THE CRESCENT CHURCHPHOTOGRAPHED IN MARCH 2022

,

THE SONY A7RV ON LOAN WHILE I WAIT FOR THE A1 II

My Sony A7R IV was damaged during a serious fall in Belfast in 2022, and its performance has gradually declined since then. Instead of replacing it immediately with the A7R V, I decided to wait for the anticipated A1 II update. I pre-ordered an A1 II before Christmas, paying the full price upfront.

It is now the end of July 2025, and my camera still hasn't arrived. My dealer has informed me that they only expect to receive one A1 II per month going forward. Recognising the unreliability of my current A7R IV, the dealer kindly offered me a second-hand A7R V on loan until my A1 II is delivered. This offer was a pleasant surprise, as I had almost decided to purchase a used A7R V with the intention of trading it in or selling it once the A1 II eventually arrived.

Along with the A1 II, I also ordered the Sony F2 28-70mm GM lens and two expensive CFexpress Type A cards.

Sony A7R V vs. Sony A7R IV (My Current Camera)
The Sony A7R V represents a significant upgrade over the A7R IV, despite both cameras sharing the same 61MP sensor. The improvements in the A7R V are largely thanks to a new processor and a dedicated AI processing unit.

Here are the key areas where the A7R V surpasses the A7R IV:

Autofocus System: This is arguably the most substantial improvement. The A7R V features a dedicated AI processing unit that dramatically enhances subject recognition and tracking. It can recognise a wider range of subjects, including humans, animals, birds, insects, cars, trains, and aircraft, and tracks them more reliably, even when faces or eyes are obscured, or subjects change poses. Its low-light performance is also superior.

Image Stabilisation (IBIS): The A7R V boasts an improved in-body image stabilisation system, offering up to 8.0 stops of correction compared to the A7R IV's 5.5 stops. This is a huge advantage for handheld shooting, particularly in low-light conditions.

Processor: The A7R V incorporates the newer BIONZ XR processor, which is eight times faster than the A7R IV's BIONZ X. This leads to:

Larger Buffer: The A7R V has a significantly larger buffer, enabling much longer continuous shooting bursts (e.g., 583 compressed RAW images vs. 68 on the A7R IV at 10fps).

Faster Operations: General camera operations feel noticeably snappier.

Rear LCD Screen: The A7R V features a brand-new 3.2-inch, 2.36M-dot, 4-axis multi-angle touchscreen. This highly versatile screen tilts and rotates, offering far more flexibility for shooting at various angles than the A7R IV's limited tilting screen. It also supports full touch menu operation.

RAW File Options: The A7R V introduces lossless compressed RAW with medium (26MP) and small (15MP) file size options. This can be very useful for managing file sizes while preserving image quality. The A7R IV only offers uncompressed and lossy compressed RAW.

Video Capabilities: While both are primarily still cameras, the A7R V offers 8K video recording (with some crop) and improved 4K options (4K 60p with a 1.2x crop). The A7R IV is limited to 4K 30p.

Dual Card Slots: The A7R V has two dual-format card slots that accept either CFexpress Type A or UHS-II SD cards, providing faster write speeds with CFexpress Type A for demanding applications. The A7R IV only has UHS-II SD card slots.

Menu System: The A7R V incorporates the newer, more intuitive menu system found in recent Sony cameras, making it easier to navigate.

Pixel Shift Multi Shooting: While both models offer this feature, the A7R V includes "motion correction intelligence," which does a better job of handling moving subjects within a pixel shift composite.

Should I Get a Used A7R V and Forget About the A1 II?
This decision largely depends on my specific needs and priorities.

Arguments for Getting a Used A7R V:

Immediate Availability: I can acquire it now, rather than waiting until August or September for the A1 II.

Significant Upgrade from A7R IV: As detailed above, the A7R V offers substantial improvements in autofocus, IBIS, screen, and processing power. This would make my existing workflow much more efficient and open up new possibilities, especially for subjects that benefit from advanced autofocus.

Excellent for High-Resolution Stills: Given my primary interest in high-resolution photography (landscapes, studio, portraits, detailed wildlife), the 61MP sensor of the A7R V is exceptional.

Cost-Effective: A used A7R V will be considerably less expensive than a new A1 II, allowing me to invest in lenses or other gear.

Arguments Against Getting a Used A7R V (and Waiting for the A1 II):

If Speed is Paramount: If I frequently shoot fast-moving action (sports, birds in flight) or engage in professional photojournalism, the A1 II's stacked sensor and unparalleled speed are game-changers.

Sony A1 II vs. Sony A7R V
The A1 II is Sony's flagship "do-it-all" camera, combining high resolution with extreme speed. The A7R V is a resolution-focused camera with highly advanced autofocus.

Here are the key areas where the A1 II is superior to the A7R V:

Stacked Sensor: This is the fundamental difference. The A1 II features a 50.1MP stacked Exmor RS CMOS sensor. This design allows for incredibly fast readout speeds, leading to:

Higher Burst Shooting: Up to 30fps with AF/AE tracking (compared to 10fps on the A7R V).

Blackout-Free Shooting: No viewfinder blackout during continuous shooting, providing a seamless view of the action.

Significantly Reduced Rolling Shutter: The A1 II's electronic shutter is far more usable than the A7R V's, practically eliminating rolling shutter distortion. This is a huge advantage for silent shooting and shooting under flickering lights.

Faster Flash Sync: The A1 II has a mechanical flash sync speed of 1/400s (vs. 1/250s on the A7R V), and electronic flash sync up to 1/250s.

Autofocus Performance (Overall Speed): While the A7R V has excellent AI-driven subject recognition, the A1 II's stacked sensor allows its autofocus system to operate with much greater speed and refresh rates (120 times/second), leading to even better tracking performance for extremely fast or erratic subjects. It also inherits the latest AI AF unit.

Video Capabilities: The A1 II offers 8K 30p and 4K 120p video recording, with generally better internal codecs and more robust video features for professional production.

Pre-Capture: The A1 II offers pre-capture, a crucial feature for capturing fleeting moments where I might be slow to react.

Durability/Robustness: The A1 series is generally built to a higher standard for professional use, with more robust construction and weather sealing.

Professional Features: The A1 II is designed with professional workflows in mind, including a 2.5Gbps Ethernet port for fast wired data transfer.

Where the A7R V Might Still Hold an Edge (Minor):

Resolution: The A7R V has a slightly higher 61MP sensor compared to the A1 II's 50.1MP. While 50MP is still incredibly high, for absolute maximum detail, the A7R V might have a tiny edge in specific, static scenarios where every pixel can be exploited.

Price: A used A7R V is significantly cheaper.

Robustness and Life Expectancy (A1 II vs. A7R V)
The Sony A1 II is designed and marketed as Sony's flagship professional camera. This generally translates to:

Enhanced Build Quality: Expect more robust materials, better weather sealing, and more durable components compared to the A7R V, which is also well-built but not at the same "pro" tier.

Shutter Life: Flagship professional cameras often have higher shutter actuation ratings, indicating a longer expected lifespan for the mechanical shutter. While Sony doesn't always publish these figures, it's generally understood that the A1 series is built for heavier professional use.

Heat Dissipation: For extended shooting sessions, especially video, the A1 II's design is likely to manage heat more effectively, contributing to long-term reliability.

In summary, the A1 II is generally considered a more robust unit with a better life expectancy, particularly if one is pushing the camera in demanding professional scenarios.

THE CHILDREN OF LIR SCULPTURE [I USED A SONY A7RV CAMERA]

The Garden of Remembrance in Dublin, a serene and poignant space, is home to a magnificent sculpture that captures the essence of a beloved Irish legend: The Children of Lir. This bronze masterpiece serves as the focal point of the garden, which itself commemorates all those who gave their lives for Irish freedom.

The Art: "The Children of Lir"

The sculpture by Oisín Kelly depicts the four children of Lir – Fionnuala, Aodh, Fiachra, and Conn – in their transformed state as swans, rising from the water. The work is crafted from copper bronze and stands at an imposing height, conveying a sense of aspiration and transcendence. The composition is dynamic, with the swans' forms suggesting both grace and a powerful surge upwards, symbolising rebirth and resurrection.

The legend of the Children of Lir is a tale from Irish mythology, often grouped as one of the "Three Sorrows of Storytelling". It recounts how the four children of King Lir were cruelly transformed into swans by their jealous stepmother, Aoife, cursed to spend 900 years in this form, enduring hardship across various waters in Ireland. The curse is eventually broken by the ringing of a Christian bell, returning them to human form as frail, aged individuals who are then baptised before their peaceful deaths.

In the context of the Garden of Remembrance, the sculpture takes on deeper symbolic meaning. It represents not only the suffering and endurance of the Irish people through periods of oppression but also their ultimate transformation, resilience, and the enduring hope for freedom and renewal. The swans in flight can be seen as an allegory for the nation's struggle and eventual liberation, a vision that ultimately became a reality.

Behind the sculpture, a poem by Liam Mac Uistin is inscribed, further reinforcing the themes of vision, hope, valour, and resurrection, drawing parallels between the mythical tale and Ireland's historical journey to independence.

The Artist: Oisín Kelly (1915-1981)

The creator of this iconic sculpture was Oisín Kelly, born Austin Kelly in Dublin in 1915. Kelly was a prominent Irish sculptor, highly regarded for his accessible style and mastery of various techniques and materials. He initially pursued a career as a schoolteacher, studying languages at Trinity College Dublin and later attending night classes at the National College of Art and Design. He also had the invaluable experience of studying under the renowned British sculptor Henry Moore from 1948 to 1949.

Before "The Children of Lir," Kelly primarily focused on small wood carvings and received commissions for Catholic churches. However, the commission for the Garden of Remembrance, unveiled on Easter Monday 1966 to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Easter Rising, brought him significant public recognition. While some initially criticised the use of a pagan legend for a national monument in a Christian country, the sculpture has undeniably become one of his most celebrated and enduring works.

Following "The Children of Lir," Kelly received numerous other public commissions, including the statue of trade union leader James Larkin on Dublin's O'Connell Street and "Oisín Goes to Tir Na Nóg" at the Irish Life Mall Plaza. In 1966, he became artist-in-residence at the Kilkenny Design Centre, a role he held until his death in 1981. Oisín Kelly's work played a crucial role in upholding sculptural standards in Ireland during a period when the art form was experiencing a lull, leaving a lasting legacy on the country's public art landscape.
THIS IS AN INTERESTING BUILDING COMPLEX AS IT IS AN ARTS CENTRE AND A CHURCH [SONY A7RIV WITH FE 20MM LENS]

The photographs are from my March 2022 visit to Belfast and I am a bit surprised by them as I appear to have used a Sony A7RIV and a Sony FE 20mm F1.8 G lens. I am surprised because I do not remember having a Sony 20mm Lens Back then but I had a wide angle Voigtlander and a 25mm Zeiss Batis. I thought that I had purchased the Sony 20mm as part of a package deal when I acquired my FX30 in December 2022. I hope that I do not actually have two. On that visit I had a bad fall and damaged the camera body and the Voigtlander and at least two ribs.

The Crescent Arts Centre and the First Church of Christ, Scientist, Belfast, share a fascinating history, housed within a building complex that has undergone significant transformations over 150 years. What appears to be one structure is, in fact, an amalgamation of distinct architectural phases and purposes.

Early History: Victoria College (Girls' School)
The imposing red-brick building at 2-4 University Road was not originally built as a church. Constructed in 1873, it served as the home for Victoria College, a renowned girls' school founded by Margaret Byers in 1859. Byers' vision led to the creation of this purpose-built facility for the college.

While public records don't explicitly name a single architect for the original 1873 Victoria College building, such projects were typically funded through a combination of subscriptions, donations, and the dedicated efforts of founders and benefactors, all driven by Byers' educational goals.

Transition to the First Church of Christ, Scientist, Belfast
The First Church of Christ, Scientist, Belfast, initially acquired a site in the University area and completed a permanent building there in 1923. However, it quickly became apparent that a larger space was needed.

This led to the construction of the main church building (the one with the distinctive white walls, arches, cloister, and "church tower") between 1936 and 1937. The original 1923 building then transitioned into use as the Sunday School.

This prominent church structure was designed by the acclaimed architect Sir Bertram Clough Williams-Ellis, famously known for creating the Italianate village of Portmeirion in Wales. His distinctive style is evident in the church's unique, almost Mediterranean, appearance, which strikingly contrasts with the surrounding red-brick Victorian architecture.

It's important to clarify that the "church tower" was not part of the original school building. It belongs to the later structure designed by Williams-Ellis for the First Church of Christ, Scientist. The former Victoria College building (now the core of the Crescent Arts Centre) and the church building are distinct, though they are adjacent and share a historical connection to the area.

The Crescent Arts Centre Today
The Crescent Arts Centre, established in 1980, is primarily housed in the refurbished former Victoria College building. This section of the complex underwent a significant refurbishment between 2008 and 2010 to better serve its purpose as an arts venue. Meanwhile, active church services continue to be held in the adjacent (though connected) building designed by Clough Williams-Ellis.

Summary of Architectural Phases and Purposes
The building complex represents two main architectural phases and purposes:

1873: The original red-brick building was constructed for Victoria College (girls' school).

1936-1937: Construction of the distinct First Church of Christ, Scientist, with its unique design by Clough Williams-Ellis, which includes the features associated with a "church tower." This church building continues to host services.

Victoria College's Relocations
Over the past 150 years, Victoria College (as it is now called) has relocated four times. Former Belfast locations include Howard Street, Pakenham Place, and Lower Crescent, before the current school was established at Cranmore in the 1970s. The names of the school houses reflect these past locations, preserving a link to its rich history.

The presence of numerous churches, especially in an area like Belfast's University Quarter, is indeed a notable characteristic and has deep historical roots in Northern Ireland. Here's why you're seeing so many in my photographs of the area:

1. Historical Denominational Landscape:

Protestant Diversity: Unlike some other parts of the world where one or two Protestant denominations might dominate, Northern Ireland, and Belfast in particular, historically had a significant presence of various Protestant denominations. The main ones were:

Presbyterianism: This was, and remains, a very strong force, particularly amongst the Scottish settlers who came to Ulster.

Church of Ireland (Anglican): The established church, historically linked to the Church of England.

Methodism: Grew significantly during various revival movements.

Other smaller denominations: Baptists, Congregationalists, Free Presbyterians, and others also had (and still have) a presence.

Catholic Presence: While historically a minority in Belfast (though this has changed in recent decades), the Catholic population also grew significantly in the 19th and early 20th centuries as people moved from rural areas to the industrialising city. They also built their own churches and institutions.

2. "Building Boom" of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries:

Industrial Growth and Population Influx: Belfast experienced massive industrial growth in the 19th century, particularly in shipbuilding and linen. This led to a huge increase in population. As people moved to the city, their respective religious communities sought to establish places of worship and community hubs for their expanding congregations.

Civic Pride and Philanthropy: Building grand churches was often a matter of civic and denominational pride, and a way for wealthy philanthropists and congregations to demonstrate their prosperity and commitment to their faith. The University Quarter, being a desirable and affluent area, would have attracted congregations with the means to construct substantial buildings.

Victorian Era Religious Revival: The Victorian era was a time of significant religious revival and earnestness across Britain and Ireland. This fervent religious atmosphere encouraged church building and expansion.

3. Distinct Denominational Identity and Community:

Separate Institutions: Historically, and even to a large extent today, religious identity in Northern Ireland is deeply intertwined with social and cultural life. Different denominations often established their own schools, social organisations, and indeed, their own churches, even if they were geographically close. This reinforced distinct community identities.

Competition and Proximity: While there might have been some level of competition, it was also simply a reflection of different congregations wanting their own dedicated space within a growing urban area, accessible to their members.

4. Proximity to Queen's University Belfast:

Student Population: A university area naturally attracts a diverse student population, many of whom may wish to maintain their religious affiliations. Chaplaincy services for various denominations are often clustered around university campuses to serve students and staff. Queen's University Belfast, for instance, has several chaplaincy centres for different denominations located very close to its main buildings.

Historical Academic Ties: Many universities historically had strong ties to various religious denominations, and these denominations would often establish churches or student residences in close proximity to provide a spiritual and social home for their students.

In essence, the cluster of churches to be seen in Belfast's University Quarter is a tangible reflection of the city's complex social, religious, and industrial history, where different denominations established their presence to serve their growing communities during a period of rapid urban expansion and religious fervour.

Commercial Disclosure

You will find links to buy products from Amazon, Google and other partners. If you click on these links, you’ll find that the URL includes a small extra piece of text which identifies that the click came from my websites. This text is an affiliate code, and it means that I get a small percentage of the money you spend if you choose to buy that product, or, in some cases, other products from the site soon after. These affiliate links help pay the costs of producing my websites and ensure that the content is free to you.