20th Century Housing Crisis
The genesis of Ceannt Fort is inextricably linked to the appalling housing conditions prevalent in Dublin during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The city faced a public health and housing crisis of immense proportions, largely a legacy of the previous century. Overcrowded and dilapidated tenements were widespread, particularly in the inner city. These conditions were starkly highlighted by disasters such as the collapse of two tenement houses on Church Street in September 1913, an event that claimed seven lives and spurred the Dublin Corporation Housing Committee into action to expedite the provision of better housing for the city's poor and low-paid citizens. Endemic poverty meant that diseases like tuberculosis, diphtheria, smallpox, and typhoid spread easily, leading to high rates of premature death. The need for reform and the provision of "healthy homes" was urgent. However, progress was hampered by significant national and international events. The onset of the First World War in 1914 diverted resources and attention, and the subsequent Easter Rising of 1916 further disrupted civic life and administration, slowing housing initiatives almost to a halt.
Dublin Corporation's Housing Initiatives
Despite these challenges, Dublin Corporation began tentatively engaging with the housing crisis from the 1880s onwards, initially through small inner-city schemes. The development of what would become Ceannt Fort represented a more substantial effort. The project was initiated on land known as McCaffrey's Estate, strategically located in Mount Brown, adjacent to the extensive grounds of the South Dublin Union Workhouse (a site now largely occupied by St James's Hospital). This site itself had historical associations, formerly being McCaffrey's Orchard, connected with the South Dublin Union which played a significant role in the 1916 Rising. The Corporation's aim was to provide quality housing for working-class families, moving away from the slum conditions and reflecting contemporary urban planning ideals that emphasised community cohesion and improved living standards.
Development Amidst Turmoil
The formal process for developing McCaffrey's Estate began amidst the backdrop of war and revolution. Dublin Corporation sought a loan from the Local Government Board (LGB), a British government body overseeing local administration in Ireland, to purchase the land in 1914 based on an initial design by City Architect C.J. McCarthy. This initial loan request was refused due to wartime restrictions. A renewed application, seeking an increased amount due to rising building costs, was made in 1917 and this time approved, with funding arrangements made with the British Government. Construction commenced in 1918, based on a revised design by T.J. Byrne.
The development period, spanning from 1917 to 1922, was fraught with difficulties. Progress was slow; by August 1919, only 80 of the planned 202 houses were completed, despite an overwhelming demand demonstrated by 2,000 applicants. Strikes, along with procedural and ongoing funding challenges, further delayed the scheme's completion. The very fact that Dublin Corporation, initially under the scrutiny of the British LGB and later navigating the transition to the Irish Free State, persisted with this major housing project throughout such a turbulent period – encompassing the final year of WWI, the entire War of Independence (1919-1921), and the establishment of the new state – speaks volumes. While major national upheaval often halts such large-scale public works, and the project certainly faced delays, the critical need for housing, evidenced by the high number of applicants, appears to have driven it forward. It arguably became not only a response to a social crisis but also a symbol of municipal capability and perhaps nascent nation-building during a period of profound political change.
The Renaming: A Political and Commemorative Act
A significant act during the estate's development was its renaming from McCaffrey's Estate to Ceannt Fort. This renaming was far more than a simple administrative change; it was a deeply symbolic gesture. Undertaken during a period coinciding with the rise of Sinn Féin and the establishment of the Irish Free State, the act aligned this new, modern housing development directly with the narrative of Irish independence. Naming public works after revolutionary heroes became a common practice for the emerging state and its institutions to embed the nationalist story into the fabric of the nation. Choosing Éamonn Ceannt, a signatory of the 1916 Proclamation executed by the British military authorities, powerfully linked the estate to the foundational event of the new Irish state. This transformed Ceannt Fort from a purely functional housing scheme into a living site of national memory and commemoration, simultaneously reflecting and reinforcing the patriotic credentials of Dublin Corporation in the new political landscape.
Furthermore, the choice of Ceannt was particularly resonant given the estate's specific location. Éamonn Ceannt had commanded the 4th Battalion of the Irish Volunteers during the Easter Rising at the South Dublin Union, the grounds of which were immediately adjacent to the McCaffrey's Estate site where the houses were being built. Naming the development Ceannt Fort thus created an explicit spatial connection between the man, his pivotal role in the Rising nearby, and the new community being established. This geographical link made the commemoration intensely specific and locally meaningful, forever tying the identity of the estate to the legacy of Éamonn Ceannt and the events of 1916.
III. Éamonn Ceannt: The Man Behind the Name
Biography
Éamonn Ceannt, the man whose sacrifice is commemorated by the naming of Ceannt Fort, was a pivotal figure in the Irish cultural and nationalist movements leading up to the 1916 Rising. Born Edward Thomas Kent on 21 September 1881 in the police barracks at Ballymoe, County Galway, he was the son of James Kent, a Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC) officer, and Joanne Galway. His father's career led the family to move first to Ardee, County Louth, and then to Drogheda, before settling in Dublin upon James Kent's retirement in 1892. In Dublin, Éamonn received his education at Christian Brothers' schools, including O'Connell Schools on North Richmond Street, and later attended University College Dublin. He secured employment with Dublin Corporation, working as a clerk and later an accountant in the City Treasurer's office from 1901 until the Rising in 1916. Notably, he refused to join the British Civil Service but accepted the Corporation role on the grounds that its funds came from the people of Dublin. Ceannt also demonstrated an early commitment to social justice, becoming involved in trade unionism within the Corporation and serving as chairman of the Dublin Municipal Officers' Association.
Ceannt was deeply immersed in the Irish cultural revival. He joined the central branch of the Gaelic League in 1899, becoming a fluent Irish speaker and adopting the Irish form of his name, Éamonn Ceannt. He met key nationalist figures like Patrick Pearse and Eoin MacNeill through the League and became an inspiring teacher of the Irish language. Music was another passion; he was an accomplished player of the uileann pipes and war pipes, co-founding the Dublin Pipers' Club (Cumann na bPíobairí) with Edward Martyn in 1900 and serving as its secretary. His musical talent earned him a gold medal at the 1906 Oireachtas, and in 1908, while leading a group of Irish athletes and musicians in Rome, he performed on the pipes for Pope Pius X. A devout Catholic throughout his life, he neither smoked nor drank.
His cultural nationalism evolved into political action. He joined Arthur Griffith's Sinn Féin party in 1907 and was later elected to its national council. Recognising his militant commitment, Seán Mac Diarmada recruited him into the secretive Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB) around 1911-1912. With the formation of the Irish Volunteers in November 1913, Ceannt became a founding member, elected to the provisional committee and actively involved in fundraising and procuring arms. He participated in the significant gun-running operations at Howth and Kilcoole in the summer of 1914. After the split in the Volunteers later that year, Ceannt sided with the more radical faction and became a key leader, serving as director of communications and, from March 1915, commandant of the 4th Battalion of the Dublin Brigade.
In his personal life, Ceannt married Áine O'Brennan, whom he met in the Gaelic League, in June 1905. They had one son, Rónán, born in 1906. The family lived at various Dublin addresses, including 2 Dolphin's Terrace, South Circular Road, and later 'Bloomfield' on Herberton Road (1909-14), a house mentioned in James Joyce's Ulysses. Intriguingly, while Éamonn pursued revolution, his brother William served as a colour sergeant-major in the Royal Dublin Fusiliers, part of the British Army.
Role in the 1916 Easter Rising
Éamonn Ceannt was central to the planning and execution of the Easter Rising. In May 1915, he became a member of the IRB's secretive Military Council (alongside figures like Pearse, Plunkett, Clarke, Mac Diarmada, Connolly, and MacDonagh) which planned the insurrection. He was one of the seven leaders who signed the Proclamation of the Irish Republic on Easter Sunday, 1916.
During Easter Week, Ceannt served as Commandant of the 4th Battalion of the Irish Volunteers. His assigned position was the South Dublin Union (SDU), a vast complex encompassing a workhouse and hospital spread over 52 acres off James's Street. Due to Eoin MacNeill's countermanding order cancelling the planned manoeuvres, only about one-third of Ceannt's battalion, approximately 120 men, reported for duty on Easter Monday. Notable figures serving under him included his second-in-command Cathal Brugha and future Irish leader W. T. Cosgrave. Ceannt's forces occupied the SDU and several outlying buildings, including parts of Jameson's and Roe's distilleries.
The SDU garrison faced intense and bloody fighting throughout the week. Positioned near several British Army barracks (including Richmond Barracks), their task was to control a key approach to the city centre. British troops, primarily the Royal Irish Regiment, launched determined attacks. The fighting within the SDU's maze of buildings, lanes, and corridors was often at close quarters, involving handguns and improvised grenades. Ceannt himself was described as an effective and courageous commander, leading from the front in several fierce engagements. Despite being heavily outnumbered (British forces reportedly numbered around a thousand against fewer than 50 effective defenders at times), Ceannt's battalion held their position tenaciously. The South Dublin Union was one of only two major rebel positions (along with de Valera's at Boland's Mill) that were not captured by British forces during the week.
Execution and Legacy
Following the general surrender ordered by Patrick Pearse on Saturday, 29 April, Ceannt and his men laid down their arms, though Ceannt reportedly did so reluctantly. He was imprisoned in Kilmainham Gaol, court-martialled, and condemned to death. On 8 May 1916, Éamonn Ceannt was executed by firing squad, aged 34. He was buried alongside other executed leaders in the grounds of Arbour Hill prison. In his final letter, he expressed regret at surrendering and famously advised future republicans: "never to treat with the enemy, never to surrender at his mercy, but to fight to a finish".
Contemporaries regarded Ceannt as dedicated, determined, and courageous, though perhaps more taciturn and less overtly charismatic than some other leaders. While not renowned as a poet or theorist, his commitment to the cause was unquestioned. His legacy is commemorated in numerous ways across Ireland, most notably by the Ceannt Fort housing estate adjacent to the site of his Rising command, but also by Ceannt Barracks at the Curragh, Ceannt Station in his native Galway, Éamonn Ceannt Park and cycling track on Sundrive Road, Dublin, and formerly by Ceannt Tower in Ballymun.
IV. Architectural Significance and Design
The architectural character of Ceannt Fort is a key element of its identity and historical importance, representing a significant moment in the evolution of Dublin's social housing landscape. Its design was the subject of debate and revision, reflecting changing ideas about urban planning and the influence of key figures within both Dublin Corporation and the overseeing British administration.
The Architects: McCarthy vs. Byrne
The initial proposal for housing on the McCaffrey's Estate site was developed in 1914 by Charles James (C.J.) McCarthy, who served as Dublin City Architect from 1893 for over 25 years. McCarthy was a prolific architect responsible for numerous significant municipal buildings, including public libraries (Pearse Street, Charleville Mall), fire stations, market buildings (Fish Market, Mary's Lane), technical schools (Kevin Street, Bolton Street), and earlier housing schemes like those at Blackhall Place and Bride's Alley. His initial plan for McCaffrey's Estate envisaged 240 houses.
However, McCarthy's 1914 layout faced criticism. P.C. Cowan, Chief Engineering Inspector for the Local Government Board (LGB) for Ireland, and a colleague named Aston, reviewed the scheme as part of the Corporation's loan application process. Cowan, a Scottish-born engineer noted for his brilliance, administrative skill, and strong social conscience, was reportedly appalled by Dublin's slum conditions upon his appointment to the LGB in 1899. He found McCarthy's proposed layout for McCaffrey's Estate to be "uninspired and monotonous," potentially characterised by "narrow straight laneways, monotonous rows of red brick dwellings, enforced absence of foliage, [and] back yards of a few square feet abutting on each other". This intervention by a senior figure within the British administration's oversight body is noteworthy. It demonstrates that, even amidst rising nationalism and wartime pressures, there was a level of administrative focus extending beyond mere funding to encompass the aesthetic and planning quality of municipal housing projects in Ireland. Cowan's critique, driven by a concern for better living conditions, directly influenced the project's architectural direction.
As a result of these concerns, the Corporation Housing Committee advised McCarthy to consult with Thomas Joseph (T.J.) Byrne, an architect recognised for his "great deal of experience in the erection of working class dwellings". Byrne had previously designed successful cottage schemes for South Dublin Rural District Council under the Labourers Acts, including innovative two-storey 'suburban' types and schemes with 'garden village' characteristics. Byrne took on the McCaffrey's Estate project as a private commission, albeit charging a significantly reduced fee (1% instead of the standard 5%), suggesting a degree of personal commitment. His revised scheme, reducing the density to 202 houses and introducing a "radically different layout," was approved in principle by the Housing Committee in February 1915, though delayed by the war. An updated version was submitted and approved in October 1917, forming the basis for the estate built between 1918 and 1922.
Design Philosophy and Layout
The transition from McCarthy's likely more rigid plan to Byrne's finalised design marks a discernible shift towards more progressive urban planning ideals for social housing in Dublin at the time. Byrne's approach moved away from potential monotony towards a layout described as "dynamic and visually engaging," featuring "improved spatial arrangements" and creating an "intimate series of housing clusters, gardens and playgrounds". This emphasis on variety, reduced density, integrated green space, and the creation of smaller, distinct clusters strongly reflects the influence of the Garden City movement and contemporary town planning principles. These ideals promoted healthier, more aesthetically pleasing, and community-oriented environments as a deliberate contrast to the overcrowded urban slums and purely utilitarian housing blocks of the past. The adoption of Byrne's design indicates that Dublin Corporation, guided by experienced architects like Byrne and potentially influenced by figures like Cowan, was embracing more modern, humane approaches to designing large-scale working-class estates. The finished scheme was regarded at the time as "one of the finest examples of urban housing of its day".
Housing Types and Architectural Style
Ceannt Fort primarily consists of two-storey houses, typically arranged in terraces or as end-of-terrace units. Some sources refer to them as "cottages," reflecting their scale and perhaps a deliberate design choice to evoke a less urban feel. Examples of double-fronted houses also exist within the estate.
In terms of materials, an "attractive brick facade" is noted on at least one property. Cathy Scuffil, Dublin City Council's Historian in Residence, has highlighted the use of "County Dublin granite and Dolphin's Barn brick," suggesting this may have been a deliberate choice to support local employment in quarries and brickworks. Pebble dash or other renders are also likely common finishes, as noted for Dublin Corporation housing of the era generally.
Internally, properties originally featured relatively simple layouts, typically comprising an entrance hall, living room, sometimes a separate dining room or lounge, a kitchen, and usually two or three bedrooms upstairs. Bathrooms were often located downstairs, sometimes in a rear extension or lobby area, although many houses now have upstairs bathrooms following renovations. Original features sometimes included fireplaces (solid fuel or gas), though many have been updated with modern alternatives like wood burners. Flooring varied, with laminate and tile mentioned in renovated properties. A significant feature for many houses is the provision of private rear gardens or courtyards, often south-facing, providing valuable outdoor space. The overall architectural style is modest, functional, yet well-proportioned, reflecting the aim of providing quality, durable housing.
Street Names and Commemoration
Reinforcing the estate's connection to the 1916 Rising, the streets within Ceannt Fort were deliberately named after individuals associated with the rebellion, primarily Volunteers who fought and, in many cases, died during Easter Week or were subsequently executed. This commemorative naming strategy transforms the streetscape into a daily reminder of the area's historical significance.
Table 1: Ceannt Fort Street Names and Commemorated Figures
McDowell Avenue Volunteer Associated with the 1916 Rising
O'Reilly Avenue Volunteer Associated with the 1916 Rising
Owens Avenue Volunteer Associated with the 1916 Rising
Burke Place Volunteer Associated with the 1916 Rising
Traynor Place Volunteer Associated with the 1916 Rising
Donnellan Avenue Volunteer Associated with the 1916 Rising
Quinn Avenue Volunteer Associated with the 1916 Rising
Ceannt Fort Éamonn Ceannt 1916 Proclamation Signatory, Executed Leader
V. Ceannt Fort as an Architectural Conservation Area (ACA)
The unique historical and architectural character of Ceannt Fort has been formally recognised through its designation as an Architectural Conservation Area (ACA) by Dublin City Council. This designation carries significant implications for the preservation and management of the estate.
Designation and Purpose
Under the Planning and Development Act, 2000 (as amended), an ACA is defined as a place, area, group of structures, or townscape that holds special architectural, historical, archaeological, artistic, cultural, scientific, social, or technical interest or value, or contributes to the appreciation of protected structures within it. The primary purpose of ACA designation is to protect this special character, which often derives from the cumulative impact of buildings, their setting, layout, landscape, street furniture, and other locally important features that have evolved over time. Ceannt Fort was identified as a priority area for ACA designation, highlighting its perceived importance within Dublin's heritage landscape. The designation acknowledges that the value of Ceannt Fort lies not just in individual buildings but in the overall composition and historical resonance of the estate as a whole.
Implications for Preservation
The ACA status provides a framework for managing change within Ceannt Fort to ensure its historical integrity is maintained. It necessitates ongoing efforts by both residents and Dublin City Council to preserve the estate's heritage. Crucially, planning permission is required for most works that would materially affect the special character of the ACA. This typically includes external alterations such as changes to windows, doors, rooflines, boundary walls, and the construction of extensions. Depending on the specific nature of the building and the ACA designation details, internal alterations might also require permission if they impact features of special interest. The goal is not necessarily to prevent all change, but to manage it in a way that is sensitive to the area's character, permitting flexibility while safeguarding its essential qualities.
The scope of ACA protection extends beyond the mere facades of the houses. As the definition includes "group of structures," "townscape," "layout," "setting," and "landscape" , the designation legally safeguards T.J. Byrne's overall design concept for Ceannt Fort. His contribution, which was specifically praised for its dynamic layout, intimate clusters, integrated gardens, and improved spatial arrangements , is recognised as a fundamental part of the estate's special character. Therefore, the ACA aims to protect the planned relationship between buildings, streets, open spaces, and landscaping – the very elements that distinguish Byrne's design – ensuring that the integrity of this early 20th-century planned environment is conserved.
Challenges and Management
While the ACA designation provides a protective framework, it also presents ongoing challenges. A key tension exists between the aims of conservation – often favouring the retention of original features and uniformity where intended – and the demands of modern living and the pressures of the property market. Homeowners naturally desire to upgrade their properties for comfort, energy efficiency (often reflected in varying Building Energy Ratings (BER) seen in listings, from B3 to F ), and increased value, which may involve extensions, replacement windows, external insulation, or other alterations. Property listings clearly show that significant renovations and modernisations are common within the estate. Balancing these individual desires for modernisation with the collective need to maintain the historical and architectural integrity defined by the ACA requires careful management and ongoing dialogue between residents, planners, and conservation officers within Dublin City Council. The success of the ACA ultimately depends on finding appropriate ways to accommodate contemporary needs without eroding the unique character that the designation seeks to protect.
VI. Location, Amenities, and Connectivity
Ceannt Fort benefits from a highly strategic location within Dublin 8, combining a setting rich in historical context with excellent access to modern urban infrastructure and amenities.
Geographical Context
The estate is situated in the Mount Brown area of Kilmainham, Dublin 8. Its specific location is clearly identifiable through Eircodes associated with properties within the estate, such as D08 Y3YA, D08 TF9R, and D08 DA2T. The estate comprises several distinct streets, including McDowell Avenue, O'Reilly Avenue, Owens Avenue, Burke Place, Traynor Place, Donnellan Avenue, and Quinn Avenue.
This location places Ceannt Fort in a unique position, blending layers of history with the pulse of contemporary Dublin. Kilmainham itself is an area steeped in history, known for landmarks such as the Royal Hospital Kilmainham and Kilmainham Gaol, both located nearby. Simultaneously, the estate sits immediately adjacent to major modern facilities that define the current landscape of the area: the sprawling St James's Hospital campus, which incorporates the site of the new National Children's Hospital, is directly beside Ceannt Fort ; Heuston Station, one of Dublin's primary rail and bus terminals, is within easy walking distance ; and the Luas Red Line tram service runs close by, offering rapid transit across the city. This juxtaposition of deep historical roots and exceptional modern connectivity is a defining characteristic of Ceannt Fort's location and a significant factor in its enduring appeal.
Transport Links
The excellent public transport links serving Ceannt Fort are frequently highlighted as a major advantage of living in the estate.
Rail: Heuston Station is remarkably close. While one source estimates an 8-minute walk , another suggests it is only a 1-2 minute walk away , indicating immediate proximity. Heuston provides access to national rail services and serves as a major hub for regional and national bus services.
Light Rail (Luas): The St James's stop on the Luas Red Line is consistently described as being very nearby, typically a 3 to 5-minute walk from the estate. This line offers direct tram services eastwards through the city centre to Connolly Station and The Point (Docklands), and westwards towards Tallaght and Saggart.
Bus: Numerous Dublin Bus routes serve the area, with stops located just 80-100 metres away at St James's Hospital and Mount Brown. Key routes mentioned include the G1 and G2 (part of the BusConnects network, connecting to Spencer Dock, Red Cow Luas, and Liffey Valley Shopping Centre), the S2 (Heuston Station), Route 13 (Grange Castle to City Centre), and Route 123 (linking Marino to Kilnamanagh Road via the City Centre). These services provide comprehensive connectivity across Dublin.
Recreation and Green Space: The area offers exceptional access to significant parks and recreational amenities. The vast expanse of the Phoenix Park is nearby, as are the Irish National War Memorial Gardens, the grounds of the Royal Hospital Kilmainham, and the Grand Canal walkway, providing ample opportunities for leisure and outdoor activities.
Shopping and Services: Local convenience is provided by shops, cafés, bars, and restaurants in the immediate Kilmainham and Mount Brown vicinity. A SuperValu supermarket and other services are available at the Heuston South Quarter development, close to the hospital.
VII. Community and Social Fabric
Beyond its bricks and mortar, Ceannt Fort possesses a distinct social history and evidence of a resilient community spirit that has endured for over a century.
Historical Roots
The estate was founded with the explicit aim of providing not just shelter, but quality housing for Dublin's working-class families, reflecting planning ideals that emphasised community cohesion alongside improved living conditions. This intention of fostering a community from the outset may have contributed to its lasting social fabric. Furthermore, the reported use of local materials like Dolphin's Barn brick and County Dublin granite during construction might have served a dual purpose: providing durable housing while also supporting local employment in the quarries and brickworks, potentially strengthening ties between the new estate and the surrounding area.
Evidence of Community Life
Multiple sources point to an active and engaged community within Ceannt Fort, both historically and in the present day:
Centenary Celebration: The vibrant celebration held in September 2022 to mark the estate's 100th anniversary serves as powerful evidence of a strong communal spirit. Organised by a dedicated 'Ceannt Fort 100' committee, the event brought together past and present residents for a day of reminiscing, historical reflection (including a talk by local historian Lindy Taylor), live music from the St James's Brass & Reed Band and resident musician Josh Johnston's jazz band, and family-friendly activities. The success of this event, attracting a large crowd, underscores a shared sense of identity and pride in the estate's history.
Historical Documentation: The existence of photo galleries on the Ceannt Fort community website, showcasing residents and homes from the 75th anniversary in 1997, and documenting events like the May Procession in 1981, provides glimpses into the community's life over the decades. These visual records help to preserve collective memory.
Residents' Association: Ceannt Fort maintains an active Residents' Association. This group plays a crucial role in representing the community's interests and engaging with external bodies on local issues. They have been actively involved in discussions and making submissions regarding the potential impacts of the National Children's Hospital construction, proposed BusConnects transport changes, and advocating for the estate's designation as an Architectural Conservation Area. The existence and activities of this association demonstrate ongoing collective organisation and advocacy.
Engagement with Heritage: The community has shown a clear interest in engaging with its history. This is evident not only in the historical focus of the centenary celebrations but also through interactions with Dublin City Council's Historian in Residence programme. Historian Cathy Scuffil met with Ceannt Fort residents, discussing the estate's specific history, including the significance of its building materials.
Taken together, these elements paint a picture of an enduring community identity. Despite the passage of time and the inevitable social and demographic shifts that occur over a century – transitioning from its origins as purely working-class housing to becoming a highly desirable residential area attracting diverse buyers – Ceannt Fort retains a strong sense of place and collective spirit. The persistence of community events, the active residents' association tackling contemporary challenges, and the conscious engagement with the estate's unique heritage all point to a community that values its past and actively shapes its present. This appreciation for its specific history and architectural character, demonstrated by the residents themselves, strongly validates the efforts made to preserve it through mechanisms like the ACA designation.
VIII. Ceannt Fort Today: Real Estate and Current Issues
In the 21st century, Ceannt Fort remains a vibrant and sought-after residential area, valued for its unique character, historical associations, and convenient location. However, like many established urban neighbourhoods, it also faces contemporary challenges related to infrastructure and nearby development.
Residential Character
The estate continues to be a popular place to live, with properties actively traded on the Dublin real estate market. Listings reveal a mix of properties, some retaining many original features, while others have undergone significant modernisation and renovation. The typical housing stock consists of two and three-bedroom terraced or end-of-terrace houses, generally ranging in size from approximately 68 to 75 square metres. Property values reflect the desirability of the area, though prices vary considerably depending on the size, condition, and specific location within the estate. Examples from recent years show asking prices ranging from around €350,000 to €570,000. The fact that these century-old houses, originally built as social housing, remain sought-after homes today is a testament to the quality of T.J. Byrne's design and the enduring appeal of the estate.
Current Challenges and News
Despite its desirability, Ceannt Fort has recently faced several challenges common to inner suburban areas experiencing development pressure:
Impact of National Children's Hospital (NCH) Construction: The massive construction project for the new National Children's Hospital on the adjacent St James's Hospital campus has had significant repercussions for some Ceannt Fort residents. Claims arose alleging that building works caused substantial damage to homes in the O'Reilly Avenue, Ceannt Fort, and Mount Brown areas.
This led to residents initiating High Court proceedings against the National Paediatric Hospital Development Board and the main contractors, BAM Civil Ltd, four years prior to late 2021. While the claims were opposed, court hearings indicated that significant progress was being made in mediation efforts to resolve the dispute as of October 2021. This situation highlights the direct, negative externalities that large-scale construction projects can impose on neighbouring residential communities.
Infrastructure Issues: Basic infrastructure reliability has also been a recent concern. In late March and early April 2025, Dublin City Council and Uisce Éireann (Irish Water) reported investigating water supply disruptions affecting Ceannt Fort, Mount Brown, and surrounding areas, indicating temporary issues with essential services.
Transport Planning Concerns: Proposed changes to the local road network under the BusConnects programme have also caused concern among residents. Specifically, the Liffey Valley to City Centre Core Bus Corridor Scheme included proposals for bus gates on Mount Brown. The Ceannt Fort Residents' Association raised formal objections, highlighting that these bus gates would be located on either side of the estate's single vehicular entrance and exit point, potentially severely impacting access for residents. Residents questioned the lack of alternatives offered for local access and the legislative basis for such restrictions.
These recent issues underscore the complex reality of living in a historic and desirable, yet centrally located, residential area. The proximity to the major St James's/NCH complex offers clear benefits in terms of access to healthcare and associated amenities. However, it simultaneously exposes residents to significant challenges, including the physical impacts of large-scale construction and potentially disruptive changes to traffic management driven by the needs of the hospital campus and wider city transport planning. Furthermore, the occurrence of basic utility disruptions serves as a reminder that even well-established and valued historic neighbourhoods are not immune to the pressures and vulnerabilities inherent in a dynamic, evolving city. These challenges necessitate ongoing vigilance and advocacy from the residents' association to protect the quality of life within the estate.
IX. Conclusion
Ceannt Fort represents a unique confluence of Irish history, architectural evolution, and enduring community spirit within the urban landscape of Dublin. Born out of the critical need to address the city's early 20th-century housing crisis, its development by Dublin Corporation between 1917 and 1922 occurred during a period of profound national transformation, forever linking it to the emergence of the modern Irish state. The deliberate renaming of the estate to honour Éamonn Ceannt, a signatory of the 1916 Proclamation who commanded Volunteer forces at the adjacent South Dublin Union, imbues the area with deep historical resonance and serves as a constant commemoration of the struggle for independence.
Architecturally, Ceannt Fort marks a significant step forward in the design of social housing in Dublin. The intervention of architect T.J. Byrne, moving away from potentially monotonous layouts towards a design influenced by Garden City principles, resulted in an estate characterised by intimate housing clusters, integrated green spaces, and a focus on creating a cohesive community environment. This thoughtful planning, combined with the provision of well-built, durable housing, has contributed to the estate's lasting appeal and its recognition as an Architectural Conservation Area, safeguarding Byrne's overall design concept and the unique townscape character.
The estate benefits immensely from its strategic location in Kilmainham, offering residents exceptional connectivity via Luas, national rail at Heuston Station, and numerous bus routes, alongside proximity to major amenities including St James's Hospital, the new National Children's Hospital, local schools, and significant recreational spaces like the Phoenix Park and the Royal Hospital grounds. This blend of historical charm and modern convenience underpins its continued desirability as a residential area.
Evidence of a strong and resilient community fabric persists after more than a century. From the vibrant centenary celebrations to the active engagement of the Residents' Association on contemporary issues like nearby development impacts and transport planning, the inhabitants of Ceannt Fort demonstrate a clear appreciation for their shared heritage and a commitment to collective action. However, the estate is not insulated from the pressures of modern urban life, facing challenges related to adjacent large-scale construction, infrastructure reliability, and evolving transport networks.
In synthesis, Ceannt Fort stands as more than just a collection of houses; it is a living testament to a pivotal period in Dublin's social and political history, a well-preserved example of progressive early 20th-century urban planning, and a neighbourhood defined by a strong sense of place and community. Its enduring significance lies in this rich layering of history, architecture, and social identity, making it a unique and cherished part of Dublin's built and cultural heritage, facing the future while remaining deeply connected to its past.
THE TENTERS AND THE BLACKPITTS
THE TENTERS OR THE BLACKPITTS AREAS OF DUBLIN [I FIND IT DIFFICULT TO DECIDE]
My GPS failed and as a result I had some problems deciding what areas individual streets and buildings are located within so describing all images in this collection as being in the Tenters or Blackpitts areas may not be fully accurate so you are invited to correct me.
Blackpitts and The Tenters: Industry, Community, and Heritage in Dublin 8
I. Introduction: Blackpitts and The Tenters - Heritage Hubs of Dublin 8
A. Overview
Nestled within the historic Liberties area of Dublin 8 lie the distinct yet deeply interconnected neighbourhoods of Blackpitts and The Tenters. These areas form a rich tapestry woven from the threads of centuries of industry, significant social change, and enduring cultural commemoration. Once peripheral lands beyond Dublin's medieval walls, they evolved through phases of monastic influence, intensive craft production, and ultimately, pioneering urban residential development.
Blackpitts, with its evocative name linked to medieval trades, and The Tenters, recalling the sights and sounds of textile finishing, stand today as vital parts of Dublin's urban narrative, reflecting both the hardships and the resilience that have shaped the city. Their stories encompass the rise and fall of industries, the impact of religious and migrant communities, the response to profound housing crises, and the conscious effort to embed cultural identity into the very fabric of the streets.
B. Purpose & Scope
This blog post aims to provide an expanded and fact-checked historical account of the Blackpitts and Tenters areas, drawing upon available evidence to elaborate on their geography, industrial past, significant housing developments, and cultural landscape. It seeks to move beyond a superficial overview, correcting potential inaccuracies in preliminary descriptions and delving deeper into the specific histories of these neighbourhoods.
The focus remains tightly on Blackpitts and The Tenters, exploring their individual characteristics while acknowledging their connections to the broader Liberties context and addressing specific historical points such as the origins of place names, the timeline and funding of the Fairbrother's Fields housing scheme, the sequence of early 20th-century Corporation housing projects, and the significance of local landmarks.
C. Initial Text Review Summary
Initial descriptions often capture key elements, such as the general location of The Tenters bordering Blackpitts and Newmarket Square, its proximity to city landmarks, the existence of a commemorative stone on Clarence Mangan Road, and the basic narrative of the Fairbrother's Fields housing scheme replacing former industrial or agricultural land. However, these initial accounts require verification and significant expansion regarding precise boundaries, the confirmation of walking distances, the full context of the stone inscription, the accurate timeline, funding details, and sequential development of early Dublin Corporation housing schemes, and the specific origins of numerous evocative street names. This report will address these points, grounding the narrative in documented historical and archaeological evidence.
II. Defining the Areas: Geography, Boundaries, and City Connections
A. Mapping The Tenters
The Tenters is formally defined as an area within Dublin 8 bordering the Liberties neighbourhood proper, Blackpitts, Donore Avenue, and Newmarket Square. However, common local understanding often extends the name "The Tenters" to encompass a wider residential zone that includes the original Fairbrother's Fields housing scheme (built 1922-1924) and adjacent streets stretching towards the South Circular Road, Donore Avenue, Cork Street, and Blackpitts. This area developed on lands historically known as the tenterfields, used for drying textiles.
Today, The Tenters is recognised as a mature, popular, and long-established residential neighbourhood. It possesses a distinct character marked by its quaint streets, a legacy of the planned layout from the 1920s scheme. Visitors are encouraged to observe the diverse architectural styles and intricate ironwork details that adorn many of the houses, reflecting the period's design sensibilities. Central to the area's identity is Oscar Square park, originally designated simply as a "Playground" in the housing plans, which now serves as a beloved focal point for the community, particularly popular with dog enthusiasts. The area retains a strong, tangible sense of community, making it a highly desirable place to live.
B. Situating Blackpitts
Located immediately adjacent to The Tenters, Blackpitts occupies a historically significant position connecting towards New Street and Fumbally Lane, in close proximity to the landmark St Patrick's Cathedral. Historically, Blackpitts was noted as an area inhabited by self-employed artisans and craftspeople, suggesting a degree of prosperity in earlier periods.
Its identity became strongly associated with industry, particularly the tanning of leather, but also weaving and milling, activities facilitated by the nearby River Poddle. In the early 1800s, part of the area was even known as the Cottonfields due to experimental cotton growing aimed at supporting the local weaving industry. In recent times, Blackpitts has gained recognition as a "cool" and "hip" neighbourhood, undergoing significant regeneration while still retaining elements of its historic character, such as artisan terraces and cottages.
C. Proximity and Connectivity
The location of The Tenters offers excellent connectivity to Dublin's city centre and key landmarks. Claims that the area is within a short walk of Grafton Street, St Stephen’s Green, and Christ Church Cathedral are substantiated by multiple sources. This proximity is frequently highlighted as a major factor in the area's enduring appeal as a residential location. Christ Church Cathedral, the elder of Dublin's two medieval cathedrals, is nearby , as is St Patrick's Cathedral, Ireland's largest church, founded in 1191.
Other significant nearby attractions and institutions include the Guinness Storehouse at St James's Gate , the Teeling Whiskey Distillery in Newmarket , the historic Marsh's Library , and the major medical facility, St James's Hospital, itself built on the site of the former South Dublin Union workhouse.
D. Interconnected Histories and Urban Change
The close geographical positioning and shared boundaries of Blackpitts and The Tenters point towards a historically interconnected relationship. Their development trajectories were not entirely separate; rather, they appear to have influenced one another. Blackpitts' focus on industry, particularly tanning which relied heavily on water from the River Poddle , existed alongside The Tenters, initially open fields crucial for the final stages of textile production – bleaching and drying – which also utilized local water resources. Fumbally Lane serves as a physical link, connecting Blackpitts to New Street near The Tenters boundary.
The eventual decline of the weaving industry, which rendered the tenterfields obsolete for their original purpose, directly paved the way for their transformation into market gardens and subsequently the large-scale Fairbrother's Fields housing scheme. This major shift in land use in The Tenters undoubtedly had implications for the adjacent industrial and residential landscape of Blackpitts.
Furthermore, the evolution of these areas illustrates broader patterns of urban change in inner-city Dublin. Blackpitts' journey from a relatively prosperous artisan quarter through intense industrial use, subsequent decline, and its current phase of regeneration and recognition as a desirable, "hip" location exemplifies cycles of economic fortune and gentrification.
This contrasts subtly with The Tenters, whose identity is strongly rooted in the 1920s housing scheme, fostering a sense of enduring community and heritage, marked by events like the Tenters100 Centenary commemorations. The continued high demand for housing in The Tenters, noted as echoing the desires of families nearly a century ago , highlights its sustained appeal. Yet, this contemporary popularity in both areas exists alongside the ongoing challenge of balancing modern urban pressures with the preservation of unique historical character, architectural integrity, and the continuity of established communities.
III. Echoes of Industry: The Making of Blackpitts and The Tenters
A. The Story in the Names
The very names "The Tenters" and "Blackpitts" serve as powerful linguistic markers, encoding centuries of industrial activity and landscape transformation.
"The Tenters": This name originates directly from the "tenterfields" that once occupied the area. From the 17th to the 19th centuries, these fields were essential to the Liberties' thriving textile industry. Locally woven cloth, primarily wool and linen, was brought here to be stretched taut on large wooden frames known as "tenters".
The cloth was secured by numerous "tenterhooks," a term that survives in the English idiom "to be on tenterhooks," meaning to be in a state of suspense or anxiety. This process allowed the fabric to dry evenly and bleach in the open air. The Huguenots, Protestant refugees who arrived from France in the late 17th century, brought valuable weaving skills and significantly contributed to this industry.
The memory of this practice is explicitly preserved by a stone inscription located on Clarence Mangan Road, which reads: “This area is known as the Tenters — because linen cloth was stretched out to bleach in the sun. When the linen trade failed, the fields were used for market gardens, until this housing scheme was built.”. Recognizing the challenges posed by the Irish weather, philanthropist Thomas Pleasants constructed a stone Tenter House in 1814, located between Cork Street, Brickfield Lane, Brown Street, and Ormond Street, to allow cloth drying indoors, protected from the elements.
"Blackpitts": The origin of the name Blackpitts has been subject to some debate. One theory proposed that it derived from mass burial pits used during the devastating Black Death (Bubonic Plague) epidemic that struck Dublin in 1348. However, extensive archaeological excavations conducted in the area, particularly at New Street South in 2004, have provided compelling evidence for an alternative, industry-related origin.
These excavations unearthed over one hundred tanning pits dating from the late thirteenth to the seventeenth century, revealing one of the largest and most long-lived medieval leatherworking sites discovered in Ireland or Britain. The tanning process involved soaking hides in pits filled with solutions often containing oak bark and other agents, which would have created dark, odorous liquids. It is now strongly suggested that the name "Blackpitts" refers directly to these numerous pits of black tanning solution that characterized the area for centuries, potentially dating back to late-medieval times.
B. Industrial Landscape
Blackpitts and the surrounding Liberties area, including the lands later known as The Tenters, formed a significant industrial zone for centuries, heavily reliant on local resources, particularly water from the River Poddle.
Textiles and Weaving: The Liberties was historically Dublin's primary textile district. Industries produced wool, linen, silk, cotton, and the famous Irish poplin (a silk and wool blend). Huguenot immigrants played a key role from the late 17th century, establishing weaving as a major activity. The Quaker community, including families like the Fairbrothers, were also heavily involved in weaving and cloth-making from the 17th century onwards. Notable figures like Richard Atkinson, a Master Weaver and twice Lord Mayor, pioneered the factory-based production of poplin.
Evidence of this trade includes the former Silk Weavers Union Hall (built 1904) on Donore Avenue, later used by rebels linked to Michael Mallin during the 1916 Easter Rising. Fumbally Lane housed businesses like Blair Fancy Linens, specializing in linen drapery in the late 20th century. The gradual decline of the weaving industry during the 19th century was a major economic shift for the area.
Tanning: As confirmed by archaeological work, tanning was a dominant industry in Blackpitts from at least the late 13th century through to the 17th century, and likely continued thereafter. The scale was significant, suggesting not just one large tannery but potentially a quarter with numerous smaller operations. This trade, transforming animal hides into leather, was vital for producing goods like shoes, harnesses, and containers. The industry relied heavily on the River Poddle, with evidence of ditches being dug off the watercourse to supply tanneries with water and provide drainage. Tanneries existed alongside other small industries, contributing to the area's mixed industrial character. Fumbally Lane, connecting Blackpitts to New Street, reflects this historical mix of tanning, brewing, and residential use.
Brewing and Distilling: The area around Blackpitts and Fumbally Lane also had a strong tradition of brewing and distilling, dating back to at least the mid-17th century and influenced by both Quaker and Huguenot entrepreneurs. Quaker families like Poole (who laid out Fumbally Lane in 1721) and Taylor had significant brewing interests here. It's suggested that Dublin's first porter may have been brewed in this vicinity. Notable operations included Samuel Madder's Blackpitts Porter Company (from 1779) and John Busby's Distillery, established in the 1830s on Fumbally Lane – a stone building featuring his initials 'JB' and the date '1836' on a water tank still exists today, incorporated into the Fumbally Studio development. The City of Dublin Brewery later occupied the Busby buildings in the late 19th century before the complex shifted to other industrial uses like textile manufacturing.
The River Poddle's Role: The River Poddle was the lifeblood of this industrial landscape. This fast-flowing river, originating in the Dublin Mountains and flowing towards the Liffey, was instrumental in shaping the area's development. It served multiple crucial functions: determining estate and parish boundaries; providing an early source of drinking water for the city; powering mills, initially for grain and later for larger industries; and supplying the vast amounts of water needed for tanning, brewing, distilling, and textile finishing processes like bleaching, dyeing, and washing.
Purpose-built ponds and cisterns associated with these trades appear on old maps, particularly in The Tenters area. Archaeological evidence shows ditches connected to the Poddle serving the tanneries. However, the river was also prone to flooding, and concerns about contamination from industrial effluent led to legislation from the 15th century onwards attempting to regulate its use and associated ditches. Despite now flowing largely underground through the area, the Poddle's legacy persists, occasionally causing flooding issues in modern times. The river's critical role highlights how natural resources fundamentally drove the area's economic specialization and shaped its physical and environmental history, with its eventual culverting marking a significant transformation in the urban relationship with water.
C. Land Use Evolution
The landscape of The Tenters underwent significant transformation over time, driven by economic shifts.
From Fields to Gardens: The primary identity of the "Tenters" fields was tied to their function in the textile industry – the open-air drying and bleaching of cloth stretched on tenter frames. As the traditional weaving and linen trades experienced a decline in the 19th century, this specific industrial use became obsolete. The open fields were then repurposed for market gardening, supplying produce to the growing city. This agricultural phase represents an intermediary stage before the land was ultimately earmarked for residential development.
The Fairbrother Connection: The name "Fairbrother's Fields" became associated with this land, linking it to the Fairbrother family. This family belonged to the Quaker community that settled in the Liberties in the 17th century and were actively involved in the area's weaving trade. Their ownership or association with these particular fields led to the name that persisted even after the land use changed. It was this site, known as Fairbrother's Fields, that Dublin Corporation selected in 1912 for what would become a major housing scheme. This sequence—from industrial use (tenterfields) to agriculture (market gardens) to residential development (Fairbrother's Fields housing scheme)—clearly illustrates a common pattern of urban transformation where declining industries free up land for new urban functions, driven by changing economic realities and growing population needs.
The layered identities encapsulated in the names "Tenters" and "Blackpitts" reflect this complex history. "The Tenters" speaks directly to the textile finishing process, while "Blackpitts" evokes the tanning industry (and perhaps older folk memories of plague burials). Together with the association of specific communities like Huguenots and Quakers with particular trades and locations (e.g., Fumbally Lane, Fairbrother's Fields), these names underscore a strong local identity deeply rooted in centuries of industrial activity, economic adaptation, and community presence.
IV. Building Communities: Dublin's Early 20th Century Housing Revolution
A. The Context: Addressing the Dublin Housing Crisis
The early decades of the 20th century found Dublin grappling with a housing crisis of appalling proportions. The city's tenements were widely regarded as the worst slums in Europe, characterised by overcrowding, dilapidation, and lack of basic sanitation. The catastrophic collapse of tenements on Church Street in 1913, which killed seven people, brought the dire situation into sharp public focus and acted as a catalyst for action.
Surveys revealed the shocking extent of the problem; a 1918 report indicated that nearly a third of Dublin's population (around 87,000 people) lived in slums, with over 20,000 families crammed into single-room dwellings. These conditions fostered the spread of diseases like tuberculosis and typhoid and were seen by some contemporary observers as contributing factors to social unrest, even potentially influencing the events of the 1916 Easter Rising. The tenement system itself had deep roots, evolving from the subdivision of former single-family Georgian houses into multi-occupancy dwellings without adequate adaptation.
In response, efforts to provide better housing gained momentum. The Dublin Corporation Housing Committee, under the long-term chairmanship of the dedicated Alderman Tom Kelly, was established to expedite the provision of new, well-planned housing for the city's working poor. Influences included emerging town planning ideas, the British Garden City and Garden Suburb movements, and the existing models of philanthropic housing associations like the Dublin Artisans’ Dwellings Company (DADC).
B. Pioneering Corporation Schemes (Sequence & Details)
Against a backdrop of global war and national revolution, Dublin Corporation embarked on a series of ambitious housing projects. The sequence of these initial schemes is important: Spitalfields was the first to see tenders accepted in 1918, work commenced on St James's Walk concurrently, followed by the planning and eventual construction of Ceannt Fort (McCaffrey's Estate) from 1919, and culminating in the largest scheme, Fairbrother's Fields, built between 1922 and 1924.
1. Spitalfields (Opened 1918):
Located in the heart of the Liberties, between Francis Street and Meath Street, this site required the clearance of existing slum properties. Identified early by Alderman Kelly, funding challenges were overcome when the prospect of an "American Loan" prompted the British Treasury to provide assistance. The project faced some public opposition regarding the ownership of the properties slated for demolition, some of which were reportedly owned by Corporation councillors.
The tender for the initial 75 houses was accepted in April 1918, with J. and M. Clarke as contractors. Despite wartime shortages, the houses were completed later that year. Rents were subsidised, representing a significant annual cost to the Corporation.
Architecturally, the scheme drew heavily on the style of the DADC and incorporated picturesque Garden Suburb elements like varied rooflines, brick and pebbledash finishes, and polychromatic brick details, though built at a relatively high density. A small shared public square was provided instead of individual gardens, a point of critique by figures like Sir John Griffith. While intended for former tenement dwellers, issues like overcrowding in the small, often one-roomed, dwellings persisted, almost replicating tenement conditions in some cases.
2. St James's Walk / Colbert's Fort (Completed 1921):
Construction began on this scheme while Spitalfields was still underway. Sited on elevated ground along the Grand Canal Main Line near the Guinness Brewery and Grand Canal headquarters, it was considered well-located for employment.
The Corporation already owned the land. Building contracts were awarded (possibly post-1916 to Alexander Hull) but completion, initially planned for nine months, was significantly delayed by factors including proposed road widening, shortages of materials and labour exacerbated by the war, and strikes by craftsmen. The completed housing was finally handed over to the Corporation in March 1921.
The naming of the scheme strongly reflected the heightened political atmosphere following the 1916 Rising. Dublin Corporation named the terraces in honour of executed leaders and participants: Colbert’s Fort (after Con Colbert), Clarke’s Terrace (after Tom Clarke), Mallin Avenue (after Michael Mallin), and McCarthy Terrace.
The scheme provided homes for 66 families arranged in four terraces. Learning from the Spitalfields experience, some houses facing the canal were provided with small front gardens, and a shared kitchen garden was allocated for the estate.
3. Ceannt Fort / McCaffrey Estate (Construction started 1919):
Located at Mount Brown, on the grounds of the former McCaffrey Estate adjacent to the South Dublin Union workhouse (now St James's Hospital). An initial 1914 proposal by City Architect C.J. McCarthy for 240 houses was criticised for its monotonous layout by figures like P.C. Cowan of the Local Government Board (LGB) and housing activist E.A. Aston.
Consequently, architect Thomas Joseph (TJ) Byrne, known for his progressive views on social housing standards, was commissioned. His radically different, lower-density design, incorporating features like a parlour, indoor toilet and bathroom, and large gardens for each house, was approved in February 1915. However, the necessary loan from the LGB (the British administrative body overseeing local authorities) was refused due to wartime financial restrictions.
Dublin Corporation reapplied successfully for the loan in 1917 (requesting an increase due to rising costs), and Byrne submitted revised plans. The tender was awarded to Louis Monks in January 1918, and construction commenced in 1919. Progress was slow, hampered by industrial action, funding difficulties, and the ongoing War of Independence; by August 1919, only 80 of 202 houses were complete despite high demand.
The estate was renamed Ceannt Fort in honour of Commandant Éamonn Ceannt, executed after the 1916 Rising, with individual roads named after other volunteers killed nearby in the South Dublin Union engagement.
Despite the difficulties, the finished scheme was lauded as "a wonderfully intimate series of housing clusters, gardens and playgrounds" and is still regarded as one of the finest examples of early 20th-century urban housing design in Ireland.
C. Focus: The Fairbrother's Fields Scheme (The Tenters) (1922-1924)
Genesis and Delays (1912-1922): The journey to build the Fairbrother's Fields housing scheme was long and arduous. Dublin Corporation selected the 22-acre site, named after the Quaker Fairbrother family associated with the land, as early as 1912. Initial plans were drawn up, but the project became entangled in a decade of profound national and international turmoil. The outbreak of the First World War, the 1916 Easter Rising, the subsequent War of Independence, and the Irish Civil War all contributed to significant delays and disruptions, preventing construction from commencing until 1922.
Funding Narratives: Funding this ambitious project spanned the transition from British rule to the establishment of the Irish Free State.
Regarding a claim that the British Government promised £4 million for Dublin housing schemes, which was then diverted to rebuild the city centre after the 1916 Rising, the available sources do not directly corroborate this specific figure being allocated to Fairbrother's Fields and subsequently redirected in this manner. However, it is documented that the British government did increase housing funds for Ireland expediently in the aftermath of the Rising, and Dublin Corporation utilised these funds, often adopting Garden Suburb design principles then favoured in Britain.
Crucially, the construction of Fairbrother's Fields (1922-1924) coincided with the birth of the new Irish state. The scheme holds the distinction of being the first Tenant Purchase housing project undertaken by the Irish Free State, specifically aimed at housing Dublin's working class. Its funding was significantly supported by the Provisional Government's landmark 'Million Pound Grant' scheme, championed by W.T. Cosgrave in January 1922.
This national initiative provided grants to urban local authorities covering two-thirds of construction costs, with the remaining third to be financed through local rates and short-term loans. Fairbrother's Fields was one of the major developments realised under this scheme. Dáil Éireann debates from the period reference the scheme's costs in comparison to other projects like Marino , while Seanad Éireann records also mention the grant and loan arrangements.
Realisation (1922-1924): Fairbrother's Fields became the final and largest of this initial wave of four Corporation housing estates, ultimately providing over 430 houses. To achieve this scale and expedite construction in the challenging post-conflict environment, the Corporation employed several different building contractors, resulting in a degree of variation in housing styles across the estate.
A key design feature, reflecting the evolving standards influenced by the Garden City movement, was the provision of both front and back gardens for all houses. The layout also prudently reserved space for future community amenities, including a school, a public park (Oscar Square), and a new Roman Catholic Church. In an effort to support local industry and employment, bricks from the nearby Dolphin’s Barn Brick Company were used in the construction of a large portion of the houses (357 units in 1922). The houses themselves were typically constructed using mass concrete, a common method for Corporation housing of this era.
Oscar Square: This central green space was an integral part of the original plan, referred to by the architects simply as the "Playground". It quickly became, and remains, a much-loved community asset. A fascinating hidden layer to its history is that its current raised elevation is a result of an underground air raid shelter constructed beneath it during the Second World War (known in Ireland as 'The Emergency').
Legacy and Centenary: The Fairbrother's Fields scheme, now encompassed within the broader Tenters area, marked its centenary in 2022, celebrating 100 years since construction began. The houses and the neighbourhood remain highly sought-after today, testament to the quality of the original planning and the enduring strength of the community that developed there.
The development of these four housing schemes—Spitalfields, St James's Walk/Colbert's Fort, Ceannt Fort, and Fairbrother's Fields—reveals much about the period. The progression demonstrates a clear evolution in design philosophy within just a few years. Spitalfields, the earliest, reflected older, higher-density models with limited private amenity space. In contrast, Ceannt Fort, under T.J. Byrne's influence, pioneered lower densities, private gardens, and significantly improved internal layouts with parlours and bathrooms, setting new standards. Fairbrother's Fields adopted the principle of private gardens for all dwellings. This rapid improvement in standards reflects the growing influence of Garden City ideals and a rising aspiration for better living conditions for the working classes.
Furthermore, the naming strategies employed across the schemes serve as a barometer of the shifting political climate. While Spitalfields retained older street names, the schemes built during and immediately after the revolutionary period (St James's Walk/Colbert's Fort and Ceannt Fort) were explicitly named to commemorate leaders and participants of the 1916 Rising.
Fairbrother's Fields, however, as the first major scheme undertaken by the new Free State, adopted a different commemorative approach, focusing on figures associated with Ireland's cultural and intellectual heritage, particularly the Celtic Revival. This deliberate choice demonstrates how social housing projects became platforms for expressing and embedding evolving concepts of national identity – initially focused on revolutionary sacrifice, later broadening to encompass cultural achievement – within the urban landscape of the nascent state.
Finally, the persistent delays encountered across nearly all these projects underscore the immense practical challenges of implementing ambitious social policy during a period marked by war, revolution, civil conflict, economic instability, material shortages, and labour disputes. The eventual completion of these schemes, despite such formidable obstacles, stands as a remarkable achievement of the Dublin Corporation Housing Committee and the various state bodies involved.
V. Reading the Streets: Landmarks, Names, and Cultural Memory
A. Decoding Street Names
The naming of the streets within the Fairbrother's Fields housing scheme was a deliberate act of cultural inscription. Alderman Thomas Kelly, the influential chairman of the Housing Committee, proposed naming the roads after prominent figures associated with Irish arts, literature, history, and scholarship, particularly those connected with the Celtic Revival movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This suggestion was approved by Dublin Corporation. Intriguingly, several of the individuals honoured also shared a common history of employment with the Ordnance Survey Ireland (OSI), the national mapping agency whose work was foundational to the study of Irish topography, archaeology, and place names. This adds another layer of meaning, connecting the new neighbourhood to the scholarly project of defining and understanding the Irish nation.
The following list summarises the confirmed or highly probable origins of key street names within The Tenters area, clarifying connections and correcting potential assumptions:
St Thomas's Road: St Thomas the Martyr/Abbey. Linked to the 12th C Abbey of St Thomas & Liberty of Thomas Court & Donore.
Oscar Square: Oscar, son of Oisín - Figure from Fenian Cycle of Irish Mythology (reflecting Celtic Revival interest).
Clarence Mangan Road: James Clarence Mangan (1803-1849) 19th C Poet, known for dark, powerful verse; key figure in pre-Revival literature.
O'Carolan Road: Turlough O'Carolan (1670-1738) - Renowned blind travelling harper & composer, considered a national composer.
O'Curry Road/Avenue: Eugene O'Curry (1794-1862) 19th C Scholar & Antiquary, researched/translated Irish history manuscripts.
O'Donovan Road: John O'Donovan (1806-1861) - 19th C Scholar, worked on Ordnance Survey, translated Annals of Four Masters.
Geoffrey Keating Road: Geoffrey Keating (c.1569-c.1644) 17th C Priest, Poet & Historian (author of Foras Feasa ar Éirinn).
Petrie Road: George Petrie (1790-1866) 19th C Painter, Musician, Antiquary, Archaeologist, RIA President.
Gilbert Road: Sir John Gilbert (1829-1898) 19th C Historian & Archivist of Dublin, edited key city records.
Dufferin Avenue: Baroness Dufferin (1807-1867) Poet (Likely Helen Blackwood, Lady Dufferin, known for "The Irish Emigrant").
This deliberate naming strategy represents a conscious act of placemaking. By inscribing the names of figures central to Irish cultural and intellectual history onto the streets of this new working-class neighbourhood, the authorities of the nascent Irish Free State aimed to foster a sense of national heritage and pride, embedding cultural memory into the residents' daily lives. The specific inclusion of four prominent figures associated with the Ordnance Survey further links the area to the foundational work of mapping and documenting the Irish landscape and its past.
B. Key Sites and Features
Beyond the street names, several physical features contribute to the character and historical understanding of Blackpitts and The Tenters:
Clarence Mangan Road Stone: As previously mentioned, this simple stone marker provides a direct, tangible link to the area's industrial past, explicitly commemorating the transition from tenter fields to market gardens to housing.
Oscar Square Park: This central green space remains a vital community hub. Its history as the site of a Second World War air raid shelter adds a layer of hidden history, explaining its raised topography. While cherished locally, planning documents have noted its limitations in terms of size and the range of activities it can support. Its role as a site for communal expression is also evidenced by the placement of religious statues within it.
Architectural Details: The housing stock within The Tenters, primarily dating from the 1922-24 scheme, offers examples of early 20th-century residential design, with encouragement to note the varied styles and surviving ironwork. The use of mass concrete in construction is also a notable feature of Corporation housing from this period.
Proximity to Cathedrals: The easy walking distance to both Christ Church Cathedral and St Patrick's Cathedral places The Tenters and Blackpitts firmly within the orbit of two of Dublin's most significant historical and architectural landmarks.
Fumbally Lane Buildings: Remnants of the 18th and 19th-century industrial past survive along Fumbally Lane, including former distillery and malthouse buildings. While their original functions have ceased, many have been adapted for modern use as offices and creative hubs, preserving the physical structures while transforming their purpose.
Roper's Rest: Located near Blackpitts, this area name recalls the historical practice of rope-making (using hemp and flax-tow along a rope-walk, likely parallel to the Poddle) and is associated with a local ghost story concerning the headless horseman spectre of Sir Thomas Roper, after whom the area is named.
Features like the hidden air raid shelter beneath Oscar Square and the largely invisible, culverted River Poddle serve as reminders of the layers of history that exist beneath the surface of the modern city.
Recognising these subterranean or disguised elements—wartime precautions, the critical reliance on now-hidden watercourses—adds considerable depth to an understanding of how these neighbourhoods have evolved and functioned over time.
VI. Conclusion: Enduring Identity in Dublin 8
A. Synthesis
The histories of Blackpitts and The Tenters in Dublin 8 are deeply interwoven, revealing layers of urban development shaped by industry, social reform, and cultural assertion. From the medieval period onwards, the area west of the city walls evolved into a significant industrial hub, particularly for tanning in Blackpitts and textile finishing in the fields that became The Tenters. The River Poddle was the critical artery for these trades, dictating land use and powering mills.
The decline of traditional industries, notably weaving, paved the way for agricultural use and subsequently, in the early 20th century, for large-scale social housing initiatives. Responding to a severe housing crisis, Dublin Corporation, and later the nascent Irish Free State, undertook pioneering schemes like Spitalfields, St James's Walk/Colbert's Fort, Ceannt Fort, and the extensive Fairbrother's Fields (The Tenters).
These projects not only provided much-needed homes but also reflected evolving design standards and served as canvases for national commemoration, initially honouring revolutionary figures and later celebrating Ireland's rich cultural and scholarly heritage through street names chosen for The Tenters.
B. Enduring Character
This unique blend of industrial legacy, planned residential development rooted in social reform, and conscious cultural commemoration has forged a distinctive character for Blackpitts and The Tenters. Blackpitts retains echoes of its artisan and tanning past while undergoing modern regeneration, noted for its "hip" atmosphere. The Tenters, defined largely by the Fairbrother's Fields scheme, is consistently described as possessing a strong, tangible sense of community and remains a highly desirable residential area, valued for its location, character, and heritage. The persistence of names like "Blackpitts" and "The Tenters," the preservation of landmarks like the Clarence Mangan Road stone, and the community focus around spaces like Oscar Square all point to an enduring local identity.
C. Final Thoughts
Blackpitts and The Tenters offer compelling case studies in the complex narrative of Dublin's urban history. They demonstrate the profound impact of industrial change, the challenges and achievements of early social housing policy during times of immense upheaval, and the ways in which urban landscapes are actively shaped to reflect and embed cultural and national identity. Their story is one of resilience, adaptation, and the constant interplay between the legacies of the past and the realities of present-day city life, making them vital components of Dublin 8's rich historical and social fabric.
THE TENTERS MARKER
THE TENTERS COMMEMORATIVE STONE [CLARENCE MANGAN ROAD DUBLIN 8]
I must admit that until I came across this stone I thought that the word was "tenderhooks" rather than "tenterhooks" ... see below.
The Tenters Commemorative Stone is a physical marker located in the Tenters area of Dublin 8. It serves as a reminder of the unique history and heritage of this friendly neighbourhood.
Here's a breakdown of its significance:
Origin of the Name: The Tenters gets its name from the "tenterfields" that were once located here. These fields were used by weavers, particularly the Huguenots who settled in the area in the 17th century, to stretch and dry their woven cloths on large wooden frames called tenters. The phrase "on tenterhooks" originates from this practice.
A Symbol of Industry: The stone commemorates the area's historical association with the textile industry, specifically weaving. The Huguenots brought refined skills in working with materials like silk, poplin, and linen, enhancing Dublin's weaving reputation.
Centenary of Housing: While the area is historically linked to weaving, the Tenters as a residential district is notable for its early public housing scheme. Constructed between 1922 and 1924 on Fairbrother's Fields, it was one of the first and most ambitious public housing projects in the newly formed Free State, aiming to address the severe housing crisis of the time.
Community Identity: The commemorative stone, likely erected in more recent times, helps to solidify the community's sense of identity and pride in its unique past, connecting the historical industry with the later development of the residential area.
Location: The stone is located on Clarence Mangan Road in Dublin 8, making it a visible landmark within the neighbourhood.
In essence, the Tenters Commemorative Stone acts as a touchstone, reminding residents and visitors of the area's fascinating evolution from a centre of the textile industry, driven by the skilled Huguenot community, to a significant early example of public housing in Dublin. It's a symbol of the area's rich and layered history.
SONY TELECONVERTERS
DO THEY WORK BETTER WITH NEW GM LENSES
PUBLISHED 22 APRIL 2025
SHOULD I GET A SONY TELECONVERTER [SOME HAVE ADVISED AGAINST DOING SO]
I am considering a Sony teleconverter with my new 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II lens, especially given its macro capabilities. While I was previously advised against them, the dealer's suggestion to consider one now, particularly the 1.4x, makes sense given the advancements in both lenses and teleconverters. At €600 each, it's a considered purchase so I have yet to decide as I have only suitable lens but maybe one could be suitable for the rumoured 50-150mm F2 ... assuming that it is announced 23 April 2025.
Sony Teleconverter Performance with Newer 70-200mm Lenses: A Comparative Analysis
Introduction: Setting the Scene - Teleconverters and the Sony Ecosystem
Teleconverters are valuable tools for photographers, providing a means to extend the reach of existing lenses without the immediate need for an entirely new optic. By magnifying the image projected by the primary lens, they bring distant subjects closer, effectively increasing the focal length. This capability can be particularly advantageous in scenarios where physical proximity to the subject is limited, such as wildlife or sports photography.
However, the integration of additional optical elements into the light path inherently introduces potential trade-offs, most notably concerning image quality and light transmission. Historically, the use of teleconverters has been met with varying degrees of acceptance, with some photographers embracing the added versatility and others wary of the potential for image degradation. Within the Sony ecosystem, past perceptions of teleconverter performance, especially concerning the 2x models, have often leaned towards caution, with recommendations frequently advising users to prioritise native lenses for optimal results.
This blog post aims to re-evaluate this perspective in light of Sony's advancements in both lens and teleconverter technology, specifically focusing on the performance of current teleconverter models when paired with the more recent iterations of their popular 70-200mm lenses. The central objective is to investigate whether these newer combinations have overcome the limitations of the past and to provide a comprehensive analysis comparing the utility of a teleconverter versus the acquisition of a dedicated lens with a longer focal length.
A Look Back: The Historical Performance of Sony Teleconverters
Historically, the performance of Sony teleconverters has been a subject of discussion among photographers, with a general understanding that the 1.4x model offered a more practical balance between increased focal length and minimal impact on image quality compared to its 2x counterpart.
Many users in the past found the 2x teleconverter to introduce a level of image degradation that often outweighed the benefits of the doubled focal length. This historical viewpoint suggests that while the concept of extending lens reach was appealing, the execution, particularly with the 2x models, presented challenges in maintaining the high optical standards expected by serious photographers. This prior understanding forms a crucial backdrop against which the current performance of Sony teleconverters with newer lenses must be evaluated, as the user's query directly stems from this historical context.
The fundamental principles of optics dictate that inserting additional glass elements, as teleconverters do, can lead to certain compromises. These typically manifest as a reduction in the amount of light reaching the camera sensor, effectively decreasing the lens's maximum aperture. For instance, a 2x teleconverter reduces the aperture by two full stops, while a 1.4x converter results in a reduction of approximately one stop. This loss of light not only affects the photographer's ability to shoot in low-light conditions but also impacts the depth of field achievable. Furthermore, the magnification process inherent in teleconverters can also amplify any existing optical aberrations in the primary lens, potentially leading to a decrease in overall sharpness, contrast, and an increase in chromatic aberration. These inherent limitations are important to acknowledge when considering the overall utility of teleconverters.
Adding to these optical considerations, Sony's teleconverters have historically been designed with specific compatibility in mind. They are not universally applicable to all lenses within the Sony E-mount system. Instead, they are engineered to work seamlessly with a select group of their higher-end native lenses, often identified by their white barrels. This limited compatibility means that a photographer must either already own or plan to purchase one of these designated lenses to take advantage of Sony's teleconverter offerings. This restriction influences the decision-making process, as the investment in a compatible primary lens is a prerequisite for utilising the teleconverter.
The Modern Era: Evolution of Sony 70-200mm Lenses and Teleconverters
In recent years, Sony has introduced significant advancements in its lens technology, including notable updates to its popular 70-200mm lens lineup. The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II (SEL70200GM2) represents a substantial evolution from its predecessor, boasting a remarkable weight reduction of approximately 29%. This lighter build enhances handling and portability, making it a more appealing option for a wider range of photographers. Beyond the reduction in weight, the Mark II version also incorporates improved features, enhanced autofocus capabilities, and advancements in image quality performance. Its autofocus system, driven by XD (extreme dynamic) linear motors, is notably faster, with claims of being up to four times quicker than the original model. These improvements suggest a lens that might interact more favourably with teleconverters than previous generations.
Similarly, Sony has also released the FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II (SEL70200G2), which introduces a unique half-lifesize (0.5x) macro capability across its entire zoom range. This lens also benefits from a more compact and lighter design compared to its predecessor. Furthermore, it retains the ability to use Sony's teleconverters, which, when coupled with its macro functionality, allows for even greater close-up magnification (up to 0.75x with the 1.4x TC and 1:1 with the 2.0x TC). The inclusion of macro capabilities alongside teleconverter compatibility positions this lens as a versatile tool for photographers with diverse shooting needs.
Complementing these lens advancements are Sony's current 1.4x (SEL14TC) and 2x (SEL20TC) teleconverter models. User reviews for the SEL14TC often highlight its excellent picture quality and ease of use, with positive experiences reported even when paired with the new 70-200 F4 G II.
Similarly, some users of the SEL20TC have shared positive feedback, noting excellent results even with lenses like the 100-400GM. However, it remains important to acknowledge the inherent optical principles, as reviews of the FE 2x Teleconverter still mention the two-stop light loss and a reduction in overall image quality as distinct penalties. Despite these limitations, the continued availability and positive user experiences suggest that Sony has refined its teleconverter designs to better complement its evolving lens technology.
Performance Analysis: Newer Teleconverters and 70-200mm Lenses
The 1.4x Teleconverter: Balancing Reach and Image Quality
Analysis of user reviews and test results indicates a generally positive reception for the Sony 1.4x teleconverter (SEL14TC) when used with both the newer 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II and f/4 Macro G OSS II lenses. Many users find that this teleconverter strikes a favourable balance between extending the focal length and maintaining a high level of image quality. For instance, one user specifically noted that the SEL14TC "works a treat" and delivers excellent picture quality when paired with the new 70-200 F4 G II. Similarly, a user of the 70-200mm II found it to be remarkably sharp and to hold up well with the x1.4 converter. This sentiment is echoed by others who consider the decrease in image quality and autofocus performance with the 1.4x TC to be minor and acceptable for the added reach. The combination is even described as versatile, suggesting its practical utility in various shooting scenarios.
When the 1.4x teleconverter is attached, the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II transforms into a 98-280mm f/4 lens. This provides a useful extension at the telephoto end while only reducing the maximum aperture by one stop. For the 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II, the resulting lens becomes a 98-280mm f/5.6 optic. This combination also offers increased reach with a manageable one-stop reduction in maximum aperture. A user who opted for the 1.4x TC with the F4 G OSS II found it to be "Absolutely worth it," noting that the magnification was sufficient for their needs and the sharpness was clearly superior to that achieved through digital cropping. This suggests that for many photographers, the 1.4x teleconverter provides a valuable extension of their lens's capabilities without significant drawbacks.
The 2x Teleconverter: Has Performance Improved?
The performance of the Sony 2x teleconverter (SEL20TC) with the newer 70-200mm lenses appears to be more complex, with a wider range of user experiences reported. While historical perspectives often cautioned against 2x teleconverters due to significant image degradation, some newer feedback suggests potential improvements, particularly when paired with the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II. One source even suggests that this combination could be a "winner". A video review noted the autofocus performance of the 2x TC with the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II as quite impressive. However, other users still observe a softening of the image, especially when critically evaluating sharpness.
When the 2x teleconverter is used, the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II becomes a 140-400mm f/5.6 lens. This provides a substantial increase in reach, effectively doubling the original focal length, but at the cost of two stops of light. For the 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II, the resulting lens is a 140-400mm f/8 optic. The f/8 maximum aperture in this configuration represents a significant reduction in light-gathering capability, which could limit its usability in less than ideal lighting conditions. User experiences with the 2x TC on the 70-200mm II have been mixed.
One user initially found disappointing results at f5.6 but noted a considerable improvement in contrast and sharpness when stopping down to f8, achieving results comparable to the GM 100-400mm.
Another user reported being "more than happy" with the 70-200 II when used with both teleconverters, suggesting satisfactory results even with the 2x. However, there is also the perspective that the 2.0x TC might be pushing the limits of the f4 G II lens. The general consensus still leans towards the 1.4x being the better option for maintaining image quality, but the performance of the 2x with the newer, high-quality 70-200mm lenses appears to be better than historical perceptions might suggest.
The Fork in the Road: Teleconverter vs. Dedicated Longer Lens
For photographers seeking to extend their telephoto reach with a Sony system, the decision often comes down to whether to use a teleconverter with an existing lens, such as a 70-200mm model, or to invest in a dedicated lens with a longer native focal length, such as the Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM OSS or the Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS. Each approach offers its own set of advantages and disadvantages across various performance parameters.
Image Quality: A Pixel-Level Examination
When evaluating image quality, the consensus generally favours dedicated longer lenses over using a 70-200mm lens with a 2x teleconverter, particularly when scrutinising images at a pixel level. While some users find the image quality at 400mm to be surprisingly similar between the 70-200 F2.8 GM II with a 2x TC and the 100-400mm GM F4.5-5.6, the dedicated lens often exhibits better control over chromatic aberration. Some users have reported a noticeable softening of images when using the 2x TC on the 70-200GM II. Conversely, the 1.4x teleconverter tends to have a less pronounced impact on image quality, offering a more subtle trade-off for the increased reach. The Sony 100-400mm GM OSS is often regarded as a sharper lens than the 200-600mm G OSS, although the latter provides significantly more reach. Adding a 2x teleconverter to the 100-400mm can lead to a noticeable reduction in overall image quality, especially in terms of sharpness at the corners. Ultimately, while the 70-200mm with a teleconverter offers flexibility, photographers prioritising the highest possible image quality at longer focal lengths will likely find a dedicated lens more appealing.
Autofocus Performance: Speed and Accuracy Under Scrutiny
Autofocus performance with teleconverters has seen improvements, particularly with newer Sony camera bodies and lenses. While some older reports indicated a noticeable slowdown in autofocus speed when using a 2x teleconverter, more recent experiences, especially with the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II, suggest that the autofocus remains quite responsive even with the 2x TC. The Sony 100-400mm GM OSS and 200-600mm G OSS lenses are both known for their capable autofocus systems, which are often preferred for demanding action and wildlife photography. However, even these dedicated lenses can experience a slight reduction in autofocus speed and accuracy when used with teleconverters. The 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is particularly noted for its rapid autofocus capabilities, which may help to mitigate some of the potential slowdown associated with using a teleconverter.
Aperture and Low-Light Capabilities: The Trade-offs
The use of teleconverters invariably results in a reduction of the lens's maximum aperture, which directly impacts its low-light performance. The 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II, when paired with a 2x teleconverter, becomes a 140-400mm f/5.6 lens. This is still a relatively fast aperture compared to the native f/4.5-5.6 of the 100-400mm GM OSS or the f/5.6-6.3 of the 200-600mm G OSS. However, the 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II with a 2x TC results in a much slower f/8 aperture, which could be limiting in lower light conditions. The 70-200mm f/2.8 model retains a low-light advantage even with the teleconverter compared to the dedicated longer lenses. When teleconverters are added to the 100-400mm or 200-600mm, the maximum aperture becomes even narrower, further impacting their low-light capabilities.
Physical Attributes: Size, Weight, and Ergonomics
The Sony 70-200mm lenses, particularly the GM II, are significantly lighter and more compact than both the 100-400mm GM OSS and the 200-600mm G OSS. Adding a teleconverter does increase the size and weight of the 70-200mm, but the resulting package is generally still more portable than the dedicated longer lenses. The internal zoom mechanism of the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is also preferred by some users over the external zoom of the 100-400mm. For photographers who prioritise portability and ease of handling, the 70-200mm with a teleconverter can be an attractive option.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: The Financial Implications
From a purely financial perspective, purchasing a teleconverter is generally more cost-effective than investing in a dedicated longer lens. This can be a significant factor for photographers who only occasionally require the extended reach. For instance, using a teleconverter with an existing 70-200mm lens to achieve a 400mm equivalent is less expensive than buying a separate 100-400mm or 200-600mm lens. However, if the longer reach is a frequent requirement, the benefits of the potentially superior image quality and handling of a dedicated lens might justify the higher cost.
Voices from the Field: User Experiences and Community Insights
The experiences shared by Sony users on various photography forums and review sites provide valuable real-world perspectives. There is a general consensus that the 1.4x teleconverter performs admirably with the newer 70-200mm lenses, offering a good balance of reach and image quality. Opinions on the 2x teleconverter are more varied, with some users reporting satisfactory results, especially with the f/2.8 GM OSS II, while others still observe a noticeable softening of the image.
In terms of use cases, the 70-200mm with teleconverters is often favoured for its versatility and portability in scenarios like travel and general photography. For wildlife and sports photography, where longer reach is often paramount, dedicated lenses like the 100-400mm and 200-600mm are frequently recommended, although the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II with a teleconverter can serve as a more portable alternative for certain situations.
Making the Informed Decision: Recommendations Based on Usage Scenarios
For wildlife photography, while the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II with a 2x teleconverter can provide a more portable option, the Sony 200-600mm G OSS or the Sony 100-400mm GM OSS (potentially with a 1.4x teleconverter) are generally better suited due to their longer native reach and often superior image quality at those focal lengths. The f/4 model with a 2x TC might not be ideal for serious wildlife work due to the slower aperture.
In sports photography, the Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II, either by itself or with the 1.4x teleconverter, stands out as a versatile choice offering fast autofocus and good reach for many situations. The 2x teleconverter can extend the reach further, but the potential for softness and the f/5.6 aperture should be considered, especially in lower light.
For portrait photography, the 70-200mm range is excellent on its own, and teleconverters are typically not necessary unless extreme compression is desired.
For travel and general use, the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II or the f/4 Macro G OSS II with the 1.4x teleconverter offer a compelling combination of versatility and portability, providing increased reach without excessive bulk. The 2x teleconverter can provide even more reach but with more noticeable compromises in image quality and aperture.
Conclusion: Weighing the Options - Versatility vs. Specialisation
In conclusion, the performance of Sony teleconverters, particularly the 1.4x model, has indeed improved with the latest generation of 70-200mm lenses, offering a more viable option for extending focal length than in the past.
The 2x teleconverter also shows enhanced performance, especially with the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II, although it still involves more significant trade-offs in terms of image quality and light loss.
The decision of whether to opt for a teleconverter or a dedicated longer lens hinges on the photographer's specific needs and priorities. Teleconverters provide a cost-effective and versatile way to increase reach without carrying multiple large lenses, making them suitable for photographers who need occasional extra magnification and prioritise portability. However, for those who frequently shoot distant subjects and demand the highest possible image quality, investing in a dedicated lens like the 100-400mm GM OSS or the 200-600mm G OSS is likely the more rewarding long-term solution.
Ultimately, the optimal choice depends on a careful consideration of the trade-offs between versatility, cost, image quality, and the primary photographic pursuits of the user.
STILL AWAITING MY A1 II
EXPECTING A FUJI GFX100RF
MAY NOT GET A LEICA
THE A1 HAS BEEN DELAYED THE FUJI GFX100RF IS DUE IN MAY [NOT SURE IF I NEED THE LEICA Q3 43]
The delivery of the A1 has been delayed, and the Fuji GFX100RF is expected in May. I'm currently weighing up whether I still need the Leica Q3 (or Q3 43).
My predicament stems from having pre-booked hotel rooms across Ireland, yet I'm still awaiting a suitable camera. Initially, I was leaning towards the Leica Q3 43, as it was readily available, albeit at a considerable cost. However, the unexpected early availability of the Fuji GFX caught my attention, as I'd previously understood it might be delayed for many months.
Upon its release, I promptly purchased the Sony A7RIV. Shortly after its arrival, a trip to Belfast resulted in an unfortunate fall due to a loose paving stone. This incident damaged my camera, my ribs, and a Voigtländer lens. Since then, the A7RIV has exhibited intermittent faults. While I still use it, its reliability is questionable. Nevertheless, I've continued to invest in Sony's original lenses.
When the A7RV was announced, I placed a pre-order. After a lengthy wait, I decided to cancel it to save for the A1. By the time I could afford the A1, the A1 II had been launched. I placed and paid for an order in November/December 2024 and am still awaiting its arrival. I was offered the option to switch to a Fujifilm GFX100SII, but I was hesitant as I was starting to consider more compact alternatives. I did briefly consider a second-hand unit, but the prospect of acquiring a set of suitable lenses was unappealing.
My exploration of other options led me to consider the Leica Q3 43, knowing I could finance it by May 2025. Then, in April 2025, the Fuji GFX100RF was announced.
I attended a presentation of the camera here in Dublin, and a few days later, I was informed that one would be available to me by the last week of May. Furthermore, I could have any colour, as long as it was black. So, I anticipate having a camera for my week-long visit to Belfast at the end of May.
Therefore, I never acquired the A7RV, and while I'm still awaiting the A1 II (possibly arriving in June/July), my collection of GM II lenses means I won't cancel my order, especially as I'm not interested in any current Sony alternatives.
I've more or less decided against the Leica Q3/43, assuming the Fuji meets my expectations."
Navigating the Summit: A Strategic Analysis of the Sony A1 II, Fuji GFX100RF, and Leica Q3 in a High-End Photographic Toolkit
I. Introduction: Navigating the Peaks of Photographic Technology
A. Acknowledging My Position:
The current photographic landscape presents a wealth of high-performance imaging tools, prompting both enthusiasts and professionals to carefully consider the strategic composition of their equipment.
The described situation – awaiting the delivery of a flagship Sony A1 II while simultaneously integrating the unique capabilities of the Fuji GFX100RF, and reconsidering a planned acquisition of a Leica Q3 or Q3 43 – represents a privileged position. It allows for equipment decisions driven not primarily by budgetary constraints, but by the pursuit of optimal photographic capability, user experience, and the avoidance of functional redundancy.
This analysis aims to provide an expert perspective on this specific scenario, evaluating the distinct roles these cameras play and offering guidance on the most strategically sound path forward. The context provided by past experiences, including issues with a previous Sony A7RIV and the subsequent commitment to the Sony ecosystem through significant investment in Version II GM lenses and the A1 II pre-order, underscores the importance of reliability and maximising the potential of the chosen primary system.
B. Introducing the Contenders:
At the heart of this assessment are three distinct photographic instruments, each representing a pinnacle of design and technology within its respective category:
Sony A1 II: As the anticipated successor to the formidable A1, this camera represents the zenith of Sony's full-frame mirrorless technology. It embodies a philosophy of ultimate versatility, promising exceptional speed, high resolution, state-of-the-art autofocus, and comprehensive video features, all supported by the mature and extensive E-mount lens system in which significant investment has already been made.
Fuji GFX100RF: This camera stands out as a significant innovation within the medium format market, packaging a 102-megapixel sensor into a rangefinder-style body. It offers a fundamentally different approach to image capture compared to full-frame systems, emphasising ultimate image quality, unique tonal rendering, and a distinct handling experience, marking a deliberate step into the medium format realm.
Leica Q3/Q3 43: Representing the archetype of the premium full-frame fixed-lens compact camera, the Leica Q series prioritises exceptional build quality, intuitive operation, and the singular optical signature of its integrated Summilux lens. It embodies a philosophy of deliberate constraint, focusing on the purity of the shooting experience with a fixed focal length. However, it shares the same sensor as my A7RIV.
C. Defining the Core Question:
The central consideration is whether the Leica Q3/43, despite its own merits, offers a sufficiently unique and valuable proposition to justify its inclusion alongside the already formidable combination of the Sony A1 II and the Fuji GFX100RF.
Does the GFX100RF, with its distinct medium format sensor and rangefinder styling, adequately fulfil the desire for a 'different' high-quality shooting experience, thereby rendering the Leica Q3 potentially redundant within this specific, high-capability toolkit? Or does the Q3 carve out a niche – perhaps in portability or its specific fixed-lens character – that remains unfilled? This report will dissect the capabilities, philosophies, and potential synergies of these systems to provide a clear recommendation.
II. The Core Systems: Defining Capabilities & Philosophies
A. Sony A1 II & GM Lens Ecosystem: The Apex Predator
Overview: The Sony A1 II, building upon the legacy of its predecessor, is positioned as the system engineered for peak performance across the widest possible range of photographic disciplines. It is the embodiment of a "do-it-all" philosophy at the highest level, expected to deliver uncompromising speed, substantial resolution, industry-leading autofocus capabilities, and professional-grade video functionality.
Performance Expectations: The original A1 set benchmarks with capabilities like 30fps blackout-free continuous shooting and highly sophisticated real-time tracking autofocus, proving indispensable for demanding genres such as sports, wildlife, and photojournalism. The A1 II is anticipated to refine and potentially elevate these capabilities further, solidifying its role as the high-performance engine of the photographic kit. Its predecessor's 50MP sensor struck a potent balance between detail capture and processing speed; the A1 II is expected to maintain or enhance this resolution, ensuring competitiveness with other high-megapixel bodies while retaining its speed advantage. This combination of high resolution and extreme speed clearly differentiates it from systems prioritising one aspect over the other.
System Investment & Inertia: A critical factor in this analysis is the substantial existing investment in Sony's top-tier Version II GM lenses. These lenses are optically engineered to resolve immense detail and perform optimally on high-resolution, high-speed bodies like the A1 II. This investment represents not just sunk cost, but a deep integration into a specific ecosystem. Familiarity with the system, muscle memory developed through use, and the sheer breadth of optical choices available create significant operational advantages. Consequently, the A1 II and its associated lenses naturally assume the role of the primary, "default" system. Any potential addition, like the Leica Q3, must offer compelling advantages to overcome the inherent convenience, versatility, and optimised performance already present within the established Sony framework. The bar for justification is therefore elevated; the question is not merely whether the Q3 is a good camera, but whether it adds indispensable value beyond what the comprehensive Sony system already provides.
B. Fuji GFX100RF: The Medium Format Experience, Redefined
Overview: The Fuji GFX100RF distinguishes itself immediately through its 100-megapixel medium format sensor. However, its identity extends beyond resolution; it incorporates rangefinder-style ergonomics and leverages Fujifilm's renowned colour science and lens design. The larger sensor format inherently influences image characteristics, offering potential advantages in tonal gradation, depth of field rendering, and the sheer level of detail achievable.
Image Quality and Handling: The GFX system consistently earns accolades for its exceptional image quality, characterised by fine detail, smooth tonal transitions, and a distinct rendering often described as having a "medium format look" or enhanced "presence" compared to full-frame output. Fujifilm's Film Simulations add another layer of unique character directly out of camera. While image quality is paramount, the handling experience is also distinct. GFX cameras, including the RF model, are generally regarded as more deliberate instruments compared to flagship full-frame mirrorless bodies. While autofocus performance has steadily improved within the GFX line, it typically does not match the blistering speed and tracking tenacity of systems like the Sony A1 series. The rangefinder-inspired design of the GFX100RF offers a specific tactile appeal, differentiating it from SLR-style grips common on other GFX models and most mirrorless cameras. This ergonomic choice caters to photographers who appreciate that particular way of interacting with a camera.
The Deliberate Shooting Niche: The GFX system's strengths align naturally with photographic genres that benefit from a measured approach – landscape, architecture, studio portraiture, and fine art reproduction. Its relative performance characteristics make it less suited for capturing fast, unpredictable action compared to the A1 II. This distinction is not merely a limitation but can be viewed as a feature. The GFX100RF encourages a slower, more considered photographic process, focusing attention on composition, light, and subject interaction. This provides a valuable experiential counterpoint to the Sony A1 II's emphasis on capturing the decisive moment, however fleeting. The GFX system already introduces a significantly different way of seeing and shooting, potentially fulfilling the need for a departure from the primary full-frame workflow and reducing the impetus to seek yet another distinct experience via the Leica Q3.
C. Leica Q3/43: The Art of the Focused Instrument
Overview: The Leica Q series, exemplified by the Q3 (and potential variants like a Qe), operates on a distinct philosophy: pairing a high-resolution full-frame sensor with a single, optically exceptional fixed prime lens – the Summilux 28mm f/1.7 ASPH. – within a meticulously crafted, minimalist body. It champions the idea that creative potential can be unlocked through simplification and focus.
Lens, Experience, and Portability: The cornerstone of the Q3's appeal is its lens. Reviews consistently extol the virtues of the 28mm Summilux, praising its sharpness, micro-contrast, pleasing bokeh, and overall rendering characteristics. It is widely considered one of the finest lenses ever integrated into a compact camera. Beyond the lens, the Q series is lauded for the sheer "joy of use." The tactile satisfaction of its physical controls, the premium materials and construction, the streamlined menu system, and the overall responsiveness contribute to a highly engaging shooting experience. This focus on the process of photography is central to the Leica value proposition. Furthermore, the Q3 offers significant portability compared to interchangeable-lens systems like the A1 II (especially with a GM lens attached) or the GFX100RF, positioning it as a potential candidate for an "everyday carry" or travel camera.
Image Quality Context and the Fixed Lens: The Q3's 60MP full-frame sensor delivers excellent image quality. However, within the context of this specific user's toolkit, it doesn't offer the unique sensor-size advantage of the GFX medium format system, nor is it expected to match the specialised speed and autofocus prowess of the A1 II. Its strength lies in the synergy between its high-quality sensor, the specific character of its Summilux lens, and the overall user experience. In the case of the Q3, the fixed 28mm lens is the defining characteristic, representing both a potential creative catalyst and a significant constraint. It forces the photographer to engage actively with composition and perspective, moving within the scene rather than relying on zoom. For some, this limitation fosters discipline and a unique way of seeing. For others accustomed to the flexibility of interchangeable lenses, it can feel restrictive, particularly when faced with situations demanding longer or wider focal lengths. The core appeal of the Q3, therefore, hinges significantly on an embrace of this fixed-lens philosophy as a deliberate creative choice.
III. Analysing Synergy & Potential Redundancy: The Core Dilemma
A. GFX100RF vs. Leica Q3/43: Complementary Tools or Overlapping Niches?
A direct comparison reveals fundamental differences between the Fuji GFX100RF and the Leica Q3, suggesting they occupy distinct spaces rather than overlapping significantly in technical capability.
Image Quality: The GFX100RF's primary advantage lies in its 102MP medium format sensor, delivering a level of detail resolution and a specific rendering (tonality, depth transitions) that is characteristic of the larger format. It excels in applications where maximum detail and nuanced tones are paramount, such as landscape and studio work. The Leica Q3, while offering excellent 60MP full-frame quality, is defined more by the unique character imparted by its fixed 28mm Summilux lens. Its strength lies in capturing scenes with a specific wide-angle perspective and environmental context, rendered with the lens's signature look. The nature of the image quality produced by each camera is fundamentally different; technical overlap in terms of the final "look" is minimal.
Handling & Experience: The physical interaction with each camera is markedly different. The GFX100RF, despite its rangefinder styling, remains a medium format system, generally encouraging a more deliberate pace due to its size, handling dynamics, and potentially slower operational speed compared to smaller formats. The Leica Q3, conversely, is designed for immediacy and engagement. Its compact size, integrated lens, tactile manual controls, and simplified operation foster a direct and intuitive connection between the photographer and the scene. The shooting experiences offered are thus poles apart.
Portability & Use Case: This is perhaps the most significant point of divergence. The Q3 is inherently more portable than the GFX100RF system (body plus lens) and also generally more compact than the A1 II with most GM lenses attached. This makes the Q3 a strong candidate for travel, street photography, or as an "always with you" camera for spontaneous opportunities – a role neither the A1 II nor the GFX typically fills with the same ease.
Despite these clear technical and experiential differences, the question of redundancy requires a deeper look beyond specifications. It's essential to consider the role each camera plays within the photographer's overall process and habits. The GFX provides a unique image quality proposition and encourages a specific, methodical approach. The A1 II offers supreme versatility and speed. The Q3 presents portability, simplicity, and a specific lens character for spontaneous or minimalist shooting. While these roles appear distinct on paper, the practical reality is that the GFX already provides a significant departure from the A1 II experience. Does the photographer, that's me, need another distinct shooting experience offered by the Q3, or does the GFX adequately satisfy the desire for an alternative process? The potential redundancy, therefore, is less technical and more practical: will the Q3 be carried and utilised frequently enough alongside the other two powerful systems to justify its place, or will it remain sidelined due to the compelling capabilities of the A1 II and GFX?
B. Justifying the GFX Acquisition: Its Unique Place
The decision to acquire the Fuji GFX100RF appears strategically sound within the context of building a diverse, high-capability toolkit alongside the Sony A1 II. Its value proposition extends far beyond simply adding more megapixels. The tangible difference in image rendering attributable to the larger medium format sensor – the specific way it handles tones, depth, and detail – provides a genuinely distinct visual signature. Furthermore, the more deliberate shooting process it encourages offers a valuable counterpoint to the high-speed capabilities of the A1 II. The GFX100RF successfully introduces a different imaging modality (medium format) and a different approach to image creation, ensuring minimal direct overlap with the capabilities of the high-performance full-frame Sony system.
C. The Case For (and Against) the Leica Q3/43:
Evaluating the potential addition of the Leica Q3/43 requires weighing its unique attributes against the capabilities already secured with the A1 II and GFX100RF.
Arguments "For" the Q3:
Unique Experience: The blend of Leica's renowned build quality, intuitive tactile controls, the specific rendering of the Summilux 28mm lens, and the inherent simplicity of a fixed-lens design offers a distinct and highly engaging shooting experience not replicated by either Sony or Fuji.
Portability/Everyday Carry: It fills a clear gap in portability. It is significantly smaller and lighter than the A1 II (with lens) or the GFX system, making it ideal for situations where carrying a larger kit is impractical or undesirable.
Creative Catalyst: The constraint of the fixed 28mm lens can act as a powerful creative stimulant, forcing a more considered approach to composition and perspective, potentially strengthening the photographer's vision within that focal length.
Complementary Focal Length: The classic 28mm focal length might naturally complement the existing GM lens collection, which likely includes standard zooms or primes at other focal lengths (e.g., 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, 135mm).
Arguments "Against" the Q3:
Potential Role Overlap (Experiential): With the GFX100RF already providing a "deliberate shooting" experience distinct from the A1 II, does the Q3's specific alternative experience offer enough additional value to warrant adding a third system? The need for another alternative might be diminished.
Fixed Lens Limitation: While potentially liberating for some, the inability to change lenses is an undeniable limitation. Will the user frequently encounter situations where 28mm is unsuitable, leading to frustration when compared to the flexibility of the A1 II and GFX systems?
Cost vs. Usage Frequency: Although budget is not the primary constraint, the substantial cost of the Q3 necessitates justification through regular and meaningful use. Given the immense capabilities of the A1 II and GFX, will the Q3 receive sufficient "shooting time" to provide value commensurate with its price and its place in the kit
SONY FE 50-150MM F2
SONY'S UNIQUE 50-150MM F2 LENS [I WAS NOT EXPECTING THIS UNTIL TOMORROW]
I was aware of this lens but was under the impression that it would be announced 23 April 2025. I am awaiting a 28-70 F2 and the 70-200 GII F4 but I suspect that I will not be getting this particular lens as the retail price in Ireland is Euro 4399.00 and especially as it does not work with the Teleconverters.
Sony's Audacious Gambit: An In-Depth Analysis of the FE 50-150mm F2 GM Lens
I. Introduction: Sony Redefines the Telephoto Zoom with the Groundbreaking FE 50-150mm F2 GM
Sony has once again pushed the boundaries of optical design with the introduction of its 80th E-mount lens, the FE 50-150mm F2 GM (SEL50150GM).
As the newest member of the esteemed G Master (GM) series, a lineup renowned for prioritising ultimate resolution and exquisite bokeh , this lens arrives with significant anticipation. It marks Sony's second foray into constant F2 aperture zooms for full-frame mirrorless cameras, following the FE 28-70mm F2 GM launched in late 2024. This release signals a clear strategic direction from Sony, investing heavily in the development of ultra-fast zoom lenses previously thought impractical or impossible.
The FE 50-150mm F2 GM immediately distinguishes itself with a headline specification: it is the world's first telephoto zoom lens for interchangeable lens cameras offering a maximum focal length of 150mm coupled with a constant F2 maximum aperture throughout its range. This represents a considerable feat of optical engineering and positions the lens as a unique proposition in the market. Sony and early commentators suggest it has the potential to be a "game-changer" for certain professionals, potentially replacing a kit of several fast prime lenses with a single, versatile optic.
This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive technical description of the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM, analyse its unique characteristics and market positioning through detailed comparisons, evaluate its expected performance based on released specifications and initial assessments, identify its intended target audience and primary applications, and offer an expert perspective on its potential impact within the professional imaging landscape.
II. The Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM: Technical Specifications and Design Philosophy
Understanding the capabilities and intended purpose of the FE 50-150mm F2 GM begins with examining its core technical specifications and the design choices Sony has implemented.
Core Specifications Overview
Focal Length & Aperture: The lens offers a versatile 50mm to 150mm zoom range, covering standard to medium-telephoto perspectives. Its defining feature is the constant maximum aperture of F2 across this entire range, with a minimum aperture of F22. This constant F2 capability is significant, providing a full stop advantage in light gathering compared to the professional standard F2.8 telephoto zooms, enabling lower ISO settings or faster shutter speeds in challenging lighting conditions.
Optical Formula: The complex optical design comprises 19 elements arranged in 17 groups. Reflecting its G Master status, it incorporates a significant number of specialised elements to achieve high image quality: two XA (extreme aspherical), two standard aspherical, two Super ED (extra-low dispersion), and three ED glass elements. These elements work synergistically to effectively suppress various optical aberrations, including chromatic and spherical aberration, ensuring sharp, high-contrast images throughout the zoom range. Sony's proprietary Nano AR Coating II is applied uniformly to element surfaces to significantly reduce internal reflections, minimising ghosting and flare, particularly in backlit situations.
Autofocus System: Autofocus is driven by four of Sony's high-thrust XD (extreme dynamic) Linear Motors, coupled with advanced control algorithms. This sophisticated quad-motor system is engineered for extremely fast, precise, quiet, and powerful focus acquisition, capable of moving the large, complex focusing groups rapidly. It is designed to keep pace with demanding applications, including supporting continuous shooting up to 120 frames per second with full AF/AE tracking on Sony's Alpha 9 III camera. A floating focusing mechanism is also employed to maintain image quality at all focusing distances.
Aperture Mechanism: A newly developed 11-blade circular aperture diaphragm is utilised. This design aims to produce exceptionally smooth and aesthetically pleasing bokeh (background blur), maintaining near-perfectly circular out-of-focus highlights, a hallmark characteristic of the G Master series.
Close Focus & Magnification: The lens features a minimum focusing distance of 0.4 metres (approximately 1.3 feet) at the 50mm wide end and 0.74 metres (approximately 2.4 feet) at the 150mm telephoto end. This results in a maximum magnification ratio of 0.20x across the zoom range. While useful for moderately tight shots, this magnification does not classify the lens as a macro optic.
Dimensions & Weight: The FE 50-150mm F2 GM measures approximately 200mm (7-7/8 inches) in length and has a maximum diameter of approximately 103mm (4.1 inches). It weighs approximately 1340 grams (47.3 ounces or 2.95 pounds) without the tripod foot attached. To put this into perspective, it shares the same length as Sony's popular FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II lens, but is notably wider (by about 17%) and heavier (by about 30%). However, it is lighter than the original FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM lens (1480g).
Filter Thread: The lens necessitates a large 95mm front filter thread. Users should note that filters with an outside diameter exceeding 99.4mm may interfere with attaching the supplied lens hood.
Build Quality and Handling Features
G Master Construction: As expected from a G Master lens, the FE 50-150mm F2 GM features premium build quality, utilising a durable metal barrel construction designed for professional use.
Weather Sealing: The lens incorporates a robust dust- and moisture-resistant design, allowing for operation in challenging environmental conditions. Additionally, a fluorine coating is applied to the front element to repel water, oil, and other contaminants, making it easier to clean.
Internal Zoom: A key handling feature is the internal zoom mechanism. The lens maintains its physical length and centre of gravity throughout the entire 50-150mm zoom range. This provides consistent balance for handheld shooting and is particularly advantageous for maintaining stability when mounted on gimbals or other video rigs.
Controls: The lens barrel provides comprehensive physical controls, including dedicated rings for manual focus, zoom, and aperture adjustment. The aperture ring features a switch to de-click the stops for smooth iris transitions during video recording, along with an Iris Lock switch to prevent accidental aperture changes. Linear Response MF ensures that the manual focus ring responds directly and predictably to input, mimicking the feel of mechanical lenses for precise focus pulls. Three customisable Focus Hold buttons are strategically placed around the barrel, ensuring one is always accessible regardless of camera orientation. The lens features the white finish common to Sony's high-end telephoto lenses, often chosen for its thermal properties to reduce heat absorption during prolonged use under direct sunlight.
Tripod Collar: A removable and rotating tripod collar is included, allowing for balanced mounting on tripods and monopods and easy switching between horizontal and vertical orientations. However, a point of criticism noted in early reviews is that the tripod foot itself lacks integrated Arca-Swiss compatibility, necessitating the attachment of a separate quick-release plate for use with most modern tripod heads. Some potential users expressed hope that the collar design was improved over previous iterations, specifically referencing the non-removable collar on the 70-200 GM II which some found bothersome.
Lens Hood: The included bayonet-mount lens hood is described as being relatively short or shallow compared to typical telephoto hoods. It incorporates a practical sliding window, allowing users to easily rotate circular polarising or variable neutral density filters without needing to remove the hood first.
The confluence of several design elements—specifically the internal zoom mechanism maintaining constant length and balance , the implementation of four powerful yet quiet XD linear motors , and video-centric features like Linear Response MF and a de-clickable aperture ring —strongly suggests that catering to hybrid shooters and dedicated videographers, particularly those using gimbals, was a primary consideration during the lens's development. These features are not mere additions but fundamental aspects of its design, justifying Sony's emphasis on its "Cinematic Video Production" capabilities in promotional materials. The decision to maintain the same 200mm length as the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II , despite the F2 aperture demanding a wider barrel, might also be seen as an attempt to facilitate integration into existing professional kits and carrying solutions.
A notable omission from the specifications is Optical SteadyShot (OSS) image stabilisation. Incorporating effective optical stabilisation into an already large and complex F2 zoom design would inevitably add further size, weight, complexity, and cost. Sony likely made a calculated decision, assuming that potential buyers investing nearly $4,000 in this lens will predominantly pair it with modern Sony Alpha bodies featuring high-performance in-body image stabilisation (IBIS).
This reliance on IBIS makes the lens less optimal for users with older camera bodies lacking this feature or in scenarios demanding the absolute maximum stabilisation achievable through combined lens and body systems. This choice starkly differentiates it from stabilised competitors like the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II and potentially future rivals, such as rumoured Canon F2 telephoto zooms that might incorporate IS.
The choice of a 95mm filter thread , while optically necessary to accommodate the large F2 aperture elements, presents both a practical and financial challenge for photographers who regularly employ filters. Filters in this size are considerably less common and substantially more expensive than the 77mm standard used on lenses like the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II or the 82mm size found on the popular Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8. This additional investment , potentially requiring a completely new set of large-diameter filters, could be a significant deterrent, particularly for landscape photographers who often rely on circular polarisers and neutral density filters. While the 50-150mm focal range itself could prove useful for certain landscape compositions , the filter situation reinforces the lens's primary intended applications in portraiture, event coverage, and indoor sports, where filter use is typically less frequent or critical.
Table: Key Technical Specifications - Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM
Specification Detail Source(s)
Focal Length 50-150mm
Aperture Range F2 (constant) - F22
Lens Mount Sony E (Full-Frame Coverage)
Optical Design 19 Elements in 17 Groups
Special Elements 2 XA, 2 Aspherical, 2 Super ED, 3 ED; Nano AR Coating II
AF Motor Four XD (Extreme Dynamic) Linear Motors; Floating Focus
Diaphragm Blades 11, Rounded
Min. Focus Distance 0.4m (at 50mm), 0.74m (at 150mm)
Max. Magnification 0.20x
Image Stabilisation (OSS) No
Filter Size 95mm (Front)
Dimensions (Ø x L) Approx. 103mm x 200mm (4.1" x 7.9")
Weight (w/o foot) Approx. 1340g (47.3 oz / 2.95 lb)
Tripod Collar Removable and Rotating (Included)
Weather Sealing Dust and Moisture Resistant; Fluorine Coating
Internal Zoom Yes
III. Defining Uniqueness: The F2 Speed and Versatile 50-150mm Range
The Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM carves out a unique niche primarily through the combination of its exceptionally bright constant F2 aperture and its specific, versatile focal length range.
The Constant F2 Advantage
The lens's constant F2 maximum aperture represents its most significant differentiating factor compared to typical professional telephoto zooms, which commonly feature an F2.8 maximum aperture. This one-stop advantage offers several key benefits:
Low Light Performance: Gathering twice the amount of light as an F2.8 lens, the F2 aperture allows photographers and videographers to use significantly lower ISO sensitivity settings or faster shutter speeds in dimly lit environments. This is particularly advantageous for indoor sports, wedding ceremonies and receptions, concerts, and other event photography where ambient light is often scarce. The result is cleaner images with less noise or the ability to freeze motion more effectively.
Depth of Field Control: The wider F2 aperture enables a shallower depth of field compared to F2.8 at equivalent focal lengths and subject distances. This allows for more pronounced subject isolation, separating the main subject from the background with a beautifully blurred bokeh effect. The newly designed 11-blade circular aperture further contributes to the smoothness and pleasing quality of these out-of-focus areas.
Creative Potential: The combination of telephoto compression and the shallow depth of field afforded by the F2 aperture can create a distinct visual style, often described as "cinematic". It allows creators to achieve a look typically associated with high-end, fast prime lenses, but with the flexibility of a zoom.
The 50-150mm Focal Range
While the F2 aperture provides the speed, the 50-150mm focal length offers a specific brand of versatility:
Versatility: This range spans from a standard 50mm perspective, suitable for environmental portraits and general use, up to a 150mm medium telephoto, ideal for tighter portraits and reaching subjects from a moderate distance. This coverage conveniently encompasses the classic portrait focal lengths of 50mm, 85mm, and 135mm, making it highly suitable for portraiture, as well as wedding and event photography where subject distances can vary rapidly.
Prime Lens Replacement Argument: Sony actively positions this lens as a potential replacement for carrying multiple fast prime lenses within its range , an idea echoed by several reviewers. The primary advantage is workflow efficiency and convenience – photographers can cover multiple perspectives without needing to swap lenses during critical moments, particularly valuable in fast-paced event scenarios. The trade-offs include the lens's significant cost, size, and weight compared to individual primes, and the potential for subtle differences in rendering compared to the specialised optics of top-tier primes like the 85mm GM or 135mm GM.
Market Context: Crucially, this specific combination of a 50-150mm focal length and a constant F2 aperture is unprecedented in a full-frame zoom lens. It occupies a unique space between standard zooms (like 24-70mm or 28-70mm) and traditional telephoto zooms (like 70-200mm).
Comparative Analysis: Positioning the FE 50-150mm F2 GM
To fully appreciate the FE 50-150mm F2 GM's unique position, it's essential to compare it against key alternatives mentioned in the research:
vs. Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II:
This is Sony's flagship F2.8 telephoto zoom and a benchmark professional workhorse. The 50-150mm F2 offers a one-stop speed advantage (F2 vs F2.8) and starts wider (50mm vs 70mm). However, the 70-200mm F2.8 II provides significantly more reach (200mm vs 150mm), is considerably lighter (1045g vs 1340g) and slimmer (88mm vs 103mm diameter), uses more common 77mm filters (vs 95mm), includes Optical SteadyShot (OSS) stabilisation, is compatible with Sony's teleconverters (1.4x and 2.0x) for even greater reach , and is substantially less expensive (approx. $2800 vs $3899).
The 50-150mm F2 is clearly specialised for situations where the F2 aperture is paramount (low light, maximum bokeh), primarily indoors or for portraiture/events within its range. The 70-200mm F2.8 II remains the more versatile, general-purpose telephoto zoom, better suited for applications requiring longer reach, optical stabilisation, teleconverter flexibility, or where size, weight, and cost are greater concerns.
vs. Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD: Tamron's lens has gained popularity for its unique versatile range and relatively fast variable aperture. The Sony 50-150mm F2 boasts a constant F2 aperture across its entire range, whereas the Tamron varies from F2 at the wide end to F2.8 at the long end. The Sony lens, being a G Master, is expected to offer potentially superior optical performance, build quality, and likely more advanced autofocus capabilities with its four XD linear motors compared to Tamron's VXD motor. Furthermore, the Sony features an internal zoom mechanism, maintaining its length while zooming, unlike the Tamron which extends. However, the Tamron offers a significantly wider starting focal length (35mm vs 50mm), is lighter (approx. 1165g vs 1340g), uses smaller 82mm filters (vs 95mm), and is dramatically less expensive (approx. $1700-$1900 vs $3899). The Sony lens targets the absolute pinnacle of performance and speed within its specific range for users willing to pay a substantial premium. The Tamron provides broader focal length versatility and outstanding value, making compromises on the constant F2 aperture and internal zoom design.
vs. Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM: While operating in a different focal range (standard zoom vs telephoto zoom), the Canon RF 28-70mm F2L provides important context as the lens that pioneered the F2 constant aperture zoom for modern full-frame mirrorless systems. Sony now offers two such lenses (FE 28-70mm F2 GM and FE 50-150mm F2 GM), creating a potential two-lens F2 zoom kit. Both the Sony 50-150mm F2 and the Canon 28-70mm F2 are large lenses, utilise 95mm filters, lack in-lens image stabilisation, and command premium prices (Sony $3899, Canon approx. $2800-$3100). The existence of these lenses highlights a trend among manufacturers to leverage the design freedoms of mirrorless mounts to create ultra-fast, high-performance zooms targeting demanding professionals willing to invest heavily in specialised tools.
The introduction of the FE 50-150mm F2 GM, following the FE 28-70mm F2 GM , suggests a deliberate strategy by Sony to establish a distinct system of ultra-fast zoom lenses. Releasing a second F2 zoom covering the logical subsequent focal range indicates more than just an experiment; it points towards building an ecosystem aimed at the highest echelon of professional photographers and videographers.
This strategy likely aims to attract and retain users who prioritise maximum aperture speed and are willing to accept the associated costs and size/weight penalties , thereby creating a premium niche within the already extensive E-mount lineup. The substantial price tag reinforces the exclusivity of this F2 system. The fact that competitors like Canon are rumoured to be developing similar lenses lends credence to the market potential Sony perceives for these specialised optics.
A significant factor defining the 50-150mm F2's specific role is its confirmed lack of compatibility with Sony's 1.4x and 2.0x teleconverters. This limitation, reportedly due to the rear optical elements being positioned very close to the mount to achieve the compact design , firmly caps the lens's maximum reach at 150mm. While F2 is exceptionally fast, the inability to extend its range (for instance, to a hypothetical 100-300mm F4 equivalent with a 2x TC, which some users desired ) prevents it from serving as a flexible substitute for longer telephoto lenses in scenarios like outdoor sports or wildlife photography. This constraint reinforces its specialisation for applications where 150mm is sufficient reach, and the F2 aperture is the overriding priority – namely portraiture, weddings, events, and indoor sports. It means users requiring reach beyond 150mm must carry an additional lens, somewhat mitigating the "prime replacement" convenience argument for certain types of assignments.
IV. Performance Expectations: Optics, Autofocus, and Video Prowess
Based on its G Master designation, advanced specifications, and initial reports, the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM is poised to deliver exceptional performance across optical quality, autofocus speed, and video functionality.
Optical Quality
Sharpness & Resolution: The lens is engineered for flagship optical performance. The complex formula incorporating high-precision XA elements alongside Super ED and ED glass is designed to deliver outstanding sharpness and resolution across the entire image frame, throughout the 50-150mm zoom range, and even wide open at F2. Early reports and assessments of theoretical MTF (Modulation Transfer Function) charts suggest performance comparable to high-quality prime lenses. One reviewer confirmed experiencing exceptional sharpness during initial use.
Aberration Control: The sophisticated optical design, particularly the strategic placement of XA, Super ED, and ED elements, aims to meticulously control various optical aberrations, including chromatic aberration (colour fringing) and spherical aberration, ensuring clean image rendering.
Bokeh Quality: A key focus of the G Master line is the aesthetic quality of the bokeh. The combination of the bright F2 constant aperture and the newly developed 11-blade circular diaphragm is intended to produce "beautifully smooth," "stunning," and characteristically pleasing background blur. The use of XA elements also contributes by suppressing undesirable "onion ring" patterns within bokeh balls, a known benefit of these advanced elements.
Flare Control: Sony's Nano AR Coating II is applied uniformly across element surfaces. This advanced coating technology is proven to effectively minimise internal reflections, significantly reducing ghosting and lens flare, thereby maintaining high contrast and clarity even when shooting into light sources or in challenging backlit conditions.
Autofocus Performance
Speed & Precision: Equipped with four powerful XD Linear Motors and Sony's latest control algorithms, the lens promises extremely fast, accurate, and responsive autofocus performance. Sony has positioned it as having one of its "best" AF systems to date and being among its fastest focusing lenses overall. Initial hands-on testing confirmed swift AF operation.
Tracking: The high-performance AF system is specifically designed for reliable tracking of fast-moving subjects. Its compatibility with the demanding 120 frames per second continuous shooting mode (with full AF/AE tracking) of the Sony Alpha 9 III underscores its capability for capturing peak action moments. This makes it particularly well-suited for indoor sports and dynamic event coverage.
Quiet Operation: The XD Linear Motors are inherently quiet during operation. This is crucial not only for discrete stills photography in sensitive environments (like weddings or film sets) but also essential for video recording to avoid capturing unwanted focusing noise.
Video Capabilities
The FE 50-150mm F2 GM appears to have been designed with serious video production needs in mind, incorporating several key features:
Focus Breathing: The optical design minimises focus breathing – the distracting change in focal length that can occur when adjusting focus. Furthermore, the lens is compatible with Sony's Breathing Compensation feature available in select Alpha cameras, which can digitally correct any residual breathing for perfectly stable framing during focus pulls.
Zoom Stability: The internal zoom mechanism ensures the lens's length and centre of gravity remain constant while zooming. This is highly beneficial for maintaining balance and stability when the camera and lens are mounted on gimbals or other stabilisation rigs.
Manual Focus Control: The implementation of Linear Response MF provides cinematographers with an intuitive, repeatable, and precise manual focusing experience, essential for executing controlled focus pulls.
Aperture Control: The physical aperture ring can be de-clicked via a switch, allowing for smooth, stepless adjustments to the iris during recording, preventing abrupt changes in exposure.
Silent Operation: Both the autofocus motors and the aperture drive mechanism are designed for quiet operation, ensuring that mechanical noises do not interfere with audio recording during video capture.
The explicit mention of compatibility with the Alpha 9 III's remarkable 120fps continuous shooting capability serves as more than just a technical footnote; it's a clear signal of the lens's intended application in high-speed action photography. Indoor sports environments typically suffer from poor lighting, demanding compromises between shutter speed, aperture, and ISO. The F2 aperture allows photographers to achieve motion-freezing shutter speeds at half the ISO required by an F2.8 lens under the same conditions. This translates directly to significantly better image quality with less noise. Consequently, the lens is positioned not merely as a low-light tool but as a critical enabler for achieving peak performance in demanding, fast-paced indoor action scenarios, particularly when paired with Sony's most capable sports camera body, helping to justify its premium price for professionals specialising in this field.
While Sony and reviewers promote the lens as a potential replacement for multiple primes , it's important to consider its close-focusing limitations in that context. The specified maximum magnification of 0.20x , achieved at minimum focus distances of 0.4m (wide) to 0.74m (tele) , is respectable for a telephoto zoom but falls short of true macro capabilities. It's also slightly lower than the 0.30x maximum magnification offered by the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II. This means that while the 50-150mm F2 will excel at general portraiture and capturing events within its focal range, it won't be as adept at capturing very tight close-up details (like intricate ring shots at a wedding or small product details) compared to dedicated macro lenses or even some other zooms with better magnification ratios. This subtly reinforces its primary focus on overall subject isolation and capturing moments within its versatile range, rather than serving as a quasi-macro tool.
V. The Ideal User: Target Audience and Applications
The unique combination of features, performance, and price point defines a specific target audience and set of applications for the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM.
Primary Target User Profile
The lens is clearly aimed at:
Professional Photographers and Videographers: Particularly those already invested in the Sony full-frame E-mount system who demand the highest levels of performance and are willing to invest in premium tools.
High-End Enthusiasts: Serious amateurs with substantial budgets who prioritise cutting-edge technology and specific creative capabilities.
F2 Aperture Prioritisers: Users for whom the benefits of the constant F2 aperture – superior low-light performance and extremely shallow depth of field – are the primary decision drivers, outweighing factors like cost, weight, or maximum reach.
Prime Lens Consolidators: Creators attracted by the potential to replace several commonly used prime lenses (such as 50mm, 85mm, and 135mm) with a single, high-quality zoom, thereby streamlining their workflow and potentially reducing the amount of gear carried during shoots.
Hybrid Shooters: Individuals who require exceptional performance for both high-resolution still photography and demanding video production, leveraging the lens's comprehensive video-centric features.
Key Applications
The lens's characteristics make it exceptionally well-suited for several specific genres:
Portrait Photography: The 50-150mm range comfortably covers standard, half-body, and tighter portrait perspectives (encompassing 50mm, 85mm, 135mm fields of view). The F2 aperture allows for dramatic subject isolation with smooth, aesthetically pleasing bokeh, making it an ideal tool for professional portraitists.
Wedding & Event Photography: This is arguably a primary target application. The F2 aperture is invaluable in typically dim wedding venues like churches and reception halls. The versatile zoom range allows photographers to adapt quickly to changing scenes and subject distances without needing frequent lens changes during critical moments. Features like quiet autofocus and the internal zoom mechanism further enhance its suitability for unobtrusive event coverage.
Indoor Sports Photography: The combination of the F2 aperture (allowing faster shutter speeds to freeze action in low light) and the high-performance autofocus system (capable of tracking fast, erratic movement) makes it a powerful option for sports like basketball, ice hockey, volleyball, and gymnastics, especially from courtside or rinkside positions where 150mm reach may be sufficient.
Concert Photography: Similar to indoor sports and events, concert photography benefits immensely from the lens's excellent low-light gathering ability and the potential for strong subject separation from distracting backgrounds.
Cinematography/Videography: As detailed previously, the suite of video-focused features – internal zoom, minimised focus breathing, Linear Response MF, de-clickable aperture, and quiet operation – positions this lens as a highly capable tool for professional video production, particularly for interviews, documentaries, event coverage, and narrative work requiring shallow depth of field.
Addressing Trade-offs - Who Might Not Choose This Lens?
Despite its impressive capabilities, the FE 50-150mm F2 GM is not a universal solution. Several factors might lead potential users to choose alternative lenses:
Budget-Conscious Users: The substantial price tag (approx. $3,899 USD, $5,499 CAD, €4400) places it firmly in the professional/ultra-premium category, making it inaccessible for many photographers and enthusiasts.
Users Needing Maximum Reach: The 150mm maximum focal length is insufficient for many types of photography, including most outdoor sports, wildlife, and birding. The lack of teleconverter compatibility further limits its reach. Users requiring longer focal lengths would be better served by the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II (especially with teleconverters) or dedicated super-telephoto lenses.
Users Relying Heavily on Lens Stabilisation (OSS): Photographers using Sony bodies without IBIS, or those who need the absolute maximum stabilisation possible for handheld shooting at slow shutter speeds, might find the inclusion of OSS in the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II more beneficial.
Users Prioritising Smallest/Lightest Kit: While Sony emphasises its portability considering the F2 aperture , it remains a large and heavy lens (1340g) compared to F2.8 zooms or prime lenses. The Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 offers a similar range in a lighter package.
Frequent Filter Users: The large 95mm filter thread presents challenges in terms of filter availability and cost, potentially deterring landscape photographers or others who rely heavily on filters.
The introduction of the FE 50-150mm F2 GM alongside the existing high-end FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II suggests Sony is intentionally creating a tiered structure within its professional lens offerings. The F2.8 zooms represent the premium workhorse standard, while the F2 zooms like this new 50-150mm constitute an "ultra-premium" tier focused squarely on maximising aperture speed. This new tier targets professionals and well-funded enthusiasts for whom the unique capabilities of the F2 aperture provide a tangible creative advantage or a competitive edge in specific fields , making the significant cost and inherent limitations (no OSS, no TCs, size/weight) acceptable trade-offs to achieve that goal.
While the narrative of the lens potentially replacing multiple primes is compelling from a convenience standpoint, it's worth tempering expectations regarding the absolute replication of optical character. Even exceptional zooms often possess a different rendering signature, micro-contrast, or bokeh quality compared to the best specialised prime lenses. Therefore, while the sharpness is expected to be outstanding , the primary driver for adoption among its target audience will likely be the unique and powerful combination of F2 speed coupled with zoom versatility across a highly practical range for portraits and events. This combination offers a significant workflow advantage in dynamic shooting environments, which, for many professionals, is more valuable than perfectly matching the rendering of individual primes they might otherwise carry. The F2 aperture itself, applied across this useful zoom range, remains the core, defining value proposition.
VI. Conclusion:
A Specialised Tool Offering Unprecedented Speed and Versatility for Demanding Creators
The Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM stands as a testament to Sony's continued innovation in optical engineering and its commitment to serving the high-end professional market. Its status as the world's first full-frame telephoto zoom lens reaching 150mm with a constant F2 aperture makes it a truly groundbreaking product. Its core strengths lie in this exceptional F2 speed, the promise of outstanding G Master optical quality, a highly advanced and fast autofocus system, robust professional build quality, and a comprehensive suite of features tailored for demanding video production.
This lens carves out a distinct and specialised position within the market. It is not intended as a replacement for the versatile FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II, but rather as an ultra-premium alternative for specific professional niches where its unique attributes offer compelling advantages. Wedding, event, portrait, and indoor sports photographers, along with cinematographers seeking a distinctive shallow depth-of-field look with zoom flexibility, constitute its primary target audience. For these users, the ability to shoot at F2 across the 50-150mm range can provide significant benefits in low light, enable greater creative control over depth of field, and potentially streamline workflows by reducing the need to swap between multiple prime lenses.
However, this specialisation comes with notable trade-offs. The lens's substantial price tag, considerable size and weight (despite being relatively compact for its specifications), lack of optical stabilisation (OSS), inability to accept teleconverters, and large 95mm filter requirement clearly define its role and limit its appeal for broader applications or more budget-conscious users. It is a tool designed for those who specifically need what it offers and are prepared for the associated investment and compromises.
Ultimately, the value proposition of the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM extends beyond mere technical specifications. It lies in the unique combination of unprecedented speed and practical zoom versatility, offering demanding creators new possibilities for capturing images and video in challenging conditions and achieving a distinct aesthetic. It represents a significant investment, but for professionals operating in its target genres, the potential enhancements to workflow efficiency, low-light capability, and overall creative expression could make it an indispensable part of their toolkit. The FE 50-150mm F2 GM sets a new benchmark for fast telephoto zooms and underscores Sony's ambition to lead innovation in the mirrorless lens market.
I was aware of this lens but was under the impression that it would be announced 23 April 2025. I am awaiting a 28-70 F2 and the 70-200 GII F4 but I suspect that I will not be getting this particular lens as the retail price in Ireland is Euro 4399.00 and especially as it does not work with the Teleconverters.
Sony's Audacious Gambit: An In-Depth Analysis of the FE 50-150mm F2 GM Lens
I. Introduction: Sony Redefines the Telephoto Zoom with the Groundbreaking FE 50-150mm F2 GM
Sony has once again pushed the boundaries of optical design with the introduction of its 80th E-mount lens, the FE 50-150mm F2 GM (SEL50150GM).
As the newest member of the esteemed G Master (GM) series, a lineup renowned for prioritising ultimate resolution and exquisite bokeh , this lens arrives with significant anticipation. It marks Sony's second foray into constant F2 aperture zooms for full-frame mirrorless cameras, following the FE 28-70mm F2 GM launched in late 2024. This release signals a clear strategic direction from Sony, investing heavily in the development of ultra-fast zoom lenses previously thought impractical or impossible.
The FE 50-150mm F2 GM immediately distinguishes itself with a headline specification: it is the world's first telephoto zoom lens for interchangeable lens cameras offering a maximum focal length of 150mm coupled with a constant F2 maximum aperture throughout its range. This represents a considerable feat of optical engineering and positions the lens as a unique proposition in the market. Sony and early commentators suggest it has the potential to be a "game-changer" for certain professionals, potentially replacing a kit of several fast prime lenses with a single, versatile optic.
This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive technical description of the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM, analyse its unique characteristics and market positioning through detailed comparisons, evaluate its expected performance based on released specifications and initial assessments, identify its intended target audience and primary applications, and offer an expert perspective on its potential impact within the professional imaging landscape.
II. The Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM: Technical Specifications and Design Philosophy
Understanding the capabilities and intended purpose of the FE 50-150mm F2 GM begins with examining its core technical specifications and the design choices Sony has implemented.
Core Specifications Overview
Focal Length & Aperture: The lens offers a versatile 50mm to 150mm zoom range, covering standard to medium-telephoto perspectives. Its defining feature is the constant maximum aperture of F2 across this entire range, with a minimum aperture of F22. This constant F2 capability is significant, providing a full stop advantage in light gathering compared to the professional standard F2.8 telephoto zooms, enabling lower ISO settings or faster shutter speeds in challenging lighting conditions.
Optical Formula: The complex optical design comprises 19 elements arranged in 17 groups. Reflecting its G Master status, it incorporates a significant number of specialised elements to achieve high image quality: two XA (extreme aspherical), two standard aspherical, two Super ED (extra-low dispersion), and three ED glass elements. These elements work synergistically to effectively suppress various optical aberrations, including chromatic and spherical aberration, ensuring sharp, high-contrast images throughout the zoom range. Sony's proprietary Nano AR Coating II is applied uniformly to element surfaces to significantly reduce internal reflections, minimising ghosting and flare, particularly in backlit situations.
Autofocus System: Autofocus is driven by four of Sony's high-thrust XD (extreme dynamic) Linear Motors, coupled with advanced control algorithms. This sophisticated quad-motor system is engineered for extremely fast, precise, quiet, and powerful focus acquisition, capable of moving the large, complex focusing groups rapidly. It is designed to keep pace with demanding applications, including supporting continuous shooting up to 120 frames per second with full AF/AE tracking on Sony's Alpha 9 III camera. A floating focusing mechanism is also employed to maintain image quality at all focusing distances.
Aperture Mechanism: A newly developed 11-blade circular aperture diaphragm is utilised. This design aims to produce exceptionally smooth and aesthetically pleasing bokeh (background blur), maintaining near-perfectly circular out-of-focus highlights, a hallmark characteristic of the G Master series.
Close Focus & Magnification: The lens features a minimum focusing distance of 0.4 metres (approximately 1.3 feet) at the 50mm wide end and 0.74 metres (approximately 2.4 feet) at the 150mm telephoto end. This results in a maximum magnification ratio of 0.20x across the zoom range. While useful for moderately tight shots, this magnification does not classify the lens as a macro optic.
Dimensions & Weight: The FE 50-150mm F2 GM measures approximately 200mm (7-7/8 inches) in length and has a maximum diameter of approximately 103mm (4.1 inches). It weighs approximately 1340 grams (47.3 ounces or 2.95 pounds) without the tripod foot attached. To put this into perspective, it shares the same length as Sony's popular FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II lens, but is notably wider (by about 17%) and heavier (by about 30%). However, it is lighter than the original FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM lens (1480g).
Filter Thread: The lens necessitates a large 95mm front filter thread. Users should note that filters with an outside diameter exceeding 99.4mm may interfere with attaching the supplied lens hood.
Build Quality and Handling Features
G Master Construction: As expected from a G Master lens, the FE 50-150mm F2 GM features premium build quality, utilising a durable metal barrel construction designed for professional use.
Weather Sealing: The lens incorporates a robust dust- and moisture-resistant design, allowing for operation in challenging environmental conditions. Additionally, a fluorine coating is applied to the front element to repel water, oil, and other contaminants, making it easier to clean.
Internal Zoom: A key handling feature is the internal zoom mechanism. The lens maintains its physical length and centre of gravity throughout the entire 50-150mm zoom range. This provides consistent balance for handheld shooting and is particularly advantageous for maintaining stability when mounted on gimbals or other video rigs.
Controls: The lens barrel provides comprehensive physical controls, including dedicated rings for manual focus, zoom, and aperture adjustment. The aperture ring features a switch to de-click the stops for smooth iris transitions during video recording, along with an Iris Lock switch to prevent accidental aperture changes. Linear Response MF ensures that the manual focus ring responds directly and predictably to input, mimicking the feel of mechanical lenses for precise focus pulls. Three customisable Focus Hold buttons are strategically placed around the barrel, ensuring one is always accessible regardless of camera orientation. The lens features the white finish common to Sony's high-end telephoto lenses, often chosen for its thermal properties to reduce heat absorption during prolonged use under direct sunlight.
Tripod Collar: A removable and rotating tripod collar is included, allowing for balanced mounting on tripods and monopods and easy switching between horizontal and vertical orientations. However, a point of criticism noted in early reviews is that the tripod foot itself lacks integrated Arca-Swiss compatibility, necessitating the attachment of a separate quick-release plate for use with most modern tripod heads. Some potential users expressed hope that the collar design was improved over previous iterations, specifically referencing the non-removable collar on the 70-200 GM II which some found bothersome.
Lens Hood: The included bayonet-mount lens hood is described as being relatively short or shallow compared to typical telephoto hoods. It incorporates a practical sliding window, allowing users to easily rotate circular polarising or variable neutral density filters without needing to remove the hood first.
The confluence of several design elements—specifically the internal zoom mechanism maintaining constant length and balance , the implementation of four powerful yet quiet XD linear motors , and video-centric features like Linear Response MF and a de-clickable aperture ring —strongly suggests that catering to hybrid shooters and dedicated videographers, particularly those using gimbals, was a primary consideration during the lens's development. These features are not mere additions but fundamental aspects of its design, justifying Sony's emphasis on its "Cinematic Video Production" capabilities in promotional materials. The decision to maintain the same 200mm length as the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II , despite the F2 aperture demanding a wider barrel, might also be seen as an attempt to facilitate integration into existing professional kits and carrying solutions.
A notable omission from the specifications is Optical SteadyShot (OSS) image stabilisation. Incorporating effective optical stabilisation into an already large and complex F2 zoom design would inevitably add further size, weight, complexity, and cost. Sony likely made a calculated decision, assuming that potential buyers investing nearly $4,000 in this lens will predominantly pair it with modern Sony Alpha bodies featuring high-performance in-body image stabilisation (IBIS).
This reliance on IBIS makes the lens less optimal for users with older camera bodies lacking this feature or in scenarios demanding the absolute maximum stabilisation achievable through combined lens and body systems. This choice starkly differentiates it from stabilised competitors like the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II and potentially future rivals, such as rumoured Canon F2 telephoto zooms that might incorporate IS.
The choice of a 95mm filter thread , while optically necessary to accommodate the large F2 aperture elements, presents both a practical and financial challenge for photographers who regularly employ filters. Filters in this size are considerably less common and substantially more expensive than the 77mm standard used on lenses like the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II or the 82mm size found on the popular Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8. This additional investment , potentially requiring a completely new set of large-diameter filters, could be a significant deterrent, particularly for landscape photographers who often rely on circular polarisers and neutral density filters. While the 50-150mm focal range itself could prove useful for certain landscape compositions , the filter situation reinforces the lens's primary intended applications in portraiture, event coverage, and indoor sports, where filter use is typically less frequent or critical.
Table: Key Technical Specifications - Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM
Specification Detail Source(s)
Focal Length 50-150mm
Aperture Range F2 (constant) - F22
Lens Mount Sony E (Full-Frame Coverage)
Optical Design 19 Elements in 17 Groups
Special Elements 2 XA, 2 Aspherical, 2 Super ED, 3 ED; Nano AR Coating II
AF Motor Four XD (Extreme Dynamic) Linear Motors; Floating Focus
Diaphragm Blades 11, Rounded
Min. Focus Distance 0.4m (at 50mm), 0.74m (at 150mm)
Max. Magnification 0.20x
Image Stabilisation (OSS) No
Filter Size 95mm (Front)
Dimensions (Ø x L) Approx. 103mm x 200mm (4.1" x 7.9")
Weight (w/o foot) Approx. 1340g (47.3 oz / 2.95 lb)
Tripod Collar Removable and Rotating (Included)
Weather Sealing Dust and Moisture Resistant; Fluorine Coating
Internal Zoom Yes
III. Defining Uniqueness: The F2 Speed and Versatile 50-150mm Range
The Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM carves out a unique niche primarily through the combination of its exceptionally bright constant F2 aperture and its specific, versatile focal length range.
The Constant F2 Advantage
The lens's constant F2 maximum aperture represents its most significant differentiating factor compared to typical professional telephoto zooms, which commonly feature an F2.8 maximum aperture. This one-stop advantage offers several key benefits:
Low Light Performance: Gathering twice the amount of light as an F2.8 lens, the F2 aperture allows photographers and videographers to use significantly lower ISO sensitivity settings or faster shutter speeds in dimly lit environments. This is particularly advantageous for indoor sports, wedding ceremonies and receptions, concerts, and other event photography where ambient light is often scarce. The result is cleaner images with less noise or the ability to freeze motion more effectively.
Depth of Field Control: The wider F2 aperture enables a shallower depth of field compared to F2.8 at equivalent focal lengths and subject distances. This allows for more pronounced subject isolation, separating the main subject from the background with a beautifully blurred bokeh effect. The newly designed 11-blade circular aperture further contributes to the smoothness and pleasing quality of these out-of-focus areas.
Creative Potential: The combination of telephoto compression and the shallow depth of field afforded by the F2 aperture can create a distinct visual style, often described as "cinematic". It allows creators to achieve a look typically associated with high-end, fast prime lenses, but with the flexibility of a zoom.
The 50-150mm Focal Range
While the F2 aperture provides the speed, the 50-150mm focal length offers a specific brand of versatility:
Versatility: This range spans from a standard 50mm perspective, suitable for environmental portraits and general use, up to a 150mm medium telephoto, ideal for tighter portraits and reaching subjects from a moderate distance. This coverage conveniently encompasses the classic portrait focal lengths of 50mm, 85mm, and 135mm, making it highly suitable for portraiture, as well as wedding and event photography where subject distances can vary rapidly.
Prime Lens Replacement Argument: Sony actively positions this lens as a potential replacement for carrying multiple fast prime lenses within its range , an idea echoed by several reviewers. The primary advantage is workflow efficiency and convenience – photographers can cover multiple perspectives without needing to swap lenses during critical moments, particularly valuable in fast-paced event scenarios. The trade-offs include the lens's significant cost, size, and weight compared to individual primes, and the potential for subtle differences in rendering compared to the specialised optics of top-tier primes like the 85mm GM or 135mm GM.
Market Context: Crucially, this specific combination of a 50-150mm focal length and a constant F2 aperture is unprecedented in a full-frame zoom lens. It occupies a unique space between standard zooms (like 24-70mm or 28-70mm) and traditional telephoto zooms (like 70-200mm).
Comparative Analysis: Positioning the FE 50-150mm F2 GM
To fully appreciate the FE 50-150mm F2 GM's unique position, it's essential to compare it against key alternatives mentioned in the research:
vs. Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II:
This is Sony's flagship F2.8 telephoto zoom and a benchmark professional workhorse. The 50-150mm F2 offers a one-stop speed advantage (F2 vs F2.8) and starts wider (50mm vs 70mm). However, the 70-200mm F2.8 II provides significantly more reach (200mm vs 150mm), is considerably lighter (1045g vs 1340g) and slimmer (88mm vs 103mm diameter), uses more common 77mm filters (vs 95mm), includes Optical SteadyShot (OSS) stabilisation, is compatible with Sony's teleconverters (1.4x and 2.0x) for even greater reach , and is substantially less expensive (approx. $2800 vs $3899).
The 50-150mm F2 is clearly specialised for situations where the F2 aperture is paramount (low light, maximum bokeh), primarily indoors or for portraiture/events within its range. The 70-200mm F2.8 II remains the more versatile, general-purpose telephoto zoom, better suited for applications requiring longer reach, optical stabilisation, teleconverter flexibility, or where size, weight, and cost are greater concerns.
vs. Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD: Tamron's lens has gained popularity for its unique versatile range and relatively fast variable aperture. The Sony 50-150mm F2 boasts a constant F2 aperture across its entire range, whereas the Tamron varies from F2 at the wide end to F2.8 at the long end. The Sony lens, being a G Master, is expected to offer potentially superior optical performance, build quality, and likely more advanced autofocus capabilities with its four XD linear motors compared to Tamron's VXD motor. Furthermore, the Sony features an internal zoom mechanism, maintaining its length while zooming, unlike the Tamron which extends. However, the Tamron offers a significantly wider starting focal length (35mm vs 50mm), is lighter (approx. 1165g vs 1340g), uses smaller 82mm filters (vs 95mm), and is dramatically less expensive (approx. $1700-$1900 vs $3899). The Sony lens targets the absolute pinnacle of performance and speed within its specific range for users willing to pay a substantial premium. The Tamron provides broader focal length versatility and outstanding value, making compromises on the constant F2 aperture and internal zoom design.
vs. Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM: While operating in a different focal range (standard zoom vs telephoto zoom), the Canon RF 28-70mm F2L provides important context as the lens that pioneered the F2 constant aperture zoom for modern full-frame mirrorless systems. Sony now offers two such lenses (FE 28-70mm F2 GM and FE 50-150mm F2 GM), creating a potential two-lens F2 zoom kit. Both the Sony 50-150mm F2 and the Canon 28-70mm F2 are large lenses, utilise 95mm filters, lack in-lens image stabilisation, and command premium prices (Sony $3899, Canon approx. $2800-$3100). The existence of these lenses highlights a trend among manufacturers to leverage the design freedoms of mirrorless mounts to create ultra-fast, high-performance zooms targeting demanding professionals willing to invest heavily in specialised tools.
The introduction of the FE 50-150mm F2 GM, following the FE 28-70mm F2 GM , suggests a deliberate strategy by Sony to establish a distinct system of ultra-fast zoom lenses. Releasing a second F2 zoom covering the logical subsequent focal range indicates more than just an experiment; it points towards building an ecosystem aimed at the highest echelon of professional photographers and videographers.
This strategy likely aims to attract and retain users who prioritise maximum aperture speed and are willing to accept the associated costs and size/weight penalties , thereby creating a premium niche within the already extensive E-mount lineup. The substantial price tag reinforces the exclusivity of this F2 system. The fact that competitors like Canon are rumoured to be developing similar lenses lends credence to the market potential Sony perceives for these specialised optics.
A significant factor defining the 50-150mm F2's specific role is its confirmed lack of compatibility with Sony's 1.4x and 2.0x teleconverters. This limitation, reportedly due to the rear optical elements being positioned very close to the mount to achieve the compact design , firmly caps the lens's maximum reach at 150mm. While F2 is exceptionally fast, the inability to extend its range (for instance, to a hypothetical 100-300mm F4 equivalent with a 2x TC, which some users desired ) prevents it from serving as a flexible substitute for longer telephoto lenses in scenarios like outdoor sports or wildlife photography. This constraint reinforces its specialisation for applications where 150mm is sufficient reach, and the F2 aperture is the overriding priority – namely portraiture, weddings, events, and indoor sports. It means users requiring reach beyond 150mm must carry an additional lens, somewhat mitigating the "prime replacement" convenience argument for certain types of assignments.
IV. Performance Expectations: Optics, Autofocus, and Video Prowess
Based on its G Master designation, advanced specifications, and initial reports, the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM is poised to deliver exceptional performance across optical quality, autofocus speed, and video functionality.
Optical Quality
Sharpness & Resolution: The lens is engineered for flagship optical performance. The complex formula incorporating high-precision XA elements alongside Super ED and ED glass is designed to deliver outstanding sharpness and resolution across the entire image frame, throughout the 50-150mm zoom range, and even wide open at F2. Early reports and assessments of theoretical MTF (Modulation Transfer Function) charts suggest performance comparable to high-quality prime lenses. One reviewer confirmed experiencing exceptional sharpness during initial use.
Aberration Control: The sophisticated optical design, particularly the strategic placement of XA, Super ED, and ED elements, aims to meticulously control various optical aberrations, including chromatic aberration (colour fringing) and spherical aberration, ensuring clean image rendering.
Bokeh Quality: A key focus of the G Master line is the aesthetic quality of the bokeh. The combination of the bright F2 constant aperture and the newly developed 11-blade circular diaphragm is intended to produce "beautifully smooth," "stunning," and characteristically pleasing background blur. The use of XA elements also contributes by suppressing undesirable "onion ring" patterns within bokeh balls, a known benefit of these advanced elements.
Flare Control: Sony's Nano AR Coating II is applied uniformly across element surfaces. This advanced coating technology is proven to effectively minimise internal reflections, significantly reducing ghosting and lens flare, thereby maintaining high contrast and clarity even when shooting into light sources or in challenging backlit conditions.
Autofocus Performance
Speed & Precision: Equipped with four powerful XD Linear Motors and Sony's latest control algorithms, the lens promises extremely fast, accurate, and responsive autofocus performance. Sony has positioned it as having one of its "best" AF systems to date and being among its fastest focusing lenses overall. Initial hands-on testing confirmed swift AF operation.
Tracking: The high-performance AF system is specifically designed for reliable tracking of fast-moving subjects. Its compatibility with the demanding 120 frames per second continuous shooting mode (with full AF/AE tracking) of the Sony Alpha 9 III underscores its capability for capturing peak action moments. This makes it particularly well-suited for indoor sports and dynamic event coverage.
Quiet Operation: The XD Linear Motors are inherently quiet during operation. This is crucial not only for discrete stills photography in sensitive environments (like weddings or film sets) but also essential for video recording to avoid capturing unwanted focusing noise.
Video Capabilities
The FE 50-150mm F2 GM appears to have been designed with serious video production needs in mind, incorporating several key features:
Focus Breathing: The optical design minimises focus breathing – the distracting change in focal length that can occur when adjusting focus. Furthermore, the lens is compatible with Sony's Breathing Compensation feature available in select Alpha cameras, which can digitally correct any residual breathing for perfectly stable framing during focus pulls.
Zoom Stability: The internal zoom mechanism ensures the lens's length and centre of gravity remain constant while zooming. This is highly beneficial for maintaining balance and stability when the camera and lens are mounted on gimbals or other stabilisation rigs.
Manual Focus Control: The implementation of Linear Response MF provides cinematographers with an intuitive, repeatable, and precise manual focusing experience, essential for executing controlled focus pulls.
Aperture Control: The physical aperture ring can be de-clicked via a switch, allowing for smooth, stepless adjustments to the iris during recording, preventing abrupt changes in exposure.
Silent Operation: Both the autofocus motors and the aperture drive mechanism are designed for quiet operation, ensuring that mechanical noises do not interfere with audio recording during video capture.
The explicit mention of compatibility with the Alpha 9 III's remarkable 120fps continuous shooting capability serves as more than just a technical footnote; it's a clear signal of the lens's intended application in high-speed action photography. Indoor sports environments typically suffer from poor lighting, demanding compromises between shutter speed, aperture, and ISO. The F2 aperture allows photographers to achieve motion-freezing shutter speeds at half the ISO required by an F2.8 lens under the same conditions. This translates directly to significantly better image quality with less noise. Consequently, the lens is positioned not merely as a low-light tool but as a critical enabler for achieving peak performance in demanding, fast-paced indoor action scenarios, particularly when paired with Sony's most capable sports camera body, helping to justify its premium price for professionals specialising in this field.
While Sony and reviewers promote the lens as a potential replacement for multiple primes , it's important to consider its close-focusing limitations in that context. The specified maximum magnification of 0.20x , achieved at minimum focus distances of 0.4m (wide) to 0.74m (tele) , is respectable for a telephoto zoom but falls short of true macro capabilities. It's also slightly lower than the 0.30x maximum magnification offered by the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II. This means that while the 50-150mm F2 will excel at general portraiture and capturing events within its focal range, it won't be as adept at capturing very tight close-up details (like intricate ring shots at a wedding or small product details) compared to dedicated macro lenses or even some other zooms with better magnification ratios. This subtly reinforces its primary focus on overall subject isolation and capturing moments within its versatile range, rather than serving as a quasi-macro tool.
V. The Ideal User: Target Audience and Applications
The unique combination of features, performance, and price point defines a specific target audience and set of applications for the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM.
Primary Target User Profile
The lens is clearly aimed at:
Professional Photographers and Videographers: Particularly those already invested in the Sony full-frame E-mount system who demand the highest levels of performance and are willing to invest in premium tools.
High-End Enthusiasts: Serious amateurs with substantial budgets who prioritise cutting-edge technology and specific creative capabilities.
F2 Aperture Prioritisers: Users for whom the benefits of the constant F2 aperture – superior low-light performance and extremely shallow depth of field – are the primary decision drivers, outweighing factors like cost, weight, or maximum reach.
Prime Lens Consolidators: Creators attracted by the potential to replace several commonly used prime lenses (such as 50mm, 85mm, and 135mm) with a single, high-quality zoom, thereby streamlining their workflow and potentially reducing the amount of gear carried during shoots.
Hybrid Shooters: Individuals who require exceptional performance for both high-resolution still photography and demanding video production, leveraging the lens's comprehensive video-centric features.
Key Applications
The lens's characteristics make it exceptionally well-suited for several specific genres:
Portrait Photography: The 50-150mm range comfortably covers standard, half-body, and tighter portrait perspectives (encompassing 50mm, 85mm, 135mm fields of view). The F2 aperture allows for dramatic subject isolation with smooth, aesthetically pleasing bokeh, making it an ideal tool for professional portraitists.
Wedding & Event Photography: This is arguably a primary target application. The F2 aperture is invaluable in typically dim wedding venues like churches and reception halls. The versatile zoom range allows photographers to adapt quickly to changing scenes and subject distances without needing frequent lens changes during critical moments. Features like quiet autofocus and the internal zoom mechanism further enhance its suitability for unobtrusive event coverage.
Indoor Sports Photography: The combination of the F2 aperture (allowing faster shutter speeds to freeze action in low light) and the high-performance autofocus system (capable of tracking fast, erratic movement) makes it a powerful option for sports like basketball, ice hockey, volleyball, and gymnastics, especially from courtside or rinkside positions where 150mm reach may be sufficient.
Concert Photography: Similar to indoor sports and events, concert photography benefits immensely from the lens's excellent low-light gathering ability and the potential for strong subject separation from distracting backgrounds.
Cinematography/Videography: As detailed previously, the suite of video-focused features – internal zoom, minimised focus breathing, Linear Response MF, de-clickable aperture, and quiet operation – positions this lens as a highly capable tool for professional video production, particularly for interviews, documentaries, event coverage, and narrative work requiring shallow depth of field.
Addressing Trade-offs - Who Might Not Choose This Lens?
Despite its impressive capabilities, the FE 50-150mm F2 GM is not a universal solution. Several factors might lead potential users to choose alternative lenses:
Budget-Conscious Users: The substantial price tag (approx. $3,899 USD, $5,499 CAD, €4400) places it firmly in the professional/ultra-premium category, making it inaccessible for many photographers and enthusiasts.
Users Needing Maximum Reach: The 150mm maximum focal length is insufficient for many types of photography, including most outdoor sports, wildlife, and birding. The lack of teleconverter compatibility further limits its reach. Users requiring longer focal lengths would be better served by the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II (especially with teleconverters) or dedicated super-telephoto lenses.
Users Relying Heavily on Lens Stabilisation (OSS): Photographers using Sony bodies without IBIS, or those who need the absolute maximum stabilisation possible for handheld shooting at slow shutter speeds, might find the inclusion of OSS in the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II more beneficial.
Users Prioritising Smallest/Lightest Kit: While Sony emphasises its portability considering the F2 aperture , it remains a large and heavy lens (1340g) compared to F2.8 zooms or prime lenses. The Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 offers a similar range in a lighter package.
Frequent Filter Users: The large 95mm filter thread presents challenges in terms of filter availability and cost, potentially deterring landscape photographers or others who rely heavily on filters.
The introduction of the FE 50-150mm F2 GM alongside the existing high-end FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II suggests Sony is intentionally creating a tiered structure within its professional lens offerings. The F2.8 zooms represent the premium workhorse standard, while the F2 zooms like this new 50-150mm constitute an "ultra-premium" tier focused squarely on maximising aperture speed. This new tier targets professionals and well-funded enthusiasts for whom the unique capabilities of the F2 aperture provide a tangible creative advantage or a competitive edge in specific fields , making the significant cost and inherent limitations (no OSS, no TCs, size/weight) acceptable trade-offs to achieve that goal.
While the narrative of the lens potentially replacing multiple primes is compelling from a convenience standpoint, it's worth tempering expectations regarding the absolute replication of optical character. Even exceptional zooms often possess a different rendering signature, micro-contrast, or bokeh quality compared to the best specialised prime lenses. Therefore, while the sharpness is expected to be outstanding , the primary driver for adoption among its target audience will likely be the unique and powerful combination of F2 speed coupled with zoom versatility across a highly practical range for portraits and events. This combination offers a significant workflow advantage in dynamic shooting environments, which, for many professionals, is more valuable than perfectly matching the rendering of individual primes they might otherwise carry. The F2 aperture itself, applied across this useful zoom range, remains the core, defining value proposition.
VI. Conclusion:
A Specialised Tool Offering Unprecedented Speed and Versatility for Demanding Creators
The Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM stands as a testament to Sony's continued innovation in optical engineering and its commitment to serving the high-end professional market. Its status as the world's first full-frame telephoto zoom lens reaching 150mm with a constant F2 aperture makes it a truly groundbreaking product. Its core strengths lie in this exceptional F2 speed, the promise of outstanding G Master optical quality, a highly advanced and fast autofocus system, robust professional build quality, and a comprehensive suite of features tailored for demanding video production.
This lens carves out a distinct and specialised position within the market. It is not intended as a replacement for the versatile FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II, but rather as an ultra-premium alternative for specific professional niches where its unique attributes offer compelling advantages. Wedding, event, portrait, and indoor sports photographers, along with cinematographers seeking a distinctive shallow depth-of-field look with zoom flexibility, constitute its primary target audience. For these users, the ability to shoot at F2 across the 50-150mm range can provide significant benefits in low light, enable greater creative control over depth of field, and potentially streamline workflows by reducing the need to swap between multiple prime lenses.
However, this specialisation comes with notable trade-offs. The lens's substantial price tag, considerable size and weight (despite being relatively compact for its specifications), lack of optical stabilisation (OSS), inability to accept teleconverters, and large 95mm filter requirement clearly define its role and limit its appeal for broader applications or more budget-conscious users. It is a tool designed for those who specifically need what it offers and are prepared for the associated investment and compromises.
Ultimately, the value proposition of the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM extends beyond mere technical specifications. It lies in the unique combination of unprecedented speed and practical zoom versatility, offering demanding creators new possibilities for capturing images and video in challenging conditions and achieving a distinct aesthetic. It represents a significant investment, but for professionals operating in its target genres, the potential enhancements to workflow efficiency, low-light capability, and overall creative expression could make it an indispensable part of their toolkit. The FE 50-150mm F2 GM sets a new benchmark for fast telephoto zooms and underscores Sony's ambition to lead innovation in the mirrorless lens market.
LEXAR 6 BAY HUB
AN OVERVIEW OF THE LEXAR PROFESSIONAL WORKFLOW SYSTEM
I am in the process of upgrading my photographic and computer equipment and my first purchase was an M4 Pro Mac Mini which I will discuss at a later date. My most recent purchase was Lexar Professional Workflow System ... all elements except the CfExpress Type B card reader. I intend to purchase an Apple M4 studio but not until later this year.
Lexar Professional Workflow System: An In-Depth Analysis for Creative Professionals
I. Introduction
The Lexar Professional Workflow system represents a modular hardware ecosystem designed explicitly to streamline and accelerate the data management tasks inherent in modern creative workflows. Recognising the diverse and often complex media ingest requirements faced by professionals, Lexar has developed a solution centred around a customisable docking station and interchangeable modules. This system primarily targets photographers, videographers, production teams, and other media professionals who frequently handle large volumes of data from various memory card formats and require efficient backup and transfer processes.
This blog post provides a comprehensive analysis of the Lexar Professional Workflow system, focusing specifically on the latest 6-Bay Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station (model WF800). It examines the hub's architecture, connectivity, and features, delves into the specifications and performance characteristics of key modules like the Workflow Portable SSD and various card readers, and synthesises available professional reviews to offer an overall judgement. Furthermore, it addresses compatibility with Apple Silicon-based Mac Studio systems (M3 Ultra and the anticipated M4 Max) and critically evaluates the performance implications of using USB-C based modules within a Thunderbolt 4 environment, directly addressing potential bottlenecks highlighted in the initial concern that I had before deciding to purchase the system.
II. Lexar Professional Workflow 6-Bay Docking Station (WF800)
The core of the modern Lexar Professional Workflow system is the WF800 6-Bay Docking Station, engineered to serve as a central hub for high-speed data transfer and backup, thereby accelerating post-production timelines.
A. Core Functionality & Connectivity
The WF800 connects to the host computer via a Thunderbolt 4 interface, offering a maximum theoretical bandwidth of 40 Gbps. This high-speed connection is crucial for handling the potentially massive data flow from multiple simultaneous ingest sources.
The station features six modular bays designed to accept Lexar's specific Workflow SSD and card reader modules. These bays are not uniform in their speed capabilities, reflecting a design choice balancing performance and likely cost:
Two Thunderbolt 4 Bays (40 Gbps): Located on the right side, these bays offer the highest potential throughput, ideally suited for the most demanding modules like the CFexpress 4.0 card readers.
Four USB 3.2 Gen 2 Bays (10 Gbps): These bays provide ample bandwidth for UHS-II SD card readers and are the interface speed used by the Workflow Portable SSD modules when docked.
A key design feature is the ability for all six bays to operate simultaneously, enabling parallel data transfers from multiple sources, significantly reducing ingest time compared to sequential processing.
Beyond the module bays, the WF800 incorporates additional connectivity options to enhance its utility as a workstation hub:
Front Ports: One USB-C port (10 Gbps) and one USB-A port (10 Gbps) provide convenient access for connecting peripherals like standard external drives, thumb drives, or other accessories.
Rear Ports: Two Thunderbolt 4 ports are present. One connects to the host computer, while the second allows for daisy-chaining additional Thunderbolt devices (including up to five more WF800 docks) or connecting high-resolution displays. A dedicated USB-C port serves as the power input.
B. Features & Design
The WF800 emphasises flexibility and performance sustainment through several key features:
Modularity: Users can mix and match various Workflow reader and SSD modules to create a configuration tailored to their specific camera formats and storage needs.
Daisy-Chaining: The ability to link up to six WF800 docks via Thunderbolt 4 allows for highly scalable ingest stations in demanding studio environments.
Display Support: Leveraging the Thunderbolt 4 connection, the dock can drive a single 8K display or two 4K displays, integrating video output into the workflow hub.
Build and Thermal Management: The dock features a robust, scratch-resistant aluminium housing designed to dissipate heat effectively. It incorporates high-efficiency airflow channels and a built-in, temperature-sensitive dual-phase fan to maintain performance during sustained, simultaneous operation across all bays.
Power: A substantial 140W Gallium Nitride (GaN) charger powers the dock and connected modules. It includes replaceable international plug adaptors, adding convenience for travelling professionals.
C. Specifications
Model: WF800
Dimensions (L x W x H): 270 × 143.5 x 78mm
Weight: 1570 g (approx. 3.5 lbs)
Operating System Compatibility: Windows 10/11; macOS 11 (Big Sur) or later
Software Compatibility: Compatible with major NLEs and photo editing software like Adobe Premiere Pro, Final Cut Pro, DaVinci Resolve, Lightroom, Photoshop, etc.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty
Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP): $599.99 (Docking station only, modules sold separately)
III. Workflow Modules
The modularity of the Workflow system relies on a range of purpose-built SSD and card reader modules. Lexar has a history with this concept, having released earlier Workflow hubs (HR1 and HR2) based on Thunderbolt 2 and USB 3.0 technology, establishing the foundation for the current Thunderbolt 4 iteration.
A. Lexar Professional Workflow Portable SSD
Designed for both standalone use and integration into the Workflow docks, this portable SSD offers high capacity and ruggedness.
Capacities: Available in 2TB and 4TB options.
Interface (Standalone): The module itself features a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 interface, capable of speeds up to 20 Gbps when connected to a compatible host port.
Performance (Standalone): Lexar advertises maximum read and write speeds of up to 2000 MB/s when used as a standalone drive with a supporting USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 port.
Performance (in Workflow Dock): Crucially, when inserted into any bay of the WF800 dock (including the 40 Gbps Thunderbolt 4 bays), Lexar officially states the maximum transfer speed for the SSD module is limited to 1050 MB/s. This strongly suggests the module utilises a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) connection path when docked, irrespective of the bay's native capability. While one review mentioned achieving 2000 MB/s in the dock , this contradicts Lexar's official specifications across multiple documents and should be considered potentially inaccurate. The official documentation does not provide a technical explanation for this limitation.
Features: The SSD module boasts an IP68 rating for high-level protection against dust and water ingress (submersion up to 1.5m for 30 mins) and is tested for drop resistance up to 3 metres (approx. 9.8 feet). It features a durable aluminium construction for scratch resistance and heat dissipation, incorporates a thermal control design, supports AES 256-bit encryption when used standalone (via Lexar DataShield software), and comes preformatted with the widely compatible exFAT file system.
Compatibility (Standalone): Works with Windows, macOS, and Android devices via its USB-C connector (includes USB-C to USB-C cable and USB-C to USB-A adaptor). However, Apple devices (Macs, iPads) do not support the USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 standard. When connected directly to a Mac, the drive will operate at USB 3.2 Gen 2 speeds (10 Gbps), limiting its standalone performance to approximately 1050 MB/s.
Warranty: 5-year limited warranty.
MSRP: 2TB - $299.99; 4TB - $499.99.
B. Lexar Professional Workflow Card Readers
Lexar offers several card reader modules covering the most common formats used by creative professionals. All readers share a modular design with an aluminium finish and can function independently of the hub using the included USB-C cable and USB-A adaptor.
SD/microSD UHS-II Reader (WF710):
Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps).
Slots: One SD UHS-II, one microSD UHS-II.
Performance: Supports transfer speeds up to 312 MB/s per slot (limited by UHS-II interface). Both slots can transfer data simultaneously.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty.
MSRP: $49.99.
Dual-Slot SD UHS-II Reader (WF720):
Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps).
Slots: Two SD UHS-II slots.
Performance: Supports transfer speeds up to 312 MB/s per slot. Both slots can transfer data simultaneously.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty.
MSRP: $49.99.
CFexpress 4.0 Type A Reader (WF730):
Interface: USB 4. This interface standard incorporates Thunderbolt protocols and supports speeds up to 40 Gbps, allowing it to potentially leverage the full bandwidth of the WF800's Thunderbolt 4 bays when paired with a fast card and host system.
Performance: Capable of speeds up to 1800 MB/s read and 1650 MB/s write (dependent on CFexpress 4.0 Type A card capabilities). Backwards compatible with CFexpress 2.0 Type A cards.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty (inferred from other reader modules).
MSRP: $99.99.
CFexpress 4.0 Type B Reader:
Interface: USB 4. Similar to the Type A reader, this interface allows for potential 40 Gbps speeds in the appropriate dock bays.
Performance: Supports transfer speeds up to 40 Gbps (dependent on CFexpress 4.0 Type B card capabilities, e.g., Lexar Diamond series cards reach up to 3700 MB/s read ). Backwards compatible with CFexpress 2.0 Type B cards.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty (inferred).
MSRP: $99.99.
IV. Performance Analysis & Thunderbolt vs. USB-C Concern
Understanding the performance dynamics of the WF800 hub and its modules is critical, particularly concerning the interplay between Thunderbolt 4 and USB interfaces.
A. Hub and Module Speed Dynamics
The WF800 hub's architecture provides two distinct speed tiers for its module bays: 40 Gbps (Thunderbolt 4) and 10 Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 2). This tiered design likely aims to optimise performance where needed most – for the ultra-fast CFexpress cards via the USB 4 readers – while managing overall system complexity and cost.
The key point of potential confusion, and the crux of the user's query, lies with the Workflow Portable SSD module. Despite its standalone 20 Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 2x2) capability and the availability of 40 Gbps bays in the hub, its performance within the dock is capped at 1050 MB/s. This strongly indicates that the module's connection interface, when docked, defaults to or is limited to USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps). Therefore, placing the SSD module in a 40 Gbps bay does not yield speeds beyond this 10 Gbps limit. While the hub itself leverages Thunderbolt 4 for its connection to the computer and for two of its bays, the SSD module does not appear to utilise this higher bandwidth when docked.
In contrast, the CFexpress Type A and Type B readers utilise a USB 4 interface. USB 4 can operate over Thunderbolt ports and achieve speeds up to 40 Gbps. This means these readers, when placed in the WF800's 40 Gbps Thunderbolt 4 bays and paired with sufficiently fast CFexpress 4.0 cards, can potentially leverage the higher bandwidth for significantly faster offloads compared to the 10 Gbps bays or older USB 3.x readers. The UHS-II SD readers operate at USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps), which is more than adequate for the ~312 MB/s maximum speed of the UHS-II SD card interface.
B. Simultaneous Operation and Real-World Throughput
The ability to run all six bays concurrently is a major performance advantage for professionals ingesting from multiple sources. The hub's total bandwidth to the host computer is 40 Gbps via Thunderbolt 4. While the sum of the maximum potential speeds of all modules might exceed this, real-world scenarios involving mixed card types and SSD backups are unlikely to consistently saturate the host connection, especially given the 10 Gbps cap on four bays and the SSD module. The internal architecture, active cooling system (fan and airflow channels), and robust power supply are designed to sustain performance during these parallel operations.
Direct performance benchmarks for the WF800 hub itself are still somewhat limited in publicly available reviews. However, reviews of previous Lexar Workflow generations (HR1/HR2) generally praised the concept and performance, noting that transfer speeds were often limited by the memory cards themselves rather than the hub, particularly with USB 3.0 connections. Some older tests even found USB 3.0 connections performing better than the Thunderbolt 2 implementation on the HR2 hub under certain conditions, possibly due to chipset limitations or driver maturity at the time. The WF800, with its updated Thunderbolt 4 interface, should theoretically offer much higher peak throughput and better handling of simultaneous high-speed transfers, especially benefiting the CFexpress 4.0 modules. Initial hands-on reviews of the WF800 acknowledge its speed potential and the efficiency gains from simultaneous offloads.
V. Reviews and Overall Judgement
The Lexar Professional Workflow 6-Bay Dock (WF800) and its associated modules were announced in late 2024 and became available shortly thereafter. As a relatively new product, comprehensive, independent benchmark reviews are still emerging. However, initial impressions and reviews from tech publications and users provide a good sense of its reception.
A. Review Sources and General Sentiment
Sources reviewing or discussing the WF800 system include photography/tech websites like PetaPixel and Fstoppers, storage-focused sites (often referencing past Workflow models), YouTube channels (some sponsored), and user forums or comment sections.
The overall sentiment towards the WF800 is largely positive, recognising it as a powerful and well-designed solution for a specific professional need. Key strengths consistently highlighted include:
Modularity and Customisation: The ability to tailor the hub with specific readers and SSDs is seen as a major advantage for diverse workflows.
Build Quality: The robust aluminium construction and thoughtful thermal management (heat dissipation, fan) are praised.
Performance Potential: Thunderbolt 4 connectivity, dedicated high-speed bays for CFexpress, and simultaneous operation offer significant speed improvements for ingest and backup.
Connectivity: Extra USB ports, daisy-chaining capability, and display output add value as a central workstation hub.
Problem Solving: It effectively addresses the logistical challenge of managing multiple card formats and simultaneous offloads from multi-camera shoots.
However, some drawbacks and considerations have also been noted:
Cost: The system represents a significant investment, with the hub alone costing $599.99 and each module adding to the total price. The SSD modules, in particular, were perceived by one reviewer as expensive given their 1050 MB/s speed limit within the dock.
Fan Noise: At least one detailed review mentioned that the internal fan, while necessary for cooling, could be noticeably loud, especially in quiet environments or when idle.
SSD Speed Limitation: The fact that the Workflow Portable SSD does not utilise the full speed of the Thunderbolt 4 bays when docked is a technical limitation that potential buyers should be aware of.
Historical Brand Perception: Some users in forums express lingering concerns about Lexar product reliability following its acquisition by Longsys, although recent product reviews (including for the WF800 system) are generally positive regarding build and performance.
B. Overall Judgement
The Lexar Professional Workflow WF800 is judged as a highly effective, specialised tool for creative professionals who can leverage its modularity and simultaneous ingest capabilities to significantly improve workflow efficiency. It is particularly well-suited for studios or individuals dealing with high data volumes from multiple camera systems using varied media formats like CFexpress and UHS-II SD cards. While the initial cost is substantial, the potential time savings and convenience can justify the investment for its target audience. The primary caveats are the potential for audible fan noise and the specific performance limitation of the SSD module when used within the dock.
VI. Compatibility with Mac Studio (M4 Max / M3 Ultra)
The Lexar Professional Workflow WF800 dock is designed for compatibility with modern Mac systems, including Apple Silicon models.
Operating System Requirement: The dock requires macOS 11 (Big Sur) or a later version. Mac Studio models running M3 Ultra or the anticipated M4 Max chips will ship with macOS versions far exceeding this minimum requirement.
Connectivity Standard: Mac Studio computers, across M1, M2, and M3 Ultra generations, feature Thunderbolt 4 ports. It is virtually certain that the upcoming M4 Max-based Mac Studio will also include Thunderbolt 4 / USB4 ports. The WF800 hub utilises a Thunderbolt 4 connection to the host computer, ensuring a direct, high-speed link.
Apple Silicon Compatibility: Thunderbolt 4 is natively supported by Apple's M-series silicon. Therefore, the WF800 docking station is expected to be fully compatible with Mac Studio models equipped with M3 Ultra and M4 Max processors. No specific compatibility issues related to Apple Silicon have been reported in the available documentation or reviews. The system relies on standard Thunderbolt protocols supported by macOS.
SSD Module Speed on Mac: As previously noted, the Workflow Portable SSD module is limited to 1050 MB/s when used inside the dock, regardless of the operating system. Furthermore, when used standalone and connected directly to any Mac (including M1/M2/M3/M4 models), the SSD's speed is also limited to ~1050 MB/s (10 Gbps USB 3.2 Gen 2 speeds). This is because macOS and Apple hardware do not support the faster USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) standard that the drive uses for its maximum standalone potential. Consequently, for Mac users, the Workflow Portable SSD offers the same maximum theoretical speed whether used standalone or within the Workflow dock.
VII. Conclusion
The Lexar Professional Workflow 6-Bay Docking Station (WF800) emerges as a sophisticated and highly functional modular system tailored for the demanding ingest needs of contemporary creative professionals. Its core strengths
I am in the process of upgrading my photographic and computer equipment and my first purchase was an M4 Pro Mac Mini which I will discuss at a later date. My most recent purchase was Lexar Professional Workflow System ... all elements except the CfExpress Type B card reader. I intend to purchase an Apple M4 studio but not until later this year.
Lexar Professional Workflow System: An In-Depth Analysis for Creative Professionals
I. Introduction
The Lexar Professional Workflow system represents a modular hardware ecosystem designed explicitly to streamline and accelerate the data management tasks inherent in modern creative workflows. Recognising the diverse and often complex media ingest requirements faced by professionals, Lexar has developed a solution centred around a customisable docking station and interchangeable modules. This system primarily targets photographers, videographers, production teams, and other media professionals who frequently handle large volumes of data from various memory card formats and require efficient backup and transfer processes.
This blog post provides a comprehensive analysis of the Lexar Professional Workflow system, focusing specifically on the latest 6-Bay Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station (model WF800). It examines the hub's architecture, connectivity, and features, delves into the specifications and performance characteristics of key modules like the Workflow Portable SSD and various card readers, and synthesises available professional reviews to offer an overall judgement. Furthermore, it addresses compatibility with Apple Silicon-based Mac Studio systems (M3 Ultra and the anticipated M4 Max) and critically evaluates the performance implications of using USB-C based modules within a Thunderbolt 4 environment, directly addressing potential bottlenecks highlighted in the initial concern that I had before deciding to purchase the system.
II. Lexar Professional Workflow 6-Bay Docking Station (WF800)
The core of the modern Lexar Professional Workflow system is the WF800 6-Bay Docking Station, engineered to serve as a central hub for high-speed data transfer and backup, thereby accelerating post-production timelines.
A. Core Functionality & Connectivity
The WF800 connects to the host computer via a Thunderbolt 4 interface, offering a maximum theoretical bandwidth of 40 Gbps. This high-speed connection is crucial for handling the potentially massive data flow from multiple simultaneous ingest sources.
The station features six modular bays designed to accept Lexar's specific Workflow SSD and card reader modules. These bays are not uniform in their speed capabilities, reflecting a design choice balancing performance and likely cost:
Two Thunderbolt 4 Bays (40 Gbps): Located on the right side, these bays offer the highest potential throughput, ideally suited for the most demanding modules like the CFexpress 4.0 card readers.
Four USB 3.2 Gen 2 Bays (10 Gbps): These bays provide ample bandwidth for UHS-II SD card readers and are the interface speed used by the Workflow Portable SSD modules when docked.
A key design feature is the ability for all six bays to operate simultaneously, enabling parallel data transfers from multiple sources, significantly reducing ingest time compared to sequential processing.
Beyond the module bays, the WF800 incorporates additional connectivity options to enhance its utility as a workstation hub:
Front Ports: One USB-C port (10 Gbps) and one USB-A port (10 Gbps) provide convenient access for connecting peripherals like standard external drives, thumb drives, or other accessories.
Rear Ports: Two Thunderbolt 4 ports are present. One connects to the host computer, while the second allows for daisy-chaining additional Thunderbolt devices (including up to five more WF800 docks) or connecting high-resolution displays. A dedicated USB-C port serves as the power input.
B. Features & Design
The WF800 emphasises flexibility and performance sustainment through several key features:
Modularity: Users can mix and match various Workflow reader and SSD modules to create a configuration tailored to their specific camera formats and storage needs.
Daisy-Chaining: The ability to link up to six WF800 docks via Thunderbolt 4 allows for highly scalable ingest stations in demanding studio environments.
Display Support: Leveraging the Thunderbolt 4 connection, the dock can drive a single 8K display or two 4K displays, integrating video output into the workflow hub.
Build and Thermal Management: The dock features a robust, scratch-resistant aluminium housing designed to dissipate heat effectively. It incorporates high-efficiency airflow channels and a built-in, temperature-sensitive dual-phase fan to maintain performance during sustained, simultaneous operation across all bays.
Power: A substantial 140W Gallium Nitride (GaN) charger powers the dock and connected modules. It includes replaceable international plug adaptors, adding convenience for travelling professionals.
C. Specifications
Model: WF800
Dimensions (L x W x H): 270 × 143.5 x 78mm
Weight: 1570 g (approx. 3.5 lbs)
Operating System Compatibility: Windows 10/11; macOS 11 (Big Sur) or later
Software Compatibility: Compatible with major NLEs and photo editing software like Adobe Premiere Pro, Final Cut Pro, DaVinci Resolve, Lightroom, Photoshop, etc.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty
Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP): $599.99 (Docking station only, modules sold separately)
III. Workflow Modules
The modularity of the Workflow system relies on a range of purpose-built SSD and card reader modules. Lexar has a history with this concept, having released earlier Workflow hubs (HR1 and HR2) based on Thunderbolt 2 and USB 3.0 technology, establishing the foundation for the current Thunderbolt 4 iteration.
A. Lexar Professional Workflow Portable SSD
Designed for both standalone use and integration into the Workflow docks, this portable SSD offers high capacity and ruggedness.
Capacities: Available in 2TB and 4TB options.
Interface (Standalone): The module itself features a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 interface, capable of speeds up to 20 Gbps when connected to a compatible host port.
Performance (Standalone): Lexar advertises maximum read and write speeds of up to 2000 MB/s when used as a standalone drive with a supporting USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 port.
Performance (in Workflow Dock): Crucially, when inserted into any bay of the WF800 dock (including the 40 Gbps Thunderbolt 4 bays), Lexar officially states the maximum transfer speed for the SSD module is limited to 1050 MB/s. This strongly suggests the module utilises a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) connection path when docked, irrespective of the bay's native capability. While one review mentioned achieving 2000 MB/s in the dock , this contradicts Lexar's official specifications across multiple documents and should be considered potentially inaccurate. The official documentation does not provide a technical explanation for this limitation.
Features: The SSD module boasts an IP68 rating for high-level protection against dust and water ingress (submersion up to 1.5m for 30 mins) and is tested for drop resistance up to 3 metres (approx. 9.8 feet). It features a durable aluminium construction for scratch resistance and heat dissipation, incorporates a thermal control design, supports AES 256-bit encryption when used standalone (via Lexar DataShield software), and comes preformatted with the widely compatible exFAT file system.
Compatibility (Standalone): Works with Windows, macOS, and Android devices via its USB-C connector (includes USB-C to USB-C cable and USB-C to USB-A adaptor). However, Apple devices (Macs, iPads) do not support the USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 standard. When connected directly to a Mac, the drive will operate at USB 3.2 Gen 2 speeds (10 Gbps), limiting its standalone performance to approximately 1050 MB/s.
Warranty: 5-year limited warranty.
MSRP: 2TB - $299.99; 4TB - $499.99.
B. Lexar Professional Workflow Card Readers
Lexar offers several card reader modules covering the most common formats used by creative professionals. All readers share a modular design with an aluminium finish and can function independently of the hub using the included USB-C cable and USB-A adaptor.
SD/microSD UHS-II Reader (WF710):
Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps).
Slots: One SD UHS-II, one microSD UHS-II.
Performance: Supports transfer speeds up to 312 MB/s per slot (limited by UHS-II interface). Both slots can transfer data simultaneously.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty.
MSRP: $49.99.
Dual-Slot SD UHS-II Reader (WF720):
Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps).
Slots: Two SD UHS-II slots.
Performance: Supports transfer speeds up to 312 MB/s per slot. Both slots can transfer data simultaneously.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty.
MSRP: $49.99.
CFexpress 4.0 Type A Reader (WF730):
Interface: USB 4. This interface standard incorporates Thunderbolt protocols and supports speeds up to 40 Gbps, allowing it to potentially leverage the full bandwidth of the WF800's Thunderbolt 4 bays when paired with a fast card and host system.
Performance: Capable of speeds up to 1800 MB/s read and 1650 MB/s write (dependent on CFexpress 4.0 Type A card capabilities). Backwards compatible with CFexpress 2.0 Type A cards.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty (inferred from other reader modules).
MSRP: $99.99.
CFexpress 4.0 Type B Reader:
Interface: USB 4. Similar to the Type A reader, this interface allows for potential 40 Gbps speeds in the appropriate dock bays.
Performance: Supports transfer speeds up to 40 Gbps (dependent on CFexpress 4.0 Type B card capabilities, e.g., Lexar Diamond series cards reach up to 3700 MB/s read ). Backwards compatible with CFexpress 2.0 Type B cards.
Warranty: 3-year limited warranty (inferred).
MSRP: $99.99.
IV. Performance Analysis & Thunderbolt vs. USB-C Concern
Understanding the performance dynamics of the WF800 hub and its modules is critical, particularly concerning the interplay between Thunderbolt 4 and USB interfaces.
A. Hub and Module Speed Dynamics
The WF800 hub's architecture provides two distinct speed tiers for its module bays: 40 Gbps (Thunderbolt 4) and 10 Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 2). This tiered design likely aims to optimise performance where needed most – for the ultra-fast CFexpress cards via the USB 4 readers – while managing overall system complexity and cost.
The key point of potential confusion, and the crux of the user's query, lies with the Workflow Portable SSD module. Despite its standalone 20 Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 2x2) capability and the availability of 40 Gbps bays in the hub, its performance within the dock is capped at 1050 MB/s. This strongly indicates that the module's connection interface, when docked, defaults to or is limited to USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps). Therefore, placing the SSD module in a 40 Gbps bay does not yield speeds beyond this 10 Gbps limit. While the hub itself leverages Thunderbolt 4 for its connection to the computer and for two of its bays, the SSD module does not appear to utilise this higher bandwidth when docked.
In contrast, the CFexpress Type A and Type B readers utilise a USB 4 interface. USB 4 can operate over Thunderbolt ports and achieve speeds up to 40 Gbps. This means these readers, when placed in the WF800's 40 Gbps Thunderbolt 4 bays and paired with sufficiently fast CFexpress 4.0 cards, can potentially leverage the higher bandwidth for significantly faster offloads compared to the 10 Gbps bays or older USB 3.x readers. The UHS-II SD readers operate at USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps), which is more than adequate for the ~312 MB/s maximum speed of the UHS-II SD card interface.
B. Simultaneous Operation and Real-World Throughput
The ability to run all six bays concurrently is a major performance advantage for professionals ingesting from multiple sources. The hub's total bandwidth to the host computer is 40 Gbps via Thunderbolt 4. While the sum of the maximum potential speeds of all modules might exceed this, real-world scenarios involving mixed card types and SSD backups are unlikely to consistently saturate the host connection, especially given the 10 Gbps cap on four bays and the SSD module. The internal architecture, active cooling system (fan and airflow channels), and robust power supply are designed to sustain performance during these parallel operations.
Direct performance benchmarks for the WF800 hub itself are still somewhat limited in publicly available reviews. However, reviews of previous Lexar Workflow generations (HR1/HR2) generally praised the concept and performance, noting that transfer speeds were often limited by the memory cards themselves rather than the hub, particularly with USB 3.0 connections. Some older tests even found USB 3.0 connections performing better than the Thunderbolt 2 implementation on the HR2 hub under certain conditions, possibly due to chipset limitations or driver maturity at the time. The WF800, with its updated Thunderbolt 4 interface, should theoretically offer much higher peak throughput and better handling of simultaneous high-speed transfers, especially benefiting the CFexpress 4.0 modules. Initial hands-on reviews of the WF800 acknowledge its speed potential and the efficiency gains from simultaneous offloads.
V. Reviews and Overall Judgement
The Lexar Professional Workflow 6-Bay Dock (WF800) and its associated modules were announced in late 2024 and became available shortly thereafter. As a relatively new product, comprehensive, independent benchmark reviews are still emerging. However, initial impressions and reviews from tech publications and users provide a good sense of its reception.
A. Review Sources and General Sentiment
Sources reviewing or discussing the WF800 system include photography/tech websites like PetaPixel and Fstoppers, storage-focused sites (often referencing past Workflow models), YouTube channels (some sponsored), and user forums or comment sections.
The overall sentiment towards the WF800 is largely positive, recognising it as a powerful and well-designed solution for a specific professional need. Key strengths consistently highlighted include:
Modularity and Customisation: The ability to tailor the hub with specific readers and SSDs is seen as a major advantage for diverse workflows.
Build Quality: The robust aluminium construction and thoughtful thermal management (heat dissipation, fan) are praised.
Performance Potential: Thunderbolt 4 connectivity, dedicated high-speed bays for CFexpress, and simultaneous operation offer significant speed improvements for ingest and backup.
Connectivity: Extra USB ports, daisy-chaining capability, and display output add value as a central workstation hub.
Problem Solving: It effectively addresses the logistical challenge of managing multiple card formats and simultaneous offloads from multi-camera shoots.
However, some drawbacks and considerations have also been noted:
Cost: The system represents a significant investment, with the hub alone costing $599.99 and each module adding to the total price. The SSD modules, in particular, were perceived by one reviewer as expensive given their 1050 MB/s speed limit within the dock.
Fan Noise: At least one detailed review mentioned that the internal fan, while necessary for cooling, could be noticeably loud, especially in quiet environments or when idle.
SSD Speed Limitation: The fact that the Workflow Portable SSD does not utilise the full speed of the Thunderbolt 4 bays when docked is a technical limitation that potential buyers should be aware of.
Historical Brand Perception: Some users in forums express lingering concerns about Lexar product reliability following its acquisition by Longsys, although recent product reviews (including for the WF800 system) are generally positive regarding build and performance.
B. Overall Judgement
The Lexar Professional Workflow WF800 is judged as a highly effective, specialised tool for creative professionals who can leverage its modularity and simultaneous ingest capabilities to significantly improve workflow efficiency. It is particularly well-suited for studios or individuals dealing with high data volumes from multiple camera systems using varied media formats like CFexpress and UHS-II SD cards. While the initial cost is substantial, the potential time savings and convenience can justify the investment for its target audience. The primary caveats are the potential for audible fan noise and the specific performance limitation of the SSD module when used within the dock.
VI. Compatibility with Mac Studio (M4 Max / M3 Ultra)
The Lexar Professional Workflow WF800 dock is designed for compatibility with modern Mac systems, including Apple Silicon models.
Operating System Requirement: The dock requires macOS 11 (Big Sur) or a later version. Mac Studio models running M3 Ultra or the anticipated M4 Max chips will ship with macOS versions far exceeding this minimum requirement.
Connectivity Standard: Mac Studio computers, across M1, M2, and M3 Ultra generations, feature Thunderbolt 4 ports. It is virtually certain that the upcoming M4 Max-based Mac Studio will also include Thunderbolt 4 / USB4 ports. The WF800 hub utilises a Thunderbolt 4 connection to the host computer, ensuring a direct, high-speed link.
Apple Silicon Compatibility: Thunderbolt 4 is natively supported by Apple's M-series silicon. Therefore, the WF800 docking station is expected to be fully compatible with Mac Studio models equipped with M3 Ultra and M4 Max processors. No specific compatibility issues related to Apple Silicon have been reported in the available documentation or reviews. The system relies on standard Thunderbolt protocols supported by macOS.
SSD Module Speed on Mac: As previously noted, the Workflow Portable SSD module is limited to 1050 MB/s when used inside the dock, regardless of the operating system. Furthermore, when used standalone and connected directly to any Mac (including M1/M2/M3/M4 models), the SSD's speed is also limited to ~1050 MB/s (10 Gbps USB 3.2 Gen 2 speeds). This is because macOS and Apple hardware do not support the faster USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) standard that the drive uses for its maximum standalone potential. Consequently, for Mac users, the Workflow Portable SSD offers the same maximum theoretical speed whether used standalone or within the Workflow dock.
VII. Conclusion
The Lexar Professional Workflow 6-Bay Docking Station (WF800) emerges as a sophisticated and highly functional modular system tailored for the demanding ingest needs of contemporary creative professionals. Its core strengths
SPITALSFIELD PUB AND RESTAURANT
THIS EXCELLENT RESTAURANT WAS ONCE A POPULAR PUB [PHOTOGRAPHED APRIL 2025]
Spitalfields Pub and Restaurant
Location and Ambiance: Nestled in the historic heart of Dublin's Liberties, Spitalfields Pub and Restaurant enjoys a location near a street also named "Spitalfields". This welcoming establishment offers a cosy pub setting where patrons can savour traditional, classically prepared restaurant fare.
History and Ownership: The building now housing Spitalfields was formerly home to Shanahan's pub. In 2019, the premises were acquired by Stephen McAllister, a chef and television personality known from "The Restaurant", and his wife, Andrea Hussey, who also own the highly regarded Pig's Ear restaurant on Nassau Street.
Transformation into a Restaurant: Spitalfields transitioned from a traditional pub to a restaurant, opening its doors in September 2019. Intriguingly, it has retained elements of its pub heritage, creating a distinctive "restaurant in a pub" experience. The focus remains on providing high-quality cuisine within a relaxed and inviting atmosphere.
Origin of the Name: While the precise origin of the pub's name is not definitively known, it is highly likely that it draws inspiration from the adjacent Spitalfields Street. This street may, in turn, have been named after the Spitalfields area in London, a historically significant district renowned for its vibrant markets and diverse communities.
Culinary Style: The restaurant prides itself on serving classic dishes with a contemporary twist, with a strong emphasis on seasonal and locally sourced produce. Its dedication to quality has been acknowledged with a Bib Gourmand award from the Michelin Guide.
The Liberties Area:
Historical Significance: The Liberties boasts a rich history stretching back to medieval times, when it existed outside the city walls and enjoyed certain "liberties" or freedoms. It was historically significant for its breweries, distilleries, and bustling markets.
Present Day: Today, the Liberties retains its unique character as a lively and close-knit community, blending historic landmarks, traditional pubs, and innovative businesses.
Regarding the history of Shanahan's pub, while precise historical records are difficult to access, available online mentions and local knowledge suggest the following:
Existence: Shanahan's pub was located at the corner of 25 The Coombe for a number of years before its sale in July 2019.
Local Popularity: It appears to have been a well-liked local establishment, known for its welcoming atmosphere and function room.
Previous Name: There are indications online that the premises may have previously been known as 'Grumpy Jack's', the site of a tragic murder in February 2009, where John 'Champagne' Carroll was the victim.
Ownership: Specific details about the previous ownership are unclear. However, given its traditional pub setting and strong local following, it was likely a family-run business.
Although definitive details regarding its establishment date and previous ownership remain elusive, it's evident that Shanahan's held a special place within the Liberties community before its transformation into the Spitalfields Pub and Restaurant.
FUJI GFX100RF
EXPECTED WITHIN DAYS MY NEW FUJI GFX100RF [A MEDIUM FORMAT CAMERA IN A COMPACT BODY]
When I last visited Belfast I had a bad fall and my Sony A7RIV has given many problems since then as it was damaged due making contact with a concrete bollard. Myself, I was out of action for a day because of bruised ribs.
I had considered buying the A7RV when it became available but after trying it for a week I decided to wait for the next version and to consider getting a Leica Q3 but the price was not to my liking so I decided not to purchase anything during 2024. In January I decided to purchase the Leica Q3 43 in May or June. But today I was given the opportunity to obtain a Fuji GFX100RF at a good price withe a delivery date of the first week in May 2025 so I have decided to forget about the Leica for now. I will revisit Leica options in 2026 or 2027.
Fuji GFX100RF vs. Leica Q3: A Comparative Analysis for Street Photography.
The digital camera market continues to evolve, offering photographers an array of choices tailored to various needs and preferences. Among the latest entrants and established players in the high-end, fixed-lens segment are the Fuji GFX100RF and the Leica Q3 series (comprising the Q3 and Q3 43).
The Fuji GFX100RF marks a significant step for Fujifilm, bringing its renowned medium format sensor technology into a more compact, rangefinder-inspired body. This development suggests an ambition to cater to photographers seeking the pinnacle of image quality in a more portable form factor, potentially drawing those familiar with Fujifilm's X100 series but desiring higher resolution.
Conversely, Leica's Q series has carved a strong reputation in the full-frame, fixed-lens market, known for its exceptional image quality, premium build, and a distinct photographic experience.4 The introduction of the Leica Q3 43, featuring a different focal length than the original Q3, indicates Leica's responsiveness to user feedback and a strategic move to broaden the appeal of its fixed-lens offerings by providing greater versatility in perspective.
This blog post aims to provide a detailed comparative analysis of the Fuji GFX100RF and the Leica Q3/Q3 43, with a specific focus on their suitability for street photography.
By examining their technical specifications, inherent advantages and disadvantages, notable similarities and differences, current availability challenges, summarised user and professional reviews, and RAW file processing compatibility, this analysis intends to offer a comprehensive overview for photographers considering these high-caliber cameras for their street photography endeavors.
Fuji GFX100RF: A Street Photography Perspective
The Fuji GFX100RF is engineered around a substantial 43.8mm x 32.9mm GFX 102MP CMOS II sensor, incorporating a primary colour filter. This exceptionally high resolution offers a significant advantage for street photographers who might want to refine their composition through cropping after capturing a scene. Despite featuring a fixed FUJINON GF 35mm f/4 lens, which provides a 28mm equivalent field of view on a full-frame camera, the immense resolution of the sensor allows users to effectively simulate different focal lengths by cropping into the image. This fixed focal length encourages a more deliberate and thoughtful approach to street photography, prompting photographers to carefully consider their framing and perspective.1For capturing the dynamic and often fleeting moments inherent in street photography, the GFX100RF is equipped with an Intelligent Hybrid AF system.
This system combines TTL contrast detection AF with TTL phase detection AF, also incorporating AI-assisted subject recognition capable of identifying animals, vehicles, birds, and aircraft. Furthermore, it features face and eye detection, enhancing its capabilities for street portraits. The phase detection AF offers low-light performance down to -3.0EV, which is crucial for focusing in the varied lighting conditions often encountered in urban environments.2In terms of physical attributes, the GFX100RF measures 133.5 x 90.4 x 76.5 mm and weighs 735g with the battery and memory card inserted.
While not as diminutive as some APS-C or full-frame compact cameras, its weight and size are notably manageable for a medium format system. This relative portability makes it a viable option for photographers who spend extended periods walking and shooting on the streets.
The image quality delivered by the GFX100RF is a significant draw, offering 16-bit RAW files, a wide dynamic range, and low noise performance starting from a base ISO of 80. Fujifilm's signature set of 20 Film Simulations provides photographers with a range of aesthetic options directly in-camera, which can be particularly appealing for street photographers who prefer to minimise post-processing.
Additionally, the built-in 4-stop ND filter allows for greater creative control over exposure, especially in bright daylight conditions.1The camera offers continuous shooting capabilities up to 6 frames per second when using the mechanical shutter (with a buffer of 296 JPEG frames or 40 Compressed RAW frames) and up to 3 frames per second with the electronic shutter (boasting a much larger buffer of 1000+ JPEG frames or 508 Compressed RAW frames). While these speeds are adequate for capturing sequences in street photography, the RAW buffer depth might be a consideration for photographers who frequently shoot long bursts.
Beyond these core features, the GFX100RF incorporates an Aspect Ratio Dial, allowing for quick and direct selection between nine different aspect ratios, which can be a valuable tool for in-camera composition favoured by some street photographers. It also features a Digital Teleconverter, offering 45mm, 63mm, and 80mm equivalent focal lengths, providing a degree of versatility despite the fixed lens, albeit with a corresponding reduction in image resolution.
The inclusion of a leaf shutter enables flash synchronisation at speeds up to 1/4000s, offering creative lighting possibilities for street portraits.1For street photography, the GFX100RF presents several compelling advantages. Its 102MP medium format sensor stands out, providing exceptional detail and significant cropping flexibility for refining composition. The camera's size and weight, while not the smallest, are surprisingly manageable for a medium format system, potentially making it suitable for all-day use. The 28mm equivalent lens is a widely favoured focal length for capturing the context of street scenes.
The built-in 4-stop ND filter offers creative control over exposure in bright conditions, and the unique Aspect Ratio Dial allows for in-camera compositional choices. The leaf shutter facilitates high-speed flash synchronisation, and Fujifilm's renowned Film Simulations provide appealing out-of-camera JPEGs.
The improved autofocus system with subject recognition is also a benefit for capturing dynamic street scenes.2However, the GFX100RF also has potential drawbacks for street photography. The fixed 35mm f/4 lens (28mm equivalent) might not suit all street photography styles, particularly those favouring longer focal lengths or a shallower depth of field.10 The f/4 aperture might also limit performance in low-light conditions and the ability to achieve significant background blur compared to lenses with wider apertures.10 The absence of in-body image stabilisation (IBIS) could make handheld shooting at slower shutter speeds challenging, especially given the high resolution sensor which can amplify any camera shake.
The electronic shutter's potential for image distortion with fast movement is another consideration. Some users might find the thumb placement awkward or desire a built-in grip for enhanced handling comfort.
Finally, the GFX100RF occupies a premium price point, which might be a barrier for some photographers.
Leica Q3 and Q3 43: A Street Photography PerspectiveThe Leica Q3 series centres around a 60MP Full-Frame BSI CMOS Sensor that incorporates Triple Resolution Technology, allowing users to select between 60MP, 36MP, or 18MP output. This full-frame sensor provides excellent image quality and strong low-light performance, while the Triple Resolution Technology offers flexibility in managing file sizes. The Leica Q3 is equipped with a fixed Summilux 28mm f/1.7 ASPH. lens, which includes an integrated macro mode.
The very fast f/1.7 aperture is a significant advantage for street photography, enabling shooting in dim lighting conditions and producing a shallow depth of field for subject isolation.4 The 28mm focal length is a classic choice for capturing the broader context of street scenes.In contrast, the Leica Q3 43 features a fixed APO-Summicron 43mm f/2 ASPH. lens, also with an integrated macro mode. The 43mm focal length, approximating a 35mm equivalent on full-frame, provides a more natural perspective that many street photographers prefer.
The f/2 aperture still offers good low-light capabilities and some degree of background separation.6 The APO designation of the lens signifies exceptional optical quality.Both Q3 models utilise a Hybrid Autofocus System that combines Phase Detection AF, Contrast AF, Depth from Defocus, and AI, including Face/Eye/Body Detection and Animal Detection. This advanced autofocus system aims to deliver fast and accurate focusing performance, crucial for capturing spontaneous moments in street photography.
Leica has made significant improvements to the autofocus in the Q3 series compared to its predecessors, making it a more competitive option for capturing dynamic street scenes.The dimensions and weight of the two Leica Q3 models are similar. The Leica Q3 measures 130 x 80.3 x 92.6 mm and weighs 743g with the battery 5, while the Leica Q3 43 is slightly larger at 130 x 80.3 x 97.6 mm and heavier at 772g with the battery.21 Both cameras are relatively compact and lightweight for full-frame systems, making them well-suited for carrying during extended street photography sessions. Their size and weight offer a good balance between portability and a substantial feel in hand.
The Leica Q3 series is renowned for its exceptional image quality, delivering rich detail and accurate colour rendition. Both models offer in-camera digital zoom/cropping capabilities. The Q3 provides equivalent focal lengths of 35mm, 50mm, 75mm, and 90mm, while the Q3 43 offers 60mm, 75mm, 90mm, 120mm, and 150mm equivalents. This feature provides some compositional flexibility without the need for lens changes.Both cameras boast a high continuous shooting speed of up to 15 frames per second. This rapid capture rate is advantageous for street photographers looking to capture fast-paced action or subtle changes in expression.Other notable features of the Leica Q3 series include a tiltable 3" display, a high-resolution 5.67MP OLED viewfinder, IP52-rated ingress protection against dust and moisture, USB-C and HDMI ports, and the option for wireless charging with an optional handgrip. The tilting screen enhances versatility for shooting from various angles, a common requirement in street photography.
The high-resolution viewfinder offers a clear and detailed view for composition. Weather sealing adds durability for shooting in less than ideal conditions.For street photography, the Leica Q3 and Q3 43 offer several notable advantages. Their excellent image quality, stemming from the full-frame sensor and high-caliber lenses, is a primary draw. The fast maximum apertures (f/1.7 for the Q3 and f/2 for the Q3 43) are particularly beneficial for low-light shooting and creating shallow depth of field.4 Their relatively compact and lightweight designs make them suitable for extended periods of carrying and shooting. The improved hybrid autofocus system offers fast and generally accurate performance. The tiltable rear screen provides versatility for shooting from various perspectives, and the high continuous shooting speed is useful for capturing action.
The IP52 weather sealing adds a layer of protection for shooting in diverse environments.4However, the Leica Q3 series also has potential drawbacks for street photography. The very high price point is a significant consideration for most photographers. Some users report that the ergonomics can be challenging, with the body being somewhat slippery and potentially requiring the purchase of an optional grip for comfortable handling. While the autofocus has been improved, some reviews still note occasional inconsistencies in its performance.
The limitation to a fixed lens (either 28mm or 43mm) might not suit photographers who prefer the flexibility of interchangeable lenses or a wider range of focal lengths. The mechanical shutter's maximum speed of 1/2000s can be limiting in very bright conditions, potentially necessitating the use of the electronic shutter, which can introduce rolling shutter effects.
Finally, the battery life, with a CIPA rating of approximately 350 shots, is relatively low compared to the Fuji GFX100RF.
Head-to-Head Comparison for Street Photography
The Fuji GFX100RF distinguishes itself with a significantly larger, higher-resolution sensor compared to the full-frame sensors of the Leica Q3 series. This difference can translate to greater detail and more extensive cropping capabilities. However, the Leica Q3 and Q3 43 offer faster lenses, which are advantageous for low-light performance and achieving a shallower depth of field, a characteristic often sought after in street photography.
While all three cameras feature advanced autofocus systems, real-world performance and consistency can vary. The Leica Q3 series incorporates optical image stabilisation, a feature absent in the GFX100RF, which can be beneficial for handheld shooting, especially at slower shutter speeds.
The size and weight of all three cameras are relatively similar, making them manageable for street photography. A significant differentiator is the price point, with the Leica Q3 models being notably more expensive than the Fuji GFX100RF. The choice between the 28mm lens of the Q3 and the 43mm lens of the Q3 43 depends on the photographer's preferred perspective for street photography.
The Fuji GFX100RF Availability Challenge in the USA
Recent reports indicate that Fujifilm has suspended pre-orders for the GFX100RF in the United States. This development suggests that obtaining the camera within the next few months might be challenging for those in the US. The rumoured primary reason behind this suspension is the anticipation of new US tariffs on electronics imported from Japan.39 Tariffs can significantly increase the cost of imported goods, potentially affecting the retail price and overall availability.
Discussions in online forums reveal various perspectives on this situation. Some speculate that units already within the US might not be subject to the new tariffs, and Fujifilm could be holding back to assess the pricing implications. Others believe that the tariffs, having gone into effect before the camera's official release date, should logically apply to all new shipments, potentially leading to a price increase across the board. There is also the possibility that no units have yet been shipped to the US.
Beyond the GFX100RF, other Fujifilm cameras manufactured in China, such as the X100VI and X-M5 (black version), are also reportedly facing order suspensions in the US due to even higher tariffs on goods from China. This broader issue highlights the potential impact of changing trade policies on the availability and pricing of photographic equipment from various manufacturers.
For the user in the US, this situation necessitates being aware of potential delays and the possibility of price fluctuations for the Fuji GFX100RF.
Review Insights and User Sentiment
Professional reviews of the Fuji GFX100RF consistently praise its compact size and lightweight design, especially considering its medium format sensor. The exceptional 102MP sensor and the resulting image quality are also frequently highlighted as key strengths. The 28mm equivalent lens is generally considered suitable for street photography, and features like the Aspect Ratio Dial and Fujifilm's Film Simulations are appreciated for the creative control they offer.
However, the f/4 aperture and the lack of in-body image stabilisation are often mentioned as potential limitations, particularly in low-light scenarios. Some reviewers have drawn favourable comparisons between the GFX100RF's shooting experience and that of the Leica Q series.
Reviews of the Leica Q3 and Q3 43 consistently commend their excellent image quality and the fast apertures of their lenses. The addition of a tilting screen in the Q3 series is seen as a significant advantage for street photography. The build quality and handling are generally well-received, although some users find that an optional grip is necessary for optimal comfort. While the autofocus system is considered good, some reviews point out occasional inconsistencies.
The high price is a recurring point of discussion, often cited as a major drawback. The Q3 43's 43mm lens is often praised for offering a more natural perspective preferred by many photographers.
Initial user feedback on the Fuji GFX100RF highlights its smaller-than-expected size and impressive image quality. Some users have noted minor quirks, such as the disappearance of aspect ratio options when shooting in RAW-only mode. The depth of field achievable at f/4 on the medium format sensor is surprisingly pleasing to many early users.
Leica Q3 and Q3 43 users often emphasise the exceptional image quality and the overall premium experience of using a Leica camera. The 28mm lens of the Q3 is viewed as a versatile option for various types of photography, including travel and everyday shooting, while the 43mm lens of the Q3 43 is favoured by those who prefer a slightly tighter, more natural field of view. The high cost is frequently acknowledged but often considered justifiable by the image quality and the prestige associated with the Leica brand. Some users have reported occasional issues with autofocus consistency and the ergonomics of the camera body.
Based on the available reviews, there isn't a definitive tendency to favour one camera over the others. The choice appears to be highly subjective and contingent on individual priorities. The GFX100RF appeals to photographers who prioritise ultimate resolution and the unique aesthetic of a medium format sensor in a relatively portable package, potentially at a more accessible price point than other medium format options. The Leica Q3 series attracts those who value the Leica brand, exceptional full-frame image quality, faster lenses for enhanced low-light capabilities and bokeh, and are willing to invest a premium for these attributes.
The decision between the Q3 and Q3 43 within the Leica lineup further depends on the photographer's preference for a wider (28mm) or a more standard (43mm) focal length.
RAW File Processing Compatibility
Adobe Lightroom fully supports RAW files (.RAF) from the Fuji GFX100RF. The latest versions of Lightroom and Adobe Camera Raw are compatible with these files. Fujifilm also provides Tether Shooting Plug-ins for Lightroom Classic, including a PRO version specifically designed for GFX series cameras. These plug-ins offer enhanced tethered shooting capabilities for GFX users within the Lightroom environment.
While there have been past discussions regarding Lightroom's handling of RAW files from Fujifilm cameras utilising X-Trans sensors, these concerns are less relevant for the GFX100RF, which employs a standard Bayer sensor.
Information regarding the compatibility of Fuji GFX100RF RAW files with DXO PhotoRaw is somewhat limited based on the provided material. However, one source indicates that support for the Fujifilm GFX100RF in both DxO PhotoLab and DxO PureRAW is expected to be available in July 2025. DXO PhotoLab already supports RAW files from other GFX cameras, such as the GFX100 II, GFX100S, and the original GFX100. Given this existing support for other GFX models with similar sensors, it is probable that compatibility for the GFX100RF will be added in due course.
DXO PureRAW 5 includes enhanced processing capabilities for both Bayer and X-Trans sensors, demonstrating DXO's ongoing commitment to supporting Fujifilm cameras.
Conclusion and Recommendation
In summary, the Fuji GFX100RF offers the unique advantage of a high-resolution medium format sensor in a relatively compact body, making it a compelling option for photographers seeking exceptional detail and cropping flexibility. Its 28mm equivalent lens is well-suited for street photography, and features like the built-in ND filter and Aspect Ratio Dial enhance creative control. However, its f/4 aperture and lack of IBIS might be limitations in certain situations.
The Leica Q3 and Q3 43 provide excellent full-frame image quality with faster lenses, offering better low-light performance and shallower depth of field. Their more compact size and the inclusion of optical image stabilisation are also beneficial for street photography. The choice between the Q3's 28mm lens and the Q3 43's 43mm lens depends on the photographer's preferred perspective. A significant factor is the price, with the Leica Q3 series being considerably more expensive than the GFX100RF.
Additionally, potential US tariffs are currently impacting the availability of the Fuji GFX100RF in the USA.For users who prioritise ultimate image resolution, cropping flexibility, and the distinctive look of a medium format sensor at a relatively lower price point (compared to other medium format options), the Fuji GFX100RF could be an attractive choice, provided they are comfortable with a fixed 28mm equivalent lens and the absence of IBIS. They should also be aware of the current uncertainty surrounding its availability in the US market.
Photographers who prioritise exceptional low-light performance, shallower depth of field, and the prestige of the Leica brand might find the Leica Q3 (with its 28mm f/1.7 lens) to be an excellent option. Those who prefer a more natural, "normal" perspective while still benefiting from Leica's image quality and a fast lens would likely favour the Leica Q3 43 (with its 43mm f/2 lens).Ultimately, the optimal choice depends on the individual photographer's budget, preferred focal length, shooting style, and tolerance for potential availability issues. It is recommended that the user consider these factors carefully and, if possible, try out the cameras in person to assess their handling and ergonomics before making a final decision.
CORNMARKET AREA
CORNMARKET AREA OF DUBLIN [PHOTOGRAPHED 13 APRIL 2025]
The Cornmarket Area of Dublin: Origins, Development, and Current Status
The Cornmarket area of Dublin, situated within the city's historic centre, holds a significant place in its urban narrative. This report aims to provide a comprehensive investigation into the origins and development of this area, its present-day condition, and the notable architectural and historical structures that are located within it. By examining the multifaceted history of the Cornmarket, a deeper understanding of Dublin's evolving urban landscape can be achieved.
The area encompassing the Cornmarket lies within the oldest settled parts of Dublin, with evidence indicating habitation as early as the mid-5th century. This early settlement, known as Átha Cliath, meaning "town of the hurdled ford," highlights the area's fundamental importance as a key crossing point over the River Liffey. The strategic positioning of this settlement on a prominent ridge overlooking the river not only offered natural defensibility but also presented considerable advantages for the facilitation of early trade. The sustained presence of human activity in the Cornmarket area for over a millennium underscores its enduring role as a central and vital location within the city of Dublin. The initial benefit provided by the ford likely established this area as a crucial nexus for subsequent urban growth and development.
The appellation "Cornmarket" was adopted for this area following the erection of a notable marble water cistern in 1308. This public amenity was commissioned by Jean le Decer, who served as the Mayor of Dublin, and was situated in close proximity to Newgate Street. The construction of such a significant structure suggests a growing formalisation of the area as a centre for commercial activity during this period. Newgate, which functioned as a principal gateway in the city wall on its western side, and is now encompassed by the Cornmarket, further contributed to the area's burgeoning popularity as a place for the sale of grain. This directly addresses the primary function that the Cornmarket would come to serve in the ensuing centuries. The economic importance of the Cornmarket in its early years was further underscored by King John's Charter. This royal decree mandated that foreign merchants were permitted to purchase only specific commodities – namely corn, hides, and wool – exclusively from the citizens of Dublin, thereby establishing the Cornmarket as a vital node within the city's broader economic framework. The erection of the water cistern appears to have been a pivotal event that facilitated the area's recognition as a dedicated marketplace for corn. Furthermore, the royal charter served to cement its significance within the larger trade networks operating in the city at the time.
Beyond its primary function as a trading hub, the early Cornmarket area also served other public purposes. To the northwest of the Cornmarket, the Bull Ring was a designated space for martial combat training. Historical records indicate that from at least the reign of Elizabeth I, the city's youth would gather here four times annually to receive instruction in military skills. This suggests that the area's significance extended beyond mere commerce into aspects of public life and civic engagement. The Brehon Laws, an ancient Irish legal system, provide evidence of the early cultivation of corn in Ireland. During the medieval period, the Cornmarket played a critical role in the large-scale export of grain to England, Scotland, and Wales. This highlights the area's enduring agricultural and economic importance on a broader scale. Records from the 14th century, including complaints registered against bakers and documented fluctuations in the price of wheat, offer insights into the Cornmarket's integral role in the city's food supply mechanisms and overall economic stability. Keyzar's Lane, which connected the Cornmarket to Cook Street, became the site of a significant event in 1496 when Mayor Jenico Marks was fatally wounded whilst attempting to quell a disturbance among the city's inhabitants. This incident suggests that the area was not always peaceful and could be subject to social unrest. Furthermore, from 1485, Newgate Prison was initially situated within the Cornmarket area, indicating a more sombre aspect of its early history, as it served as the city's primary place of detention. The initial history of the Cornmarket area reveals a dynamic and multifaceted space that was central to the life of early Dublin. It functioned not only as a vital centre for trade but also as a venue for public gatherings, military exercises, and even as the location of the city's principal prison, demonstrating its pivotal role in the social and economic fabric of the time.
Throughout the Middle Ages, the Cornmarket flourished as a vital centre for the grain trade, solidifying its position as an important and busy part of the city. The establishment of St Thomas's Abbey in the 12th century, located near what is now Thomas Street to the north of the Cornmarket, further contributed to the prosperity and commercial activity of the broader area known as the Liberties. Thomas Street, in particular, evolved into a vibrant marketplace, attracting merchants and traders and enhancing the economic dynamism of the entire district. The strategic location of the Cornmarket in proximity to significant religious and administrative hubs, coupled with its established role in the grain trade, likely underpinned its sustained prosperity during these centuries. The subsequent development of the Liberties as a thriving commercial area further amplified the economic activity in the vicinity of the Cornmarket.
However, by the early 18th century, the primary location of the Cornmarket underwent a significant change, being relocated to Thomas Street. This move was necessitated by the increasing congestion in the original area, largely attributed to the activities of individuals known as "Pluckers in." These people would stand in the streets, actively trying to entice potential customers into nearby shops, thereby impeding the flow of traffic and making passage through the Cornmarket increasingly difficult. This relocation marked a notable shift in the area's principal function as the central marketplace for grain. Following this move, the original Cornmarket area experienced a change in its character and the types of businesses operating there. It became predominantly occupied by haberdashers, who dealt in small items for sewing, woollen drapers, who traded in woollen cloth, and dealers in linens. This transition indicates a move away from its specific role as a grain market towards a more diversified mercantile area catering to different needs. In the early 19th century, the Wide Streets Commission was established with the aim of improving the layout and flow of traffic within Dublin. The efforts of this commission eventually led to the disappearance of the physical corn market hall that had been situated on Thomas Street. This reflects the impact of planned urban development initiatives on the area's physical infrastructure and historical function. The early 19th century also witnessed the construction of a new Corn Exchange on Burgh Quay. This development further diminished the significance of the original Cornmarket area as the primary location for trading in grain. The establishment of this new, purpose-built facility highlights the influence of evolving urban needs and infrastructure on the historical roles of different areas within the city. Additionally, Newgate Prison, which had been located in the Cornmarket since 1485, was relocated to Green Street in 1781. This change further altered the character of that particular part of the Cornmarket area. The functional and physical changes experienced by the Cornmarket area over time illustrate the dynamic nature of urban development and the ways in which different parts of a city adapt to evolving economic and social conditions.
Despite the relocation of the main corn market, the area around the original Cornmarket and Christchurch continued to be a bustling part of medieval Dublin. Tradespeople and craftspeople maintained a strong presence, providing essential services and goods to the town's inhabitants. The area we now recognise as Cornmarket has largely been shaped by 20th-century urban planning, specifically the widening of roads to create the thoroughfares of High Street and Bridge Street. This significant physical alteration has redefined the area's layout and likely influenced its contemporary atmosphere. The Liberties area, which encompasses the Cornmarket, also underwent substantial industrial development in subsequent centuries. Industries such as brewing, distilling, tanning, and weaving became prominent, contributing to the diverse and evolving character of the area over time. While the Cornmarket itself transitioned away from its primary role as a central grain market, the surrounding district remained a vital hub of commercial and industrial activity, demonstrating its capacity to adapt to the changing economic landscape of the city. The 20th-century road widening project represents a more recent and impactful intervention that has shaped the physical form of the Cornmarket as it exists today.
Presently, the area known as Cornmarket primarily functions as a busy transportation corridor, with High Street and Bridge Street serving as major traffic routes. Despite this modern infrastructure, remnants of the area's rich history can still be discerned. Sections of the old city wall, which once formed the boundary of medieval Dublin, are preserved at Cornmarket and in Lamb Alley. Additionally, St Audoen's Arch stands as the sole surviving gateway to the old city, providing a tangible link to its medieval past. The area's proximity to Christchurch Cathedral, a significant architectural and historical landmark, continues to draw visitors and contributes to the area's overall character. Notably, Cornmarket Group Financial Services Ltd., a financial services company offering investment and insurance brokerage predominantly to public sector employees, maintains its Dublin office at Christchurch Square, Dublin 8. The presence of this substantial commercial entity, named after the area, is a significant aspect of its contemporary status. Furthermore, the Cornmarket and Christchurch area serves as a location for filming, suggesting that it retains a degree of visual appeal and historical ambiance. The current status of the Cornmarket area reflects a confluence of its historical legacy and modern urban functions, primarily serving as a vital artery for transportation whilst still holding pockets of historical and commercial relevance.
Historically, the area's commercial activities included haberdashers, woollen drapers, and linen merchants. Today, the commercial activities in the Cornmarket area are varied. Cornmarket Group Financial Services Ltd. stands as a major business presence, as mentioned previously. Retail businesses also operate in the area, such as Farrow & Ball, a paint and wallpaper shop located at 14-15 Cornmarket. Additionally, MRCB occupies the premises at 10-13 Cornmarket, functioning as a commercial property that houses retail spaces, offices, and a dental clinic. The vicinity of Christchurch Square further contributes to the commercial landscape, featuring establishments such as the Leonardo Hotel Dublin Christchurch 20, a Spar convenience store 61, and a variety of other retail outlets and service providers. The current mix of businesses in the Cornmarket area reflects its transformation from a specialised grain market to a more general urban commercial zone, catering to a diverse range of needs and services.
The overall atmosphere of the Cornmarket area today is characterised by its function as a busy thoroughfare for vehicular traffic. This suggests a dynamic and potentially high-energy environment. However, the presence of significant historical remnants, such as the surviving sections of the medieval city wall and St Audoen's Arch, imbues the area with a tangible connection to its rich past, lending a sense of historical character amidst the modern activity. The close proximity of Christchurch Cathedral, a prominent landmark with centuries of history, further contributes to the area's historical and potentially tourist-oriented ambiance. The wider Liberties area, in which the Cornmarket is situated, is known for its diverse and vibrant atmosphere, featuring an eclectic mix of antique shops, vintage boutiques, art galleries, bars, and cafes. Moreover, the area surrounding Christchurch Square offers a variety of restaurants, cafes, and bars, contributing to the local vibrancy. The present-day character of the Cornmarket area is therefore a blend of the functional aspects of a major transportation route and the enduring presence of its medieval heritage, enhanced by the cultural and commercial activity of the surrounding Liberties district.
The Cornmarket area of Dublin is home to several buildings of significant architectural and historical note, each contributing to the rich tapestry of the city's heritage.
Christ Church Cathedral stands as a pivotal landmark, with its construction commencing around 1172, replacing an earlier wooden structure dating back to approximately 1030. This makes it one of the oldest buildings in Dublin, founded by the Norse King Sitriuc 'Silkbeard' and Dúnán, the city's first bishop. Throughout its history, the cathedral has been the site of significant events, including the 'crowning' of Lambert Simnel as Edward VI in 1487. In the 1870s, the cathedral underwent extensive restoration, largely funded by the whiskey distiller Henry Roe and overseen by the architect George Edmund Street. The architectural style is predominantly Gothic, with surviving Romanesque elements that date back to the 12th century. Notable features of the cathedral include its medieval crypt, which is the oldest surviving structure in Dublin 25, prominent flying buttresses, and a belfry that holds a world record for the number of change-ringing bells. The cathedral is also connected to Synod Hall (Dublinia) by a covered footbridge that was constructed around 1875.
Adjacent to the cathedral is Synod Hall, also known as Dublinia. This building was constructed around 1875 by George Edmund Street as part of the broader reconstruction of Christ Church Cathedral. It originally served as the Synod Hall for the Church of Ireland until 1983 and now functions as the Dublinia Viking and Medieval history museum. The architectural style is characterised as robust First Pointed Gothic, featuring simple buttresses, circular turrets, and plate tracery. The structure incorporates the tower of an earlier church that dated back to the 17th century. As previously mentioned, Synod Hall is linked to Christ Church Cathedral by a covered bridge, distinguished by its elaborate limestone detailing and stained glass windows.
Located at 10-13 Cornmarket stands a building constructed in 1877 as a warehouse for James H. Webb & Company, who were clothiers and woollen drapers. The design of this seven-bay, four-storey structure is attributed to McCurdy & Mitchell and features ornate granite detailing. Originally, the ground level was designed with large display windows, indicative of its commercial purpose. However, when the building was repurposed as local health offices in the 1950s, these ground-floor windows were bricked up. More recently, the building has undergone substantial refurbishment by HSE Estates, with the intention of housing the HSE Communications Office there. This renovation included the restoration of the timber sash windows on the main façade and the reinstatement of the original ground floor profile, reopening the building to the street.
At 14-15 Cornmarket, another notable building was constructed in 1866 to serve as a bank. It now operates as a shop, Farrow & Ball. The architect, Charles Geoghegan, employed an Italian Gothic style for this former Royal Bank building. The building is characterised by its decorative polychrome brick parapet and ornate render detailing on the ground floor. A more recent addition is a third storey with a flat roof.
St Audoen's Church, belonging to the Church of Ireland, stands as the sole remaining medieval parish church in Dublin, with its construction dating back to around 1190. It is dedicated to St Ouen of Rouen. The church features a 15th-century bell tower that houses the oldest set of church bells still in use in Ireland, cast in 1423. Its architectural style is a blend of Romanesque and Gothic, with later Neo-Gothic elements incorporated. Inside, the church contains the Portlester tomb, dating from 1482, as well as memorials to various notable families. The church is situated adjacent to the surviving portions of the old city wall and St Audoen's Arch.
Nearby stands St Audoen's Church, belonging to the Roman Catholic denomination. This church was built between 1841 and 1847, exhibiting a Greek Revival architectural style. The design is credited to Patrick Byrne, with a portico added later between 1898 and 1902 by George Ashlin. Due to the steeply sloping site, the church incorporates a double-level crypt at the rear. It is also notable for housing the National Shrine of St Anne.
Although no longer standing, the site of Newgate Prison holds historical significance. It was initially located in the Cornmarket area from 1485, serving as the primary prison for the city. Before its use as a prison, it functioned as one of the city's main gates. In 1781, the prison was relocated to Green Street. The original site of Newgate Prison is now occupied by Saint Michan's Park. The prison played a notable role in the penal history of Dublin for several centuries.
Another historically important structure, no longer extant, is the Corn Market House on Thomas Street. Completed in 1725, it was one of Dublin's earliest dedicated corn exchanges and was situated near Newgate and the Black Dog jail, in the area now often referred to as Cornmarket. It was a long, two-storey building featuring an arcaded facade with 13 arches and a central cupola. Due to its inconvenient location and the obstruction it caused to street traffic, the Corn Market House was demolished in 1818 by the Wide Streets Commission.
The site of the Black Dog Prison also contributes to the area's history. Located in Newhall Market, which is now known as Cornmarket, it was built on the grounds of Browne's Castle. Before becoming a prison, it operated as a tavern, from which it derived its name, and served as a place of confinement from at least the 17th century. From the early 18th century, the Black Dog Prison functioned as Dublin's primary debtors' prison. By the late 18th century, it was replaced by newer prisons, including the relocated Newgate Prison and a new Sheriff's Prison on Green Street. The site of the Black Dog Prison is situated between Upper Bridge Street and St Augustine Street, to the north of Cornmarket, and no physical remains of the structure are currently visible.
The Cornmarket area and its surroundings have witnessed recent developments and are subject to planned changes that will shape its future.
Recent developments include the refurbishment of the building at 10-13 Cornmarket by HSE Estates. This project aimed to house the HSE Communications Office within the premises and involved the restoration of the building's original facade. Additionally, a building at 61-63 Thomas Street has been undergoing redevelopment to transform it into a multipurpose space that will include a large office area and a new restaurant. The property located at 12-13 Cornmarket & 7/11 Augustine Street has been put up for sale as a retail investment opportunity. Furthermore, the Land Development Agency (LDA) has unveiled plans for the redevelopment of the Digital Hub campus, situated near Thomas Street. These ambitious plans envision the creation of affordable housing alongside commercial, cultural, and community facilities. The wider Liberties area, in which the Cornmarket is located, is also the focus of ongoing regeneration efforts by Dublin City Council, including the implementation of the Liberties Greening Strategy. These recent activities indicate a renewed focus on the area, balancing the preservation of its heritage with the introduction of contemporary uses.
Looking ahead, several planned changes are expected to further transform the Cornmarket area. The LDA's masterplan for the Digital Hub site is anticipated to be finalised, with the phased delivery of the proposed development commencing from 2024 onwards. There is also the potential for additional development and conservation projects within the broader Liberties area, driven by Dublin City Council's strategic initiatives. Notably, Cornmarket financial services has introduced a 'Sustainable Business Impact Award,' suggesting a growing corporate emphasis on environmental responsibility and community engagement. These planned changes indicate that the future of the Cornmarket area will likely be characterised by a combination of private sector development, public sector-led regeneration projects, and an increasing awareness of the importance of sustainability and community involvement in urban development.
In conclusion, the Cornmarket area of Dublin presents a rich and layered history, evolving from its earliest origins as a strategic settlement and river crossing to its significant role as a central marketplace for grain. Over the centuries, the area has witnessed substantial development and change, including the relocation of the market and its subsequent transformation into a hub of commercial and industrial activity. Today, whilst primarily functioning as a busy transportation route, the Cornmarket retains its historical significance through surviving remnants of its medieval past and its proximity to iconic landmarks. Notable buildings such as Christ Church Cathedral, Synod Hall, and the former commercial warehouses stand as testaments to the area's architectural heritage, whilst the sites of Newgate Prison and the Corn Market House serve as important reminders of its historical functions. As the Cornmarket area looks to the future, recent developments and planned changes indicate a continued process of urban evolution, balancing the preservation of its unique heritage with the introduction of new uses and a growing focus on sustainable and community-oriented development. The Cornmarket remains a vital part of Dublin's urban fabric, reflecting the city's dynamic history and its ongoing adaptation to contemporary needs.
WATER FOUNTAIN
I BET THAT YOU NEVER NOTICED THIS WATER FOUNTAIN ON LORD EDWARD STREET [AT THE RATES OFFICE BESIDE CITY HALL]
Georgian Grandeur and Financial Ruin: The Story of Newcomen Bank and its Architect
The distinguished building on Lord Edward Street, currently serving as the Dublin City Council Rates Office and situated beside City Hall, boasts a rich history intertwined with the work of a notable Irish architect and the dramatic failure of a prominent banking family. Originally designed as the Newcomen Bank by architect Thomas Ivory, the structure has witnessed significant transformations since its construction in the late 18th century, including the addition of a public fountain.
Thomas Ivory: Master of Georgian Dublin
Thomas Ivory (c. 1732–1786) was a significant figure in the architectural landscape of Georgian Dublin. Initially trained as a carpenter, he developed his skills in architectural draughtsmanship and became the first master of the Dublin Society's Architectural School in 1759, a position he held until his death. While some of his ambitious designs, such as those for the Four Courts and Newgate Prison, were not ultimately executed by him, Ivory left a lasting mark on the city with his refined Palladian and Neoclassical style. His most celebrated work is the King's Hospital, or Blue Coat School, in Blackhall Place, a commission he won in 1773. Newcomen Bank, designed around 1781, stands as another key example of his elegant and precisely detailed architectural output, notable for its use of high-quality materials like Portland stone.
Newcomen Bank and the Fate of Thomas Viscount Newcomen
Newcomen Bank originated from an earlier banking business in the 1720s, with the Newcomen family becoming prominent partners. Sir William Gleadowe-Newcomen, 1st Baronet, commissioned Thomas Ivory to design the new bank building on what is now Lord Edward Street in 1781. The bank operated successfully for a period, but its fortunes changed dramatically in the early 19th century. Sir William's son, Thomas Gleadowe-Newcomen (1776–1825), who became the 2nd Viscount Newcomen upon his mother's death in 1817, inherited the bank's management. However, unlike his predecessors, Thomas Viscount Newcomen reportedly lacked financial acumen and accumulated significant debts, including substantial borrowings from his own bank. These financial difficulties ultimately led to the collapse and closure of Newcomen Bank in 1825, a ruin that also befell other prominent families connected to the institution and tragically culminated in the Viscount's suicide.
The Building's Evolution and the Addition of the Fountain
The original Newcomen Bank building, constructed of Portland stone, was initially smaller than its present form. In the 1820s, following the bank's closure, the building was acquired by the Hibernian Bank and later, in 1884, by Dublin Corporation. The significant expansion mentioned in various accounts, where a mirror-image was built and the two parts linked by a portico, likely refers to alterations made after the Newcomen family's ownership, potentially during the Hibernian Bank's tenure or later by the Corporation.
My photographs show the water fountain on the Lord Edward Street side of the building, which corresponds to the north elevation. Historical records indicate that Lord Edward Street was created in 1886, and the north elevation of the former Newcomen Bank building was remodelled by Dublin Corporation architect Daniel J. Freeman in 1884 to create a frontage onto this new street.
Based on this information, the fountain was not part of the original building designed by Thomas Ivory in 1781, as the Lord Edward Street elevation it adorns was added or significantly altered a century later. It was installed as part of the remodelling works undertaken by Dublin Corporation around 1884, coinciding with the creation of Lord Edward Street. While the specific commissioning document for the fountain itself was not found in any of my searches, it is highly probable that it was commissioned by Dublin Corporation as part of the broader public works and street improvements in the area under the direction of the City Architect's office during that period. Public fountains were often installed in urban areas in the late 19th century for public health and convenience.
ANTIQUES DEALER
O'SULLIVAN ANTIQUES ON FRANCIS STREET [WELL WORTH A VISIT EVEN IF YOU ARE ONLY WINDOW SHOPPING]
Having rented a house just off Francis Street for about a year in the late 1970s, I must admit I enjoyed living there. However, the area has changed considerably for the better since then, and I particularly appreciate the recent upgrade to Francis Street itself. I hope the improvements planned for Meath Street prove equally successful.
O'Sullivan Antiques stands as a notable establishment on Francis Street in Dublin, a thoroughfare renowned for its historical significance as the heart of the city's antique trade.
Since its foundation in 1990, the business has become an integral part of this vibrant district, contributing to its enduring reputation as a destination for those seeking unique and historical items. Francis Street itself boasts a rich history, evolving over centuries to become the central point for antique commerce in Dublin.
From its very beginning, O'Sullivan Antiques strategically positioned itself on Francis Street, a location long recognised as Dublin's antique trade hub. This deliberate choice suggests an immediate intention to become a key player in the established market. The business quickly established a specialisation in "fine Georgian and Regency period furniture," later expanding its offerings to include pieces from the Victorian and Edwardian eras. Their inventory is particularly noted for featuring furniture crafted from high-quality materials such as mahogany, rosewood, satinwood, and walnut. This focus on specific historical periods and premium materials indicates a commitment to offering valuable and sought-after antiques.
Further solidifying its reputation within the industry, O'Sullivan Antiques holds membership in several prestigious antique dealer associations, including the Irish Antique Dealers Association, CINOA, and The Art and Antique Dealers League of America. These affiliations underscore the business's adherence to professional standards of practice and authentication, lending credibility and trust to its dealings. Demonstrating significant growth and ambition, O'Sullivan Antiques has also expanded its operations beyond Ireland to include a gallery in New York, USA. This transatlantic presence highlights the business's success in reaching an international clientele and accessing a broader market for fine antiques. The Dublin gallery itself is situated at the address 43-44 Francis Street, occupying a set of historically significant buildings that will be explored in greater detail later.
The timing of O'Sullivan Antiques' establishment in 1990 coincided with the cusp of a period of notable economic and cultural expansion in Dublin during the late 1990s and early 2000s. This timing may have provided a favourable environment for a business specialising in luxury items like antiques, as increased disposable income and a growing interest in heritage and historical artefacts could have contributed to a stronger market. Furthermore, the initial strategic decision to locate on Francis Street, coupled with memberships in esteemed associations, suggests a clear business strategy focused on gaining immediate credibility and attracting a discerning customer base interested in high-quality period furniture. This proactive approach to building a strong reputation likely played a crucial role in the business's sustained success and longevity within the competitive antique trade.
Francis Street has long been recognised as a significant location for those interested in fine furniture and the skills of accomplished craftspeople, with its reputation dating back to the 18th century. This enduring association with quality and craftsmanship provides a rich historical backdrop for O'Sullivan Antiques. To formally acknowledge and promote the area's unique identity, the established traders on Francis Street collaborated in October 2003 to create Dublin's first Antiques Quarter. This collective effort underscored the continued importance of Francis Street as a central hub for antique commerce in the 21st century, with O'Sullivan Antiques playing a part in this shared identity. To mark this significant development, a guide to Francis Street was published in 2003, showcasing its diverse array of antique shops, art galleries, and restaurants. This initiative demonstrates a unified approach among the businesses to attract visitors and reinforce the street's image as a premier destination for antiques.
The historical roots of Francis Street extend much further back in time, with its origins tracing to medieval Dublin. As early as 1200, it was known as Great Street, highlighting its significance as a major thoroughfare. Over the centuries, the street's name evolved, reflecting changes in the area's history and influence. By 1325, it was referred to as the King's Highway, and from 1337 onwards, it became associated with St. Francis, taking names such as St Francis's Street, St. Francis Street, and St Fraunces Street before settling on its current name by 1610. The name "Francis Street" itself originates from the Franciscan monastery that was established in the area in the 13th century, with the land for its foundation granted in 1235. This early connection to a significant religious order played a crucial role in shaping the area's development and identity. Adding to the historical fabric of the street is the Church of St Nicholas of Myra (Without), which has stood on Francis Street as a place of worship since at least the 12th century. This long-standing presence underscores the area's historical depth and its enduring importance within Dublin's social and religious landscape.
The transformation of Francis Street from a medieval thoroughfare to a specialised hub for the antique trade over centuries illustrates the dynamic nature of urban spaces and the persistent appeal of fine craftsmanship and historical artefacts. The progression from its early designation as "Great Street" to its 18th-century emergence as a centre for furniture and skilled artisans, culminating in its formal establishment as an Antiques Quarter in 2003, indicates a sustained economic and cultural focus on antiques in this specific location. Factors such as historical infrastructure, the presence of skilled artisans, and consistent market demand likely contributed significantly to this long-term trend. Furthermore, the collaborative spirit among the traders in 2003 to officially form and promote the Antiques Quarter suggests a strong sense of community and a shared dedication to preserving and enhancing Francis Street's reputation as a key destination for antique buyers. The publication of a guide served as a coordinated marketing strategy, indicating that the antique businesses recognised the advantages of working together to attract a wider audience and further solidify the street's esteemed reputation.
O'Sullivan Antiques' Dublin gallery is situated at 43-44 Francis Street. The buildings at this address hold significant historical value, believed to have been constructed around 1730. This places them among the earliest remaining structures on Francis Street, predating the establishment of O'Sullivan Antiques by over two centuries and linking the business to the street's early architectural heritage. Architecturally, the premises consist of a two-bay three-storey house to the north (number 43) and a two-bay two-storey house to the south (number 44), now unified by a full-width shopfront that was added later. This alteration likely reflects the evolving commercial function of the street over time.
Historical records from the 1860s reveal that number 43 was occupied by a whip maker, while number 44 served as a lodging house. These diverse uses illustrate the variety of commercial and residential activities that characterised Francis Street in the mid-19th century, highlighting its role in the daily life and economy of Dublin. By the early twentieth century, both numbers 43 and 44 were listed as a shop and dwelling, indicating a notable shift towards their primary use for commercial purposes and setting the stage for their eventual occupancy by an antique shop. O'Sullivan Antiques also extends to the adjacent building at 42 Francis Street. This terraced two-bay three-storey house was built around 1800 and in the 1830s was occupied by James Healy, who operated a grocer's and spirit dealer's shop. This provides a similar historical context of commercial use for the neighbouring building, further illustrating the street's commercial evolution. The late nineteenth-century shopfront that runs along the length of numbers 41 and 42 signifies a period of significant architectural change on this part of Francis Street, reflecting the increasing importance of retail and the desire for more prominent and appealing shopfronts.
The architectural characteristics of the buildings housing O'Sullivan Antiques, such as their early to mid-18th-century origins (Nos. 43-44) and the construction of No. 42 around 1800, clearly demonstrate the deep historical roots of the business's location. The fact that these structures have stood for centuries, witnessing significant periods in Dublin's history, adds a tangible layer of historical continuity that is particularly fitting for an antique shop. The transition in the use of these buildings from primarily residential and various commercial trades to a focus on retail, culminating in their current role as antique shops, mirrors broader patterns of urban development and the specialisation of commercial areas like Francis Street. The variety of past businesses, including a whip maker, a lodging house, and a grocer, indicates that Francis Street once served a wider range of needs for the Dublin community before it became predominantly known for its antique trade. This historical diversity contributes to the unique character of the street and provides a richer context for understanding its present-day identity as a hub for antiques.
Analysing customer reviews and testimonials available online offers valuable insights into the longevity and reputation of O'Sullivan Antiques since its establishment in 1990. These perspectives reflect the experiences of individuals who have interacted with the business over the past three decades. Recurring themes in customer descriptions include "high-quality antiques," the feeling of "stepping back in time," and the description of the shop as an "Aladdin's Cave". These positive sentiments highlight the core aspects of the business's appeal and its success in creating a unique and engaging shopping experience.
Reviews found on platforms like Google and Wanderlog generally portray O'Sullivan Antiques in a positive light. The business has received ratings of 3.9 out of 5 on Wanderlog based on Google reviews, and a perfect 5.0 out of 5 from another source. Many reviewers specifically mention the helpfulness and friendliness of the staff, contributing to a positive customer experience. While some reviews note that the items can be "expensive," they also consistently emphasise the "high quality" of the antiques on offer, suggesting that customers perceive the prices as justified by the value and authenticity of the merchandise. Notably, a testimonial from Daly Antique Services, a fellow business in the antique trade, praises O'Sullivan Antiques for their prompt service and the high quality of their work, indicating positive professional relationships within the industry.
The consistently positive feedback regarding the quality of the antiques and the unique atmosphere cultivated by O'Sullivan Antiques ("stepping back in time," "Aladdin's Cave") indicates that the business has successfully established a strong brand identity. This identity centres around offering a carefully curated selection of high-end, historically significant items and providing a memorable shopping experience for its customers. The recurring positive comments about the staff, coupled with the acknowledgment of higher prices for quality items, suggest a business model focused on delivering a premium experience with knowledgeable and attentive service, thereby justifying the cost for discerning buyers. This approach has likely contributed to the business's sustained success and longevity in the antique trade.
101 FRANCIS STREET
MOLLY'S BAR [101-103 FRANCIS STREET IN DUBLIN CITY]
Molly's Bar, located at 101-103 Francis Street in Dublin 8, occupies a pivotal position within The Liberties, a historically rich and dynamic neighbourhood in Dublin city. This report examines the evolution of this specific address, tracing its recent transformations within the hospitality sector.
To contextualise Molly's Bar's current presence, we will explore its immediate predecessors, the drag bar Doll Society and the establishment Societal Collapse, and their connection to the nearby Jackie's bar. Understanding the historical context of Francis Street itself is crucial to comprehending these changes. This thoroughfare boasts a history dating back to at least the medieval period. Records indicate it was known as "Great Street" around 1200 AD, evolving through "King's highway" in 1325, and finally becoming St Francis Street by 1610. This enduring presence underscores its continuous importance as a route and location within Dublin.
Beyond its role as a thoroughfare, Francis Street has held religious and social significance. A church has stood on this street since at least the 12th century, with the current St. Nicholas of Myra Church dating back to 1829. This church served as the registration point for Catholic births at the nearby Coombe Hospital from 1783 to 1967. Furthermore, the late 19th and 20th centuries saw Francis Street develop into a significant commercial hub, exemplified by the Iveagh Markets, which operated from 1906 until the 1990s on the site of a former brewery, Sweetman's, established in 1791.
Historical records from the 14th century confirm Francis Street's existence, and by the 18th century, it had become a bustling area inhabited by prosperous merchants and traders, even gaining a literary connection through Jonathan Swift. However, the early 20th century saw socio-economic shifts, leading to tenements and urban decay. More recently, Francis Street has undergone revitalisation, emerging as a centre for antique shops over the past 30 to 40 years, alongside new bars, restaurants, and retail outlets. Adding to its historical profile, Francis Street was also a recognised centre for clay pipe manufacture during the 18th and 19th centuries, evidenced by archaeological findings at numbers 134-143.
Focusing on 101-103 Francis Street, planning records from 2014 reveal a proposal for an additional storey to an existing four-storey mixed retail, office, and residential development. This indicates the building had already undergone significant development, establishing its current mixed-use nature. The same document mentions the demolition of the fire-damaged "The Horse and Jockey" pub for student accommodation, suggesting 101-103 Francis Street, or part of it, may have previously housed a public house.
Hotel booking websites list 101-103 Francis Street as the location for both a "2 Bedroom Apartment Near Historical Christchurch" and a "Stylish And Private Room In Central Dublin", confirming residential units within the building. Renewed planning permission in 2014 for an additional floor further supports this mixed-use development. This information suggests a significant redevelopment in the early 2010s, with retail or hospitality space at ground level and residential units above. The reference to "The Horse and Jockey" hints at a prior public house, setting the stage for its more recent hospitality incarnations.
The building transitioned into Doll Society, a drag bar, in spring 2023, operating for approximately 18 to 21 months before becoming Molly's Bar in December 2024. Doll Society was a vibrant, "pink brunch-focused bar" with a "Barbie feel," featuring neon signs, leather seating, and flower walls. It offered "savage cocktails," themed brunches, and drag performances, with "crazy performers dancing on tables." The bar aimed for an Instagram-friendly aesthetic, featuring a photo booth and a "pink sun-trap beer garden." Reviews praised its lively atmosphere and entertainment, though some noted service inconsistencies and crowding.
Preceding Doll Society was Societal Collapse, described as "kind of a cocktail bar with kind of food," which closed in early 2023. While details are limited, it appears to have been a similar venue.
Both Doll Society and Societal Collapse were operated by the same individuals as Jackie's bar at 43 Francis Street. Jackie's has a 1990s and early 2000s Irish nostalgia theme, evident in its decor, music, and "nostalgia filled cocktails." The shared ownership suggests a coordinated approach to the local hospitality market, with Jackie's focusing on general nostalgia and Doll Society on a flamboyant drag theme.
The most recent transformation occurred in December 2024 with the opening of Molly's Bar, a "normal" pub under the Galway Bay Brewery group. This represents a shift from a themed drag bar to a traditional brewery-owned pub, offering Galway Bay Brewery beers alongside classics.
Francis Street itself features a diverse nightlife, including Jackie's, The Liberty Belle (a traditional pub since 1845), and the former Anti-Social (a cocktail and fast food establishment). The recent addition of new bars and restaurants alongside antique shops indicates a growing hospitality sector.
The Liberties, where Molly's Bar is situated, has a rich history dating back to the 12th century. Its autonomy and distinct jurisdiction shaped its character. The area experienced periods of prosperity and hardship, from the influx of Huguenot weavers in the 17th century to the industrial era and subsequent urban decay. Recent revitalisation has blended antique shops and markets with new businesses and a growing cultural scene.
In conclusion, 101-103 Francis Street has undergone various transformations, reflecting the dynamic nature of Francis Street and The Liberties. From a potential former public house to themed cocktail bars and now a traditional pub, this location mirrors the neighbourhood's evolution. The address holds a significant place within Dublin's social and commercial history, reflecting the ever-changing urban landscape.
FULL MOON
FULL MOON AT CHRIST CHURCH [PAINT-A-BOX BY SARA MANEIRO REY]
Magical new artwork ‘Full Moon’ by Spanish artist Sara Maneiro Rey @sarosky.studio Artwork located at Winetavern Street/Cook Street @thelibertiesdublin 8.
CEASED TRADING 13 APRIL 2025
LUIGI MALONES FINAL DAY IN DUBLIN [SUNDAY 13 APRIL 2025]
Myself and a group of friends met up for a meal at Luigi Malones once a week for about seven years (2000 - 2008) so I was a bit upset when I discovered that the restaurant's final day was today.
My favourite restaurant Eatokyo On Capel Street closed at the end of January and I expect further bad news about another restaurant within the next month. I should also mention that Desi Crew on South Richmond Street has also closed a few weeks ago. Note: Eatokyo in Temple Bar has survived and is doing very well.
The establishment of the Luigi Malones brand in Ireland can be traced definitively to 1997. Multiple sources confirm that the first restaurant under this name opened in Stillorgan, a suburb of Dublin, during that year. This marks the formal beginning of the restaurant chain within the Irish market. My family home was in Stillorgan but I have no recollection of the restaurant in Stillorgan.
In 1999, a significant strategic move occurred with the relocation of the Dublin operation from Stillorgan to the heart of the city's cultural and nightlife quarter, Temple Bar. The new premises were located at 5-6 Cecilia Street , occupying two floors and a mezzanine level within a building noted for its historical significance, with records dating back centuries. This relocation positioned the restaurant prominently within a high-footfall area, catering to both locals and the significant tourist traffic in Temple Bar.
The brand identity cultivated during this period centred around the motto "For Food – For Fun – For Friends!". The menu concept drew inspiration from international travels, aiming for broad appeal with a mix of cuisines. Core offerings included popular Italian-American style dishes such as freshly made pasta, pizzas, and Buffalo wings, alongside signature desserts like their Toblerone Cheesecake.
Interestingly, promotional materials on the restaurant's own platforms reference an earlier connection to Munich, Germany, specifically mentioning serving Fischer's Helles beer there in the late 1980s. The narrative states, "When Luigi's moved to Ireland, we brought Fischer's with us". While this detail forms part of the company's self-presented story, potentially relating to a prior venture by the founders or a conceptual origin, it does not alter the documented founding date and location of the Irish Luigi Malones chain. The consistent reporting across various sources points to Stillorgan in 1997 as the inception point for the business entity analysed in this report. The phrasing used regarding the move to Ireland further suggests that the Irish operation, starting in 1997, is considered distinct from any previous activity in Munich.
Cork Branch
The expansion into Cork occurred in 1999, coinciding with the move to Temple Bar in Dublin. This suggests a period of significant growth and investment for the brand. The Cork restaurant was established at 1-2 Emmett Place, a prime city-centre location directly opposite the Cork Opera House.
Described as one of the largest restaurants in Cork , the venue became known for its distinctive interior decor. Notable features include a large, two-sided clock reportedly originating from St. Pancras Station in London, serving as a centrepiece around the bar area. There is also an anecdotal belief that one of the propellers from the historic Vickers Vimy aircraft, flown by Alcock and Brown on the first non-stop transatlantic flight, is displayed within the Cork restaurant , adding to its unique character.
The Cork branch successfully established itself and has demonstrated considerable longevity. It remained operational following the closure of the Dublin branch in April 2025. As part of the Dublin closure announcement, it was confirmed that the Cork restaurant would honour any outstanding gift vouchers issued by the Dublin location. The restaurant maintains an active presence, listed on various dining platforms with current operating hours and contact information readily available. It appears integrated into the local dining scene, mentioned in contexts ranging from family outings to general restaurant discussions.
Limerick Branch
Luigi Malones also operated a branch in Limerick City. It was situated in a prominent location on O'Connell Street , opposite The Royal George hotel , in premises that historically housed a Woolworths store and, even earlier, the original site of a local bank. Like its sister restaurants, the Limerick venue was noted for its decor and catered to a broad audience, including families, with specific meal deals and kids' menus advertised. Its presence is confirmed by mentions in online forums discussing Limerick dining options around 2006.
However, the Limerick expansion ultimately proved unsuccessful. The restaurant ceased trading in January 2011. News reports from June 2011, discussing plans by another restaurant group to take over the vacant unit, explicitly state that the Luigi Malones closure occurred in January of that year due to "financial difficulties".
The failure of the Limerick branch represents an important data point in the chain's history. Occurring more than a decade before the Dublin closure, it demonstrates that the brand was not immune to financial pressures and that profitability challenges existed within the group well before the difficulties experienced in Dublin in the 2020s. This suggests that factors beyond localised issues, potentially related to expansion strategy, operational costs, or specific market conditions in Limerick at the time, could impact the viability of individual branches within the chain. It serves as an early indicator that the group's financial health was not uniformly robust across all locations or throughout its entire operational history.
The closure of the Luigi Malones restaurant in Temple Bar on April 13, 2025, marked the end of a 28-year trading history at that location. Over the years, it had become a well-known establishment, described as "iconic" or "beloved" and frequented by various groups, including long-term patrons and visiting students.
The closure announcement released by the restaurant operators presented a clear narrative regarding the decision to cease trading.
Primary Catalyst - Street Works: The immediate and decisive factor cited was the impact of extensive street works undertaken directly outside the restaurant premises in early 2025. The announcement expressed "deep frustration" that the business had been "effectively barricaded" for three months.
Critically, these works significantly overran their initially communicated schedule; the operators stated they were told the project would take one month but it ultimately lasted over three. This prolonged disruption directly caused turnover to "plummet". The resulting financial loss was described as "the straw that broke the camel’s back," making continued trading impossible without damaging stakeholders. This explanation was consistently reported across multiple news outlets covering the closure.
Contributing Factors: Alongside the acute impact of the street works, the owners acknowledged underlying pressures. These included the "gradual but general decline in trade in Dublin City Centre for various reasons known to myself and others compounded by "inflationary pressures that have made it impossible for our operation to trade at a profit". This aligns with broader commentary on the challenges facing the hospitality sector, with the CEO of the Restaurants Association of Ireland noting the "razor-thin margins" in the industry when commenting on the closure.
CHAPELIZOD ROAD
BOTH ENDS OF CHAPELIZOD ROAD [I WAS TOO LAZY TO WALK THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ROAD]
Today I had decided to visit Chapelizod but I decided to get of the bus at the Islandbridge entrance to Phoenix Park and explore the Magazine Fort. My revised plan was to walk to Chapelizod but the sun proved to be overpowering so I limited myself to exploring the two ends of Chapelizod Road.
Chapelizod Road, running along the north bank of the River Liffey, offers a blend of historical charm, scenic views, and access to some of Dublin's most treasured spaces. Here's a look at what makes this route noteworthy:
Chapelizod Village:
Chapelizod itself is a historic village with a distinct character. It's considered one of Dublin's oldest villages.
Its history is intertwined with the River Liffey and the nearby Phoenix Park.
The village retains a sense of its past, with older buildings and a traditional atmosphere.
The village offers a selection of pubs, restaurants, and local shops, providing a pleasant stop for those traveling the road.
It provides a quieter atmosphere than the very center of Dublin city.
Phoenix Park Access:
Gateways to the Park:
Chapelizod Road provides crucial access to Phoenix Park, one of Europe's largest enclosed city parks.
This means that those traveling the road can easily access the park's many attractions.
Phoenix Park Attractions:
Within Phoenix Park, you'll find:
The Fallow deer herd.
Dublin Zoo.
Áras an Uachtaráin (the Irish President's residence).
Farmleigh House and Estate.
The Irish National War Memorial Gardens.
And vast areas of green space for recreation.
River Liffey Scenery:
A significant feature of Chapelizod Road is its proximity to the River Liffey.
The road offers scenic views of the river and the surrounding landscape.
The Liffey's banks provide opportunities for walking and enjoying the natural environment.
Key Considerations:
Accessibility:
Chapelizod Road is a key route for those traveling to and from Dublin city centre.
It is serviced by public transport, and also provides routes for cyclist, and pedestrians.
Historical Atmosphere:
The area surrounding the road has a very rich history, and that history is very present within the buildings, and the general atmosphere of the area.
In essence, Chapelizod Road is more than just a thoroughfare. It's a route that connects historical Dublin with natural beauty, and access to one of the cities most beloved parks.
TUDOR ROAD
TUDOR ROAD [RANELAGH AREA OF DUBLIN]
Tudor Road is located in the desirable Dublin 6 area, specifically within the Ranelagh neighbourhood. This area is known for its affluent residential character, its proximity to Dublin city centre, and its vibrant local amenities. Here's a breakdown of what makes Tudor Road
It is primarily a residential street, characterised by attractive and often substantial family homes.
The area is highly sought after, which contributes to the relatively high property values.
THE DOOR TO CHINA
THE DOOR TO CHINA IS A MURAL NOT A FIVE STAR RESTAURANT [ON LANE BEHIND HOUSES ON MOYNE ROAD]
It has come to my attention that some online sources incorrectly identify 81 Moyne Road, Rathmines, as the former location of a Chinese restaurant, "The Door To China," purportedly boasting a five-star rating. This is a misrepresentation. In actuality, 81 Moyne Road is a private residence. The confusion may stem from the presence of a street art mural located on a lane situated behind the property.
To clarify the nature of 81 Moyne Road, it is a Victorian home situated in a desirable residential area. Property listings describe the address as being within the "lush and leafy heartland of Dublin 6," a location noted for its proximity to both St Stephen's Green and the Beechwood Luas stop. The residence itself, having undergone a comprehensive refurbishment and extension, offers approximately 2,200 square feet of living space.
The accommodation comprises an entrance hall, drawing room, dining room, open-plan study, kitchen, and family room. The contemporary extension features floor-to-ceiling glazing, providing ample natural light and views of the rear garden. Upstairs, the home includes four bedrooms and a family bathroom. The property also benefits from a large, private, walled and fenced rear garden with a decking area.
Key features of the residence include high ceilings, sash windows, ornate plasterwork, and fireplaces, blending period charm with modern amenities such as a bespoke kitchen with granite worktops and designer appliances.
ERROR MESSAGE
I PHOTOGRAPHED BOLTON STREET USING A CANON 5D MKIII [I HAD A CANNOT COMMUNICATE WITH BATTERY ERROR]
It should be mentioned that the batteries are/were original Canon product and I have included a detailed discussion of the issue which may be of interest I you ever consider buying a used Canon 5D MkIII.
On 6 April 2025, I photographed Bolton Street using a Canon 5D Mark III. This camera, which I acquired a few years ago, has recently presented some intriguing technical challenges. My local camera dealer, aware of my extensive collection of Canon lenses (despite my shift to Sony mirrorless systems), offered me an unused 5D Mark III at a very favourable price. The camera had been won in a competition and remained unused for several years. I agreed to purchase it, provided he could supply a GPS attachment.
Currently, I am in the process of evaluating my photographic equipment, deciding which cameras to retain. I opted to use the Canon 5D Mark III for a week. However, upon powering it on, I encountered a 'battery communication error'. Subsequent attempts with different batteries yielded the same error, and the display panel went blank, rendering the camera unresponsive.
After several hours of troubleshooting, I discovered that removing the SD card allowed the camera to restart. Inserting an old CompactFlash (CF) card enabled normal operation. Reinserting the original SD card caused the camera to crash. Replacing it with a new SD card resolved the issue.
This problem prompted me to investigate the Canon 5D Mark III's operational characteristics, particularly concerning memory card compatibility and reported issues.
Canon 5D Mark III: General Operational Considerations
The Canon 5D Mark III, although a robust professional DSLR, has documented limitations. Some users report less flexibility in RAW file shadow recovery and inferior high ISO performance compared to the Canon 6D. The autofocus system, while adequate, exhibits weaker low-light sensitivity at its centre point than the 6D. This indicates trade-offs in specific photographic scenarios.
The 61-point autofocus system, while offering advanced tracking, requires considerable expertise to master, potentially leading to challenges in capturing fast-moving subjects. The complexity of this system suggests sensitivity to operational conditions and external factors, such as memory card insertion.
Additionally, reports of image sharpness issues, often attributed to lens calibration or wide-aperture lens characteristics, highlight potential operational challenges.
One particularly relevant account describes erratic camera behaviour following a low battery state, including spontaneous photo capture and unresponsive controls. Prolonged removal of the battery, lens, and memory card, to discharge an internal 'keep alive' capacitor, resolved the issue. This suggests the camera’s electronic systems are sensitive to power fluctuations, potentially linking my battery communication error to a past low battery or unexpected power-down scenario affecting peripheral communication.
SD Card Compatibility and Limitations
The Canon 5D Mark III features dual memory card slots for CF and SD cards. However, the camera’s SD card implementation has limitations. It is not recommended for high-speed burst shooting, as speeds are capped at approximately 20MB/s, despite supporting UHS-I SD cards. When both CF and SD cards are inserted, write speed defaults to the slower card, hindering CF card performance.
The camera does not support UHS-II SD cards, limiting high-speed card potential and potentially contributing to communication issues. Some photographers advise using the SD card slot sparingly, primarily for wireless transfers via Eye-Fi cards, and relying on CF cards for image capture.
Reports of the camera not stopping writing to both SDXC and CF cards, while different from my issue, indicate potential instability in memory card handling. Recommendations include formatting cards within the camera and using faster CF cards.
Simultaneous use of both card slots can reduce the camera’s buffer size, suggesting shared system resources and potential performance degradation or communication errors.
Firmware Updates and Memory Card/Battery Issues
Firmware updates often address bugs and improve performance. The latest firmware, version 1.3.6, primarily corrects PTP communication and update process vulnerabilities, not directly addressing SD card or battery communication issues.
However, earlier firmware, such as version 1.2.1, addressed memory card-related problems, including LCD monitor freezes during Live View and issues with Eye-Fi cards, demonstrating Canon’s awareness of memory card compatibility.
User Experiences with Similar Issues
User forums reveal reports of physically damaged SD card slots and instances where the camera powers on without an SD card but shuts down upon insertion. This mirrors my issue, suggesting a link between SD card insertion and power system errors. Recommendations include reformatting SD cards (FAT32 for cards 32GB or smaller, exFAT for larger cards) and trying new cards.
Other users report 'Error 2 - card cannot be accessed' and complete SD slot failures, further indicating potential SD card interface issues.
Interplay Between SD Card and Battery Communication Errors
While battery communication errors can occur independently, my issue appears triggered by SD card insertion. It is possible my 'battery communication error' is a power-related issue stemming from SD card communication difficulties. The camera might draw excessive power or experience instability when accessing the SD card, resulting in a battery monitoring error.
Cleaning battery contact points is a general troubleshooting step. Canon’s error code documentation does not explicitly mention SD card-triggered battery communication errors, suggesting it may be uncommon or misreported.
The fact that memory card issues can cause complete power-offs indicates a deep integration between memory card interface and power management, supporting the possibility of a link between these issues.
SD Card Age, Speed Class, and Brand Impact
The Canon 5D Mark III is compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, with a suggested maximum capacity of 128GB, although larger cards are often supported. The camera operates UHS-I cards at Class 10 speeds and does not support UHS-II cards.
PARNELL STREET
DEMOLITION WORK IS ONGOING ON PARNELL STREET [A NEW HOTEL WILL BE LOCATED HERE]
Demolition and construction are underway on Parnell Street, Dublin 1, where a new hotel development is planned. This project involves significant alterations to several existing structures, including a protected structure at No. 3 Parnell Street (RPS Ref. 6422), and will extend to include Nos. 4, 5, and 6 Parnell Street, No. 57a Jervis Lane Upper, and Nos. 58 and 59 Capel Street, which back onto Jervis Lane Upper.
The development will consist of:
Demolition of No. 57a Jervis Lane Upper and the existing single-storey structures at Nos. 4-6 Parnell Street.
Demolition of Nos. 58 and 59 Capel Street, with the exception of the west-facing facades, the shared party wall, and the original internal structure of No. 58.
Refurbishment of the west-facing facades of Nos. 58 and 59 Capel Street to their original state, including cleaning and re-pointing the existing brickwork, and installing new traditional-style timber windows to replace existing non-original windows.
Replacement shopfronts, with associated lighting and signage, will be provided for Nos. 58 and 59 Capel Street.
Internal and external alterations to the three-storey over basement building at No. 3 Parnell Street (a protected structure) to accommodate the new hotel. This includes cleaning and re-pointing the original brickwork, installing new traditional-style timber windows in existing openings on the north-facing facade, retaining and refurbishing the existing chimney stack, and partially removing internal partitions/walls to facilitate the reconfiguration of the ground, first, and second floors. This will enable the creation of an entrance foyer/lobby, bedrooms, and a connection (including a new feature atrium to the rear) to the new hotel development.
Replacement shopfronts will also be installed at No. 3 Parnell Street.
The Ryder's Row Triangle, bordered by Ryder's Row, Capel Street, and Parnell Street, has historically suffered from urban decay and anti-social behaviour. This decline is attributed to a combination of factors:
Historical Context: The area experienced the broader economic decline of Dublin's inner city during the latter half of the 20th century, leading to business closures and property dilapidation. Fragmented property ownership further complicated redevelopment efforts.
Economic Factors: The growth of suburban shopping centres and online retail impacted traditional high street shops, resulting in increased vacancy and neglect.
Social Factors: Derelict buildings and vacant spaces attracted anti-social behaviour, creating a negative perception and hindering investment.
The presence of the Dutch Billy house (a protected structure) on Capel Street and a previously uncooperative bicycle yard on Ryder's Row presented significant obstacles to comprehensive regeneration.
The Dublin City Council's response has been criticised for its slow pace, potentially due to:
Lack of political will.
Financial constraints.
Legal challenges from property owners.
Recent developments include the relocation of the bicycle yard and the creation of a pocket park. However, the derelict buildings on Parnell Street remain a concern.
While various redevelopment proposals have been made, concrete plans for the wider Ryder's Row Triangle are still pending.
The ongoing construction at No. 3 Parnell Street, across from the triangle, is a mixed-use development featuring a four-star hotel (approximately 150 rooms), retail space (shops and restaurants), and residential apartments (one and two-bedroom units). The project will also include a public plaza and a rooftop terrace. This development aims to contribute to the revitalisation of the area and create new jobs. Previous estimations of a 2025 completion date are optimistic, and it is likely to continue past this date.
BOLANDS MILLS
THE REDEVELOPED BOLANDS MILLS [PROGRAMME IS ALMOST COMPLETE]
The redevelopment of Bolands Mills in Dublin has significantly transformed the area, with Google playing a pivotal role.
Historical Significance:
Bolands Mills holds historical importance, notably its association with the 1916 Easter Rising. The site's industrial heritage, including 19th-century warehouses, has been incorporated into the modern development.
Google's Influence:
Google acquired the site and has developed it into a mixed-use space, including office space for its engineering hub in Ireland.
A key feature of Google's involvement is the provision of 46 discounted rental apartments for local key workers, managed by Clúid Housing. This initiative aims to support those essential to the community.
Mixed-Use Development:
The redevelopment includes:
Office spaces.
Residential apartments.
Retail outlets and restaurants.
Public spaces.
Public Spaces and Community Retail:
The project emphasises creating vibrant public spaces, including a new civic plaza overlooking the waterfront at Grand Canal Dock.
Planned retail outlets and restaurants aim to provide amenities for residents and workers, fostering a lively community atmosphere. This includes bars, bakerys, food halls, and coffee shops.
Completion Timeline:
It was indicated that the commercial spaces were planned to be opened on a phased basis between late 2024 and early 2025.
The apartments for key workers are scheduled to be ready for occupation in Spring 2025.
Impact of Google:
Google's investment has revitalised a previously derelict site, contributing to the regeneration of the Dublin Docklands.
The company's commitment to providing discounted housing for key workers demonstrates a focus on community support.
The development has created a significant employment hub, further solidifying Google's presence in Dublin.
APRIL FOOLS DAY 2025
ANOTHER VISIT TO TEMPLE BAR [THIS TIME I USED A SIGMA DP3 QUATTRO]
The Sigma Quattro Dp3, renowned for its exceptional image quality at low ISO settings, is a camera with distinctive strengths and weaknesses. Its unique Foveon X3 sensor captures colour in a way that yields images often compared to medium format, boasting remarkable detail and colour accuracy. The fixed 50mm f/2.8 lens (75mm equivalent) complements the sensor, contributing to the images' sharpness. Furthermore, the camera exhibits robust build quality.
However, the Dp3's unconventional design results in awkward ergonomics. Its performance is notably slow, with sluggish autofocus and overall operation, rendering it unsuitable for fast-paced photography. The Foveon sensor struggles in low-light conditions, producing noticeable noise at higher ISO settings. Battery life is inconsistent and often frustratingly short, varying from 40 to 80 images per charge. Additionally, the required Sigma Photo Pro software is considered clunky and challenging to use. Crucially, it lacks features common in other cameras, such as video recording and image stabilisation.
These limitations, including slow performance, poor high ISO performance, and unusual ergonomics, relegated the Dp3 to a niche market. It is not a general-purpose camera, but rather a specialised tool for specific photographic applications. The demanding workflows necessary to maximise its potential further limit its appeal.
BUILDINGS OF INTEREST
DESI CREW RESTAURANT
I have not seen the menu so I can only guess as to what you can expect until I actually have a meal there [note I did attend the opening and was impressed by the sample dishes]
"Desi Crew" is aiming to bring the vibrant and diverse flavours of South Indian street food to Dublin! Here's what you might expect if you visit:
Food:
Focus on South Indian cuisine: Expect dishes from the regions of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh. Think dosas (thin, crispy crepes made from fermented batter), idlis (steamed rice cakes), vadas (savory lentil doughnuts), and uttapams (thicker pancakes with toppings).
Street food style: This likely means the food will be casual, flavourful, and perhaps served in a way reminiscent of street stalls in India.
Variety of chutneys and sambars: South Indian food is known for its accompanying sauces and dips. You'll probably find coconut chutney, tomato chutney, sambar (a lentil-based vegetable stew), and perhaps even some more unique regional chutneys.
Spice levels: South Indian food can be spicy, but a restaurant catering to a wider audience will likely offer a range of spice levels to suit different palates. Don't hesitate to ask for your preferred level of heat.
Fresh ingredients: Given the emphasis on street food, you can hope for fresh, vibrant ingredients and bold flavours.
Atmosphere:
Casual and lively: Street food is all about a bustling, energetic atmosphere. The restaurant might have bright colors, lively music, and a casual setting.
"Desi Crew" is a promising addition to Dublin's food scene, offering a taste of authentic South Indian street food. If you're looking for a casual, flavourful, and potentially spicy dining experience, it's definitely worth checking out!
SELECT ANY IMAGE AS THEY ARE MENU OPTIONS
A NEW QUICK MENU IS AVAILABLE BELOW
Commercial Disclosure
You will find links to buy products from Amazon, Google and other partners. If you click on these links, you’ll find that the URL includes a small extra piece of text which identifies that the click came from my websites. This text is an affiliate code, and it means that I get a small percentage of the money you spend if you choose to buy that product, or, in some cases, other products from the site soon after. These affiliate links help pay the costs of producing my websites and ensure that the content is free to you.