AUGUST 2025PHOTOGRAPHED BY WILLIAM MURPHY

WATERFORD WALLS

AN ANNUAL FESTIVAL SINCE 2015

Animalitoland's mural from the 2018 festival is located on Doyle Street, near its junction with St Ignatius Street. The mural depicts a large, purplish, bear-like creature sitting, with its head thrown back in a joyous, laughing expression. It holds a small, childlike figure wearing a red hoodie, who in turn holds a glowing, lightbulb-like object. The scene is set against a vibrant background that radiates a warm, yellow light from behind the large creature, with abstract, geometric shapes and symbols on the left side of the building's facade. The style is recognisably consistent with the artist's signature aesthetic, which often features "fantastic creatures" and children in a "colourful explosion". The presence of this artwork, and its clear recognisability, reinforces the festival's success in commissioning works that resonate with the public while maintaining artistic integrity.

WATERFORD 2025 VISIT

This was my most successful city visit to date and it was the most enjoyable however my visit ended on the Friday before all the murals were due to be completed Which was a pity. One reason why it was successful was that there was no rain and the other reason was the fact that I had a room at the Granville Hotel. Another upside was that geo-tagging worked without any failures.

I brought both my Leica Q3 and my new Sony A1 II and the plan was to use both equally throughout the visit but I ended up favouring the Sony A1 FE 25-105mm F4 combination as it proved to be much more flexible. Some had suggested that the Sony A7RV might have been a better choice so I may select it for my Visit to Cork city in September.
I must admit that I was surprised to discover that I have not visited Waterford since 2021 especially as I was convinced that I had visited late in 2023.

I am trying to produce a comprehensive record, with photographs, of my visits and while the plan was to visit the city once every year every thing changed because of Covid-19 and I had no option but to cancel a number of visits. While I thought that I had visited in 2023 this was not the case as my mother who was 103 years of age, at the time, was unwell so I had to cancel my October 2023 visit a few days before I was due to travel. The hotel would not allow me to reschedule for March 2024 and as I had difficulty finding suitable accommodation Waterford did not remain on my schedule for that year. This year, 2025, I have booked the Granville.

As already mentioned, I thought that I had visited Waterford in 2023 but when I checked the records I discovered that cancelled the October trip and did not visit in 2024. I stayed at the Portree in August 2021. I also stayed at the Portree in August 2019. I stayed in the Fitzwilton in July 2018 and in August 2017. I had a room in May 2016 at the Waterford Marina Hotel. While I cannot find any records I know that I stayed at the Waterford Marina Hotel in 2015 or 2014.
[UPDATE 4 AUGUST 2025] Unfortunately Elements does not yet meet my requirements for a variety of reasons and I very much doubt that I will switch over until early 2026 at best.
Over the last twenty years I have used Rapidweaver to produce my main websites but the developer is in the process of introducing Elements as a a much better and modern alternative which I am planning to use. However life is complicated and I have many decisions to make but starting today (4 July) I will begin to experiment with Elements but you may not notice any real changes for a few months. My main aim is for my sites to be more responsive and mobile friendly.

DUBLIN IN AUGUST 2025

PHOTOGRAPHED BY WILLIAM MURPHY

MANY VISITS TO WATERFORD

PRESENTED BY THE URBAN CARTOGRAPHER

,

THE SONY A7RV ON LOAN WHILE I WAIT FOR THE A1 II

My Sony A7R IV was damaged during a serious fall in Belfast in 2022, and its performance has gradually declined since then. Instead of replacing it immediately with the A7R V, I decided to wait for the anticipated A1 II update. I pre-ordered an A1 II before Christmas, paying the full price upfront.

It is now the end of July 2025, and my camera still hasn't arrived. My dealer has informed me that they only expect to receive one A1 II per month going forward. Recognising the unreliability of my current A7R IV, the dealer kindly offered me a second-hand A7R V on loan until my A1 II is delivered. This offer was a pleasant surprise, as I had almost decided to purchase a used A7R V with the intention of trading it in or selling it once the A1 II eventually arrived.

Along with the A1 II, I also ordered the Sony F2 28-70mm GM lens and two expensive CFexpress Type A cards.

Sony A7R V vs. Sony A7R IV (My Current Camera)
The Sony A7R V represents a significant upgrade over the A7R IV, despite both cameras sharing the same 61MP sensor. The improvements in the A7R V are largely thanks to a new processor and a dedicated AI processing unit.

Here are the key areas where the A7R V surpasses the A7R IV:

Autofocus System: This is arguably the most substantial improvement. The A7R V features a dedicated AI processing unit that dramatically enhances subject recognition and tracking. It can recognise a wider range of subjects, including humans, animals, birds, insects, cars, trains, and aircraft, and tracks them more reliably, even when faces or eyes are obscured, or subjects change poses. Its low-light performance is also superior.

Image Stabilisation (IBIS): The A7R V boasts an improved in-body image stabilisation system, offering up to 8.0 stops of correction compared to the A7R IV's 5.5 stops. This is a huge advantage for handheld shooting, particularly in low-light conditions.

Processor: The A7R V incorporates the newer BIONZ XR processor, which is eight times faster than the A7R IV's BIONZ X. This leads to:

Larger Buffer: The A7R V has a significantly larger buffer, enabling much longer continuous shooting bursts (e.g., 583 compressed RAW images vs. 68 on the A7R IV at 10fps).

Faster Operations: General camera operations feel noticeably snappier.

Rear LCD Screen: The A7R V features a brand-new 3.2-inch, 2.36M-dot, 4-axis multi-angle touchscreen. This highly versatile screen tilts and rotates, offering far more flexibility for shooting at various angles than the A7R IV's limited tilting screen. It also supports full touch menu operation.

RAW File Options: The A7R V introduces lossless compressed RAW with medium (26MP) and small (15MP) file size options. This can be very useful for managing file sizes while preserving image quality. The A7R IV only offers uncompressed and lossy compressed RAW.

Video Capabilities: While both are primarily still cameras, the A7R V offers 8K video recording (with some crop) and improved 4K options (4K 60p with a 1.2x crop). The A7R IV is limited to 4K 30p.

Dual Card Slots: The A7R V has two dual-format card slots that accept either CFexpress Type A or UHS-II SD cards, providing faster write speeds with CFexpress Type A for demanding applications. The A7R IV only has UHS-II SD card slots.

Menu System: The A7R V incorporates the newer, more intuitive menu system found in recent Sony cameras, making it easier to navigate.

Pixel Shift Multi Shooting: While both models offer this feature, the A7R V includes "motion correction intelligence," which does a better job of handling moving subjects within a pixel shift composite.

Should I Get a Used A7R V and Forget About the A1 II?
This decision largely depends on my specific needs and priorities.

Arguments for Getting a Used A7R V:

Immediate Availability: I can acquire it now, rather than waiting until August or September for the A1 II.

Significant Upgrade from A7R IV: As detailed above, the A7R V offers substantial improvements in autofocus, IBIS, screen, and processing power. This would make my existing workflow much more efficient and open up new possibilities, especially for subjects that benefit from advanced autofocus.

Excellent for High-Resolution Stills: Given my primary interest in high-resolution photography (landscapes, studio, portraits, detailed wildlife), the 61MP sensor of the A7R V is exceptional.

Cost-Effective: A used A7R V will be considerably less expensive than a new A1 II, allowing me to invest in lenses or other gear.

Arguments Against Getting a Used A7R V (and Waiting for the A1 II):

If Speed is Paramount: If I frequently shoot fast-moving action (sports, birds in flight) or engage in professional photojournalism, the A1 II's stacked sensor and unparalleled speed are game-changers.

Sony A1 II vs. Sony A7R V
The A1 II is Sony's flagship "do-it-all" camera, combining high resolution with extreme speed. The A7R V is a resolution-focused camera with highly advanced autofocus.

Here are the key areas where the A1 II is superior to the A7R V:

Stacked Sensor: This is the fundamental difference. The A1 II features a 50.1MP stacked Exmor RS CMOS sensor. This design allows for incredibly fast readout speeds, leading to:

Higher Burst Shooting: Up to 30fps with AF/AE tracking (compared to 10fps on the A7R V).

Blackout-Free Shooting: No viewfinder blackout during continuous shooting, providing a seamless view of the action.

Significantly Reduced Rolling Shutter: The A1 II's electronic shutter is far more usable than the A7R V's, practically eliminating rolling shutter distortion. This is a huge advantage for silent shooting and shooting under flickering lights.

Faster Flash Sync: The A1 II has a mechanical flash sync speed of 1/400s (vs. 1/250s on the A7R V), and electronic flash sync up to 1/250s.

Autofocus Performance (Overall Speed): While the A7R V has excellent AI-driven subject recognition, the A1 II's stacked sensor allows its autofocus system to operate with much greater speed and refresh rates (120 times/second), leading to even better tracking performance for extremely fast or erratic subjects. It also inherits the latest AI AF unit.

Video Capabilities: The A1 II offers 8K 30p and 4K 120p video recording, with generally better internal codecs and more robust video features for professional production.

Pre-Capture: The A1 II offers pre-capture, a crucial feature for capturing fleeting moments where I might be slow to react.

Durability/Robustness: The A1 series is generally built to a higher standard for professional use, with more robust construction and weather sealing.

Professional Features: The A1 II is designed with professional workflows in mind, including a 2.5Gbps Ethernet port for fast wired data transfer.

Where the A7R V Might Still Hold an Edge (Minor):

Resolution: The A7R V has a slightly higher 61MP sensor compared to the A1 II's 50.1MP. While 50MP is still incredibly high, for absolute maximum detail, the A7R V might have a tiny edge in specific, static scenarios where every pixel can be exploited.

Price: A used A7R V is significantly cheaper.

Robustness and Life Expectancy (A1 II vs. A7R V)
The Sony A1 II is designed and marketed as Sony's flagship professional camera. This generally translates to:

Enhanced Build Quality: Expect more robust materials, better weather sealing, and more durable components compared to the A7R V, which is also well-built but not at the same "pro" tier.

Shutter Life: Flagship professional cameras often have higher shutter actuation ratings, indicating a longer expected lifespan for the mechanical shutter. While Sony doesn't always publish these figures, it's generally understood that the A1 series is built for heavier professional use.

Heat Dissipation: For extended shooting sessions, especially video, the A1 II's design is likely to manage heat more effectively, contributing to long-term reliability.

In summary, the A1 II is generally considered a more robust unit with a better life expectancy, particularly if one is pushing the camera in demanding professional scenarios.

,

Today I visited Dun Laoghaire and when I arrived the weather way beautiful but within about two hours it began to rain while the rest of Europe was suffering from an extreme heatwave. Towards the end of my visit I discovered that GeoTagging was not working which was annoying. When I returned home and imported the RAW images into Lightroom Classic they appeared to be very much underexposed and as this was the second time foe this to happen I needed to discover if this was a known issue and if there was a solution but as I could not wait I decided to import the files using DXO Pure RAW. The results of my research is included below:

Optimizing Your Sony A7RV RAW Workflow in Lightroom Classic: Addressing Underexposure and Enhancing Efficiency with DxO PureRAW

I. Introduction: Navigating Your New Sony A7RV Workflow

Congratulations on your new Sony A7RV and 28-70mm F2 GM lens! It is entirely understandable to perceive images from this advanced setup as superior, given Sony's cutting-edge sensor technology and the exceptional optical quality of the GM lens. However, the frustration experienced with seemingly underexposed RAW imports into Lightroom Classic, coupled with the slow processing encountered with DxO PureRAW, represents a common challenge for many new users of high-resolution Sony Alpha cameras. This report aims to demystify these specific issues, provide clear and actionable solutions, and ultimately help photographers optimize their workflow to fully leverage the immense power and image quality of the Sony A7RV.

II. Understanding RAW Files and Camera Previews: The Core Discrepancy

The perception of underexposed images often stems from a fundamental difference in how cameras and RAW processing software interpret and display image data. Grasping this distinction is crucial for effective post-processing.

The Nature of RAW Data vs. In-Camera JPEG Previews

When an image is captured, the camera's sensor records raw light intensity data. This "untouched sensor data" is stored in proprietary RAW file formats, such as Sony's.ARW files. This raw data is inherently linear and grayscale, not immediately suitable for direct viewing. To provide an immediate visual feedback, cameras generate an embedded JPEG preview within the RAW file. This preview incorporates all in-camera settings, including Picture Profiles, Creative Styles, Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO), sharpening, contrast, and color adjustments, to present a visually appealing and "finished" image on the camera's LCD screen.  

Upon importing these RAW files into Lightroom Classic, the software initially displays this embedded JPEG preview in the Library module. However, when transitioning to the Develop module, Lightroom processes the actual RAW data using Adobe's proprietary raw engine and its default settings. These default settings are designed to provide a neutral, flexible starting point for editing, rather than replicating the camera's processed JPEG look. Consequently, the image displayed in the Develop module often appears flatter, less vibrant, and notably darker than the in-camera preview. This difference is not an error by Lightroom but rather a revelation of the raw data as it truly is, prior to any creative interpretation or enhancement. This unadulterated starting point is, in fact, ideal for maximizing editing flexibility.  

Why Camera LCDs and Histograms Can Be Misleading for RAW Exposure

A significant source of confusion arises from relying on the camera's LCD and its histogram for assessing RAW exposure. The histogram displayed on the camera's screen is based on the embedded JPEG preview, not the raw sensor data itself. This means that if the camera applies internal processing, such as boosting shadows or reducing highlights for the JPEG, the histogram might appear "correctly exposed" even if the underlying RAW file is technically underexposed or has a much flatter tonal curve than what is visually presented.  

This reliance on a JPEG-based histogram for RAW shooting can lead directly to underexposed RAW files. For instance, if Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO) is active, the camera's processing might make the JPEG look brighter, leading the photographer to believe the exposure is sufficient when the actual RAW data is darker. Therefore, for accurate RAW exposure, photographers should consider alternative methods, such as learning to "expose to the right" (ETTR), or primarily consult Lightroom's histogram once files are imported, as it accurately reflects Adobe's interpretation of the RAW data. This shift in understanding and practice is crucial for achieving consistent and optimal results with RAW files.

III. The "Dark Image" Phenomenon: A Common Sony A7RV Issue in Lightroom Classic

The experience of Sony A7RV RAW files appearing significantly darker or flatter in Lightroom Classic is a widely reported and common phenomenon within the photography community. This behavior has been consistently observed across various Sony Alpha models, including the A7III, A7R IV, and the A7RV, and is a frequent topic in photography forums and Adobe community discussions. This widespread experience validates the user's observations, confirming that this is not an isolated issue and that well-documented reasons and solutions exist.  

Primary Causes of Underexposed Imports

Several factors contribute to this perceived underexposure, primarily related to how Sony cameras process images internally versus how Lightroom interprets the raw data.

Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO) and Auto HDR Settings in-Camera

One of the most frequent causes for the perceived underexposure is the camera's Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO) or Auto HDR setting. When these settings are enabled, particularly on "Auto" or higher levels, the camera intentionally underexposes the image at the sensor level to preserve highlight detail and prevent clipping. Subsequently, it digitally boosts the shadows in the embedded JPEG preview to create a more balanced, visually pleasing image on the camera's screen.  

Lightroom Classic, however, processes the raw file without applying this specific shadow recovery. As a result, it displays the "true" underexposed raw data, which can appear several stops darker than what was seen in-camera. This intentional underexposure by the camera, coupled with Lightroom's neutral interpretation, creates the visual discrepancy.

Camera Picture Profiles (e.g., S-Log) and Their Impact on Previews, Not RAW Data

Sony cameras offer various Picture Profiles (PPs) and Creative Styles, some of which are primarily designed for video recording, such as S-Log2 or S-Log3 (often found in PP8). While the general understanding is that these profiles do not bake into the RAW photo's untouched sensor data , they significantly affect the camera's LCD preview and histogram.  

If a photographer shoots RAW with a "flat" video-centric profile like S-Log (which aims for maximum dynamic range and minimal in-camera processing for later color grading), the in-camera preview will appear very flat, low-contrast, and often darker than a standard JPEG. If exposure decisions are made based on this flat preview, the resulting RAW file, when interpreted by Lightroom's default profile, might appear even darker or simply "normal" compared to the flat S-Log preview, leading to confusion. It is worth noting a nuanced observation from some users that specific gamma adjustments within Picture Profiles can subtly alter the RAW file itself, potentially impacting brightness. This suggests that while most PP settings are preview-only, certain elements might have a deeper effect.  

Lightroom Classic's Default Adobe Color Profile vs. Camera-Matching Profiles

By default, Lightroom Classic applies the "Adobe Color" or "Adobe Standard" profile to imported RAW files. These profiles are engineered to be neutral starting points for editing, designed to preserve maximum dynamic range and color information. This often results in a flatter, less vibrant, and potentially darker appearance when compared to the camera's processed JPEG preview or even Sony's own "Creative Styles".  

This difference in rendering philosophy contributes to the perceived "darkness." Adobe's approach prioritizes a clean, unembellished canvas for the photographer to build upon, whereas camera manufacturers often aim for a more "finished" look directly out of the camera. Understanding this distinction is key: the "darkness" is not necessarily a flaw but a consequence of Adobe's conservative, flexible approach, which provides greater latitude for post-processing. Photographers can choose to embrace this neutral baseline for full editing control or apply camera-matching profiles within Lightroom to achieve a look closer to the in-camera preview as a consistent starting point.

Solutions and Workflow Adjustments in Lightroom Classic

Addressing the "dark import" issue involves a combination of in-camera settings adjustments and Lightroom Classic workflow optimizations.

1. In-Camera Settings to Review

Disable Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO) / Auto HDR: This is often the most impactful step to resolve the initial perceived underexposure. Navigate through your Sony A7RV's menu settings and locate the "DRO/Auto HDR" option. Set this to "Off". This ensures that the camera does not intentionally underexpose the RAW file for highlight protection and that the preview more accurately reflects the raw data.  

Choose Appropriate Picture Profiles for Stills (or Turn Them Off): For RAW stills photography, it is generally recommended to use a "Neutral" or "Standard" Creative Style. Alternatively, turning Picture Profiles off entirely can yield the absolute flattest RAW file, providing maximum post-processing flexibility. It is advisable to avoid video-centric profiles like S-Log for stills, as they can lead to misleading previews and inaccurate exposure judgments based on the camera's LCD.  

Reset Camera to Factory Defaults (if issues persist): If deeply embedded or conflicting settings are suspected of causing persistent issues, a factory reset of your camera can sometimes resolve unforeseen conflicts and return the camera to a known, consistent state.  

2. Lightroom Classic Default Settings

Understand and Adjust the Default RAW Profile: When RAW files are imported, Lightroom Classic applies a default profile, typically "Adobe Color." This default can be changed to a "Camera Matching" profile (e.g., "Camera Standard," "Camera Neutral," "Camera Vivid") to emulate Sony's in-camera processing more closely. These profiles are accessible in the "Profile" dropdown under the "Basic" panel in the Develop module. To set a camera-specific default, navigate to  

Edit > Preferences (Windows) or Lightroom Classic > Preferences (macOS), select the Presets tab. Under Raw Defaults, choose Override master settings for specific cameras, select your Sony A7RV, and then select your preferred default profile or a custom preset.  

Create and Apply Import Presets for Consistent Exposure and Tone Adjustments: Manually adjusting every underexposed image after import can be time-consuming and lead to inconsistencies. A powerful way to automate initial corrections and ensure a consistent starting point is to create and apply import presets. Begin by manually adjusting a single image in the Develop module (e.g., increasing Exposure, lifting Shadows, or slightly decreasing Blacks) to achieve the desired initial appearance. Then, save these adjustments as a new preset. To create the preset, click the "+" sign in the  

Presets panel (located on the left side of the Develop module) and select Create New Preset. Assign a descriptive name (e.g., "Sony A7RV Initial Boost"). Ensure that only relevant settings such as Exposure, Shadows, Blacks, Contrast, Profile, and Process Version are checked. During the import process, in the  

Apply During Import section on the right-hand panel, select this newly created preset from the Develop Settings dropdown. This proactive approach significantly streamlines the initial phase of post-processing, saving time and ensuring a consistent visual starting point for all incoming RAW files from the Sony A7RV, allowing more focus on creative edits rather than corrective ones.  

Check Basic Panel Sliders and Use "Reset (Adobe)" Function: If images appear unexpectedly dark, it is prudent to check the Basic tab in the Develop module. Ensure that sliders such as Exposure, Highlights, and Shadows are set to zero if no manual edits have been applied. If these sliders show values other than zero, it indicates that a default setting or an import preset is automatically applying changes. To reset an image to Adobe's default RAW interpretation, hold the Shift key and click the  

Reset button in the Develop module (its label will temporarily change to "Reset (Adobe)"). This action helps to confirm whether a custom default or an applied preset is contributing to the initial darkness.  

3. Exposure Best Practices for RAW

"Expose to the Right" (ETTR) for Optimal RAW Data: ETTR is a technique that involves intentionally overexposing your RAW image slightly without clipping the highlights, effectively pushing the histogram as far to the right as possible. This method maximizes the amount of light captured by the sensor, resulting in a higher signal-to-noise ratio in the RAW file. Sony sensors, including the A7RV's, are renowned for their excellent shadow recovery capabilities. By exposing to the right, more information is captured in the darker tones, which can then be safely pulled back in Lightroom during post-processing without introducing significant noise. This approach proactively counteracts the "dark import" issue at the capture stage by ensuring the RAW file itself contains the richest possible data, even if it initially appears flat or requires a slight exposure reduction in post. Adopting ETTR as a shooting practice is a fundamental way to improve the quality and flexibility of Sony A7RV RAW files, allowing the user to fully realize the superior image quality they perceive.  

Relying on Lightroom's Histogram for Accurate RAW Exposure Assessment: Since the in-camera histogram is based on the embedded JPEG preview and can be misleading, it is crucial to learn to trust Lightroom's histogram in the Develop module. This histogram accurately reflects Adobe's interpretation of the RAW data and serves as a more reliable guide for assessing the true exposure and tonal range of your RAW file.  

Here's a summary of common causes and solutions for dark Sony RAW imports:

Cause: Camera JPEG vs. RAW Interpretation

Explanation: Camera LCD and Library previews show processed JPEGs; the Develop module shows unprocessed RAW data.

Recommended Action (In-Camera): Understand the difference; calibrate your monitor.

Recommended Action (Lightroom Classic): Rely on the Develop module preview and histogram for editing.

Cause: Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO) / Auto HDR

Explanation: The camera underexposes RAW to protect highlights, then boosts shadows in the JPEG preview. Lightroom shows the underexposed RAW.

Recommended Action (In-Camera): Set "DRO/Auto HDR" to "Off" in camera settings.  

Recommended Action (Lightroom Classic): Adjust Exposure, Shadows, and Blacks in the Develop module.  

Cause: Picture Profiles (e.g., S-Log)

Explanation: Profiles affect in-camera JPEG previews and histograms, not typically RAW data (though some gamma settings may affect RAW).  

Recommended Action (In-Camera): For stills, use "Neutral" or "Standard" Creative Style, or turn Picture Profiles off. Avoid video-centric profiles.  

Recommended Action (Lightroom Classic): Apply "Camera Matching" profiles (e.g., Camera Standard) in the Profile browser.  

Cause: Lightroom's Default Adobe Color Profile

Explanation: Adobe's default profile is a neutral starting point, often flatter/darker than camera JPEGs.  

Recommended Action (In-Camera): None (this is a software philosophy, not a camera setting).

Recommended Action (Lightroom Classic): Change default RAW profile to a "Camera Matching" profile in Preferences, or create an import preset.  

Cause: Existing Import Presets

Explanation: An exposure-adjusting preset might be automatically applied during import, causing unexpected darkness.  

Recommended Action (In-Camera): None.

Recommended Action (Lightroom Classic): Check "Apply During Import" settings; hold Shift and click "Reset (Adobe)" in Develop module.  

IV. Integrating and Optimizing DxO PureRAW for Enhanced Quality
The user's exploration of DxO PureRAW indicates a desire for enhanced image quality, particularly in noise reduction and optical corrections. Understanding its role and optimizing its performance are key to a seamless workflow.

A. The Role of DxO PureRAW in Your Workflow

DxO PureRAW's primary function is to improve the quality of digital images by applying advanced optical corrections and sophisticated denoising to RAW files before they undergo extensive editing in other programs. It is not a full image editor but rather a "preparer" for RAW files. Its strength lies in its proprietary DxO Modules, which correct lens flaws such as vignetting, distortion, and chromatic aberration, and its DeepPRIME/XD AI-powered noise reduction algorithms. These specialized corrections are often superior to Lightroom's built-in tools for these specific tasks.  

By processing RAW files through PureRAW first, photographers can generate cleaner, sharper Linear DNG files. These DNGs retain the full RAW file latitude and are ideal for subsequent, more extensive editing in Lightroom Classic. This strategic integration means PureRAW acts as a specialized first step, providing Lightroom with a higher-quality, optimized starting point, thereby enhancing the overall image quality and streamlining the later stages of the workflow.  

B. Addressing Slow Processing

The observation that DxO PureRAW processing is slow is a common concern, particularly when dealing with large RAW files from high-resolution cameras like the Sony A7RV. The computational intensity of DxO's DeepPRIME/XD algorithms, which leverage both CPU and GPU resources, contributes significantly to processing times.  

Slower processing is frequently a direct consequence of hardware limitations, including insufficient RAM, a less powerful CPU, an older or less capable GPU, or reliance on traditional hard disk drives (HDDs) instead of faster solid-state drives (SSDs). The A7RV produces very large RAW files, which inherently demand more processing power and time. Additionally, outdated graphics drivers or conflicts with antivirus software can significantly impede PureRAW's performance. The DeepPRIME XD mode, while offering superior results, is also more computationally intensive than other denoising options. Recognizing these hardware and software dependencies is crucial for diagnosing and resolving performance bottlenecks.  

While individual file processing might be slow, DxO PureRAW offers robust batch processing and queuing capabilities. This allows photographers to process large volumes of images unattended, for instance, by setting up a queue to run overnight or during periods of low computer usage. Leveraging these features effectively mitigates the impact of individual file slowness on active workflow time, transforming a potentially disruptive task into an efficient background operation.  

C. Workflow Recommendations with DxO PureRAW

For optimal results and efficiency:

Process in PureRAW First: It is recommended to process your RAW files through DxO PureRAW before importing them into Lightroom Classic for extensive editing. This ensures that the denoising and optical corrections are applied to the raw data at its purest form, maximizing their effectiveness.  

Output as Linear DNGs: Configure PureRAW to output Linear DNG files. This format retains the full RAW file latitude and is fully compatible with Lightroom Classic, allowing for non-destructive editing and further adjustments without sacrificing image quality.  

Leverage Batch Processing: For large batches of images, utilize PureRAW's queuing system. Process files in batches, perhaps overnight, to minimize disruption to your active editing time.  

Here's a summary of DxO PureRAW features and performance considerations:

Optical Corrections

Description: Automatic correction of vignetting, distortion, chromatic aberration using DxO Modules.  

Performance Impact/Benefit: Enhances image sharpness and corrects lens flaws; generally quick.

Optimization Tip: Ensure DxO Optics Modules are downloaded for your specific camera/lens combinations.  

DeepPRIME/XD Noise Reduction

Description: AI-powered denoising and demosaicing for superior noise reduction and detail preservation.  

Performance Impact/Benefit: Highly effective, but computationally intensive; DeepPRIME XD is slower but more powerful.  

Optimization Tip: Use a powerful GPU (Nvidia/AMD) and ample RAM (64GB+). Consider using DeepPRIME instead of XD for faster processing if ISO is not extremely high.  

Output Formats (Linear DNG)

Description: Generates DNG files that retain RAW latitude for further editing.  

Performance Impact/Benefit: Preserves maximum image quality and flexibility for Lightroom Classic.

Optimization Tip: Always output to a fast SSD for quicker file writing and subsequent Lightroom access.  

Lightroom Integration

Description: Functions as a plugin, allowing processing without leaving Lightroom.  

Performance Impact/Benefit: Seamless workflow integration.

Optimization Tip: Process files via the plugin, then import the resulting DNGs into your Lightroom catalog.  

System Requirements

Description: Demanding on CPU, GPU, and RAM, especially for high-resolution files.  

Performance Impact/Benefit: Direct impact on processing speed; insufficient hardware causes significant slowdowns.

Optimization Tip: Upgrade to a fast CPU, powerful GPU, 64GB+ RAM, and use SSDs for active files. Keep graphics drivers updated.  

Compressed RAW Support

Description: PureRAW generally does not support compressed RAW formats (e.g., Sony's mRAW, sRAW) as they are not "true RAW".  

Performance Impact/Benefit: Ensures full RAW data is processed; may mean larger file sizes.

Optimization Tip: Shoot uncompressed RAW (.ARW) with your Sony A7RV for full PureRAW compatibility and optimal results.  

V. General Workflow Recommendations for High-Resolution RAWs

Beyond specific camera and software settings, a holistic approach to your digital photography workflow is essential, especially when managing the large file sizes produced by high-resolution cameras like the Sony A7RV and Fuji GFX100RF.

Efficient performance in any demanding photography software, including Lightroom Classic and DxO PureRAW, is fundamentally dependent on adequate hardware. The sheer size of high-resolution RAW files means that processing is critically bottlenecked by computing power. Recommendations consistently highlight the importance of fast solid-state drives (SSDs) for both the operating system and active photo libraries. Ample Random Access Memory (RAM), ideally 64GB or more, is crucial for handling large files and running multiple applications smoothly. Furthermore, a powerful Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) is vital to accelerate computationally intensive tasks such such as noise reduction, sharpening, and rendering. Optimizing these hardware components forms the bedrock of a smooth and responsive post-processing workflow, directly impacting overall efficiency and satisfaction.  

In addition to hardware, consider these workflow best practices:

Streamlined Catalog Management: Avoid using multiple Lightroom catalogs unless absolutely necessary, as this can slow down your workflow. Instead, organize photos within a single, well-structured catalog.  

Consistent Editing Practices: Develop a consistent editing approach. This can involve creating your own presets for common adjustments or copying and pasting development settings across similar images to maintain a cohesive look and save time.  

Regular Backups: Implement a robust backup strategy for your RAW files and Lightroom catalogs. Given the size and importance of your image data, multiple backups (e.g., local external drives, cloud storage, or RAID arrays) are highly recommended.  

Culling and Rating: Efficiently cull and rate your images early in the workflow to focus your editing efforts on the best shots. This minimizes time spent on unusable or less important files.  

VI. Conclusion: Mastering Your Sony A7RV Images

The initial experience of dark RAW imports from your Sony A7RV into Lightroom Classic is a common hurdle, but one that is entirely surmountable with a clear understanding of RAW file behavior and optimized workflow practices. The perceived "underexposure" is often Lightroom's neutral interpretation of your camera's raw sensor data, unembellished by the in-camera processing that creates the brighter, more "finished" JPEG previews on your camera's LCD.

By addressing key camera settings such as disabling Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO) and carefully selecting (or disabling) Picture Profiles for stills, you can ensure that your RAW files provide a truer, more consistent starting point. Furthermore, leveraging Lightroom Classic's powerful features, such as setting camera-specific default RAW profiles and creating custom import presets, will automate initial corrections, transforming a manual, repetitive task into a seamless part of your workflow. Adopting the "Expose to the Right" (ETTR) shooting technique will maximize the data captured by your A7RV's excellent sensor, enhancing shadow recovery and minimizing noise in post-processing.

Integrating DxO PureRAW strategically as a pre-processing step for optical corrections and advanced noise reduction will further elevate the quality of your RAW files before they enter Lightroom. While PureRAW's processing can be slow due to the large file sizes and intensive algorithms, optimizing your computing hardware (fast SSDs, ample RAM, powerful GPU) and utilizing its batch processing capabilities will significantly improve efficiency.

By implementing these recommendations, you will gain greater control over your images, streamline your post-processing, and fully unlock the superior image quality you perceive from your Sony A7RV and 28-70mm F2 GM lens. The initial "darkness" will no longer be a frustration, but rather a testament to the rich, flexible data available for your creative vision.

My journey as a street photographer is deeply intertwined with the urban landscape, a quarter-century exploration of cities and their unspoken stories. My lens isn't just a tool; it's a means to understand the pulse of a city, to decipher its unique language, and to translate that into an image that communicates a feeling, an idea, or a narrative.


My Approach: The Art of Unplanned Discovery

What often surprises people, especially at photography conferences, is my deliberate avoidance of detailed pre-trip research. I firmly believe that such research, while seemingly precise, often presents a curated, 'best-of' version of a city – think of commercially 'approved street art' or ubiquitous 'wild meadow areas'. This pre-existing information can subtly steer a photographer towards expected views, limiting genuine discovery and imposing a 'tourist gaze'. Instead, I embrace random exploration to build an intuitive understanding of a city's contemporary trends and its underlying structure. I've observed that cities often develop in similar ways, albeit in different phases and according to current fashions.

My entire photographic process unfolds in a distinctive, multi-stage cycle:

Phase 1: Immersion and Mental Mapping (Two Days, No Camera)

The journey begins with a crucial two-day immersion period, consisting of four four-hour sessions and two two-hour late evening sessions. During this time, my camera remains in its bag. This is a period of pure observational reconnaissance and sensory absorption. My sole focus is to develop a comprehensive 'mental map' of the city and its public transport system. This deliberate non-shooting phase allows for an unburdened engagement with the urban environment, fostering a deeper, more organic understanding of its rhythms, hidden facets, and subtle cues. It's about slowing down, allowing the city to reveal itself, and trusting my gut instinct. This initial 'getting lost' isn't haphazard; it's a sophisticated form of embodied, intuitive research.

Phase 2: Active Shooting (Several Days)

Only after this immersive period do I begin actively shooting. My camera selection is a tactical choice, based on what's 'appropriate for best results' and, crucially, 'cameras that do not attract attention'. Smaller, more unobtrusive cameras – often mirrorless or compact models with prime lenses – are my preference. This helps me blend in, allowing for authentic, unmediated interactions and candid captures without subjects becoming self-conscious. Techniques like shooting from the hip or using a wide-angle lens for misdirection further minimise intrusion.

The benefits of this spontaneous engagement are manifold:

  • Authenticity: It inherently favours the capture of 'unposed, spontaneous shots that convey a raw and authentic portrayal of life'. Imperfections in a scene aren't flaws; they add to the feeling of a spontaneous moment.
  • Blank Canvas Approach: By avoiding pre-research, I approach the city as a 'blank canvas', free from the 'conceptual baggage' that pre-existing knowledge can create. This allows for a more 'visceral response' and the opportunity to define the location through personal intuition, rather than being influenced by established norms.
  • Heightened Intuition: This initial exploration cultivates an intuitive understanding of the city, sharpening my 'gut and instinct' to anticipate and react quickly to unfolding moments. I can find compelling images in 'places that you might have previously disregarded'.
  • Discovering the 'Unseen': This approach is highly conducive to discovering the 'unseen' or 'everyday' aspects of a city, rather than merely re-documenting popular tourist spots. It's about finding beauty in 'everyday things' and 'quirky things' that someone not from the area might find interesting.

Phase 3: Post-Shoot Research (Visual-Led Inquiry)

Once the active shooting phase concludes, I initiate a post-shoot research phase, driven entirely by my visual discoveries. Instead of researching what I want to photograph, I research 'what I have seen/photographed' and seek out items or locations that may be related in some way – perhaps a memorial that leads to research about the person's life. This reversal of typical methods allows the visual data to lead the intellectual inquiry, adding depth and substance to my photos.

Phase 4: Long-Term Follow-Up (Approximately One Year Later)

The cycle culminates in a long-term follow-up visit, typically about a year later. This is a hallmark of rigorous documentary work, designed to confirm my initial findings and to document changes. This multi-visit approach allows me to 'freeze a moment in time and showcase the changes that occur between different moments', fostering a 'more meaningful connection with the subject matter'.


Why I Do It: Interest in Street Photography of the Built Environment

My deep interest in street photography, particularly of the built environment, stems from a desire to capture the authentic, uncurated essence of urban life. I believe that official narratives and 'beautification movements' can sometimes obscure the more organic, unofficial, or even transgressive forms of urban expression. My deliberate avoidance of pre-trip research is a conscious philosophical stance against the commodified and curated narratives often presented by official city guides and mainstream art circuits.

By seeking out 'unapproved expression' and 'unintended' urban elements, my work inherently becomes a counter-narrative to the official 'best-of' representations. I aim for a deeper, more honest portrayal of urban reality, one that is less a reflection of external, commercialized narratives and more an emergent interpretation of the city's organic, often messy, reality. This positions me as a critical observer who actively deconstructs official representations, offering a more sociologically valuable portrayal of urban life.

My pursuit of unmediated experience aligns with a desire for 'authentic urban experiences' that avoid the 'placelessness' of 'purposefully designed tourist attractions'. I lean into the subjective perception of authenticity, seeking genuine 'lived-in' spaces and 'imperfections' over 'staged' experiences. By avoiding pre-researched 'approved street art', I'm more likely to encounter and document 'defiant graffiti' or 'underground art', which might be ephemeral and not part of official city tours, capturing a more dynamic and unfiltered aspect of urban expression.

The observation that cities tend to develop in a 'similar manner but in different phases' and according to 'current fashions' demonstrates an intuitive, empirically derived understanding of urban planning trends, gentrification patterns, and the socio-economic forces that shape built environments. This 'mental map' isn't just topographical; it's also sociological. It recognises recurring urban phenomena across different locales, allowing me to anticipate and identify these patterns without needing explicit pre-research.


Documenting Urban Evolution: The Power of Long-Term Engagement

The commitment to revisiting locations a year later to 'follow up/confirm my research and also determine what has changed' is what truly elevates my practice. This long-term engagement allows me to document 'urban decay and renewal,' 'gentrification and displacement,' and the 'transformation of neighbourhoods due to economic development'. It facilitates the creation of 'visual archives of changing cityscapes and vanishing neighbourhoods', contributing significantly to 'historical research and urban studies'. This moves my practice beyond mere snapshots to 'tell complex urban stories'.

The post-shoot research, followed by annual re-visits, establishes a powerful feedback loop that transforms initial spontaneous observations into deeply contextualised, longitudinal urban narratives. The initial random exploration provides raw, authentic visual data, and the post-shoot research then provides the 'historical and cultural context' for these observations, allowing me to 'get under the skin of what is, essentially, bricks and mortar'. This iterative process allows me to build a 'narrative construction in series', moving from isolated moments to a comprehensive story of urban evolution. This transforms my practice from individual 'street photos' into a sophisticated form of 'urban documentary photography' or 'visual history'. It allows for the capture not just of moments but of processes of urban change, offering profound insights into the dynamism of cities and the social forces shaping them.

My approach is a sophisticated hybrid methodology, uniquely combining initial spontaneous engagement with subsequent structured inquiry. While street photography is often defined by its spontaneity and documentary photography by meticulous planning, I explicitly reject pre-trip detailed research due to its inherent biases. The initial spontaneous phase allows for authentic, unbiased discovery and the development of a deeply personal 'mental map'. The post-shoot research and annual re-visitation then introduce a rigorous, systematic, and longitudinal dimension, transforming what might otherwise be a series of disconnected 'decisive moments' into a cohesive, long-term documentary project. This hybrid model offers a compelling alternative to traditional research-heavy documentary projects, demonstrating that discovery can precede formal inquiry, and that a deep, embodied understanding of a place can be built iteratively over time.


Where My Approach Stands Out

While elements of my methodology are common in street and urban photography, their unique combination and sequencing set my approach apart:

  • Deliberate Initial Non-Shooting Period: The formalised 'getting lost' phase, dedicated solely to intuitive mental mapping and sensory absorption before any targeted photography, is a distinctive characteristic. This deep immersion allows for an organic understanding of the city's nuances without the influence of external information.
  • Sequential Nature of Discovery and Research: The specific sequence – random exploration, followed by capture, then targeted research based on visual findings, then systematic follow-up – reverses the conventional research-then-shoot model. This 'research-after-the-fact' approach, driven by visual discoveries, is a methodological innovation.
  • Explicit Philosophical Rejection of Pre-Trip Research: My articulated rationale for avoiding detailed pre-trip research, specifically due to its inherent biases towards 'approved' or commercial narratives, represents a strong and distinct philosophical stance.

My overall practice positions me as a contemporary 'flâneur' who, through systematic documentation, also functions as an 'archivist of the unseen' urban narratives. I observe the city's 'noise, chaos, and frisson', but I extend beyond mere observation by systematically documenting 'unseen' or 'unapproved' elements over time. My focus on the built environment, including its 'imperfections' and 'urban decay', positions me as a chronicler of the city's true life cycle, rather than its idealised facade. This dual role elevates my practice to a significant contribution to visual urban history and sociology, providing a counterpoint to official narratives and offering a more holistic, grounded understanding of urban transformation.


Enhancing My Practice: A Vision for the Future

My current methodology possesses significant strengths, particularly in fostering authentic discovery and longitudinal urban documentation. I'm always looking to refine and extend my practice to enhance its impact and analytical rigour.

Refining Current Practice

  • Formalising the 'Mental Map' for Reflective Analysis: While the intuitive development of a mental map is a strength, I'm considering subtle ways to document or reflect upon this process without compromising its intuitive essence. This isn't about pre-planning, but post-reflection on the intuitive experience. For instance, maintaining a brief journal of observations, sensory impressions, or initial spatial connections formed during the two-day exploration period could serve as a valuable 'field site inventory'.
  • Optimising Camera Settings for Instinctive Capture: I already select cameras based on discretion and results. Further refinement of pre-set camera parameters (e.g., aperture priority around F8 for depth of field, shutter speed above 1/200th to freeze motion, appropriate ISO ranges for different lighting conditions) allows for quick, instinctive shooting without fumbling. Embracing noise and converting to black and white can also be a stylistic choice for low-light conditions.
  • Ethical Reflexivity in Candid Documentation: The commitment to candidness is central to the authenticity of my work. Continuous reflection on the ethical implications of photographing individuals in public spaces, particularly those in potentially vulnerable situations, is crucial. I consciously assess each person before I snap their photo and trust my 'gut' to 'wait for the next shot' if discomfort arises.

Conceptual Extensions

  • Developing Explicit Thematic Series (Post-Discovery): While my initial exploration is organic, allowing themes to emerge post-discovery can provide a stronger narrative arc and deeper analytical focus for long-term projects. For example, my observation about 'wild meadow areas' could evolve into a thematic series on 'standardised urban greening' or 'environmental branding' across cities, exploring its sociological implications.
  • Embracing 'Imperfection' as a Core Aesthetic and Narrative Device: My preference for non-curated views naturally leads to the documentation of urban 'imperfections' – such as decay, unofficial street art, or signs of organic growth. I'm focused on framing these imperfections not as flaws, but as integral components of urban authenticity and historical layers, enriching the aesthetic and narrative depth of my work.
  • Strengthening Sociological Storytelling: I aim to frame my post-shoot research as a form of visual sociological inquiry. Connecting individual 'related items' (e.g., memorials, residences) to broader social histories, community narratives, or urban phenomena can elevate the work beyond aesthetic capture to a deeper understanding of place. My photographs can function as 'primary source material' for historians, relaying information not available through other records.

Methodological Modifications

  • Integrating Qualitative Data (Post-Shoot): Beyond historical facts, I'm considering incorporating brief, informal, and ethical interactions or interviews with local residents after initial photographic capture, where appropriate. This could add a human voice to my focus on the built environment, enriching the 'story' behind the structures.
  • Leveraging Historical Maps and Archives (Post-Shoot): While avoiding pre-trip research is a core tenet, my detailed post-shoot research could be significantly enhanced by consulting historical maps, urban planning documents, and local archives. This would provide a deeper historical context for the changes observed during annual follow-ups.
  • Adopting Comparative Analysis Frameworks: For long-term projects and observations about cities developing similarly, adopting frameworks from comparative urban studies or visual sociology can structure the analysis. This could involve examining patterns of 'urban decay and renewal,' 'gentrification and displacement,' or 'global urban phenomena' across different locales.

My evolved approach positions me not merely as a chronicler of urban scenes, but as a visual sociologist and historian, capable of offering unique and profound insights into the ever-evolving urban landscape. My work holds immense potential to foster a deeper, more nuanced understanding of cities, moving beyond their polished facades to reveal the complex, lived realities beneath.

EXAMPLES OF PUBLIC ART

VERONICA MEMORIAL AT DUBLIN CASTLE

My recent photography excursion along River Road R102 in Dublin took an alarming turn on 30th July, an experience that caught me entirely by surprise despite my extensive background in walking country roads. What was particularly disheartening was the discernible lack of awareness shown by many drivers.

THE RIVER ROAD INCIDENT

30 JULY 2025 WHEN I WAS HIT BY A WING MIRROR

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

ALL PHOTOGRAPHS BY WILLIAM MURPHY

NORTH DUBLIN COASTLINE

PHOTOGRAPHED 2025

The Causeway Road is a 2.5-kilometre stretch connecting Clontarf to North Bull Island in Dublin. Constructed in 1962, its primary purpose was to provide vehicular access to the island, as the only previous means of reaching it was by boat. Today, the road is a popular route for walking, running, and cycling, offering stunning panoramic views of Dublin Bay. The Causeway Road is open to vehicles from 6 am to 10 pm, and a car park is available at its end (note that drive-on access to the beach is no longer permitted). While there's a bus stop mentioned at the end of the Causeway Road, I was unable to locate it despite observing buses in the vicinity. It's also a renowned spot for birdwatching.

ST ANNE'S PARK

PHOTOGRAPHED 2025

2025 VISIT TO LIMERICK

ALSO A QUICK VISIT TO COUNTY CLARE

I was hoping that my Sony A1 II would arrive in time for my visit to Limerick (July 2025) but I had been informed that I might not receive it until September and to compensate for a very long delay, it was ordered and paid for in December 2024, I was given a Sony A7RV on loan so I had the opportunity to compare my Fuji GFX100RF and the Sony A7RV. While I was in Limerick I received a phone call informing me that the A1 had arrived and that a new Sony RX1R III had been announced.

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

ALL MODES AVAILABLE IN IRELAND

Public transport in Ireland is a comprehensive network primarily overseen by the National Transport Authority (NTA). While the Córas Iompair Éireann (CIÉ) group plays a major role through its subsidiaries, other entities are also key to the system.

CHURCH AND GRAVE

PHOTOGRAPHED 2025

The stone casket-shaped graves that I photographed during a recent visit to Glasnevin Cemetery are known as sarcophagi (singular: sarcophagus) or chest tombs.

PARKS AND GARDENS

THERE IS AN AMAZING SELECTION

Dublin boasts an impressive selection of excellent and well-maintained public parks for several reasons, stemming from historical development, urban planning, and a strong emphasis on quality of life and environmental benefits.

EXAMPLES OF STREET ART

URBAN EXPRESSION AND CULTURE

Modern street art is a vibrant and dynamic art movement that has transformed urban landscapes globally. While its roots can be traced back to ancient wall drawings, the contemporary form largely emerged from the graffiti boom of 1960s and 70s New York City and Philadelphia.

DUN LAOGHAIRE

AN ATTRACTIVE TOWN

In 1821, King George IV's visit to the newly built port led to the town being renamed "Kingstown" in his honour. It quickly became a fashionable marine resort and yachting centre, further boosted by the opening of Ireland's first railway line connecting it to Dublin in 1834. This railway cemented its status as a desirable suburb and a vital gateway to Ireland. The town reverted to its original Irish name, DĂşn Laoghaire, in 1920, leading up to the formation of the Irish Free State.

TEMPLE BAR

CHILD FRIENDLY DURING THE DAY

Temple Bar, during the daytime, is a lively and exciting cultural quarter that offers a wealth of family-friendly restaurants and attractions. By planning your visit before the evening crowds arrive, you can give your children a wonderful experience of Dublin's vibrant heart.

DUBLIN JULY 2025

PUBLISHED JULY 2025

LEGACY PHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTOGRAPHED BEFORE 2025

All photographs supplied by William Murphy

BELFAST

PUBLISHED 2025

,

Belfast's urban environment is home to a rich and dense tapestry of monuments and memorials, a characteristic that visitors often find profoundly impactful. The observation that these structures can appear "overpowering" and predominantly "refer to the past"—commemorating political figures or individuals whose relevance may have faded for the general population—highlights a significant aspect of the city's public memory. This perception stems from the sheer volume of historic sites across Northern Ireland, with over 18,000 archaeological sites, 9,000 listed historic buildings, and more than 2,000 scheduled monuments of regional significance. Many of Belfast's older structures, particularly those from the Victorian and Edwardian eras, feature a significant number of sculptures, further contributing to this historical density.

The pervasive nature of these historical markers means Belfast's public space isn't merely decorative; it's deeply inscribed with historical narratives. The overwhelming sensation some visitors experience comes from the constant confrontation with deeply felt, and often unresolved, historical narratives, particularly those of the Troubles, which remain a potent part of the city's present. Public space in Belfast, therefore, functions as a dynamic arena for memory and identity, rendering the encounter with these monuments emotionally and historically charged.

Until recently, a notable aspect of Belfast's commemorative landscape has been the scarcity of memorials dedicated to women, with Queen Victoria standing as a prominent exception. This historical imbalance is now undergoing a discernible shift, with new examples emerging. The historical focus on the past isn't simply a chronological statement; it's deeply tied to anchoring contemporary community identities in historical grievances or triumphs. Older statues, for instance, often reflected a singular narrative, representing the dominant or privileged group in society. For a city with a deeply divided past, constantly referencing historical figures and events serves to reinforce and legitimise specific community identities, whether tied to industrial heritage or political allegiance. This can inadvertently hinder the emergence of new, more inclusive narratives, as the "past" isn't merely a bygone era but an active force shaping the "present." The perceived irrelevance of some figures for contemporary populations highlights a potential generational or societal disconnect, where the symbolic power of these monuments may be waning for some, while remaining intensely potent for others. This report explores this evolving landscape, examining the traditional narratives, the impact of the Troubles, and the recent movements towards a more inclusive public memory.

The Weight of History: Traditional Narratives in Stone and Bronze
Belfast's identity as a former industrial powerhouse and a significant city within the British Empire is profoundly etched into its older monuments. These structures served not just as historical markers but as active participants in constructing and projecting Belfast's civic identity as a prosperous, industrial, and loyal city within the British Empire.

Key figures of Belfast's industrial era are prominently commemorated. Sir Edward Harland, founder of the Harland and Wolff shipyard, and William Pirrie, its Managing Director and a former Lord Mayor, are notable examples. Harland's statue, unveiled in 1903, depicts him with a ship's hull, directly symbolising his pivotal role in Belfast's shipbuilding prowess. Pirrie, instrumental in the conception of the Titanic and the construction of City Hall, has a bust rededicated in 2006, highlighting his enduring legacy.

The grand statue of Queen Victoria stands as a central civic monument before Belfast City Hall. This masterpiece by sculptor Thomas Brock is flanked by allegorical figures representing the textile and shipbuilding industries—a female textile worker and a male shipbuilder—explicitly linking the monarch to the city's economic foundations and its imperial connections. The significance of this specific statue is underscored by the fact that its design influenced Brock's commission for the national Victoria Memorial at Buckingham Palace. The Queen Victoria statue was explicitly associated with Belfast's development and growth into the most successful and populous city on the island, even surpassing Dublin.

Beyond individual statues, other public art installations reinforce this industrial heritage. The feature lighting masts on Donegall Place, for instance, are clad in copper to evoke Belfast's linen and maritime traditions. The "Spirit of Belfast" sculpture also draws inspiration from the city's shipbuilding and linen industries. More recently, "The Yardmen" statue, unveiled in 2012, directly celebrates the over 30,000 East Belfast workers who built the Titanic and other great ships, reflecting a deep community pride in this industrial past.

Older memorials in Belfast also frequently honour military engagements and imperial connections. The Royal Irish Rifles Memorial, unveiled in 1905, specifically commemorates the officers and men who died in the South African War (1899-1902). This memorial features a bronze figure of a soldier and is adorned with allegorical figures representing war, victory, death, and fame, embodying a traditional heroic narrative of conflict.

More broadly, war memorials are a significant feature of the public landscape, often centrally located to symbolise their importance. While the majority of these date from the First World War, earlier conflicts are also commemorated. The Belfast Cenotaph, positioned prominently next to City Hall, serves as a prime example of such a highly visible and symbolically important military memorial.

The historical scarcity of memorials dedicated to women, with the exception of Queen Victoria, is strongly supported by the evidence of older public statuary. Historically, Belfast's commemorative landscape has been overwhelmingly dominated by male figures. Statues of industrialists like Sir Edward Harland and William Pirrie, and the male soldier on the Royal Irish Rifles Memorial, are emblematic of this trend. Even on Queen Victoria's statue, while she is the central figure, the allegorical representations of industry include a prominent male shipbuilder alongside a female textile worker, reinforcing the male-centric focus of industrial leadership. This historical pattern reflects a broader societal norm where public recognition primarily extended to men in positions of political, industrial, or military power.

The overwhelming feeling experienced by some visitors is not solely about the quantity of monuments, but significantly about the monolithic and often contested nature of the historical narrative they present. If the majority of public monuments celebrate a specific, often partisan, version of history—such as industrial might tied to British identity or imperial military victories—it can feel oppressive or alienating to those whose histories, identities, or political allegiances are marginalised or excluded from this dominant narrative. This creates a sense of being overwhelmed by a past that is not universally shared or celebrated, contributing to the feeling that they "all appeared to refer to the past" in a way that might not resonate or feel inclusive to a broader contemporary audience.

Key older monuments and their commemorative themes include:

Royal Irish Rifles Memorial (Unveiled 1905): Commemorates officers and men of the Royal Irish Rifles, focusing on military service, the South African War (1899-1902), valour, and imperial connections. It is located on the City Hall grounds.

Titanic Monument (Unveiled 1920): Commemorates the victims of RMS Titanic, highlighting the maritime disaster, loss of life, and industrial achievement in shipbuilding. It is also on the City Hall grounds.

Pirrie Memorial (Unveiled 1924, rededicated 2006): Honours William Pirrie, focusing on his industrial leadership, role in shipbuilding (Harland and Wolff), and civic development. This memorial is located on the City Hall grounds.

Sir Edward Harland Statue (Unveiled 1903): Commemorates Edward J Harland MP, recognising his industrial leadership, role in shipbuilding (Harland and Wolff), and civic and political influence. It stands on the City Hall grounds.

Queen Victoria Statue (Unveiled 1903): Celebrates Queen Victoria, symbolising imperial connection, industrial prosperity (textile and shipbuilding), and civic identity. This prominent statue is located on the City Hall grounds.

The Troubles: A Landscape of Conflict and Contention
The period of "The Troubles," from the late 1960s until the signing of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, profoundly reshaped Belfast's public spaces, leading to an extensive proliferation of often deeply partisan memorials. These commemorative sites are inextricably linked to the conflict, serving as enduring tributes to individuals and groups affected by the violence.

Partisan Memorials and Murals

Murals, a particularly prominent form of commemoration, initially served as a mode of expression for Unionists, celebrating historical victories such as the Battle of the Boyne and figures like King William III. However, their use evolved significantly in the 1960s with the emergence of Catholic civil rights campaigns, leading to new murals that depicted the militant and hostile atmosphere of the time, often referring to the killing of individuals on both sides of the conflict. Republican murals, which emerged more prominently at the height of the Troubles, often depicted the Irish Republican Army's armed struggle for self-determination and overtly demanded British withdrawal from Ireland.

These memorials are not merely static historical artefacts; they are living, dynamic expressions of ongoing identity formation and, at times, continued conflict. Their partisan nature means they actively reinforce existing divisions rather than simply commemorating a past event. They serve as constant, tangible reminders of "us versus them" narratives, making genuine reconciliation a prolonged and deeply challenging process. Their continued political potency and role in shaping contemporary social dynamics extend the "overpowering" feeling beyond mere historical density to active social tension and unresolved trauma.

Common themes found across these memorials include the explicit commemoration of fallen volunteers from various paramilitary organisations, such as the Provisional Irish Republican Army, the Irish National Liberation Army, the Ulster Defence Association, and the Ulster Freedom Fighters. These often feature extensive lists of names, dates of death, and sometimes the circumstances of their demise. Significant tributes are also paid to hunger strikers, notably those of 1981 like Bobby Sands, with memorials often displaying their portraits, names, ages, and dates of death. Many memorials also remember civilian casualties, frequently attributing their deaths to specific forces.

The symbolism employed in these memorials is rich and often highly divisive, reflecting the deep ideological cleavages of the conflict. Common symbols include Celtic crosses, the Irish Tricolour and Starry Plough flags, Easter Lilies (associated with Republicanism), larks breaking free from barbed wire (symbolising freedom and defiance, particularly for hunger strikers), and shields of the Four Provinces of Ireland (representing a united Ireland). Loyalist memorials sometimes feature figures like Cú Chulainn, an ancient Irish mythological hero, as a defender of Ulster. These memorials are strategically located in public spaces, including dedicated gardens of remembrance, road junctions, or within cemeteries like Milltown Cemetery. Their strong political connections are evident, as many are commissioned by or unveiled by political figures, particularly from Sinn Féin for Republican memorials, and featuring symbols of groups like the UDA/UFF for Loyalist ones.

"Peace Walls" as Enduring Symbols

A striking and paradoxical feature of Belfast's post-conflict urban landscape is the presence of over 100 "defensive security barriers," commonly known as "peace walls." These towering structures were erected to physically segregate communities. While ironically labelled "walls of peace," they fundamentally serve to keep communities apart, underscoring the persistent challenge of building trust and reducing hostility in a deeply divided society.

These walls, frequently adorned with murals, act as a dynamic canvas for the expression of conflicting and contrasting views on Belfast's past, present, and future, reflecting the ongoing struggle for narrative control. The continued existence of these "peace walls" highlights a profound paradox: while initially erected to prevent violence and foster fragile peace, they have become monumentalised divisions. They are concrete, visible symbols of unresolved trauma, ongoing segregation, and a lack of genuine cross-community trust. Their continued presence signifies that peace in Belfast is not simply the absence of overt violence but a deeply challenging, slow process of building trust and inclusive identity, which extends beyond political agreements into the fabric of everyday life, including segregated education and social housing. This physical manifestation of division directly contributes to the overwhelming feeling, as the historical divisions are not just abstract concepts but tangible elements of the urban environment.

The Challenge of Reconciliation

The continued existence and prominence of partisan murals and peace walls demonstrate that, despite the signing of the Good Friday Agreement in 1998, Belfast continues to grapple with its "dark" or "negative tourism" and deeply entrenched divisions. Efforts have been made to transform the often hostile messages of these murals. The Belfast City Council, in collaboration with community workers, has actively worked to repaint walls with more positive, future-oriented images or to introduce "neutral" street art, featuring famous Northern Irish figures or brand names, in an attempt to foster a sense of shared pride and unity. However, these efforts are not without tension, as attempts to paint over murals glorifying paramilitary fighters can spark protests, particularly in loyalist areas.

The "war of flags" and the numerous annual parades (over 3,000 annually) further highlight ongoing symbolic conflicts, necessitating strict legal provisions to prevent the incitement of hostilities. A significant institutional initiative towards fostering a more shared, reflective commemoration is the proposed Museum of the Troubles and Peace, envisioned for the historic Belfast Assembly Rooms. This museum aims to provide a thoughtful and respectful space for exploring the conflict and the peace process, signalling a deliberate move towards shared understanding. This observed shift from purely partisan murals and memorials to more neutral public art and the institutional proposal for a shared "Museum of the Troubles and Peace" indicates a growing societal desire, particularly from civic bodies, to move towards a more inclusive and less divisive form of public memory. This trend, while facing challenges, suggests a maturation of the peace process, with a growing recognition that true reconciliation requires acknowledging multiple perspectives and fostering shared understanding rather than perpetuating singular, exclusionary narratives.

Shifting Sands: The Emergence of Inclusive Narratives and Women's Representation
The historical exclusion of women from Belfast's public narrative, where they were often underrepresented or confined to "essentialised categories of apolitical motherhood" in existing murals, is now being actively challenged. The recent emergence of new memorials dedicated to women represents a deliberate act of re-storying and reclaiming public space, aiming to inspire future generations and foster a sense of belonging for previously marginalised groups.

Early Steps Towards Female Recognition

While Queen Victoria historically stood as the primary female figure commemorated in Belfast's public spaces, earlier, albeit less prominent, efforts to recognise women beyond royalty did exist. A notable pioneering example is the "Monument to the Unknown Woman Worker," a 1992 sculpture by Louise Walsh. This bronze artwork features two working-class women adorned with symbols of domestic labour, focusing on issues of low-paid jobs and unpaid housework. Despite facing initial opposition from civic bodies during its commission in the late 1980s, it was eventually realised and is strategically located near the Europa Hotel, serving as one of the first public artworks many visitors encounter.

Another instance of individual female recognition is the Eliza Ward Plaque, dedicated in 2002. This plaque commemorates Eliza Ward, an 18-year-old civilian who tragically lost her life in 1997 while protecting her employer, an act of selfless bravery that earned her a posthumous George Cross. This memorial highlights recognition for individual courage outside traditional military or political spheres.

Recent Unveilings: Mary Ann McCracken and Winifred Carney

A landmark development in Belfast's commemorative landscape occurred on International Women's Day 2024, with the unveiling of striking bronze statues of Mary Ann McCracken and Winifred Carney at Belfast City Hall. These statues hold particular significance as they are the first non-royal women to be honoured with permanent statues in the prominent City Hall grounds, marking a profound shift in public recognition.

Mary Ann McCracken (1770-1866): Her statue commemorates her multifaceted legacy as an abolitionist, educator, social reformer, businesswoman, and Irish language enthusiast. She was a staunch supporter of the United Irishmen and actively campaigned against slavery, challenging the prevailing attitudes of her class and Belfast's merchant elite. Her sculpture depicts her in the act of handing out abolitionist leaflets, symbolising her activism. Her importance is further underscored by the restoration of a bust of her in Carrick Hill following its theft, demonstrating community efforts to preserve her memory.

Winifred Carney (1887-1943): Her memorial recognises her pivotal roles as a suffragist, committed trade unionist, and political activist. She served as James Connolly's personal secretary and was a participant in the 1916 Easter Rising, later advocating for women's voting rights and standing for election in Belfast in 1918. Her statue portrays her in the uniform of the Irish Citizen Army, reflecting her direct involvement in historical political events.

These significant sculptures were collaboratively created by internationally acclaimed artist Ralf Sander and his daughter Naomi Sander, designed to reflect the values and key activities for which these women were known. The Belfast Lord Mayor, Ryan Murphy, emphasised at the unveiling that these sculptures "celebrate female achievement, inclusivity and the diversity of the people who have helped shape our city," serving as an inspiration for future generations to continue the fight for equality.

Other Initiatives

Beyond individual statues, other initiatives contribute to the growing recognition of women's historical contributions:

Belfast Women's Stained Glass Window: Unveiled in 2016 within Belfast City Hall, this window was commissioned by the Belfast City Council's Women's Steering Group. It visually narrates the struggles of Belfast women mill workers, highlighting their arduous working conditions, low wages, and their courageous collective action in forming unions and organising the pivotal Belfast Linen Strike of 1911. The window serves as a powerful symbol, aiming to inspire contemporary women to continue advocating for equality.

"Peace Heroines" Education Programme: Launched in 2022 through a collaboration between the Herstory movement, National Museums NI, and the Department of Foreign Affairs, this initiative features a touring exhibition with compelling portraits of 30 women. These "Peace Heroines" played crucial roles in peace-building efforts across Northern Ireland, from grassroots activism to governmental levels, including figures like Monica McWilliams, Pearl Sagar, Linda Ervine, Pat Hume, and Baroness May Blood. The programme underscores how these women transcended traditional religious and political affiliations to work collectively for civil rights, trade unionism, and peace, actively challenging systems of domination and championing power-sharing approaches. The Northern Ireland Women's Coalition (NIWC), co-founded by Avila Kilmurray and Monica McWilliams, notably influenced the Good Friday Agreement by successfully introducing amendments related to mixed housing, women's inclusion in public life, and reconciliation.

The Societal Impact of Inclusive Commemoration

These new memorials represent a significant challenge to the historical exclusion of women from Belfast's public narrative. Their unveiling reflects a conscious and deliberate effort to broaden the city's historical narrative, educating both locals and visitors about the diverse and often overlooked contributions of women to Belfast's development and social fabric.

The statues are explicitly positioned as a "reflection of the city as it is now," celebrating female achievement, promoting inclusivity, and recognising the diversity of individuals who have shaped the city. They are intended to serve as inspirational figures, encouraging new generations to continue the pursuit of equality and women's rights. The choice of figures like McCracken and Carney, who represent broader social justice movements—abolition, women's rights, trade unionism—rather than purely political or sectarian conflict, indicates a societal desire to celebrate shared values and universal struggles that transcend traditional divisions. This contrasts sharply with the often partisan nature of many Troubles memorials. The emphasis on women's cross-community peace-building efforts further underscores a move towards narratives that unite rather than divide. This suggests that as Belfast matures in its post-conflict phase, its public memory is becoming more complex, nuanced, and focused on unifying elements of its history.

The broader call for "parity of esteem" for previously overlooked heroes, including figures like Henry Joy McCracken (Mary Ann's brother), suggests a wider movement to diversify public monuments beyond traditional, dominant figures, aiming for a more balanced and representative historical landscape. This signifies a move from passive historical display to active civic education and identity building, directly addressing the observation of a welcome change from the past-oriented, male-dominated landscape. This shift towards greater female representation and more inclusive narratives is not a spontaneous occurrence but a result of deliberate policy decisions, sustained advocacy from various community groups, and proactive civic leadership. This highlights the crucial role of institutions and organised efforts in actively shaping public memory and driving social change.

Recent women's memorials in Belfast and their significance include:

Monument to the Unknown Woman Worker (Unveiled 1992): This bronze sculpture on Great Victoria Street highlights women's labour issues like low pay and unpaid housework, serving as an early recognition of women's rights beyond traditional figures and a prominent piece of public art for visitors.

Eliza Ward Plaque (Dedicated 2002): Located near City Hall, this plaque commemorates Eliza Ward's civilian bravery and her posthumous George Cross for protecting her employer, recognising individual civilian courage and sacrifice.

Belfast Women's Stained Glass Window (Unveiled 2016): Situated in City Hall, this window celebrates the struggles of Belfast women mill workers for labour rights and their collective action, such as the Linen Strike of 1911, aiming to inspire contemporary women in their fight for equality.

Mary Ann McCracken Statue (Unveiled 2024): This bronze statue on the City Hall grounds honours Mary Ann McCracken as an abolitionist, social reformer, educator, and businesswoman. It is one of the first non-royal women to be recognised at City Hall, celebrating diverse female achievement and inclusivity.

Winifred Carney Statue (Unveiled 2024): Also a bronze statue on the City Hall grounds, it commemorates Winifred Carney's roles as a suffragist, trade unionist, and political activist (including her participation in the Easter Rising and the Irish Citizen Army). Like McCracken's, it is among the first non-royal women to be honoured at City Hall, promoting diverse female achievement and inclusivity.

Peace Heroines Programme/Exhibition (Exhibition launched 2022): This touring exhibition and education programme features 30 women peace-builders, including Monica McWilliams and Pearl Sagar. It highlights their cross-community peace-building efforts, civil rights advocacy, and challenges to domination systems, promoting reconciliation, power-sharing, and providing female role models for peace.

Belfast's Evolving Public Memory: Towards a More Inclusive Future
Belfast is currently engaged in a complex and delicate process of acknowledging its deeply rooted historical narratives—encompassing its industrial triumphs, imperial connections, and the profound trauma of the Troubles—while simultaneously striving to cultivate a more forward-looking and inclusive public representation. The city's commemorative landscape is not a static historical record but a dynamic, evolving canvas where different narratives constantly compete for visibility and legitimacy. The shift towards inclusive memorials and contemporary public art represents a conscious effort to move beyond the overwhelming and often divisive historical narratives.

Balancing Past and Present

A significant aspect of this challenge lies in ensuring that the emerging, inclusive narratives do not inadvertently erase or diminish the historical significance of existing memorials, even those that might be controversial or rooted in partisan perspectives. Instead, the aim is to complement these older monuments, creating a richer, more comprehensive, and multi-layered historical tapestry. This sentiment is encapsulated in the desire for "parity of esteem" for diverse historical figures, rather than the removal of existing statues.

The proposed Museum of the Troubles and Peace, planned for the historic Belfast Assembly Rooms, serves as a prime example of an institutional effort to create a dedicated space for thoughtful, respectful, and shared exploration of the city's complex history, aiming to foster deeper understanding and reconciliation. This initiative indicates a maturation of the peace process, with a growing recognition that true reconciliation requires acknowledging multiple perspectives and fostering shared understanding rather than perpetuating singular, exclusionary narratives.

Beyond traditional statues and historical monuments, contemporary public art plays an increasingly crucial role in shaping and broadening Belfast's evolving public narrative. Pieces such as "The Big Fish," "The Thanksgiving Statue," "RISE," and "The Seahorse" contribute to a more diverse public memory that extends beyond purely political or historical figures. These artworks often celebrate broader civic identity, maritime heritage, or abstract concepts. For instance, "RISE" explicitly symbolises "new hope for Belfast's future," offering more neutral or universally appealing forms of commemoration that can resonate with a wider audience, transcending historical divisions. Even commercially-driven installations like the "Glass of Thrones" windows contribute to the city's contemporary cultural identity and appeal, showcasing a different, more modern facet of its narrative.

Ongoing Challenges and Opportunities

Despite significant progress in peace-building and inclusive commemoration, persistent challenges remain. The continued physical presence and symbolic weight of "peace walls" and the ongoing "war of flags" continue to symbolise segregation and unresolved symbolic conflicts. The process of genuine reconciliation necessitates not only addressing physical barriers but also building trust and reducing hostility at a societal level, extending to critical policy domains such as segregated education and social housing.

However, significant opportunities lie in continued cross-community dialogue, proactive community engagement, and the strategic placement of new memorials that genuinely reflect the "diversity of the people who have helped shape our city." Initiatives like the ongoing "War and Me Oral History Project," which collects personal memories of World War II, indicate a broader, sustained effort to capture and preserve diverse individual stories, moving beyond grand narratives. The Belfast City Council's "Good Relations Unit" actively seeking the sentiments of the "silent majority" regarding potentially divisive parades and protests highlights a conscious desire from civic leadership for more inclusive and less confrontational celebrations, signalling a commitment to fostering a more harmonious public space.

Conclusion: A City in Dialogue with its Past and Future

Belfast's public memory is a rich, dense, and often contested tapestry, characterised by the profound presence of historical monuments. These range from the grand Victorian tributes to industrial pioneers and imperial figures, embodying a specific era of prosperity and identity, to the raw, deeply partisan murals and "peace walls" that serve as stark reminders of the unresolved trauma and divisions of the Troubles. This density and historical layering contribute significantly to the initial observations of an overwhelming and past-focused commemorative landscape.

The recent, deliberate emergence of memorials dedicated to women—such as the statues of Mary Ann McCracken and Winifred Carney at City Hall, and initiatives like the Belfast women mill workers' stained glass window and the "Peace Heroines" exhibition—signifies a crucial evolution in the city's approach to public memory. This shift moves beyond a historically male-dominated, industry- and conflict-centric narrative towards one that actively embraces social justice, diverse societal contributions, and the vital efforts towards peace-building. It reflects a conscious societal effort to foster inclusivity and a more nuanced, representative understanding of Belfast's complex, multifaceted past.

Ultimately, Belfast stands as a city in continuous, active dialogue with its multifaceted past. Its commemorative landscape is not merely a static record of what was, but a living, evolving testament to its ongoing journey of reconciliation, re-evaluation, and the conscious shaping of a more inclusive and harmonious future. The overwhelming past is being re-contextualised and enriched by new voices, reflecting a city determined to acknowledge all who have shaped its story.

KILKENNY 2025

ALSO PREVIOUS VISITS

Commercial Disclosure

You will find links to buy products from Amazon, Google and other partners. If you click on these links, you’ll find that the URL includes a small extra piece of text which identifies that the click came from my websites. This text is an affiliate code, and it means that I get a small percentage of the money you spend if you choose to buy that product, or, in some cases, other products from the site soon after. These affiliate links help pay the costs of producing my websites and ensure that the content is free to you.