,

,

,

DRIVER SAVES LIFE ON GRANBY ROW [MAN TRAPPED IN BURNING BUILDING]

Dublin Lorry Driver Hailed as Hero After Daring Fire Rescue on Granby Row

1. Introduction: A Moment of Extraordinary Bravery

On a seemingly ordinary Tuesday morning, the bustling rhythm of Dublin's north inner city was shattered by the outbreak of a ferocious fire on Granby Row. Amidst the chaos and escalating danger, a remarkable act of courage unfolded, transforming a routine delivery round into a dramatic, life-saving intervention. Tomasz Zareba, a Polish lorry driver for the Eurospar chain, demonstrated extraordinary quick thinking and decisive action, positioning his vehicle to provide a vital escape route for a man trapped in the burning building. This selfless deed has since resonated deeply with the public and his employer, cementing his status as an 'everyday hero'.  

The incident, swiftly captured on video and widely disseminated across social media platforms, immediately seized public attention. The visual evidence of Mr Zareba's calm resolve under immense pressure, and the subsequent leap to safety, drew widespread admiration. Witnesses at the scene were left stunned, with many expressing sentiments such as "Incredible. Absolute hero. Many would have driven on," underscoring the profound impact of his unsolicited bravery. This spontaneous outpouring of praise highlights a societal appreciation for acts of heroism that emerge from the most unexpected circumstances, performed by individuals who, like Mr Zareba, were simply going about their daily lives when confronted with a critical emergency. His actions embody a powerful narrative of ordinary citizens rising to extraordinary challenges, reinforcing the notion that profound differences can be made by anyone, at any time.  

2. The Granby Row Inferno: A Scene of Chaos

The fire, which would become the backdrop for Mr Zareba's heroic act, ignited on Tuesday, 24th June 2025, at approximately 8:00 am. The blaze erupted within a multi-storey building situated on Granby Row, a busy thoroughfare in Dublin's north inner city. Initial reports indicated that the fire was primarily located on the third floor of the structure, which was variously described as a three-storey or four-storey premises. Thick plumes of smoke and aggressive flames were seen billowing from the windows, painting a harrowing picture of the escalating danger within.  


Before Mr Zareba's intervention, the scene was one of rapidly escalating peril and desperation. He observed the immediate consequences of the fire's severity: another individual had already attempted to escape by jumping from the building, landing injured on the footpath with a bloodied face and suspected broken legs. This stark and immediate evidence of severe harm underscored the critical danger faced by those still trapped inside. Moments later, Mr Zareba heard another man "screaming for help" from a window, clearly in distress and caught between the advancing flames behind him and the perilous "long drop below him," uncertain of any viable escape. This direct observation of a previous, unsuccessful escape attempt, resulting in serious injury, played a pivotal role in shaping Mr Zareba's subsequent actions. It allowed him to quickly assess the immediate risks and formulate a safer, alternative solution, demonstrating a capacity for intelligent, empathetic problem-solving under duress.  

3. Tomasz Zareba's Quick-Thinking Intervention

As Tomasz Zareba, a seasoned delivery driver for Eurospar, approached the unfolding disaster on Granby Row, he was confronted with a scene of profound urgency. His observation of smoke pouring from an upper-floor apartment was quickly followed by the sight of an injured person on the pavement, a casualty of a desperate leap from the burning structure. This immediate, visual confirmation of the danger of jumping directly onto the hard ground was crucial. The subsequent cries for help from another trapped man, visibly distressed by the flames closing in, solidified Mr Zareba's resolve to act.  

Recognising that the footpath offered a perilous landing and that time was of the essence, Mr Zareba made a split-second, yet remarkably calculated, decision. He quickly activated his lorry's hazard lights, a signal of emergency and caution. With impressive precision for such a large vehicle, he then reversed the lorry "as close as [he] safely could to the window" from which the man was calling for help. His primary objective was to provide a "much safer" alternative landing platform than the unforgiving pavement below, directly addressing the danger he had just witnessed. This was not merely an impulsive act of courage, but an adaptive response informed by real-time observation, aimed at mitigating the clear and present risk of further severe injury.  

With the lorry positioned, onlookers on the footpath joined in, shouting encouragement to the trapped man to make the jump onto the vehicle's roof. The dramatic moment, captured on video, shows the man leaping from the window, followed by a "loud impact noise" as he landed safely on the lorry. Though understandably "in shock" from the terrifying ordeal, the rescued man was otherwise unharmed by the jump onto the vehicle, a testament to Mr Zareba's ingenious and timely intervention.  

4. Beyond the Rescue: The Wider Impact of the Blaze

While Tomasz Zareba's swift action undoubtedly averted a potentially tragic outcome for one individual, the fire on Granby Row had a broader and more widespread impact on the community. Emergency services, including the Dublin Fire Brigade and the National Ambulance Service, were on scene to manage the crisis. In total, seven people received medical attention at the scene of the blaze. Of these, three individuals required further medical care and were transported to hospital by ambulance, underscoring the serious nature of the incident and the injuries sustained by others caught in the fire. While the specific conditions of those hospitalised, beyond the rescued man being in shock, were not extensively detailed, there were widespread hopes expressed for their full recovery.  

The professional emergency response was swift and comprehensive. Dublin Fire Brigade deployed a significant contingent of resources, including six fire engines, a turntable ladder, and an emergency tender, to combat the inferno. Breathing apparatus teams were committed to the building to fight and extinguish the fire, which was eventually brought under control through their concerted efforts. An Garda Síochána also played a crucial role, assisting emergency services, preserving the scene for investigation, and implementing local diversions to manage traffic and ensure public safety around Granby Row.  

Crucially, even after the successful rescue, Mr Zareba did not immediately depart the scene. He maintained his lorry's position, remaining vigilant for approximately 20 minutes "in case maybe somebody else would need to jump from the window". This sustained commitment to public safety, extending beyond his initial heroic act, highlights a profound sense of responsibility. His presence provided an invaluable interim safety net, bridging the critical time gap before the official emergency services could fully deploy their resources for vertical rescue. He only left the scene once the Dublin Fire Brigade had fully arrived and assumed control of the situation, receiving a simple yet heartfelt commendation from a firefighter: "Grand job, buddy, thanks for that". This acknowledgement from a professional underscores the vital contribution of his individual bravery in complementing and enhancing the overall effectiveness of the organised emergency response, potentially reducing the severity of casualties and mitigating the incident's impact.  

5. A Hero's Humility: "I Just Finished My Deliveries"

Despite the widespread public acclaim and being unequivocally hailed as a hero, Tomasz Zareba, a Polish national who has been driving lorries in Ireland since 1998 , responded to the accolades with remarkable humility. In interviews with the Irish Mirror and The Irish Times, he consistently downplayed his actions, stating simply that he "just thought it would be much safer for him to jump on the lorry instead of the footpath". This statement reveals a focus on practical problem-solving and safety rather than any desire for heroic recognition. He explicitly articulated this sentiment, expressing that he doesn't "want to make a hero myself, it's not about that".  

This understated perspective stands in stark contrast to the immediate public perception of him as an "absolute hero" and an "EVERYDAY HERO". While society often seeks to elevate individuals who perform such extraordinary acts, Mr Zareba's personal motivation appears to be rooted in a more fundamental human instinct. He briefly alluded to his own family, mentioning his 18-year-old daughter and 11-year-old son, suggesting that his actions stemmed from a universal empathetic response, stating that "anyone who has kids is to do what I did". This offers a glimpse into a deeper, intrinsic goodness that compelled him to act without expectation of reward or recognition.  

Further reinforcing his grounded and dedicated nature, Mr Zareba's immediate return to his professional duties after the dramatic rescue resonated powerfully with the public. He simply stated, "I went on to finish my deliveries for the day". This detail, highlighting his commitment to his routine job even after such a high-stakes event, amplified the 'everyday hero' narrative. It speaks to an authenticity where bravery is not a performance, but an inherent quality that manifests in moments of need, followed by a return to the ordinary rhythms of life. This disconnect between the public's desire to label and celebrate heroes and the individual's humble, practical motivation makes Mr Zareba's story even more compelling, showcasing a form of heroism that is selfless and deeply human.  

6. Praise and Public Acclaim

The extraordinary actions of Tomasz Zareba quickly garnered widespread praise from both his employer and the general public, solidifying his place in the narrative of Dublin's community spirit. Eurospar, the supermarket chain for whom Mr Zareba delivers groceries, was swift to acknowledge his bravery. Joanne Mellon, representing BWG Foods, Eurospar's parent company, publicly lauded Mr Zareba's "quick thinking" and described his intervention as "incredibly brave," particularly given the frightening circumstances of the fire. The company confirmed that he was indeed on his usual delivery round when the incident occurred, underscoring the spontaneous nature of his heroism.  

The incident's video footage, circulating widely on social media, played a significant role in amplifying public admiration. Witnesses at the scene were visibly "stunned" by his actions, with one exclaiming that he "just saved someone from an agonising death". Other comments echoed this sentiment, describing him as an "incredible" and "absolute hero," with many noting that "many would have driven on," highlighting the exceptional nature of his response. The public's appreciation quickly translated into calls for formal recognition, with suggestions that Mr Zareba should receive a medal for his life-saving efforts.  

Mr Zareba's story rapidly became a quintessential example of an "EVERYDAY HERO" – an ordinary individual who, without prior intention or special training, performs an act of life-saving bravery. This narrative resonated profoundly, celebrating the potential for heroism inherent within ordinary life and underscoring the vital role of citizens in moments of crisis. This collective response, extending beyond mere acknowledgement, serves a broader societal purpose. It actively reinforces values such as altruism, quick thinking, and community solidarity, particularly in an era where such spontaneous acts of selflessness can feel increasingly rare. Public recognition provides a powerful positive reinforcement, not only honouring Mr Zareba but also implicitly encouraging similar behaviour in others, thereby strengthening social cohesion and offering a hopeful counter-narrative to negative news cycles.  

7. Ongoing Investigation

Following the dramatic rescue and the containment of the blaze, official investigations into the cause and circumstances of the Granby Row fire commenced. An Garda Síochána, Ireland's national police force, confirmed that an investigation is ongoing to determine the origin and nature of the fire. The scene on Granby Row was carefully preserved for forensic examination, and temporary street closures, along with local traffic diversions, were put in place to facilitate the work of emergency services and the subsequent investigative procedures.  

A particularly disturbing detail emerged regarding the potential cause of the fire, suggesting it may not have been an accidental occurrence. One report indicates that "a man was prevented from entering the building several times because security staff were suspicious about his behaviour". This individual then allegedly circumvented security, went to the side of the building, "used a brick to smash a window before hurling some form of incendiary device inside". This information, if confirmed by the ongoing investigation, would fundamentally shift the context of the incident from a tragic accident to a deliberate, criminal act.  

The potential for a human-instigated fire adds a significant layer of complexity and danger to the entire event. It means that Tomasz Zareba's heroism was not merely a response to an unforeseen disaster but potentially an intervention against a malicious threat, making his quick action even more critical and courageous. Such a revelation would raise serious questions about urban security protocols, public safety measures, and the broader implications of criminal acts in densely populated areas. The ongoing investigation will be crucial in determining the precise nature of the fire's origin and any potential criminal elements involved, thereby shaping the full understanding of this extraordinary incident.

8. Conclusion: An Act of Ordinary Heroism

Tomasz Zareba's decisive actions on Granby Row stand as a powerful testament to the profound impact a single individual can have in a moment of extreme peril. His combination of quick thinking, practical ingenuity in utilising his lorry, and unwavering courage transformed a potentially catastrophic situation into a successful life-saving rescue, undoubtedly preventing further tragedy and severe injury.

The incident powerfully underscores the vital role that ordinary citizens can play in emergency situations, bridging critical gaps before professional services can fully engage. It highlights the profound value society places on spontaneous acts of selflessness, particularly when they emerge from unexpected quarters. Mr Zareba's remarkable humility in returning to his daily deliveries immediately after such a dramatic event only amplifies the resonance of his story, embodying the true spirit of an 'everyday hero' – someone who acts out of a fundamental human instinct to help, without seeking personal glory.

As investigations into the fire's origin continue, potentially revealing a more complex and disturbing cause, the memory of Tomasz Zareba's decisive intervention will undoubtedly remain a beacon of hope. His story serves as a compelling reminder of the extraordinary bravery that can emerge from the most ordinary of lives, reinforcing a sense of community resilience and demonstrating how individual actions can collectively strengthen the fabric of public safety and mutual aid.

SHOULD I CANCEL MY ORDER FOR THE SONY A1 II

In 2022 I had a bad fall while visiting Belfast and damaged my Sony A7RIV and as a result the camera was usable but unreliable but I decided not to invest in a new camera until the Sony A7RV became available but when it arrived on the market in December 2022 I decided to go a step higher and wait for the A1 update/upgrade to become available.

In December 2024 I pre-ordered and paid for the A1 II assuming that I would have it by March at the latest. It is now July 2025 and my Camera Dealer has advised me that I would not get my camera before August (best case) and that he was expecting to receive one per month going forward. My problem was that my city visits begin in March every year and this my Sony A7RIV had become unusable and I needed a replacement urgently. In April/May I got the opportunity to get both a Leica Q3 and a Fuji GFX100RF and a greatly reduced price so I decided that this might me the ideal solution. About three weeks ago I had a meeting with my dealer as I had more-or-less decided to forget about getting the A1 II and was offered a loan of a Sony A7RV until the A1 arrived and then things became complicated. I have an extensive collection of Sony glass and as soon as I began testing the A7RV I began to suspect that the Sony actually outperformed either the Leica Q3 or the Fuji GFX100RF and this was unexpected. The Sony combined with the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II, in my opinion, outperformed the Leica Q3 which certainly outperforms the Fuji GFX100RF in low light. Don't get the wrong impression - I like both the Leica and Fuji and have every intention of keeping them for a variety of reasons.

As I now need decide if I should keep the A7RV and cancel my order for the A1 II I commissioned a report which is included below:


A Deep Dive into High-End Camera Systems for Stills, Macro, and General Use

This analysis explores high-end camera systems, comparing the Sony Alpha 7R V, Leica Q3, and Fujifilm GFX100RF, while also evaluating the potential of the pre-ordered Sony Alpha 1 II. The assessment focuses on photographic interests that primarily involve stills, macro, and general use, with minimal emphasis on video capabilities.

The recent damage to an Alpha 7R IV, the temporary use of a loaned Alpha 7R V, and the recent acquisitions of the Leica Q3 and Fujifilm GFX100RF provide a crucial backdrop for this analysis. The positive experience with the Alpha 7R V, particularly when paired with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens, serves as a central reference point.

The Sony Alpha 7R V: A Deep Dive into its Capabilities

The Sony Alpha 7R V stands out with its 61-megapixel full-frame Exmor R BSI CMOS sensor, maintaining the high resolution of its predecessor, the Alpha 7R IV. A pivotal advancement in this model is the integration of a dedicated AI processing unit, operating independently from the BIONZ XR processor. This innovation significantly enhances autofocus accuracy and subject recognition, allowing for real-time tracking through a sophisticated 693-point hybrid autofocus system that covers a substantial portion of the image area.

Furthermore, the Alpha 7R V incorporates an improved 5-axis in-body image stabilisation (IBIS) system. Thanks to new gyro sensors and enhanced processing, it is rated to provide up to 8 stops of correction. For still photography, the camera is capable of continuous shooting at up to 10 frames per second with full autofocus and auto-exposure tracking when utilising the mechanical shutter.

The positive experience with the Alpha 7R V, particularly when combined with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens, is noteworthy. The camera's high-resolution sensor and advanced autofocus capabilities are optimally suited to capitalise on the optical excellence of a premium G Master lens. The enhanced IBIS further contributes to sharper handheld images, especially beneficial for wide-angle shots or in challenging low-light conditions.

Professional evaluations consistently commend the Alpha 7R V for its exceptional 60-megapixel BSI sensor, which delivers remarkable detail, expansive dynamic range, and accurate colour rendition, even at elevated ISO settings. Its AI-powered autofocus system is frequently highlighted as a significant advantage, demonstrating precise and consistent tracking of faces, eyes, and full bodies across various subjects, making it highly effective for wildlife, portraiture, and general photography. While the camera offers 8K video recording, it is primarily designed for still photographers, with its video performance generally described as competent rather than exceptional.

For macro photography, the Alpha 7R V’s superior acquisition speed for small subjects, such as insects, coupled with its AI-trained subject recognition, positions it as a formidable option. The inclusion of a pixel-shift shooting mode, although requiring post-processing, provides an avenue for achieving ultimate resolution in static scenes.

The observation that the Alpha 7R V "outperformed" the Leica Q3 and Fujifilm GFX100RF can be understood by examining the technical specifications and operational characteristics of each camera in relation to stated preferences. Both the Leica Q3 and the Alpha 7R V share a 60MP sensor, but the Alpha 7R V boasts superior IBIS, offering 8 stops of compensation compared to the Leica's 5 stops. Critically, the Leica Q3 lacks automatic focus bracketing, a feature often desired for precise macro photography, which the Alpha 7R V offers through its pixel-shift mode. The Alpha 7R V's advanced AI autofocus system would also likely provide a more versatile and responsive experience compared to the Q3's phase detection, especially for general photography and potentially for macro work involving subjects that are not entirely static. Furthermore, the Q3's fixed-lens design inherently limits the versatility that an interchangeable-lens system, like the Alpha 7R V with the 16-35mm GM II zoom, provides.

When comparing the Alpha 7R V to the Fujifilm GFX100RF, the latter features a larger 102MP medium format sensor, theoretically offering superior pure image quality at low ISOs. However, a significant practical difference is the GFX100RF's lack of in-body image stabilisation. This absence can be a considerable disadvantage for handheld shooting, particularly in lower light, where the Alpha 7R V's 8-stop IBIS allows for much slower shutter speeds without compromising sharpness. The GFX100RF's fixed 35mm f/4 lens (equivalent to a 28mm f/2.8 on a full-frame sensor) also restricts optical flexibility compared to the Alpha 7R V's ability to use a wide range of E-mount lenses, including the versatile 16-35mm GM II zoom. The Alpha 7R V's AI autofocus is also generally considered more advanced for general use than the Fujifilm's system, which some characterise as more suited to a deliberate, artistic approach. The perception of the Alpha 7R V's superior performance likely stems from its comprehensive blend of high resolution, cutting-edge autofocus, robust image stabilisation, and lens system versatility, which collectively provide a more adaptable and satisfying shooting experience for diverse interests.

Leica Q3: The Art of Fixed-Lens Photography

The Leica Q3 is constructed around a variant of the excellent 60-megapixel full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor, which shares similarities with the sensors found in the Sony Alpha 7R IV and Alpha 7R V, but incorporates phase detection elements for its autofocus system. This camera delivers superb raw image quality, characterised by abundant detail and impressive dynamic range. The build quality of the Q3 consistently receives high praise, described as outstanding, robust, and featuring an all-metal body shell with IP52 weather resistance. From an ergonomic standpoint, it offers engaging dial-led controls and a classic design, encouraging a more deliberate and tactile shooting approach. However, some photographers note that the absence of a substantial handgrip can make one-handed operation less comfortable.

While the Q3 has incorporated phase detection for faster autofocus and includes subject recognition for people and animals, its autofocus system is generally regarded as less advanced than Sony's AI-powered capabilities. The Q3's in-body image stabilisation is rated at 5 stops, which is less effective than the Alpha 7R V's 8 stops. A significant limitation for macro photography is the Q3's inability to perform automatic focus bracketing.

The Leica Q3 is a premium compact camera featuring a fixed 28mm f/1.7 lens. Its appeal lies in its simplicity, its tactile shooting experience, and the exceptional image quality it produces from a compact form factor. While its digital zoom function allows for in-camera cropping to simulate 35mm, 50mm, 75mm, and 90mm focal lengths, this is a digital crop of the high-resolution sensor, not an optical zoom. For a photographer who values lens versatility, as evidenced by the use of the 16-35mm GM II, and specific macro capabilities, the fixed lens and absence of focus bracketing likely explain why the Alpha 7R V was perceived as offering superior performance for particular use cases.

The Q3's high price point, approximately $6,995 compared to the Alpha 7R V's $3,898, also positions it as a luxury item designed for a specific, often less versatile, photographic purpose.

Fujifilm GFX100RF: Medium Format in a Compact Package

The Fujifilm GFX100RF is distinguished by its 102-megapixel medium format GFX CMOS II sensor, which is substantially larger than typical full-frame sensors. This larger sensor translates to approximately 70% more resolution than an average full-frame camera, providing immense detail and remarkable flexibility for cropping. For controlled environments such as studio fashion shoots, the GFX system is often considered objectively superior for achieving pristine image quality at low ISOs, complemented by the exceptional optical performance of Fuji G lenses.

A striking aspect of the GFX100RF is its relatively compact size for a medium format camera, contributing to its surprising portability. It features engaging analogue controls and offers a tactile shooting experience, appealing to photographers who prefer a more deliberate approach to image capture. However, a notable drawback is the absence of in-body image stabilisation (IBIS). This omission means that handheld video footage will likely exhibit shakiness, and still photography in low light without a tripod becomes more challenging, often necessitating higher ISO settings or faster shutter speeds. The fixed 35mm f/4 lens, which provides a 28mm f/2.8 full-frame equivalent field of view, also limits optical flexibility.

While the GFX100RF excels in controlled studio settings where its high resolution and lens quality can be fully leveraged, its lack of IBIS and fixed lens make it less adaptable for dynamic, handheld shooting or varied scenarios compared to a full-frame camera like the Alpha 7R V. The Alpha 7R V's advanced AI autofocus and superior IBIS offer a more versatile and responsive experience, particularly for "run and gun" situations. The GFX100RF's leaf shutter, while allowing for flash sync up to 1/125s, can be a limiting factor for managing ambient light in studio environments compared to other systems. The subjective finding that the Alpha 7R V "outperformed" the GFX100RF likely reflects these practical limitations for general and macro photography, where the Alpha 7R V's comprehensive capabilities, including its robust autofocus and IBIS, provided a more satisfying outcome.

The Sony Alpha 1 II: Launched and in High Demand

The Sony Alpha 1 II was launched in late 2024, with many reviewers obtaining copies shortly after its release. This camera builds upon the foundation of the original Alpha 1's 50.1-megapixel stacked CMOS sensor, now incorporating the advanced AI processing unit first introduced in the Alpha 7R V. This integration significantly enhances autofocus accuracy, with projected improvements of approximately 30% for human and animal eye recognition and 50% for bird eye recognition compared to the original Alpha 1. The in-body image stabilisation has also seen substantial improvement, with a rating of up to 8.5 stops of compensation. The stacked sensor technology facilitates blackout-free continuous shooting at an impressive 30 frames per second with full autofocus and auto-exposure tracking, and it also features pre-release capture capabilities. Ergonomically, the Alpha 1 II adopts the fully-articulated rear screen design seen in the Alpha 7R V, offering enhanced flexibility.

Despite its launch, Sony has reportedly underestimated the demand for the Alpha 1 II, leading to manufacturing constraints and significant delivery delays for many who pre-ordered the camera. The experience of waiting since before Christmas 2024, with dealers expecting only one unit per month, highlights these ongoing supply issues.

The implications for performance relative to the Alpha 7R V and specific requirements are significant. The Alpha 1 II merges the high resolution and advanced AI autofocus of the Alpha 7R V with the speed and stacked sensor advantages of the original Alpha 1. For photography interests:

For macro photography, the Alpha 1 II's even more refined AI autofocus and subject recognition, particularly for small, potentially moving subjects like insects, are likely to surpass the Alpha 7R V's already excellent performance. The enhanced IBIS would also prove highly beneficial for handheld macro work, allowing for greater flexibility in challenging conditions.

For general photography, the combination of 50-megapixel resolution, 30 frames per second shooting capability, and advanced autofocus positions it as an incredibly versatile camera for nearly any scenario, including fast-moving subjects where the original Alpha 1 is considered "unbeatable". The 1/400th of a second mechanical flash sync speed also represents a professional advantage, offering greater control over ambient light in flash photography.

From an ergonomic perspective, the adoption of the Alpha 7R V's fully-articulated screen addresses a common preference, providing more compositional flexibility compared to the original Alpha 1's tilting screen.

The Alpha 1 II retails for approximately $6,498, making it considerably more expensive than the Alpha 7R V, which is priced around $3,898. Furthermore, the reported limited availability, with camera dealers expecting to receive only one unit per month, presents a significant practical constraint.

The question of whether the Alpha 1 II is "better again" than the Alpha 7R V, given positive experiences with the latter, can be addressed by considering the synergistic combination of features in the new model. The Alpha 1 II is designed to consolidate the strengths of both its predecessors. It integrates the Alpha 7R V's cutting-edge AI autofocus and significantly improved IBIS (8.5 stops compared to the Alpha 7R V's 8 stops) with the original Alpha 1's high-speed stacked sensor, enabling 30 frames per second continuous shooting, and its superior mechanical flash sync speed of 1/400th of a second. This directly addresses the Alpha 7R V's limitations in continuous shooting speed and buffer performance for capturing fast action, while also upgrading the original Alpha 1's less advanced autofocus and image stabilisation. For macro interests, the Alpha 1 II's even more refined AI subject recognition, particularly for small, moving subjects like insects, would present a distinct advantage over the Alpha 7R V. For general photography, the sheer speed and versatility of the Alpha 1 II would establish it as an unparalleled tool. Owners of both the original Alpha 1 and Alpha 7R V often suggest that if they were limited to a single camera, the Alpha 1 would be their choice due to its comprehensive capability, especially for dynamic subjects. The Alpha 1 II aims to eliminate the need for such a choice by incorporating the Alpha 7R V's advancements into the Alpha 1 platform. Therefore, from an objective standpoint, the Alpha 1 II is indeed a further advancement in overall technical capability and versatility, representing the pinnacle of Sony's mirrorless technology. The primary considerations remain its significantly higher price and the current constraints on its availability.

Synthesising Subjectivity and Objective Data: Making a Camera Choice

The subjective experience of the Alpha 7R V outperforming the Leica Q3 and Fujifilm GFX100RF aligns with professional assessments that highlight the Alpha 7R V's robust all-around performance. Its advanced autofocus and excellent image stabilisation are particularly crucial for versatile shooting, including macro photography. While the Leica Q3 offers a unique, tactile experience and commendable image quality within its fixed-lens niche, and the Fujifilm GFX100RF excels in pure resolution for static, controlled environments, neither provides the same blend of high resolution, advanced autofocus, and robust in-body image stabilisation for general and dynamic photography as the Alpha 7R V. The preference likely stems from the Alpha 7R V's superior practical utility for specific workflow and diverse photographic interests.

Recommendations tailored to photographic interests can be made based on this analysis. Given satisfaction with the Alpha 7R V and its strong performance when paired with the 16-35mm GM II lens, it continues to serve as an excellent current photographic solution. The Leica Q3 and Fujifilm GFX100RF, while capable in their own right, appear to be less aligned with broad photographic needs and dynamic shooting style compared to the Alpha 7R V. The Q3's fixed lens and lack of focus bracketing are notable limitations for stated interests in macro and general versatility. Deciding to forgo the Alpha 1 II in favour of the Q3 may not be the most logical choice if versatility and advanced autofocus are primary considerations. Similarly, while the GFX100RF offers unparalleled resolution for still subjects, its absence of in-body image stabilisation and fixed lens, combined with its larger physical presence (albeit compact for a medium format camera), render it less suitable for the dynamic, handheld shooting scenarios where the Alpha 7R V demonstrated superior performance. For studio work, the GFX100RF remains a powerful tool, but for broader requirements, the Alpha 7R V's performance advantage is understandable. Cancelling the Alpha 1 II for the GFX100RF would represent a trade-off of versatility and advanced autofocus for sheer resolution, which may not be optimal given current satisfaction with the Alpha 7R V.

The Sony Alpha 1 II, despite its higher cost and current delivery delays, is objectively the most capable camera among those under consideration. It offers a significant upgrade in speed, autofocus intelligence, and stabilisation over the Alpha 7R V. If ultimate performance and versatility across all photographic genres are prioritised, including highly demanding macro and fast-action scenarios, and the higher price and extended wait time are acceptable, then retaining the Alpha 1 II pre-order would be justified. It effectively combines the best features of the Alpha 7R V with the speed and professional capabilities of the Alpha 1. Considering current satisfaction with the Alpha 7R V, the Alpha 1 II would offer an even more refined and capable experience. The Alpha 7R V serves as an excellent camera for the interim period.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Summary of Key Findings

The camera analysis indicates that the Sony Alpha 7R V offers a compelling balance of high resolution, advanced AI autofocus, and excellent in-body image stabilisation. These attributes likely contributed to its perceived superior performance for general and macro photography needs. The Leica Q3, while a premium and aesthetically appealing camera, is a niche fixed-lens system with inherent limitations in versatility and specific macro features. The Fujifilm GFX100RF, despite its impressive medium format resolution, is hindered by the absence of in-body image stabilisation and a fixed lens for dynamic, handheld use. The Sony Alpha 1 II, now launched, is poised to be a superior choice, combining the Alpha 7R V's cutting-edge AI autofocus and enhanced in-body image stabilisation with the Alpha 1's speed and stacked sensor technology, positioning it as a truly professional-grade, all-around camera. However, its availability is currently limited due to high demand.

Personalised Camera Recommendations

Given the expressed satisfaction with the Alpha 7R V and its strong performance when paired with the 16-35mm GM II lens, it continues to serve as an excellent current photographic solution. The Leica Q3 and Fujifilm GFX100RF, while capable in their own right, appear to be less aligned with broad photographic needs and dynamic shooting style compared to the Alpha 7R V.

The Q3's fixed lens and lack of focus bracketing are significant limitations for stated interests in macro and general versatility. Opting for the Q3 instead of the Alpha 1 II may not be the most logical choice if versatility and advanced autofocus are primary considerations. Similarly, while the GFX100RF offers unparalleled resolution for still subjects, its absence of in-body image stabilisation and fixed lens, combined with its larger physical presence (albeit compact for a medium format camera), render it less suitable for the dynamic, handheld shooting scenarios where the Alpha 7R V demonstrated superior performance. For studio work, the GFX100RF remains a powerful tool, but for broader requirements, the Alpha 7R V's performance advantage is understandable. Cancelling the Alpha 1 II for the GFX100RF would represent a trade-off of versatility and advanced autofocus for sheer resolution, which may not be optimal given current satisfaction with the Alpha 7R V.

The Sony Alpha 1 II, despite its higher cost and current delivery delays, is objectively the most capable camera among those under consideration. It offers a significant upgrade in speed, autofocus intelligence, and stabilisation over the Alpha 7R V. If ultimate performance and versatility across all photographic genres are prioritised, including highly demanding macro and fast-action scenarios, and the higher price and extended wait time are acceptable, then retaining the Alpha 1 II pre-order would be justified. It effectively combines the best features of the Alpha 7R V with the speed and professional capabilities of the Alpha 1. Considering current satisfaction with the Alpha 7R V, the Alpha 1 II would offer an even more refined and capable experience. The Alpha 7R V serves as an excellent camera for the interim period.

Considering the detailed analysis, which camera system do readers find most appealing for their own photographic pursuits?

DORSET STREET FIRE STATION LOOKS A BIT ISOLATED [THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT IT HAS BEEN PRESERVED]

Dorset Street/St. Mary's Place Redevelopment: A Rapid Transformation Underway

During July 2024, I photographed a complex of old city flats on Upper Dorset Street and St. Mary's Place that is rapidly undergoing redevelopment after many years of neglect. Having lived in the area for three decades, I've witnessed the rise and fall of these 1960s-era complexes. While they unfortunately became known for anti-social behaviour in their later years, the root cause was more complex than simple neglect; poor maintenance rendered the buildings increasingly unsuitable for habitation, contributing significantly to the social issues experienced.

In a significant and swift step towards revitalising the area, the redevelopment of the Dorset Street / St. Mary's Place site received crucial planning approval from Dublin City Council in January 2022. This ambitious project, which is progressing at a remarkable pace since its initial groundwork, aims to replace the outdated five-storey blocks with 163 new homes and community spaces. This not only adds 50 much-needed homes but also prioritises high environmental sustainability standards. The revitalised site will offer improved access, better amenities, and a stronger connection to the surrounding neighbourhood, aligning with the Council's wider regeneration goals for the city centre.

A Design Focused on Community and Sustainability

Led by Scott Tallon Walker Architects and Levitt Bernstein Architects, the project team has crafted a design that respects the local context while fostering a vibrant community atmosphere. The new buildings, ranging from three to seven storeys, will seamlessly integrate with the existing streetscape. Non-residential spaces will be strategically located at street level on Dorset Street, contributing to the area's vitality. Importantly, the historic Dorset Street Fire Station building has not only survived but has been beautifully restored and is in very good condition. It is being celebrated as a focal point within the new development, though its traditional charm risks being somewhat "overpowered" by the sheer ambition and scale of the overall project surrounding it.

The thoughtfully planned layout prioritises pedestrians, with new landscaped streets, play areas, and seating creating a welcoming neighbourhood feel. Residents will also enjoy access to high-quality open spaces within sheltered courtyards. A variety of modern apartments, duplexes, and terraced housing will cater to diverse needs, with the majority boasting dual-aspect views.

Project Timeline and Community Benefits

The redevelopment, demonstrating the project's rapid progression since planning approval and the start of enabling works, is being executed in phases:

Phase 1: While the initial demolition and enabling works commenced in late 2022 / early 2023, the construction of the new homes for this phase is currently ongoing. Once completed, this phase will deliver seven houses, 11 duplexes, and 79 apartments, along with a karate club, crèche, and café.

Phase 2: This phase, which was originally scheduled to commence in August 2024, is now likely integrated with the main ongoing construction efforts. Once completed, it will add 66 apartments and include the new St Saviour's boxing club.

The overall scheme, encompassing both phases, is anticipated to reach completion around 2026/2027.

The project also aims to replace and enhance existing community facilities, such as the childcare centre and a café adjacent to the future Fire Museum. Careful consideration is being given to managing construction traffic and minimising disruption to the local community. While parking within the development will be limited, additional on-street spaces are planned for St Mary's Terrace to accommodate residents, visitors, and those with accessibility needs.

A Brighter Future for Dorset Street

The Dorset Street redevelopment represents a significant investment in the area's future. By addressing the underlying issues of the old flats and providing much-needed modern housing and amenities, it promises to create a more vibrant and sustainable community for years to come.

Keywords: Urban Redevelopment, Dublin City, Community Regeneration, Sustainable Housing, Historic Preservation, Fire Station Restoration, Social Housing, Architectural Design, Urban Planning, Community Facilities.


DORSET STREET FIRE STATION LOOKS A BIT ISOLATED [THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT IT HAS BEEN PRESERVED]

In July 2024 I photographed a complex of old city flats which was about to be redeveloped after many years of neglect.

Having lived in the area for three decades, I've witnessed the rise and fall of the Upper Dorset Street and St. Mary's Place flats. While these 1960s-era complexes became known for anti-social behaviour in their later years, the root cause was more complex than simple neglect. The buildings themselves suffered from poor maintenance, becoming increasingly unsuitable for habitation. These deteriorating conditions undoubtedly contributed to the rise of social issues.

In a significant step towards revitalising the area, the redevelopment of the Dorset Street / St. Mary's Place site received crucial planning approval from Dublin City Council in January 2022. This ambitious project aims to replace the outdated five-storey blocks with 163 new homes and community spaces. This not only adds 50 much-needed homes but also prioritises high environmental sustainability standards. The revitalised site will offer improved access, better amenities, and a stronger connection to the surrounding neighbourhood, aligning with the Council's wider regeneration goals for the city centre.

A Design Focused on Community and Sustainability

Led by Scott Tallon Walker Architects and Levitt Bernstein Architects, the project team has crafted a design that respects the local context while fostering a vibrant community atmosphere. The new buildings, ranging from three to seven storeys, will seamlessly integrate with the existing streetscape. Non-residential spaces will be strategically located at street level on Dorset Street, contributing to the area's vitality. Importantly, the historic Dorset Street Fire Station building will be preserved and celebrated as a focal point within the new development.

The thoughtfully planned layout prioritises pedestrians, with new landscaped streets, play areas, and seating creating a welcoming neighbourhood feel. Residents will also enjoy access to high-quality open spaces within sheltered courtyards. A variety of modern apartments, duplexes, and terraced housing will cater to diverse needs, with the majority boasting dual aspect views.

Project Timeline and Community Benefits

The project also aims to replace and enhance existing community facilities, such as the childcare centre and a café adjacent to the future Fire Museum. Careful consideration is being given to managing construction traffic and minimising disruption to the local community. While parking within the development will be limited, additional on-street spaces are planned for St Mary's Terrace to accommodate residents, visitors, and those with accessibility needs.

A Brighter Future for Dorset Street

The Dorset Street redevelopment represents a significant investment in the area's future. By addressing the underlying issues of the old flats and providing much-needed modern housing and amenities, it promises to create a more vibrant and sustainable community for years to come.